Report: Red Hat Buying DevOps Startup Ansible (venturebeat.com) 78
An anonymous reader writes: According to VentureBeat Red Hat Inc is about to buy the company behind the automation and orchestration software Ansible. The move is seen as a good acquisition, since Ansible, other than being almost universally expanding, is also used by Red Hat's own cloud and system platforms. It could probably use some strong backing for the extra services it wishes to offer. The question remains whether this will have consequences in the future direction of the Python-based, open source platform itself (on GitHub). It's one of the most trivial to implement (compared to cfengine, ever-changing puppet or Chef) yet very powerful, and Red Hat may want to optimize it for their own purposes.
Update: 10/16 15:39 GMT by S : Red Hat has confirmed the acquisition and explained their reasons for doing so.
Re: (Score:1)
Could not agree more. Using Red Hat Linux is becoming more and more professional misconduct.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Red Hat is the twenty-first century incarnation of Microsoft of the twentieth century.
Ahh; yes. Because RedHat has completely crushed Ubuntu.
No. RedHat is controlling the future of Linux because they actually put up the people who write the successful stuff. If you don't like systemd then you can use Slackware. The thing is, though, that in real life Slackware, great though it is, has limited influence on the future of Linux because limited amounts of new useful software is generated there.
As long as RedHat is largely working with GPL software they will never be able to be anything like
Re: (Score:1)
The worst threat to freedom are happy (and dumb) slaves. You qualify.
Re: (Score:1)
The worst threat to humanity is sheer stupidity. You qualify.
Re: (Score:2)
Where I work, RHEL is one of the two Linux distributions which are approved to connect to the network. The other is CentOS if the system owner is OK with no support from central IT.
We *may* get a third option eventually.
Re: (Score:1)
They don't care, but they should. Letting you run their operations as if it's a little alchemy lab is bad for the long-term health of the business, and shows that you are far from a professional "*nix guy."
Building an operating footprint that includes a mish-mash of various platforms is going to cause you problems. Injecting your political preferences into your choice of operating system further underscores your complete lack of ability.
Re: (Score:1)
Hmm... Not sure if serious?
I ran, successfully even, a business for a long time before I sold it. I didn't give the dev team tools to use nor did I give the IT staff tools to use. They told me the tools they needed and that's what they got. They know better than I, that's why I hired them. Amazingly enough, it worked out fine.
Re: (Score:3)
The difference here is that you wanted to have a successful business, and did. The ones criticizing you have big egos and small actual business skills. They think that "running a business" means imposing your personal preferences on the people that work for you, just like a business was a little authoritarian state where everything must be controlled from the top. That is a recipe for failure, even if it takes a long time to manifest.
Re: (Score:1)
I have no idea how those companies get anything done nor how they manage to succeed. If I hired you then that's because you can do something I can not. Tell me what you need, tell me to get out of the way, and do what needs to be done. I don't know what IDE you want. I don't know what OS you prefer. I don't care - even if it's expensive.
Tell me what you need and I'll do my absolute best to make sure it's in the budget (it WILL be in there) and we will get the job done and have a happy client and a great fin
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, _those_. The people that think security can be created by bureaucratic process. These are really the worst. I am constantly amazed how many people need to be told that "compliance" does not ensure security at all and vice versa. It is the same mind-set that thinks forbidding something makes it vanish.
Re: (Score:3)
Using Red Hat Linux is becoming more and more professional misconduct.
The last time I applied for a Linux job, the Red Hat Linux GUI was a requirement for remote command line work. I was unable to convince the recruiter that not knowing the GUI wasn't a disadvantage, as opening a terminal window was all I needed for the job. In fact, I prefer using a minimalist window manager on Linux. The recruiter hanged up on me.
Re: (Score:2)
The level of stupidity in that is staggering. I do remote management, testing, development etc. all the time (currently Linux and Solaris) and the only thing (with very rare exceptions) I use is ssh without X-forwarding. As to window-manager, I mostly need it to arrange xterms (and one web-browser window). Fvwm with its pager is perfect for that and I have not had to adjust anything in about 10 years.
This also shows one fundamental problem the whole IT industry has today: Recruiters are utterly clueless. Th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
that Red Hat is controlling or attempting to control the direction of Linux subtly and not so subtly. Where Red Hat goes, so goes Linux in many ways.
Not exactly seeing folks cast off VMWare for RHEV [redhat.com] - and they've had that for awhile now. ;)
It'll be interesting to see what they do with Ansible; I just hope they don't bork it up. I use Puppet mostly everywhere I've been (with one exception that had Chef, but I live in PDX so your mileage may vary), but Ansible does get used here and there, and seems pretty solid.
Maybe it'll be an impetus for Puppetlabs to step up its game (like that C-compiled variant they've been working on that runs hella faster, for st
Re: (Score:2)
and...what do you use to push out all the Docker images to all the machines?
https://docs.ansible.com/ansib... [ansible.com]
Re:Seems to me (Score:5, Insightful)
FWIW, I've worked for Red Hat for the last year and a half as part of the Inktank Acquistion (IE working on Ceph). So far, Red Hat has been pretty reasonable. There are more RH specific initiatives around Ceph now, and a more of our QA happens on CentOS/RHEL, but the core development process has remained largely the same. In some ways, things are better as Red Hat has encouraged that some of the projects our business folks previously did not want to open source (our Web based monitoring UI) be made community projects. Like any big company there are a lot of different people with a lot of different agendas, but honestly for a company of Red Hat's size I'm fairly happy with how things have gone. You hear about acquisitions being total nightmares for everyone involved. While there have been challenges, at least in my mind, Red Hat is as good of an open source steward as we could have hoped for. I'd much rather see Ansible in Red Hat's hands than many other companies out there today.
Re: (Score:1)
As an Ansible fan and user, that is comforting to hear. Also gives me some hope they'll open source Tower.
Re: (Score:1)
Red Hat open sources everything.
period, point blank.
full stop.
end of story.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
With OpenStack gaining momentum, RHEV is nice, but with libvirt, a CM, PXE booting and provisioning, it isn't really needed to get compute nodes up.
The one thing about Ansible which is nice is the fact that it doesn't require a client installed. Just throw a SSH key onto the client, and go from there. However, Puppet has more flexibility in the fact that you can run with "puppet master" servers and push out manifests, or masterless and have clients pull manifests from something like a local github install
Re: (Score:2)
Not exactly seeing folks cast off VMWare for RHEV [redhat.com] - and they've had that for awhile now. ;)
That's likely to change, as with newer versions of ESXi can no longer be managed without a license for VCenter. Not very practically, anyway. Sure, companies with an investment in VMWare are unlikely to jump ship, but there will be more engineers and independent consultants using other tools, and those are the tools they will start recommending for businesses looking to invest in VM.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not really sure. I say this because I've seen what happens when this happens. I watched as a consultant said something like 'OMG let's replace Puppet with Salt!' just because he hated Ruby, loved Python, and happened to use Salt on his personal dev machines. Note that he did all this over my objections.
Long story short, the consultant is long gone. The company he did that to is now desperately looking for someone who knows how to use Salt in a production environment (because the guy they trained to admi
Re: Seems to me (Score:5, Insightful)
Somebody could convince me with data to the contrary but as far as I can tell Redhat puts the most money into Linux and pays the most developers to work on Linux, therefore the most work is coming out of Red Hat, therefore Redhat work gets adopted at a proportionally higher level. There doesn't need to be any conspiracy - Redhat has the money because they're popular because people like the work they do. It's a totally competitive marketplace - their dominance in enterprise is because their stuff works and is of good quality, not because of any sort of monopolistic bundling agreements - in a free market we cheer the winners!
That said, this is an area in which Redhat has been sorely lacking. If a competitor had come along with a tightly-integrated package manager and DevOps system that would couple with a network deployment system for effective cloud provisioning, Redhat would face some very fast and very intense competition to stay relevant. Fortunately they seem to realize this (finally). They could still blow it by not getting the necessary hooks all the way down into rpm, so their success is not guaranteed.
Now that PuppetLabs has destroyed everything by making puppet 4 incompatible with puppet 3, I'll take a look at ansible.
Re: (Score:2)
Now that PuppetLabs has destroyed everything by making puppet 4 incompatible with puppet 3, I'll take a look at ansible.
Most of that "incompatibility"? It's not like it's that hard to upgrade [puppetlabs.com]. To be honest, for most of it? If (for instance) you haven't quoted your strings all this time (and if you haven't kept your booleans non-quoted), then it's more your fault than theirs; clean your shiz up.
(...and seriously, they even include future parser in the later 3.x versions to check for all that shit beforehand, so it's not like nobody got warned for something like 6-9 months in advance...)
Re: (Score:3)
Not only that, but RH is quite willing to work with their apparent competitors, like Debian, for the benefit of everyone. If there's any company that understands that a rising tide lifts all boats, it's RH.
Re: (Score:1)
but Red Hat seems to have a disproportionate level of control over the direction of Linux, kernel itself aside.
It's like they have dumped a lot of resources and money on Linux development and now they seek to make a profit of it HOW THEY DARE!
Rewrite (Score:1)
RH buying an Ansible? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I admit I'm torn. On the one hand, it's cool that a term coined by Ursula K. LeGuin has gained such broad acceptance that it can even appear in a company or product name. On the other, it's bizarre that a company would use it for something that bears no resemblance to what it means. (Unless I'm missing something.)
Re: (Score:2)
Card (as well as several other writers) borrowed the name from LeGuin.
The word ansible was coined by Ursula K. Le Guin in her 1966 novel Rocannon's World.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
I think I first read Rocannon's World around '73 or so; Ender's Game wasn't even published till '85. And in Ender's Game, the word is described as being "dredged...out of an old book somewhere." In other words, it was borrowed from LeGuin both in-universe and out-!
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, I see I forgot to add something about "get off my lawn" and maybe a mention of "whippersnappers". You kids are familiar with that word, aren't you? :D
Re: (Score:2)
It's probably the easiest way to ensure the project gets proper funding. They get the talent, but more importantly, they ensure the talent gets paid, so the talent doesn't wander off and do other things to keep food on the table.
I wonder if there will be JON integration (Score:2)
This has come at a time when our company is evaluating puppet and ansible for deployment of Jboss EAP and applications. I see this as another plus on the "ansible" side, for several reasons. Firstly it will be a lot easier getting support with possible JBoss deployment issues, there will be one port of call. Secondly the large company backing is a plus. And finally there is a very strong possibility of future integration.
I wonder if it will be integrated int Jboss Operations Network. It looks a lot slicker
Interesting buy (Score:2)
Just hope they bring more enterprise to it (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
picking a winner (Score:2)
This pretty much cements the trend - Ansible has been increasingly popular over the last couple of years: http://www.google.com/trends/e... [google.com]
Wonder if they'll soon find a good way to integrate it with Spacewalk (Satellite).
Also, will Canonical grab SaltStack now? :)
Death to Katello? (Score:1)