Linux Turns 27 (omgubuntu.co.uk) 170
It's been 27 years since Linus Torvalds let a group of people know about his "hobby" OS. OMGUbuntu blog writes: Did you know that Linux, like Queen Elizabeth II, actually has two birthdays? Some FOSS fans consider the first public release of (prototype) code, which dropped on October 5, 1991, as more worthy of being the kernel's true anniversary date. Others, ourselves included, take today, August 25, as the "birth" date of the project. And for good reason. This is the day on which, back in 1991, a young Finnish college student named Linus Torvalds sat at his desk to let the folks on comp.os.minix newsgroup know about the "hobby" OS he was working on. The "hobby OS" that wouldn't, he cautioned, be anything "big" or "professional." Even as Linux continues to have lion's share in the enterprise world, it has only managed to capture a tiny fraction of the consumer space. Further reading: Ask Slashdot: Whatever Happened To the 'Year of Linux on Desktop'?
Which Linux-based distro do you use? What changes, if any, would you like to see in it in the next three years?
Which Linux-based distro do you use? What changes, if any, would you like to see in it in the next three years?
A tiny fraction of the consumer market? (Score:5, Informative)
Linux the kernel.
You know, the kernel in all those android phones and tablets.
Quite frankly Linux is in most smart phones and tablets, and is the most popular phone os kernel of all time.
Therefore itâ(TM)s incredibly popular and successful in the consumer market.
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
This actually means it's incredibly popular and successful in the Google mass-surveillance utterly unsafe binary-blob-infested ecosystem. Not what Linux and free OSes are all about.
Re: A tiny fraction of the consumer market? (Score:1)
Linux is not what makes Android into the shit that it is. Android is what makes Android shit.
Linux is a great server OS, but so far hasnâ(TM)t been used to make a good desktop or mobile OS. Maybe never will.
Re: A tiny fraction of the consumer market? (Score:5, Informative)
Except that Google is replacing it with an in-house kernel.
Re: A tiny fraction of the consumer market? (Score:4, Informative)
It's still a Linux kernel, just because it is customized doesn't make it not Linux.
Android OS - Linux kernel [wikipedia.org]
Re: A tiny fraction of the consumer market? (Score:5, Informative)
Presumably jd was referencing Google's experimental Fuscia OS, which may or may not ever actually replace Android (but they hope it does). Fuscia has a non-Linux (but still open source) kernel called Zircon: https://fuchsia.googlesource.c... [googlesource.com]
Fuchsia (Score:1)
Named after botanist Leonhart Fuchs [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Fuchsia's kernel is not Linux, but a real-time microkernel called Zircon. It's a fork of LK (Little Kernel) not under GPL.
https://github.com/littlekernel/lk/blob/master/LICENSE [github.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Linux is in most smart phones and tablets, and is the most popular phone os kernel of all time.
Linux is the most used operating system in the known universe. Wasn't always so, we needed to defeat both Microsoft and Apple to get there.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed -- ignoring those 2+ billion [youtu.be] Android devices (in 2017, no less) is strange.
If we ignore Android and look at the rest of the consumer space, then yes, we see Linux is a drop-in-the-bucket -- on the desktop it is estimated to roughly have only 2 % [wikipedia.org]
However, Linux is dominating in other areas -- it is a wildly successful in the server space. 100% of the Top 500 Supercomputers in the world run Linux [top500.org]. Not bad for a "hobby" OS. /sarcasm I wish I could "fail" like that. =P
Why does Linux need to upstage Window
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
indeed, i couldn't belive what i read.
and lets not forget that a lot of IoT and small consumer devices (tv boxes, wifi routers, etc.) also mostly run linux.
Linux Apps Not Coming To Many Chromebooks (Score:2)
Chromebooks are designed to run web applications. Most cannot run applications designed for GNU/Linux without a firmware replacement because they use a version of the Linux kernel prior to the addition of features that allow for rich container support. See the recent Slashdot story "Linux Apps Are Not Coming To Many Still-Supported Chromebooks" [slashdot.org].
Developer mode makes it too easy to lose data (Score:2)
*turns on your Chromebook with Crouton*
*presses Space as prompted*
*presses Enter as prompted*
Now where's all your data? (explanation [slashdot.org])
Re: (Score:3)
Gentoo. systemd-free by default, but to prevent any dependencies from sneaking it in:
/etc/portage/make.conf
echo sys-apps/systemd >>/etc/portage/package.mask
echo sys-fs/udev >>/etc/portage/package.mask
sed -i '/^USE=/s/"$/ -systemd"/'
Re: (Score:2)
It's not superior when I have to reboot the computer after every single dingy update. I do an X update and I need to reboot. This did not use to be the case.
battery life on laptops (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Improvement of battery life on laptops would be nice.
This.. I have been using Linux on my laptops for over a decade now. The only downside compared to the alternatives for me is battery life.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for the link. I'll see if I can use that. Since switching from Gentoo to Ubuntu/Mint years ago I've gotten a bit lazy.
Re: (Score:2)
Have you tried powertop (which has an --autotune - but not sure how reliable that is)? Useful to turn off stuff you never use that's draining battery.
Re: (Score:2)
* --auto-tune
Re: (Score:2)
Only a tiny fraction of the consumer market ... (Score:5, Insightful)
... if you forget about Android.
Re: (Score:1)
but android is getting replaced soon... https://www.digitaltrends.com/... [digitaltrends.com]
Re: (Score:2)
How quickly does this description of Fuchsia OS jump between kernel and home screen! Just in the space of 2 short paragphs! It remains to be seen what definition of the 'OS' are we going to adapt soon...
Re: (Score:2)
... and many TVs, home routers, in-car entertainment (ICE) systems, etc.
Slackware! (Score:4, Informative)
For the win!
Re: (Score:2)
The first release was "dropped" --? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's modern for "released". e.g. "Kanye dropped a new album yesterday".
Re: (Score:2)
Wikipedia says 16.36% of page requests are Linux. [wikimedia.org] What do you make of that?
Re: (Score:2)
If you read the page you linked, it says 15.01% is Android and the other 1.35% is all desktop and laptop Linuxes.
Re: (Score:3)
Oh yes, I read it. But now you're making a distinction between PC Linux and Mobile Linux, in what way is that meaningful? Either way, it is people using Linux instead of Microsoft.
Re: (Score:2)
Brought to you by your good friends at Microsoft.....
*Windows Subsystem for LINUX
Re: (Score:2)
But now you're making a distinction between PC Linux and Mobile Linux, in what way is that meaningful?
Mobile Linux is most commonly used for viewing works created by others, not for creating works longer than the one or two paragraphs of a Tweet or a Facebook post. This is in large part caused by the limits of a finger-operated input device for entering large amounts of text or indicating fine positions, combined with the hassle of carrying an external mouse and keyboard everywhere you go.
Mobile Linux cannot by default run applications designed for desktop or laptop computers. There exist apps called GNURoo
Re: (Score:2)
So what is a Chromebook, is it mobile or is it a PC? Fine distinctions. Does not change the fact that a large fraction of people are using Linux now, in a large segment of the market, where they would otherwise be using Microsoft.
What do people do most on their PCs these days? Browse. What do people do with a major amount of time on their phone? Browse.
Graduate from browsing to creating (Score:2)
What do people do most on their PCs these days? Browse. What do people do with a major amount of time on their phone? Browse.
When you want to graduate from browsing to creating, it's easier to do so if you own a PC than if all you have is what The Register refers to as a "fondleslab."
Re: (Score:2)
Almost everybody who has a PC also has a tablet, and a phone. Electronic time is distributed between them, tending more towards the phone all the time. It doesn't separate out into nice tidy categories like in the old days. Phone as laptop replacement is still in its infancy, but it is a thing it is is growing fast. Linux owns that space.
Distro: Debian Change: Scrap Systemd (Score:4, Insightful)
No need for anything else, really, as the systemd crap is replaced with a sane alternative.
Re:Distro: Debian Change: Scrap Systemd (Score:4, Insightful)
I still say it was a ploy by Redhat to bring in more support money. Here install this massive monstrosity that hasn't been tested and does many extraneous things a startup manager should never worry about. Trust us it will work fine. What is the reason for systemd having a caching DNS server?
Re:Distro: Debian Change: Scrap Systemd (Score:4, Informative)
My thoughts exactly. Make it complex, behaving arbitrarily, reduce diagnostics possibilities (binary logging) etc. and many enterprise system administrators will just have their bosses pay for support instead of wading through the mess themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
I am as mistrustful of systemd and the number of services that have come under the control of that project as anyone else, but I have not found stability to an issue. This is with long term operation of multiple Linux machines, server, desktop and laptop. For servers, I remove network manager, but that is pretty easy.
If you are going to trash systemd, and there certainly are reasons to be critical, please stick to the facts.
Re: (Score:3)
Stick to the facts scrupulously and exactly, like the pro-systemd faction you mean? Also, that you have not found stability issues does not imply others have the same experience.
Re: (Score:2)
Link please. And I am definitely not pro-systemd. I am, however, anti-hyperbole.
Re: (Score:3)
"Link please???" The war-cry of the systemd-fanatic that requires all in opposition to prove everything and proves nothing himself? Seriously? How stupid do you think we are?
Re: (Score:2)
"Link please???" The war-cry of the systemd-fanatic
You sound like an ass at the moment. I specifically said that I am not pro systemd, far from it. Now a link please, or you are a blowhard too.
Re: (Score:2)
I non-subtly hinted that I am pretty sure you are lying. If you were not, you would be aware of all the fine web-pages that list and discuss the problems with systemd.
Re: (Score:2)
Your post makes no sense.
Re: (Score:2)
When did a pro-systemd post ever made sense? These people cannot think.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't make any sense either. All those content-free posts, what is the point?
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, asking for evidence and then, should it be provided, ignoring is is a tried-and-true propaganda technique and a favorite of some type of fanatic. Can be observed to be used all the time by the systemd-fanatics.
You are simply a disgusting liar. Incidentally, I do not want the systemd-fanatics to believe anything. They are free to be as stupid as they like, as long as it does not affect me.
Re: (Score:3)
Actually, _most_ of Debian works fine with sysIVinit at this time.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
There are more non-systemd choices now:
http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_distributions_without_systemd
I have been using Antix for awhile, and I just installed Devuan on one of my machines with no problems.
Re: (Score:2)
I no longer have the ability or the enthusiasm to spend hours troubleshooting errors and that seems to be all too common on GNU/Linux.
I spend approximately 0% of my time troubleshooting errors in Linux, or more precisely Debian Linux. This has been the case since well before 2011. So... what's the difference between you and me?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm guessing Nvidia card. I found that it causes the most issues, mostly because the drivers aren't great in any capacity or package.
Some hardware incompatibilities remain (Score:2)
Probably hardware differences. Debian's own wiki acknowledges plenty of problems getting Debian GNU/Linux to behave on, say, an ASUS Transformer Book T100TA [debian.org].
Re: (Score:2)
Right, "Volunteered to help update rms's website". Troll.
Re: (Score:2)
Try Ubuntu.
What would I like to see? (Score:5, Interesting)
1. A return of hardened gentoo and grsecurity's compliance with the GPL
2. A proper audit of the kernel and critical components to eliminate defects
3. A formal analysis of SELinux along the lines of SEL4
4. 7N reliability
5. Proper funding of RTLinux and further integration into mainstream
6. VST and malloc replacement Hoard as part of a standard Linux distro
7. Third-party maintenance of abandoned architectures
8. Rewrites of XTank, NV and PHIGS
9. Ports of Elite: Dangerous and Cubase
A. Hewlett-Packard's pluggable scheduler
B. Kernel config supporting hardware detection for suggesting defaults
C. Usable Gnome and KDE
D. Replace Systemd with something not made by committee
E. Addition of Occam-Pi/Guppy, Verified C and SystemC to LLVM
F. Harness for loading Linux modules onto alternate physical devices
Fedora (Score:2)
My wish list (Score:3)
For Desktop, I'm currently running Linux Mint which is pretty damned solid and stable and I've installed it on several family members during the Windows 7->8 fiasco and they're all still really, really happy with it.
What I would like to see Linux Desktop(TM) focus on is overall greater consistency! Starting with sound, all the way through the most basic stuff, the wide plethora of desktops (KDE, Gnome, etc.) and applications is a bloody mess of inconsistency. Having lived through "The UNIX wars", I can tell you that MS' *CONSISTENCY* in everything the user did - along with enabling developers of applications to have a single target platform - led to MS being what it is today. Choice is great, until you're paralysed by the plethora of choices and wind up with a tiny market.
PS - I could give a bubbly-fart about systemd. All I (as a user) care about is: Does this shit work?
Re: (Score:2)
I can tell you that MS' *CONSISTENCY* in everything the user did - along with enabling developers of applications to have a single target platform - led to MS being what it is today.
And just to support that statement, kind of... MS' lack of consistency is what led to Windows Phone being what it is today, too. It's amazing they didn't figure out how to run NT on a PDA earlier. You could actually install Linux on many WinCE PDAs and phones, I had it on both an iPaq H2215 (worked fine) and on a HTC Raphael (which was garbage, but it worked fine there too.)
Re:My wish list Ummmmmm (Score:2)
FTR, my first distro was Yggdrasil, followed quickly by Slackware cause they had an easier method for bring in the Adaptec SCSI card.
For Desktop, I'm currently running Linux Mint which is pretty damned solid and stable and I've installed it on several family members during the Windows 7->8 fiasco and they're all still really, really happy with it.
What I would like to see Linux Desktop(TM) focus on is overall greater consistency! Starting with sound, all the way through the most basic stuff, the wide plethora of desktops (KDE, Gnome, etc.) and applications is a bloody mess of inconsistency. Having lived through "The UNIX wars", I can tell you that MS' *CONSISTENCY* in everything the user did - along with enabling developers of applications to have a single target platform - led to MS being what it is today. Choice is great, until you're paralysed by the plethora of choices and wind up with a tiny market.
PS - I could give a bubbly-fart about systemd. All I (as a user) care about is: Does this shit work?
So ... what you really want is consistency the way YOU want it. Otherwise you would have just stuck with Windows 8 for your family.
You are given the ability to have what you want with Linux, you are NOT with Microsoft. I think i know what you were getting at, and I think you would want some things to be standardize. But really, I don't mind some of the inconsistencies.. it lets me choose what I want. e.g. XFCE is my choice of DE... I wouldn't enjoy Linux as much with some other one, even though I can ap
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> FTR, my first distro was Yggdrasil, followed quickly by Slackware
Same! Did you have the Adaptec ASC-X9160 cards (e.g. 29160) or one of the AHA-29X0 variations (2940)? Did you also have a Zip or Jazz drive? :-) Slackware "just worked." Ah, the days of waiting for an hour+ to compile our kernel.
I had a Linux book that came with Yggdrasil on CD; downloaded Slackware from the university's T1 line unto ~11x 3.5" disks IIRC -- still remember the 4 "base" disks and the 7 "development" disks. After that I t
How time flies (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Ha, but now my job consists mostly of getting developers off servers and onto serverless solutions.
What happens once the provider of a particular "serverless" solution goes mammaries-up?
Thank you Linus and the Linux community (Score:3)
Which Linux-based distro do you use? What changes, if any, would you like to see in it in the next three years?
I'm a Debian user from a million years ago who regrettably turned to the dark side of Windows as my career pulled me deeper and deeper into the abyss. Last year I cracked and switched back to Linux. I discovered and quickly fell in love with Arch, and I really identified with the Arch principles. I came to realize I may be at odds though on their versatility principle, which as I understood represented choice. This seems to apply to a number of things, but not their init system which I have had some notable frustration with. I'm sure systemd has its merits, but the next system I'm building is going to be Artix+Runit based. Not just because it is systemd free, but I'm encouraged that this seems to be a group which believes more strongly in versatility, and that is a big part of why I came crawling back to Linux. Rather than ask what my distro can do for me next, I can only hope that I can get my skills up again to be able to ask what I can do for my distro.
GNU/Linux didn't happen, but Linux???? Your nuts. (Score:1)
You have to fucking nuts to think Linux hasn't taken off. It's in everything from Chromebooks and routers to your TV and car and near everything else.
feeling old now... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Installing Slack 1.2 from its 5 or so 3.5" floppies was how I learned linux (and BIND and vi, since they were dedicated DNS servers that I had to install and configure) back in the mid '90s. I too prefer the learn by doing, though I wouldn't turn down a few CS courses if I could afford them.
Currently using Gentoo for my server at home that I play on. Tried a few other flavors in the early '00s, but went back to Slack, then switched to Gentoo when I didn't have time for a non-managed-package setup. Used to
Such a great ride (Score:2)
I started with RHL 5.2 - not RHEL 5.2, but Red Hat Linux 5.2, pre-RHEL and Fedora. I've used every RHL version and then about every other Fedora version until RHEL/WhiteBoxLinux/ScientificLinux/CentOS came out and continued on the EL path, using Fedora just for MythDora "appliance" DVR purposes. I've used Ubuntu here and there and am impressed. My most recent workstation at work is Ubuntu 18 LTS which was a breeze to setup. We're a strong RHEL shop for all things Linux, but I just got tired of fighting
It was 27 years ago today... (Score:2)
My experience with Linux (Score:2)
The first Linux distro I used was MCC. Which was the first Linux distro.
I've since used SLS, Slackware, Gentoo, Red Hat, Fedora, Centos, RHEL, Scientific Linux, Rocks, Debian, SuSE, Ubintu, Kubuntu, Mint and Linux From Scratch. Montavista is not really a distro, but I've used that too.
Of these, I think Ubuntu had the best drivers and Gentoo the best build system. None are quite what I want, so I end up rebuilding most of the system anyway.
The lack of a Linux Desktop is chiefly down to OSDL botching up that
what's the specificity of 27? (Score:2)
"27 club"?
Not captured the consumer market... (Score:1)
What is this nonsense? Android is a conclusive nail in that coffin.
The Year of the Linux Desktop has gone the way of the desktop. Not many people are using them outside of work environments and even the work environments are changing. Most people don't need a desktop. They need a portable device that they can pretend to do work on that can maybe handle spreadsheets while watching YouTube. Failing that a device to play Angry Birds while engaged in the WC is sufficient for purpose for maybe 80% of the modern
Ah, the memories. (Score:2)
Linux's birthday? (Score:3)
Debian (Score:2)
All the way. The day I jumped off the FreeBSD boat and into Linux camp, I chose Debian. I've been with it ever since.
And personally? I like systemd. It does the job and I find it easier to work with than init scripts. And for those cases I still want to use init scripts, it lets me. Debugging daemon/service issues has never been easier than since systemd dropped. journalctl is great for diagnosing issues. I really don't understand the fuss over it.
Thank you Linus and everyone in Linux/GNU/FOSS (Score:2)
Wow I feed old now. Have installed, configured and used:
Slackware 96
RedHat
Gentoo (I did the Mom experiment - she used it for years)
Ubuntu
Debian/Raspbian
Special mention to cygwin for keeping me sane whenever I was forced to use Windows.
What would I change? (Score:1)
I use Fedora was my workstation, and I love it. There's little a user can't do with Fedora or Linux (outside of playing non Unity-based games; Valve's encouraged many more games to be cross-platform ultimately though).
What would I change? Whatever regression bugs have been added to and/or existed in GNOME 3. I prefer GNOME over other DEs aesthetically, but after two or more days, the performance of GNOME, especially on modal overlay drawings, is horrific. A reboot is required with Wayland (AFAIK).
This is so
looking back (Score:2)
I've also used Suse, Red Hat, Ubuntu, Knoppix, Andy's Ham Radio Linux, DSL, and a few other variants.
I sneaked Linux into the back door of a Fortune 100 company in the form of DNS servers. When I left many years later, the company h
It seems not that long ago.. (Score:2)
Started with early Slackware, now Ubuntu LTS for servers and Mint (MATE) desktops.. It all just works! Still not totally convinced about systemd...
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
You really need new fantasies. Ever heard of pussy?
Re: (Score:1)
When used in conjunction with a campaign, yes
When used in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy, yes.
All three are true of tRump's hush fund.
Re: (Score:3)
Rubbish. I don't use Ubuntu personally, but a lot of good has come from Ubuntu, including introducing Linux to tens of millions of desktop users. They do some stupid things, but everybody does. Without Ubuntu, Debian would not be as solid and vibrant as it is now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)