Linux Distro Elive Emerges Alive After 8-Year Hibernation (theregister.co.uk) 89
Designed to run on minimal hardware, Elive is very much a passion project of its leader, Samuel F Baggen. Based on Debian, the first version took a bow in 2005. The second stable version made an appearance in 2010 and it has been a long eight years for the third stable version to become available. The Register: Elive has an impressively low bar to entry, with hardware requirements for the distribution coming in at 256 MB RAM and a 500 MHz CPU, meaning that some very elderly silicon is theoretically going to be able to enjoy the highly polished Enlightenment desktop. "Theoretically" because after The Register took Elive 3.0.0 out for a spin on a relatively low-powered laptop, we'd frankly baulk at running it on anything much slower than a 533MHz Core 2 with at least 512 MB RAM. However, the Enlightenment UI is undeniably an attractive desktop, particularly if a macOS-alike dock is your thing, and runs at an impressive lick even on hardware that lacks graphics acceleration.
At its core, Elive is based on the Debian 8 distribution (aka Jessie), using the 3.16 kernel and version 0.17.6 of the Enlightenment X11 Window Manager. It comes replete with a full set of applications, including the ubiquitous LibreOffice and Gimp, along with a variety of productivity and entertainment tools, some of which are Elive's own. Unlike the previous version of Elive, 3.0.0 removes the requirement of donating to the project in order to install the thing locally (although Baggen was quick to tell The Reg that cost-free alternatives existed, but often with annoying processes).
At its core, Elive is based on the Debian 8 distribution (aka Jessie), using the 3.16 kernel and version 0.17.6 of the Enlightenment X11 Window Manager. It comes replete with a full set of applications, including the ubiquitous LibreOffice and Gimp, along with a variety of productivity and entertainment tools, some of which are Elive's own. Unlike the previous version of Elive, 3.0.0 removes the requirement of donating to the project in order to install the thing locally (although Baggen was quick to tell The Reg that cost-free alternatives existed, but often with annoying processes).
it has no purpose that is already met (Score:3)
plenty of low memory/disk Linux distros out there for i386...
And there are the BSD too, OpenBSD desktop can work with 32MB of RAM and 250MB disk, just as example.
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
I love BSD! It's Unix without the faggotry, zealotry, and drama that comes with Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
it's faster to type 'systemd' than that phrase
Re: (Score:1)
That's about the only case where systemd is faster.
Re: (Score:2)
for fast, you should see a server when systemd goes full retard and takes everything up and down again in an endless cycle. it does that really really fast.
I've yet to meet a serious systems admin in charge of hundreds or thousands of servers that thinks systemd is good think. they all say something akin to "maggot infested shit" in more diplomatic tones
Re: (Score:3)
My favorite "tiny" Linux distribution is "Puppy" because it's just so cuuuute ;-) And only needs 64 MB and a 486 CPU. Of course for actual real work Lubuntu is my preferred lightweight system.
- I had to laugh when the article said "we recommend 512 MB". I'm still running an ancient Pentium 4 with XP on that exact amount of memory. I figure: Until the power supply or hard drive dies, I'll just keep using this ancient unit to watch youtube, read Gmail, etc.
It's almost twenty years old! (Although my Sear
Re: (Score:2)
damn small linux can go down to 16MB on 486
more RAM is recommended though 8D
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure hackers like going through your Gmail too. Seriously, running XP? When's the last time that OS got a security update? When's the last time the browser you're running on it did?
Re: (Score:1)
I would hate to see the state of your computer if you think that updates are some magic bullet that keeps shit secure.
I guarantee you it's better off than a system running with known exploits.
It's also pretty easy to secure any system, regardless of how old it may be.
No it isn't.
Re: (Score:1)
I guarantee you it's better off than a system running with known exploits.
Better known exploits than unknown ones like on your "agile", trial-and-error, end-user beta test pile of shit.
No it isn't.
Yep, it's easy. You're just a noob who doesn't know how to use a computer.
Re: (Score:2)
Better known exploits than unknown ones like on your "agile", trial-and-error, end-user beta test pile of shit.
You're legit retarded.
Yep, it's easy. You're just a noob who doesn't know how to use a computer.
Then describe your secure setup. Making claims without evidence is meaningless.
Re: (Score:2)
Says the child who thinks Windows 10 is secure.
I never said it was secure. I said XP and the outdates browsers that run on it are trivially insecure with known exploits.
It's not my job to educate you
But it is your job to substantiate your claims. What is claimed without evidence can be dismissed. If it was easy to secure then we wouldn't need to pay a super "genius" like you for consultation. We'd just look up the recipe online and do it.
Re: (Score:1)
If the goal is low power, an under-clocked modern CPU may be a better option to an older CPU.
Re: (Score:1)
it has no purpose...
Definitively you didn't tried it saying this kind of comment No offense, it is a very DIFFERENT system and the goal is absolutely not low resources, check the new homepage to see all the characteristics, low resources is just one of the much features and an important one
LOL (Score:1)
Windows 98 ran on 32 MB of RAM and a Pentium 1. It had an entire suite of GUI programs available. Even this bare bones modern OS needs 256 MB and is barely usable. It's sad how far performance has fallen over time.
Re: (Score:1)
TOS and GEM ran on my Atari ST with 1MB of RAM and a full suite of GUI apps available. Could even do multitasking with MultiTOS and a 4MB upgrade. Get off my lawn.
Re: (Score:1)
"could do multitasking with 4 MB upgrade"
Not impressed. My Commodore Amiga did multitasking from day 1 (1985) with only 1/4 MB of RAM. It also was used to create CGI for television shows like seaQuest (all three seasons) and Babylon 5 (seasons 1 and 2).
Re: LOL (Score:2)
The first video toaster ran on an Amiga 2000, which came with a full 1 MB of RAM (not 1/4) and could be upgraded up to 9 MB. The guys working on seaQuest likely had them fully upgraded, or they may even have been using the Amiga 4000 version which came standard double the RAM of the 2000.
Re: LOL (Score:2)
I don't remember the commercial, but Wesley Crusher did work on development for the Toaster 4000.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Though technically possible. Win 98 on an original Pentium would NOT have been a pleasant experience. I remember people installing it and booting up to show they could then immediately going back to actually keep the machine usable. And I'm assuming office 97 is in the suite of programs. Oh the pain. An original Pentium was a great DOS machine, but just stop there.
I think modern OSes are a lot more conservative on the minimum requirements as people expect a certain level of usability.
On a "i686" class mach
So, it has a faster development cycle than Debian? (Score:2)
So, it has a faster development cycle than Debian?
I kid! I kid! I've been a Debian user for a very long time and thoroughly love it. But looking back at how long the Sarge release took, it is difficult not to poke fun at it now.
Re: (Score:2)
They mostly fixed that and appear to have sustained a 18 month release cycle over the past few years since wheezy came out.
Article is wrong (Score:5, Informative)
The article claims Elive 3.0.0 is based on Debian 8. This is incorrect. Elive 3 is based on Debian 7, which is several months past the end of its end of life date, even for the LTS repo. This means Elive users will not have any security updates. It is not a good idea to install this OS.
Source? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
1. Download Elive. Boot from the live disc.
2. Open a terminal and run either
2a) usb_release -a
or
2b) cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian*
Both show the project is based on, and pulling packages from, Debian 7 Wheezy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have a hard time believing it as well because the base kernel on Jesse (debian 8) is 3.16 and the base kernel on Weezy (debian 7) is 3.2 (3.02 if you aren't familiar with the numbering).
The article is clear the base kernel is 3.16 indicating Jesse. Maybe it's a mix but I'd like to see this confirmed.
Ready for Robot Chicken guest open ... (Score:3)
It's Elive!
Re: I tend to agree & why... apk (Score:2)
imo as a dev
lol
Re: c6gunner FAKE NAME, tell ya what: (Score:2)
Your software is just crap - written in crayon, fictional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine as a punchline to a joke by mmell February 17, 2017
Your premise that hostfiles are a good way to deal with advertising and malvertising is fucking insane - by JazzLad April 20, 2016
his hosts "program" is actually a broken batch file by xenotransplant August 10 2015
his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to be a laughingstock while consuming excessive amounts o
Better headline (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Even the Raspberry Pi Zero, at only 5$USD, has a 1GHz processor and 512MB RAM. From the description of Elive in the sumary, it should be enough computing power and RAM to run easily it.
On a Raspberry Pi 3, with a 1.2GHz Quad Core 64bit CPU and 1GB RAM, it should be running as fast as a regular desktop computer with a modern OS.
Looks like a good start (Score:2)
Someone should help make a mirror of this distro, as it has run out of bandwidth for downloading it seems. It's also 32-bit only.
And please, resurrect Yggdrasil Linux too! (Score:2)
I love Yggdrasil, but after 1995 it became somewhat difficult to use. Porting Linux 3.x patches to 0.95 has been notoriously troublesome and we still haven't got the Meltdown patch.
Browser (Score:3)
The real problem comes when you try to use a modern web browser with such a low-powered system. Some web sites might fare OK, but the current main web is such a crapzone of intense and unbelievably big javascript, forced video, HUGE images that it forces the client to scale, transparencies, fly-outs, mouse-overs, stupid animated transitions, hooks into a zillion other sites, that ANY browser that CAN render it halfway decently is going to gobble up all your memory and CPU resources with just a single, terribly slow page.
So although such a system might work fine for some types of projects, but as a desktop, it would be pretty bad.
Ironically, I just updated my browser, and have 5 tabs open half-screen, with ads blocked, and is doing NOTHING, yet it is consuming 50% of an entire core (hasn't done THAT before, but has since the update two days ago, it pretty constant). Top shows one of the processes at 50% CPU, yet about:performance says NOTHING about anything using resources. The tabs are 4 static/old forums, Slashdot, Hotmail, Youtube. And the Youtube one is just sitting on a listing of videos with nothing playing and no animation. If I close that tab, wham, back to a very low CPU, except it didn't work this last time I closed it. Annoying on a powerful 6 core system... but it would be crippling on a old/weak 1 or 2 core system.
Re: (Score:2)
Install uMatrix [github.com] or your favorite script/annoyances blocker, among other measures (such as blocking video autoplay, flash, etc).
Use a browser that lets you disable "multi process", I know Waterfox [waterfoxproject.org] allows this. Others let you change the number of threads, I set those to 1.
Configure it to always start your last open tabs, that way you can close and open the browser periodically (don't leave it open unattended).
The current browser developer mindset is that THEY are the OS, they will eat all your cpu cores and r