Microsoft Exec Urges Linux Developers To Try Windows 10 (softpedia.com) 403
An anonymous reader shares a Softpedia article: Microsoft has finally acknowledged the potential that the open-source world in general, and Linux in particular, boasts, so the company is exploring its options to expand in this area with every occasion. Most recently, an episode posted on Channel 9 and entitled "Improvements to Bash on Windows and the Windows Console" with senior program manager Rich Turner calls for Linux developers to give up on their platforms for Windows 10. "Fire up a Windows 10 Insiders' build instance and run your code, run your tools, host your website on Apache, access your MySQL database from your Java code," he explained. Turner went on to point out that the Windows subsystem for Linux is there to provide developers with all the necessary tools to code just like they'd do it on Linux, all without losing the advantages of Windows 10. "Whatever it is that you normally do on Linux to build an application: whether it's in Go, in Erlang, in C, whatever you use, please, give it a try on Bash WSL, and importantly file bugs on us. It really makes our life a lot easier and helps us build a product that we can all use and be far more productive with, he continued. Editor's note: The original title from Softpedia was edited because it was misleading. A Microsoft employee doesn't represent the entire company (at least in this instant he wasn't speaking for the company), and at no point has he asked "all Linux developers" to "give up" on Linux.
LOL (Score:5, Funny)
Certainly. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Not even then, Windows 'tis an abomination unto mine eyes. Never touch, for it is unclean. And Office isn't sweetening the deal.
Re:LOL (Score:5, Funny)
>> Microsoft Update Servers Left All Azure RHEL Instances Hackable --> Microsoft Exec Urges Linux Developers To Try Windows 10
MS is always in for a good joke :)
Re: LOL - missed (point|boat) (Score:3)
Same reason nobody uses the windows store: Few developers write applications for it.
If you want to write a desktop application (which few people do anymore; it's all about web applications these days) win32 tends to be your best target.
Meanwhile, if you want to write server side application, Linux tends to be your best target.
Re: (Score:3)
Didn't anyone alert their marketing department that it doesn't really matter what device you are on.. and that the goodness is whats ON the Internet? A Belchfire 2020 running latest software from Frobnitz company sees the same CNN.com feed. Viewing platform is no longer relevant, as it was.
That's precisely why Android alone is already seeing WAY WAY more use than Windows is, and it and iOS are killing Windows among regular users. However if somebody buys a PC, then they likely have a specific use case in mind that is specific to windows.
In fact I'm of half of a mind to suspect that Android (in the form of Andromeda) will eventually replace Windows for regular desktop users, though I don't have a crystal ball. If that does happen though, then indeed, Linux will dominate the desktop.
Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why the fuck would any Linux developer want to do this? It's not as if Windows 10 offers any significant, or even real, architectural advantage, and it's not like Linux doesn't have plenty of its own development tools. So far as I can tell, Windows 10 has absolutely no developer advantages at all, and in fact, simply represents a pointless extra layer for any developer working on Linux.
You know, I almost preferred the Gates-Ballmer Microsoft, because it was brilliantly maniacal. The new Microsoft is just a whining pathetic pack of halfwits who can't really even decide what direction their company should go. Sure, they may be more open source friendly, but so the fuck what?
Desktop Windows has more users than X11/Linux (Score:2)
So far as I can tell, Windows 10 has absolutely no developer advantages at all
In the mobile and server fields, I'd agree. But in the desktop field, the advantage of Windows is in the economies of scale of having far more users than X11/Linux has.
Re: (Score:3)
But the whole point of this plea isn't to get more Linux developers writing Windows software, but rather to switch to their Ubuntu-on-Win10 subsystem to continue developing Windows software.
Re: (Score:3)
The article was not written by Microsoft. And Microsoft has made it ubuntantly clear (couldn't help myself) that they are providing a native Ubuntu image that runs on top of the Windows Subsystem for Linux.
A Canonical representative [msdn.com] was present at the announcement and said the following:
it's the exact same root filesystem, the same root tarball, identical--bit for bit, checksum for checksum--as Ubuntu in Azure, or any other public cloud, on a bear metal machine or virtual machine if you install Ubuntu, or if you are running Ubuntu in a Docker container or LXD container or any other container
It's identical to what you would download off Canonical's site except:
- WSL translates user mode system calls to the NT kernel instead of using a real Linux kernel
- requisite init tweaks from the default (since it isn't act
Re: Desktop Windows has more users than X11/Linux (Score:2)
Windows does with developer tools.
Re: (Score:3)
The desktop is running Linux. It is just in your hand, and not on your desk anymore.
Desktops became laptops, became Smart Phones. The modern "desktop" is touch based running on your phone.
IF Microsoft could explain how to develop Android (or iOS) on Windows 10 is better than any other platform, I'd be all ears.
Re:Desktop Windows has more users than X11/Linux (Score:5, Insightful)
The modern "desktop" is touch based running on your phone.
But what device do you use to do actual work then?
Re: (Score:3)
I can use anything I get my hands on. I have windows servers I can RDP in from just about any device I have. I have Google Drive for my documentation that surpasses anything Microsoft has to offer, and again, I can have access from just about any device I have. I have SSH to manage my Linux Servers, which I have access from just about any device I have.
So, I am not sure what you mean by "actual work" ;)
Re: (Score:2)
DevOps or MIS perhaps, but I really would like to see you programming without a proper workstation or laptop.
Re: (Score:2)
I can write programs on ChromeOS just as easy as Windows or Mac. ChromeOS is Linux based. I can program fine on Raspberry Pi and Ardruino , with a keyboard ... just fine. What you lack is imagination. Your limitation is "proper".
Or, as my dad used to say ... "A poor workman always blames his tools"
Re: (Score:2)
I can use anything I get my hands on. I have windows servers I can RDP in from just about any device I have. I have Google Drive for my documentation that surpasses anything Microsoft has to offer, and again, I can have access from just about any device I have. I have SSH to manage my Linux Servers, which I have access from just about any device I have.
So, I am not sure what you mean by "actual work" ;)
I've tried SSH over phone to my servers, works nicely for monitoring, works terrible for writing code. YMMV.
Re: (Score:3)
Agreed, I've done it a few times for easy or urgent bugs, and it's not fun.
Interestingly, as much as I love vim on the desktop, it's so much more useful (comparatively) when you're stuck on a phone keyboard.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Desktop Windows has more users than X11/Linux (Score:5, Funny)
But what device do you use to do actual work then?
I do all my real written on by phone. I can't think of anything else that souls by neuter. Isn't in typing this puts using predictive heresies to you right vote.
- Posted from a Samsung Galaxy S. Please forgive the typos.
Re:Desktop Windows has more users than X11/Linux (Score:5, Interesting)
Desktop isn't on the "desktop" any more. It moved to a Laptop, and now is on your Smart Phone.
Yes, I read before I posted. I'm just seeing beyond the historical to the now. IF by chance you see "desktop" and think "Windows/Mac", that is your problem. By that definition, the "year of Linux on the desktop" will never be. Because Linux isn't going to replace "Windows" as an OS on Intel PCs. It has however, gone and become Android and ChromeOS. It even runs on just about every other micro-controller like Raspberry Pi and Arduino. Linux is running on the Servers that make up just about every online "cloud" based activity you can think of and are the back-end of so many "apps" you use today.
I would suggest to you, that Linux is more involved in your daily "work" than windows is. Windows is basically a terminal for me.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Desktop Windows has more users than X11/Linux (Score:5, Informative)
My desktop being my computer, right? I am running Mint right now with xfce on my laptop, 2 monitors, one with a bunch of terminal sessions, another with a browser (the one I am posting this from).
I don't need anything to overtake anything for me to have my desktop based on a GNU/Linux distro, I am not being 'pedantic', I seriously don't understand people who are talking about it this way. My year of Linux on a desktop happened back in 2001.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Please mod parent up. I too have been running Linux on the desktop for many years, and I can do everything I need to do, whether locally or on the net. Sure, there's a few apps that don't work but then there's Wine and virtualization.
As more ecosystems appear, such as smart devices, cloud computing and who knows what's next, the smaller portion of the whole mess will be operating closed, proprietary software, since anyone building and selling these systems won't want to pay for that software when better sof
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
So far as I can tell, Windows 10 has absolutely no developer advantages at all
In the mobile and server fields, I'd agree. But in the desktop field, the advantage of Windows is in the economies of scale of having far more users than X11/Linux has.
I'll be sure to tell the 1% of developers still building apps for desktop OS:es.
Newflash: It's a dead market. The web won.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Why? (Score:2)
The APIs run natively just like a win32 one.
Re: (Score:3)
Why the fuck would any Linux developer want to do this?
As far as I'm concerned, two reasons: First,because I'm developing cross-platform software, and if I don't have to reboot or go to a VM, bonus. Second, because Visual Studio is a fucking fantastic IDE compared to the IDEs available on Linux. KDevelop is alright.
If your application is linux-only, and you don't need it to also run on windows, then yeah, I'm with you. Work in the environment the app will be used in. However, their new ability to build for Linux from Windows, if it works well (and that's a
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
What are your views on Eclipse? I installed Neon a week ago and I'm still waiting for it to start.
Re:Why? (Score:4, Interesting)
If you mean "try it" or "use it sometimes" then there are lots of reasons, esp if you need to maintain a windows box for any reason (there are some games I really like and have had too many headaches trying to switch)
I would much prefer to do any and all development/real work on a Unix platform and preferably linux. However... having the tools I know and love available to me is always a bonus....even if its in the ridiculously stupid, disrespectful surveillance malware of an OS Windows 10 really aspires to be.
I would never trust Windows as a platform. Its a game box, the windows 10 PC is a glorified game console that also doubles as an acceptable platform for shit-talking on the web.
That will always be the extend of its usefulness, because that is as far as I can trust it.
Re: (Score:2)
Commercial and OpenSource (Score:2)
Why the fuck would any Linux developer want to do this?
Mainly because some of us have jobs where we need to use commercial applications Illustrator, MS Office etc. for teaching and admin and yet still want to be able to code for research. It used to be that many of us in this situation used Macs because they combined an underlying UNIX OS with the ability to run commercial software. Sadly Apple is going off the rails now and while I used to despise Windows XP and earlier (the last ones I ever really encountered), Windows 10 is a very different beast.
I've on
Re: (Score:3)
Why the fuck would any Linux developer want to do this? It's not as if Windows 10 offers any significant, or even real, architectural advantage, and it's not like Linux doesn't have plenty of its own development tools. So far as I can tell, Windows 10 has absolutely no developer advantages at all, and in fact, simply represents a pointless extra layer for any developer working on Linux.
While I agree with you, back when Microsoft's .net platform came out an acquaintance of mine got deeply involved in the Mono project. I felt this was the exact wrong approach to take given Microsoft's embrace/extend/expunge model, but he was undeterred.
As far as I am concerned, as long as the OS is essentially reportware I want to stay as far away from it as I can. Bad enough I can't avoid Windows 8.1 on a particular convertible tablet/laptop, I have no interest in running Windows 10 when it will repor
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Why?
Masochism?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why the fuck would any Linux developer want to do this?
To get longer build times because of slower process launching?
Re: (Score:3)
You know, I almost preferred the Gates-Ballmer Microsoft, because it was brilliantly maniacal. The new Microsoft is just a whining pathetic pack of halfwits who can't really even decide what direction their company should go.
You've got to be kidding. The new Microsoft under Satya is *far* more entertaining: advertising right on the desktop, spyware baked in, forced "upgrades", forced updates and reboots while trying to work... the level of whining from Windows users is higher than ever with this stuff, and
Re: (Score:3)
Why the fuck would any Linux developer want to do this?
The quote in the original posting is incomplete:
"Fire up a Windows 10 Insiders' build instance and run your code, run your tools, host your website on Apache, access your MySQL database from your Java code"
...send telemetry data about what you're developing to Microsoft so that they can bring a competing product to market before you, making it look as if you're just copying Microsoft.
Re: Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
If you don't want wibdows 10 don't use it. No one is holding a gun to your head.
Unless no laptop makers are willing to sell me a laptop in a particular form factor with anything other than Windows preinstalled. System76, for instance, lacks anything smaller than 14 inches (source [system76.com]).
Re: Why? (Score:2)
That is not Microsoft but peripheral makers.
Dell is selling a new Kaby Lake line of Linux specific PCs with a small screen. It is tested and QA certified. Go Google it under slashdot stories? I don't know if it's out yet though?
There are others who don't include bargain basement grade peripherals too if you buy a premium convertible. Oddly the MS Surface Pro 3 runs Ubuntu very well. You can disable the tpm keys or add your own with Ubuntu signed.
Re: Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Sure they can't. The OOXML format is a good example of how Microsoft can use supposedly open processes to push through a proprietary system. I have little faith in Microsoft at the best of times, but of late, with the awful half-assedness of Windows 10 (not to mention its near constant attempts to sell me shit because I didn't invest in the enterprise edition), I'm not even sure if I care what Microsoft's intentions are, because at this point, I think incompetence has replaced malice.
Re: Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Then please, for the love of god, bring back a Desktop GUI to the Desktop OS.
I'd actually prefer it to look like Windows NT/2000/"Classic". That has been, and forever will be, my preferred "working GUI". Right now my Cinnamon setup more or less looks just like it. It's how I make MATE and XFCE look as well.
Stop trying to make me and my brain work like a tablet interface. (That goes for you too Ubuntu Unity)
Re: Why? (Score:4, Informative)
Windows 10 is not bad in that regard. My main beef with it is the whole automatic updates saga, which when you have to rely on a metered connection becomes extremely painful. Kind of the same deal with the constant >1GB console/games updates but I guess I just have to become more connected :(
Re: (Score:2)
Windows already has a large percentage of desktop developers, as compared to any other platform. And this isn't about making cross-compatible applications, it's about Linux developers being asked to develop their Linux software in a Linux-under-Windows environment. Cross-platform tools have existed for a very long time now, and, so far as I understand, that's not what the Ubuntu-Windows subsystem is about.
Re: (Score:2)
It is the main *desktop* OS used. It is not the main OS used overall.
Uh... sure. How much is worth to you? (Score:3, Insightful)
Because seriously, there is positively no way I will ever put Windows on any computer that I ever own unless I am being paid what I think my time is worth for the inconvenience.
So since it's clearly not worth your time to pay me to use it, it's not worth mine to install it.
Re: (Score:3)
But they did say please:
please, give it a try on Bash WSL
If you're going to solicit charity, IMO you should be a charity, not a for-profit company.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Major video game consoles are even more closed and more proprietary than desktop Windows, yet they somehow still have companies developing applications for them.
Re: (Score:2)
Even if I were an FOSS zealot, if you could prove to me that using Windows 10 to develop my FOSS software made me considerably more productive, I'd be a bit of a fool not to use it. Ideology is worth less in my book that being pragmat
Wrong issue...take off the blinders. (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
What really irks me about Win10 is the instability of some of its feature. The Start Menu, even fully updated, seems prone to some pretty strange failures, all of which end up requiring weird DISM commands to fix. On my workplace network, we just back up user profiles, and when the Start Menu or Cortana go screwy, we just wipe out the profile and replace it with a week-old backup. Part of the problem here, I suspect, is MS moving to XML files, and the greater likelihood, or so it seems, of those files being
Re: (Score:3)
technically it seems Win 10 is pretty good. What kills it for me it's the hideous mobile-like UI but mainly the spying and blatant pushing of Ms' own products inside of Windows itself.
How about the forced updates and surprise reboots? How about notification popups in the middle of full screen slide presentations? How about the endless stream of malware infections? How about the zillion horrible annoyances that one tends to forget about until they bite you?
How about not being able to look at the source when you want to know what's wrong with it?
It's not how well the OS operates. (Score:2, Insightful)
During development of any project, configuration and the ability to own the software environment often comes into play. It really comes down to, I'd rather not have them in my system changing things without my permission.
Comment removed (Score:3)
Just this morning (Score:2)
I'm using a W10 work laptop. Just this morning I pulled up the Calc app for some minor numerical twiddling. Just as I was dismissing it*, it had some pop over asking me how I was enjoying the app (or something to that effect). And I used to regularly get notifications asking me how I felt about W10 and would I recommend it to my friends. And lets not forget that W10 updates keeping bring back shit that you don't want or need**
I know that at some point will have to get a W10 system for my home dev work,
No. (Score:2, Insightful)
Remove the forced updates and spyware first.
With Canonicals help (Score:2)
Unfortunately it is the airheads at Canonical that helped them with this. It was obvious that this would help Windows only and Ubuntu showed themselves to be so clueless and easily taken advantage of to go along with it. It is an advantage on the MS side since it gives people a reason to use Windows rather than Linux and thus hurt the Linux kernel. Of course many people know that Windows will take away the ability to control and audit the OS and would bring people under the enslavement of the Windows OS, a
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly, I stopped using Ubuntu about six years ago, and went with straight-up Debian (though SystemD has irritated me a bit). I have no intention of returning to Ubuntu.
Re: (Score:2)
None that I can think of. The reason for the initial move was that the Ubuntu Apache 2 package was a bit screwy at the compiler level, and moving to Debian definitely fixed that problem and Apache performed as it did under CentOS and Slackware. A lot of time has passed, so I can't really say if you'll many roadblocks.
Re: (Score:2)
Wat? They could have used any distro for this, didn't have to be Ubuntu. Once you have Kernel land all nice and emulated, you can take any linux Userland and run it on there.
Java Apache (Score:2)
Why would I EVER want to run Java from Apache?
This guy is just throwing around some random buzzwords he remembers from the previous decade.
Advantages of Windows? For development? (Score:2, Insightful)
"Turner went on to point out that the Windows subsystem for Linux is there to provide developers with all the necessary tools to code just like they'd do it on Linux, all without losing the advantages of Windows 10"
lol, wut?
There has never been a time developing on Linux where I thought, "gee, I wish I were on Windows right now." When I'm on Windows, I hate it. Everything is so tedious on Windows, and everything from the registry to using escape characters for path delimiters just makes no sense.
Fuck You Microsoft and your Cult Dogma (Score:2)
I develop daily on OSX, Linux, and Windows. Guess what, ALL operating systems SUCK. The strengths of one tend to be the weakness of others.
Windows 7 works perfectly fine for my needs. I neither want nor need your spyware laden Windows 10.
HELL NO!! (Score:2)
Please go monkey dance "developers!" to your visualbasic developers instead!
Even if we can run linux tools on windows kernel, the system is still to heavy, outside our control... and have a still shitty company behind, just look to all the user tracking MS added to it and "edge is safer than firefox and chrome" bullshit... not, MS is still a shitty company
on the good side... MS is clearly jumping to the "then you win" step from the First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then yo [brainyquote.com]
Begging? (Score:2)
If your platform is good, then you don't have to beg people to use it.
as if. (Score:2)
host your website on NOT IIS , access your NOT SQL Server database
Wow, somebody's trying to get NOT EMPLOYED today.
Advantages of Windows 10? (Score:2)
Irony (Score:2)
The irony here is that my experience with Windows 10 is what finally drove me to switch to Linux full time on my personal laptop.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm in the same boat. Once I looked at the stream of data being sent back to Microsoft, I formatted my remaining laptops with Linux Mint. If I have to use Windows (I only use Windows 7) for a project, I spin it up in a VM.
I see no advantage to Windows 10 whatsoever. It's the spyware that interrupts ("How are you enjoying this App?") or worse, plays sneaky Pete and does things without your permission or actively misleads you (e.g. making the X actually download and install a brand new OS).
No, Microsoft has i
Sure, Get Windows 10... (Score:2)
...so they can use their "telemetry" to sell you to advertisers.
Great argument, there, Microsoft. Since changing all the end-user agreements so they're all biased toward M$'s income, and their operational assumption that YOU bought your computer, but M$ owns it, lock, stock and barrel...sure, let's all start using the unnecessary and irrelevant "Windows 10" layer to build Linux apps on.
Bellevue seems to be surrounded by mirrors, reflecting every image back to it's occupants.
but this one is the worst yet! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Over my dead Zune! (Score:5, Funny)
Over my dead Zune!
Local BBQ joint asks Orthodox Jews to try pork (Score:3)
Film at 11.
Forget it (Score:2)
Linux Developers know, why they use linux. They know windows. Of course, who doesn't. Most know OSX. And they are linux developers. And they know, how to do stuff efficiently on linux and what a PITA it is to use windows for the same things.
Why does MS even think, they can convice them (expect with a lot of money, of course)? I guess the people who try an image campaign, never learned linux themselfes.
It's pretty good (Score:2)
"Advantages of Windows 10"...what are those? (Score:2)
Turner went on to point out that the Windows subsystem for Linux is there to provide developers with all the necessary tools to code just like they'd do it on Linux, all without losing the advantages of Windows 10.
I assume he means good compatibility with modern games and a greatly lightened wallet?
And the headline two years from now: (Score:2)
Microsoft Exec Urges Windows 10 Linux Compatibility Layer Developers To Try Native Windows 10 Code
I mean, after all, you've switched to Windows. Why go through all the extra trouble of writing code that would run on Linux? We've got some wonderful vendor lock-in for you.
We are on step 4 now! (Score:2)
First they ignore you,
then they laugh at you,
then they fight you,
then you win.
-- Mahatma Gandhi
Make it cost nothing and have zero telemetry... (Score:2)
And maybe it will be worth my time to look at it, or not. Right now, Linux does everything I need. Unless there's a compelling advantage to Windows 10, then no.
What's better (Score:2)
Corporate environment or dual stack development (Score:2)
If you are a developer working for a corporation, there are tools that run only in Windows (Outlook/Exchange, lotus notes come to mind). Instead of developing in Linux and using a VM for the Windows tools (with the corresponding comsumption of resourses of resources) you may as well develop in Windows10 altogether.
Or, if corporate forces you to use Windows (I am Looking at you Huawei), instead of firing up a VM with linux, or using the half baked cygwin, you can develop on Win10 Bash...
Or, if you develop a
Works for me (Score:2)
I don't develop for Linux but I do build keyboards & program them using TMK or QMK firmware. Getting a development environment for this stuff installed in Windows in the past has been a bear. I just yesterday installed the Linux subsystem and it really does work. This is great 'cause I'm about to begin another keyboard project & I don't need to dual boot just to build the firmware.
simple phrase for him. (Score:2)
"Whatever it is that you normally do on Linux to build an application: whether it's in Go, in Erlang, in C, whatever you use, please, give it a try on Bash WSL, and importantly file bugs on us. It really makes our life a lot easier and helps us build a product...
Fuck you, PAY ME.
Poor X11 Support (Score:2)
No thanks.
Might be controversial but its not bad at all (Score:4, Interesting)
I always think about Spender from GrSecurity when I read this. He uses windows to develop for Linux because it makes him more productive.
As a long time every day user and programmer (Linux, FreeBSD since year 1, MacOS for 28 years, Windows for 20 years), of all major platforms I'm using Linux desktop primarily (and most of my colleagues use OSX) but.. I cannot disagree with Spender. I'd be more productive on Windows for my Linux code (than on either OSX or Linux). I just choose the Linux desktop for other reasons ("I like it" "ideology" "its slowly getting there").
Still, today, Win10 is still the faster, more productive environment for Linux code.. oh and its always extremely good for Windows code too - as long as you don't use old APIs, which really, you shouldn't anymore.
Basically, the Windows platform is very much underrated. No nonsense, super compatible, very fast. They just have a terrible, terrible reputation.
And the value proposition is what, exactly? (Score:5, Insightful)
So let me get this straight. I should switch from a free development environment, that I can install on as many machines as I want, that doesn't feed me ads, that doesn't phone home with my information, that doesn't auto-update unless I configure it to and that ships with source code, to a system that costs money, costs more money to install on multiple machines, feeds me ads, phone home with my information, auto-updates by default and is closed-source?
What's the value proposition here, again?
Re: (Score:2)
What exactly is there to offer? I can't imagine anyone wanting to throw an extra layer on top of their work just to help Microsoft find bugs.
Re: So much hostility (Score:2)
From what I see what MS wants is developer Mindshare and visual studio. As developers move to cloud, mobile, and html 5 it risks becoming irrelevant.
Visual Studio 2017 has Android, Linux, mono, typescript, Python, and other tool support. So MS is porting it for these reasons as setting a Hyper-V VM running Linux can be a pain.
So this is good as competition keeps bad companies good
Re: (Score:3)
Re:So much hostility (Score:5, Funny)
no basement.
Deal breaker.
Re:Incredibly misleading (Score:4, Interesting)
And why should any developer be interested in moving to another platform just to help MS find bugs?
Re:Incredibly misleading (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
If MS had used a Bash variant rather than that overly-verbose monstrosity that is PowerShell, I might have sided with them. In fact, I'd probably use a Linux subsystem on Windows 10 and Server 2012 if it could latch into the same configuration and reporting systems that Powershell does. But at the moment, I have a Linux development machine that runs Windows as a VM, and that works fairly well (though I don't do a lot of development these days).
Re: (Score:2)
I was thinking more in terms of cross-platform scripting. Being able to move Bash scripts around different Linux variants, and more particularly different *nix variants, isn't always straightforward, with different variants storing different things even within the /etc structure. But still, the Bourne family has decades of library functions and the like behind it, so if I could just run Bash on Windows (without all the awful mess of Cygwin), but still be able to latch into Windows subsystems, I'd have one c
Re: (Score:2)
FTFY