Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Operating Systems Linux

Ubuntu-Based Linux Mint 19.2 'Tina' is Here with Cinnamon, MATE, and Xfce (betanews.com) 96

The Linux Mint project today released the Linux Mint 19.2 "Tina", which is now available for download as Cinnamon, MATE, and Xfce editions. From a report: If your computer is fairly modern, take my advice and opt for the excellent Cinnamon. MATE and Xfce are solid choices too, although they are more appropriate for computers with meager hardware. For new users, choosing amongst three interfaces can be confusing -- thankfully, the Mint developers stopped using KDE almost two years ago. Linux Mint 19.2 "Tina" is based on the wildly popular Ubuntu operating system, but on 18.04 rather than the new 19.04. Why use an older version of Ubuntu as a base? Because 18.04 is an LTS or "Long Term Support" variant. While version 19.04 will be supported for less than a year, 18.04 is being supported for a mind-boggling 10 years! The Linux kernel is version 4.15 and not part of the newer 5.x series.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ubuntu-Based Linux Mint 19.2 'Tina' is Here with Cinnamon, MATE, and Xfce

Comments Filter:
  • Thankfully?!! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 02, 2019 @10:13AM (#59028446)

    A lot of us were upset when Mint dropped KDE. KDE has always been the best, and Mint was also the best until they did that.
    Choice is a wonderful thing, folks.

    • I loved KDE...then they did that Plasma release before it was solid and ready to go. It never quite worked reliably after that. Maybe it's solid now, but I moved on to Cinnamon.
      • by Dracos ( 107777 )

        KDE4 on Mint 17 was pretty solid. This March I switched to 18.04.2 and KDE5 is nowhere near feature parity with 4. No custom date formats, missing icons everywhere, it's a subtle mess.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Too lazy to google?
      https://linuxhint.com/install_kde_linux_mint_19/

      sudo apt update; sudo apt install kubuntu-desktop kde-plasma-desktop kscreen

      • by Teun ( 17872 )
        Great :)
        I've never seen the advantage of Mint/Mate vs. Kubuntu or Neon, dropping KDE was dumb and as shown not effective.
    • .. and the KDE guys don't have a Cinnamon version of their distro. Tsk tsk.

  • Are they marketing to meth heads, now?
  • by jellomizer ( 103300 ) on Friday August 02, 2019 @10:22AM (#59028486)

    We all want a choice in User Interfaces, but for love of God, we do not want anyone to be using an interface that we didn't choose.

    For more professional systems, where the distribution makers are going to be offering support and maintenance, having less choice in Windows Managers is probably more ideal, as it is easier to help someone if they are using a UI that looks like all the others. Vs some crazy custom version of FVWM that that one guy (normally Me) in the office has so customized that you don't even need to password protect the desktop, because there is a chance in hell anyone would be able to navigate the system.

    • I've long been puzzled by this, and my only thought is that a vast swath of IT is really just about configuring stuff, and it draws in people for whom configuring stuff is an end to itself.

      Like, they install an OS just so they can configure every last configurable detail, even if there's reasonable arguments that whatever they configure isn't meaningfully different than whatever the default was, or it's possibly worse in some practical way. It's not about "what can do with this computer?", the configuring

  • }}} take my advice and opt for the excellent Cinnamon. MATE and Xfce are solid choices too, although they are more appropriate for computers with meager hardware {{{ --- Is Cinnamon going the way of KDE, more and more bloat?
    • by Teun ( 17872 )
      Hehe, you are trolling because KDE is lighter on resources and RAM than any of the other DE's :)
  • What's the point? Why not use Debian?
  • by gosand ( 234100 ) on Friday August 02, 2019 @01:00PM (#59029548)

    I've been using Linux (windows free) since 1999. My main distros from them to now include Redhat, Mandrake, Kubutnu, Xubuntu, Mint, and Devuan.
    I used KDE for quite a while, but started to have issues with it. After trying others, I landed on XFCE and have used it ever since. I have tried others like Cinnamon and MATE, but I prefer XFCE. It has nothing to do with the hardware I am running. I don't understand why some people position it as ONLY being suitable for older hardware. That is ridiculous.

    I still applaud Mint, because they started out by polishing up some of the rough bits of the linux distro. I used it for many years and wish them the best. But once they adopted systemd I started having issues that persisted even after reinstalls and an entirely new computer. I had to switch, and Devuan was the most logical choice for me. It was a practical move for me, and not a philosophical one (although I can certainly appreciate and agree with the *nix philosophy). Clem, the maintainer of Mint, acknowledged that since they were a downstream of Ubuntu they didn't have a choice but to adopt systemd. I wasn't aware that they ditched KDE. It seems to me they should be able to support it, but I know KDE requires a ton of extra packages/libraries for it to work. Maybe the popularity of Mint just made maintaining it too daunting.

    If for some reason I need to switch distros again in the future, I do know I'll be using XFCE, because it's the DE I like the best. It's sooooo easy to try out different ones now, what with VMs/QEMU and bootable distros. Don't rely on reviews, even verrry lite articles like this one. Give them all a shot and use the one that you like best.

    • by Osgeld ( 1900440 )

      XFCE isnt even all that light on system resources anymore

      • by gosand ( 234100 )

        XFCE isnt even all that light on system resources anymore

        They don't put out new releases very often, so not sure what you mean by "anymore". There is a new one supposed to be coming out soon though. Not that a new release means it will use more resources.

        I haven't even felt the need to check it to be honest. I only have 8GB of RAM, and I don't see usage go above half use very often. I do work in GIMP, Kdenlive, and play a few games like HL2+variants, and a few games on Steam here and there. Never really had a problem with memory usage in general. I always h

  • by OneHundredAndTen ( 1523865 ) on Friday August 02, 2019 @01:55PM (#59029856)
    Xfce does pretty much everything that KDE and Gnome do, only it does so while using far fewer resources - thus leaving more memory and CPU processing power for your applications.

Saliva causes cancer, but only if swallowed in small amounts over a long period of time. -- George Carlin

Working...