Reports: NVIDIA Launching a Distro of Its Own (phoronix.com) 149
An anonymous reader writes: There are unconfirmed reports that NVIDIA is working on its own Linux distribution dubbed "NLINUX." This NLINUX is supposedly a Linux platform optimized for gamers and similar to SteamOS, but NVIDIA has yet to confirm these reports and the sole evidence appears to be a circulating screenshot of an NLINUX install screen. Would you be interested in a Linux distribution created by an IHV? Somewhat similar is Intel's own Linux distribution, Clear Linux, that offers high performance Linux on Intel x86_64 hardware.
Re: (Score:3)
Not that anyone asked but I'd boot it up in a VM and test it out. Not for any good reason but because I've done it to just about every distro out there at one point or another. I might as well do this one too. Why not?
So, yeah... I'll test it out but it's *really* unlikely to become my main distro. Why? Err... As I've said many times, I am not a gamer. The gaming market lost me when they promoted Fallout Tactics as both good and the spiritual descendant of Fallout and Fallout 2. I've not really gamed since
Re: Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, I'd only be testing it for usability, ease of updating, access to repositories, the DE workings, and things like that. Not for gaming. I thought I made that abundantly clear. Maybe not.
Re: (Score:2)
...I've seen some rather insightful comments from you...this isn't one of them. As an analogy, what you're essentially saying is this:
Oh look at this highly specialized and optimized drill tool that turns screws in no time flat! I can screw down these boards in half the time it would take to nail them down. But I have no use for screws, so I'll just turn it around around and see if it still works like a hammer on this line of nails. Oops...would you look at that. That line of nails completely demolishe
Re: (Score:2)
Heh, no... No it's probably not one of my best. I don't think I articulated it well.
The gist of what I'm saying is that, even though I'm not really a gamer any more, I'd still look at it in a VM. Why? I've tested pretty much all the major distros and minor distros in a VM. I might as well test this one. There's a chance, albeit a small one, that I'll like it. I'd like to see how it works, what it has for weaknesses, how easy it is to configure, and then I can make an informed opinion about it - and I might
Re: (Score:2)
It isn't that you aren't articulating things well that is the issue here (regardless of if you are or are not doing so), but rather that what you propose is completely stupid. NVIDIA is a hardware company, and their distribution will clearly be optimized for NVIDA hardware. Using their distribution and then virtualizing away their hardware is like buying a special bra designed to handle DD Breasts and getting breast reduction surgery down to C Cups befor
Re: (Score:2)
Rather than make an uninformed opinion about how it's bad, not worth the time, or sucks - I can see for myself what the weaknesses and strengths are and judge accordingly.
I think you kind of missed the point of /.
Re: (Score:2)
Games are fun & you seem to occasio
Re: (Score:2)
I may very well take you up on that offer. ;-) I do appreciate it. Speaking of gaming, did you end up getting into KoL? It's addictive... If you do *and* you'd like to, err... Hmm... If you'd like to experience what it's like to have some goodies, I'll be more than happy to find my login and hook you up. I've got millions of meat left (I'm pretty sure) and/or I might have some rather rare things kicking around in my inventory. I've got a whole bunch of stuff, including familiars that are hatchlings (unused
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux (Score:4, Insightful)
Did you actually just post to rant how little you care of the distro, because you turned your back on gaming after a single company betrayed you 15 years ago?
Re: (Score:2)
So, without interest in gaming, you'd be testing a Linux distro that is focused on gaming... why?
That's like buying a 2-door sports car and being disappointed that you can't haul a yard of gravel in it.
Re: (Score:2)
Because he's not quite dumb enough to think that "focused on" == "only usable for"?
Re: (Score:2)
Wasteland 2 is a pretty good game. It's not really a Fallout game, since the feel is slightly different, and it doesn't share things the SPECIAL system. But it is an isometric post-apocalyptic RPG, and well worth playing. Especially if you already happen to own it.
Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux (Score:5, Insightful)
Thanks for keeping us posted on what you're not interested in.
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't been following the desktop development, but NVIDIA has finally been stepping up with their Tegra 210(TX1) development. ARMV8 is awesome. Considerable progress has been made with mainline integration. For the longest time they were stuck on kernel 3.10. I'm glad they finally got it. Once they get the xhci driver merged I think they will be golden, but they have an nasty pinmux in the way complicating things.
Too bad steam for Linux will probably never work on ARMv8.
Re: (Score:1)
I think it's a fair point. nvidia can do all they want to improve graphics performance, but that's nowhere near enough to warrant a whole new distro, with all that entails. Best case, nvidia will be saddled with keeping their project up to date with non-graphics-related advances from other distros. What's more likely (assuming this turns out to be a non-starter) is that the graphics part will be worked on for a few months and then the entire project will be quietly shelved.
nvidia should just stick to what t
Re: (Score:2)
The 1990s called, and want your understanding of modern GPU architecture back. Yes. NVIDIA makes Graphics cards which do things like display an image on a monitor. Those cards also also a a whole lot more these days. For example, with CUDA [nvidia.com] one can leverage the GPU(s) for everything from Bitcoin Mining to Facial Recognition.
Re: (Score:2)
Would I be interested in nvidia's version of Linux?
No.
Wouldn't that depend on what it is? Seems a pretty silly move to dismiss something without even knowing anything about it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe not running as such, but there is a fair chance it may lead to better drivers for nvidia hardware.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Interested in Nvidia's version of Linux (Score:5, Funny)
If it's good enough for the US Senate, then it's good enough for anybody.
Re: (Score:2)
Wouldn't that depend on what it is? Seems a pretty silly move to dismiss something without even knowing anything about it.
Given that it is (if I understand TFA correctly) supposed to be Steam-friendly, and be supported by nVidia, there are a couple of assumptions that can be made:
- It will be based on Ubuntu, with gratuitous privilege escalations and more solid security measures that takes a little user understanding all turned off.
- It will rely heavily on WINE and running 32-bit Windows software in an emulator-like environment.
- It will not have LTS. You won't be able to install it on older hardware, and future upgrades mi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You know windows has a command line and powershell, OSX has terminal as well.
As a windows admin I really don't want to lose one of my most useful tools.
Re: (Score:2)
You know windows has a command line and powershell,
No, he likely doesn't know it--because with Windows, there is never any need for 99.99% of people to ever use it.
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing is more sad than the ignorant proudly proclaiming their ignorance and their dedication to holding on to it :-( That is completely untrue. There is often a need, but since the people don't even know it is an option that need goes unfulfilled. For example, if you wanted to remove the Windows 10 related Updates you need to get a tool and run it from the CLI (realistically speaking, as it wo
Re: (Score:2)
Don't worry. A week after it's released, there will be 20 forks of it with bitter squabbling over which is best.
It's a hoax (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Even better [phoronix.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Would I be interested in nvidia's version of Linux (Score:3)
No, id quite like a steambox though
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
after we had the HTTPS garbage shoved down our throats.
Perhaps it needs fixes, but HTTPS is a good news, since the trend is about malware injection in HTTP streams
Re: (Score:2)
I'm a verizon wireless user one of the millions that were subject to a tracking code injected into all of our outgoing http traffic.
They let you opt out of that part of traffic fkery now but thats just one thing https prevents.
Re: Mobile is broken now... (Score:1)
Depends on the Licensing (Score:4, Insightful)
If they'll contribute upstream and make whatever they're doing available to people like SteamOS, Debian, and RedHat, I'm absolutely in favor of this!
Hardware vendors should contribute code liberally to the linux kernel source. If all they're doing is a custom debian variant that they can control package versions on to make their drivers look better than they are, then I'll pass.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Specific and Custom Linux (Score:3)
If something is coded to be optimised for specific hardware - good on them.
So long as all code, components, drivers etc remain fully open - and are available to the wider linux community I say go for it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If your system uses DKMS, then all of that is handled transparently during the upgrade process, and doesn't introduce any extra reboots.
That said, I stopped buying NVidia products once the open source AMD driver became usable for desktop workloads. Now I buy only AMD video cards.
Re: (Score:1)
This is a clear case of cutting your nose off to spite your face. Not only do you now have underperforming video hardware, you have underperforming drivers to go with it.
Re: (Score:2)
Where as I am the opposite. I simply don't care if the source is closed or not. I care if it works. And currently I would never buy an AMD card to run on Linux until their drivers improve dramatically. Linux is why I don't use AMD.
Re: (Score:2)
What's your definition of better? The AMD open source drivers are much more stable than the nVidia closed source drivers. They're slower and have fewer features, but they're more stable, in my experience.
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't had any stability issues on any of my machines running nVidia cards and I am running a variety of hardware from an optimus laptop to an SLI rig and haven't had a single crash in years.
Re: (Score:2)
You must be from the future. Tell us more about the coming decades.
Re: (Score:1)
1) The driver can be upgraded with X11 running.
2) You can reload the driver without rebooting.
Re:Specific and Custom Linux (Score:4, Interesting)
You do understand, don't you, that nVidia has never provided OSS drivers for Linux? Their Linux drivers are nothing more than binary blobs that you can only install by booting into a CLI, then rebooting after the installation is complete.
About 10 or 12 years ago I had a Dell laptop that had Nvidia graphics. I was running Gentoo Linux. I reported some bug with the Nvidia driver. Within hours late Saturday, early Sunday I got a reply from Nvidia with a patch to the MM kernel that fixed the problem. The bug was not in the Nvidia driver but was caused by recent change in the MM kernel. I was very impressed. In this case they were acting like an FOSS shop not a proprietary software shop.
I grant you the closed portions of the Nvidia drivers can be a royal pain in the neck, especially when combined with the closed Flash player. There were times when it was maddening but that was partly driven by an obsession by some Gentoo devs to be overly zealous with purging versions of the Nvidia driver from the portage system. Things have been mostly stable for a good number of years now.
I appreciate the Linux support Nvidia does provide. For example, I've been using VDPAU which does video decoding on the graphics card which let me play blu-rays on a machine with a not so powerful CPU. Also, I've never had to reboot in order to update the Nvidia driver. I do have to rmmod the old driver after I stop X but that's no biggie. YMMVG
I am interested in seeing the Nvidia distro if they release one but I'm not holding my breath.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
A few months later AMD came out with some com
Re:Specific and Custom Linux (Score:4, Insightful)
You've been responsible for 100,000 desktop system purchases? Note: That is not doubt, I've seen you post before and have absolutely no reason to doubt you, but it is me trying to make sure I understand completely.
I thought that I might hold some sort of record in that area. I do not. If I had to guess, I'd say that I'm in the 2 to 3k region. However, it was either my company or a purchase that was gifted. For example, I keep a local elementary school's system stocked - I adopted them when I retired to the area. I refresh every couple of years and let them keep the old ones. (They've only got 56 students, a small staff, and a single IT staff.)
100,000? I am duly impressed. I've bought servers, routers, load balancing equipment, HVAC gear, switches and hubs and even hardware firewalls. I've filled racks, I've filled entire server rooms, and even purchased giant disk arrays. Hell, I've even helped run fiber but mostly did the chasing. I've done a couple of splices but that's really not something I'm going to say I know how to do - I was aided in doing so.
Oddly, I don't really use any Apple products but I guess I can probably still say that I have *personally* purchased more iDevices than anyone here, with the caveat that it was with my own money. (The school's rather fond of Apple gear and I understand why and agree with their choices. If you're unfamiliar with it, Apple actually gives a pretty good discount for school purchases.)
But, back to the point... So that I'm sure I understand correctly, you mean 100,000 desktops have been purchased at your discretion? Remind me to *not* invest in a company that has pissed you off. Ripple effects on that kind of purchase power are immense. People like you need to fill out some good, thorough, surveys so that someone can crunch that data. InfoWorld and eWeek used to have some survey results and they used to make sure I got their whitepapers. I haven't seen anything like that in years. Years and years.
Which leads to my real question... So... (This is me buttering you up.) Umm... You being all-powerful, master and commander, and knowing of all things - both good and evil... I don't suppose you know what happened to those whitepapers that said what the industry leaders where buying and why? Specifically for end-user gear would be my desire. It's time to prepare to refresh the school soon. I'll do it over this coming summer and I've not been paying enough attention. I've been leaning towards whatever iDevice gets recommended to me by the IT guy but I'm open to suggestions and able to greatly influence what he's interested in. He's not chained to Apple but Apple's the district's standard - sort of. They hook kids up with laptops in middle school. This is the elementary school. We do what we want. (And the district doesn't mind, they love that I help the kids out.)
So, got any good links where I can find the latest opinions on enterprise grade from actual people in the trenches and a history of making purchases? I have, indeed, searched Google a bunch of times. I've not really found anything good and trustworthy. Half the papers are vendor "sponsored" crap and the other half are flawed by asking stupid questions to stupid people. At least those are what I've found.
Hmm... How else can I appeal to your good, kind, soul? Oh! Ha! It's for the children. It really is, think of the children. Better, think of the poor single IT staffer (just one - and he's not always able to be on-site) and the work he'll have to go through. I've considered an AskSlashdot but, I gotta be honest here, I've *seen* the results to those. If it matters, I still have a CDW account and they were still pretty unbiased/good the last time I went through them. If it's not Apple, I'll almost certainly go through them again but I've actually considered NewEgg.
Sorry for the novella but I figured I'd ask - seeing as you do appear to be a preeminent expert on the subject. (Not sarcasm. You don't get to those kind of numbers without knowing your shit.) Hell, that last part isn't even meant to butter you up. ;-) If you've got any direction - I'd love to know. I'd go so far as to tell the kids that they can "thank Mr. Bloodhawk" but I think that the moniker might not go over well.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now that I think about it, that kind of makes sense seeing as you're dealing with that large a number. I'm just gonna get 'em the latest iDevice. They've got Chromebooks now. But, the iDevices have good support for schools and they're what the district uses. They've also held up *very* well in the past - kids can find creative ways to abuse them. So, I guess I'm just gonna do that *unless* IT has a specific recommendation.
100k is quite a few by my count. Then again, I've seen people who have more "seats" th
Re: (Score:2)
I edited my post and ended up forgetting to put my expression of gratitude back in. It made me think of a slightly different route which I may try. I might have him pick a few models of things that he likes (give him permission to make some orders with my name at CDW) and let him pick. I am able to trust him. So, I'll probably do that - actually. I'm sure he'll thank you. That's about the closest I can get to what you're suggesting and what does make the most sense. We used to buy a few, test them, and then
Re: (Score:2)
I would agree, as a general rule. I'd even extend it to other areas of your life, as a general rule. You're probably right - but there are times when I just can't pretend to respect the person I'm communicating with. So yeah, you're probably right but there are times when I've been unable to do so - they're rare times but they do happen from time to time. There have even been times when I, or one of my employees, has fired a customer (so to speak) though I guess those were done in fairly respectable fashion
Re: (Score:2)
As to the other numbnut A/C coward that responded saying I went to an inferior product, grow the fuck up and do your research, back in mid 2000 there was v
Re: (Score:1)
You do understand, don't you, that nVidia has never provided OSS drivers for Linux? Their Linux drivers are nothing more than binary blobs that you can only install by booting into a CLI, then rebooting after the installation is complete. And, you have to do the exact same thing each and every time your kernel is updated. Yes, Fedora uses a simpler system, akmod-nvidia, but that's just a repackaging of the binary blob for those of us who don't want to reboot twice every time there's a new kernel.
All I ever have needed to do is log into a console, kill the xserver, run the installer and restart the xserver. If you need to reboot to install modules for a running kernel you may be doing it wrong. I've been running debian with nvidia drivers for hardware acceleration because I like my compiz eye-candy .
I have done the same with a laptop gentoo install.
Re: (Score:2)
There is plenty of stuff that still runs when X isn't running, even if you don't have your own custom software running (e.g. chron jobs, etc. or something infinitley more complex). Suppose a system is also a gateway. Can you really not see that there is a big difference between restarting X and rebooting a gateway?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Many, many years ago when that was the appropriate course of action I did that. It worked fine for me, but then I actually knew what I was doing. Again, it has been more than five years since it was normal to have to do that.
Re: (Score:2)
I've been using the .run installers for a couple years. Works great for me. Takes about 2 minutes, which is plenty fast enough for something I might need to do every other month or so.
Re: (Score:2)
Who told you that installing nvidia drivers on Linux requires a reboot? Some random Windows user? Or did you make that up yourself just now?
Re: (Score:2)
Custom distro (Score:5, Insightful)
So we have a custom Intel distro to have better Intel support and a custom Nvidia distro to have a better Nvidia support.
What about if I have a system with Intel CPU and Nvidia GPU and I want to get better support for both?
Re: (Score:2)
LordWabbit Ducks and runs for cover
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just a screenshot? (Score:3)
With just that screenshot to go on, my first guess is a GUI-based driver installer, not a full blown distribution.
Hoax (Score:5, Informative)
It's a hoax. I modded it down in Firehose and am pissed it made the front page. That screenshot is from some page on NVIDIA's site, with an edited header. This is a non-story, and it should be blatantly obvious by now they have no interest in Linux interop.
I wouldn't say that (Score:2)
Will they supply source code for the drivers? (Score:2, Insightful)
Everyone's assuming this is for gaming (Score:1)
No, this is probably for CUDA work.
In house testing version. So what. (Score:4, Insightful)
I tend to think it's just made up. But even if it isn't then it is more than likely their own in house beta testing version.
Just be grateful it's not FreeBSD which they they could totally embrace and not have to release any code for.
But everyone needs to get it through their heads that the true future of gaming is not OS bound. The need to instead concentrate on visualized GPU infrastructure. Games will run in VM's in a client game OS. More than likely nVidia wants it's own so it's not dependent on Steam as well as allowing them to have their own store and builtin DRM. They are just playing with their own platform.
Microkernel VM, Multiple windows version, SteamOS. nVidia OS, and multiple Linux systems and entire visualized applets.
On an aside I am actually more surprised that VMWare hasn't tried to team up with AMD. AMD could create specialized CPU extensions that speed up Virtualization and before you know it VMWare could supplant Microsoft as the default software loaded on all systems by default. Microsoft might not be happy with $10-30 per computer but I think VMWare would jump at the billion dollar increase in revenue and increased name recognition.
Re: (Score:1)
Steam as well as allowing them to have their own store and builtin DRM. They are just playing with their own platform.
The companies are idiots if they think I want my games on tens of platforms.
(I'm ok with the occasional Origin/Uplay bundle but I totally wouldn't get the game there if I could have it for the same price on Steam.)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Just be grateful it's not FreeBSD which they they could totally embrace and not have to release any code for.
Why would I be grateful?
If they did this for FreeBSD and kept all the code private and too themselves, how am I any worse off than I am right now? What did I lose?
Whats that? I didn't lose anything because I never had that new code they wrote for FreeBSD?
What else? You're just an ignorant GPL fanboy lying about code being 'closed' and spreading FUD? Yea, I saw that already.
Games will run in VM's in a client game OS.
You want some drivers for your VMs so you can have drivers for your OS and the VM it runs in?
More virtualization IS NOT THE SOLUTION
Re: (Score:2)
Well, to start with, there is a temporary suspension on your use of the words to, two, and too :-)
Re: (Score:2)
For system wide stuff it is normal, and for user specific over-rides they go in the user directory, which is sound security, makes perfect sense, and oh yeah ... you sound like an idiot claiming there is somethi
awesome idea! (Score:1)
lets further splinter a platform with far too many forks and distros and reinvented wheels and fads of the week and abandoned projects and etc etc etc
no wonder the year of linux on the desktop keeps getting postponed.
Hell No (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There's no struggle - the drivers work fine. Far better then the opensource alternative too.
Re: (Score:1)
Driver Support (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah... maybe Nvidia should learn to release stable drivers on Windows before going on a Linux adventure.
"Nvidia display driver has stopped responding---" *crash*
Re: (Score:2)
Even though I keep seeing posts from people claiming the nVidia's linux driver is unstable etc etc, I've always personally found it to be rock solid, and thats been always true across many different hardware platforms/distros.
The only thing I've ever had problems with is nouveau. And those problems are large and frequent.
Annoyingly, all distros now seem to install nouveau just because its open, yet nouveau is still very unstable and far less functional than nVidias driver. Many distros also stupidly make i
New Shield varrient incomming? (Score:2)
fake (Score:1)
It's fake, find the differences:
http://i.imgur.com/59VWO7a.jpg
https://contests.nvidia.com/share-every-win-need-for-speed
Re: (Score:1)
Someone please mod this up.
When I saw this story on phoronix yesterday, my first thought was "Well, this is phoronix, the rumor mill of linux/foss news; it's to be expected". Michael has been known for posting any unsubstantiated rumor du jour that is circulating the internet at the moment in a blatant click grab.
So I concur -- this is fake until Nvidia provides download URLs for ISOs and source.
Thanks (Score:1)
People who are really serious about software... (Score:2)
People who are really serious about software should make their own hardware.
Somehow I thought this quote was from Jobs during his first time at Apple Computer inc.? wow. I haven't had a Mac since 2005 and the distortion field is still strong... (source [brainyquote.com])
More on point, it seems that not only it is true that hardware+OS+applications are a good way to make money, the control over more of these 3 is a good insurance policy against the other vendors closing down app stores or their hardware on you.
I certainly don
AMD (Score:2)