Linux 3.11-rc7 Release Celebrates 22 Years of Linux 151
An anonymous reader writes "It was on this day 22 years ago when Linus Torvalds humbly announced Linux and today he played on that in announcing the Linux 3.11-rc7 kernel release. The final Linux 3.11 kernel release is expected in about one week."
The year of the linux desktop (Score:2, Funny)
This year is the year!
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
3.11? How many years after Microsoft reached that milestone!
And Linux 2015 doesn't seem like it'll be timely.
Re: (Score:1)
3.11? How many years after Microsoft reached that milestone!
Microsoft never did reach that milestone although they did get to 3.1.1 (Windows for Workgroups) before they dumped it for a VMS wannabe. :)
Re: (Score:2)
Final WfW was Windows 3.11 [wikipedia.org]. Probably they thought that 3.1.1 would confuse people. Ironically, you are now confused.
Re: (Score:2)
No, it's just that version numbers in the PC world were considered decimal numbers,
Who told you that? PC software was frequently released with traditional major-minor-tiny version numbering.
Re: (Score:3)
and still most people would prefer windows 3.11 to linux.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The year Linux takes over the desktop is the year that they will stop selling desktops, which will be next year.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's been "The Year of the Linux Desktop" for me since February 1998.
What's your excuse?
--
BMO
Whoah whoah (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Doesn't take much when you compare Linus to Steve Jobs or Steve Ballmer, but he's always been a bit more down to earth than the rest of them.
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Compared to the way Jobs and Ballmer treat customers I much prefer Linus, even if he is a bit rude sometimes.
Re:Whoah whoah (Score:5, Funny)
He's just terse. Want him a bit more verbose, shoot a few "-v" his way.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Gah, you geeks can't be satisfied, can you? First you complain about Linux being beta forever, now you complain that Linus Finnishes it...
Re: (Score:2)
Awesome. My new thing I learned for today is "f***ing motherf***er" in Finnish! perkeleen vittupää!
I'm going to memorize that for a while and then take a long nap, because my day has peaked before 12AM.
Re:Whoah whoah (Score:4, Funny)
He's just terse. Want him a bit more verbose, shoot a few "-v" his way.
Well, the Finnish equivalent of the F word would be the V word...
Re: (Score:3)
Vittu?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought the Finnish F-word was the P word. Perkele.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op68Gh3BVEc [youtube.com]
--
BMO
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Perkele's harder to translate into English, being the name of an pagan god. So you'd probably want it to be something that offends Church of England sensibilities through blasphemy. I can't think of anything apart from "Hell!" that fits that description at the moment, but that's not really any good as the Finns have "Helvetti" for precisely that meaning. I'm not sure how much the Finns distinguish "perkele" from "saatana" = "satan". It's worth asking a Finn.
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck ~= vittu, literally cunt, from Swedish fitta
This ignores the versatility of the word "fuck" in English, which can be a verb, noun, adjective, and adverb all at the same time in the same sentence.
Perkele, I am told, is just as versatile.
--
BMO
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck ~= vittu, literally cunt, from Swedish fitta
This ignores the versatility of the word "fuck" in English, which can be a verb, noun, adjective, and adverb all at the same time in the same sentence.
Perkele, I am told, is just as versatile.
vittuilla -- to fuck with someone
vituttaa -- to feel fucked up (originally meaning to crave for a fuck)
vittumainen -- a negative adjective, literally cunt-like
I can't think of verbifying perkele in any way. It's stronger than vittu, but far less versatile verbally.
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you for edifying me.
--
BMO
Re:Whoah whoah (Score:4, Interesting)
Nothing wrong with direct, blunt communication.. It's refreshing compared with the passive aggressive kittycat games of typical government and corporate interaction. I think his blunt style is part of what keeps the kernel dev team clear of that passive aggression. It keeps the emos who can't handle blunt truth away.
Nvidia got what they deserved, and it is clear to all other manufacturers what the kernel team thinks of closed drivers making debugging a royal pain.
Re:Whoah whoah (Score:4, Insightful)
Nothing wrong except that it may keep new contributors away. There's no fun in contributing to a project where the boss is an asshole.
Re:Whoah whoah (Score:4, Insightful)
Except that it doesn't. It keeps thin skinned people away, who otherwise create needless drama.
Re: (Score:2)
That might very well be the case. All I can say is that the shortage of new contributors is a recurring topic. I don't know exactly why new people are more interested in contributing to other projects, but I have my theories.
Re:Whoah whoah (Score:5, Interesting)
some possibilities:
1. kernel programming isn't something most people can do. not just linux, but in general.
2. the project is mostly stable at this point. 90% of the work is drivers anyway, and those are submitted by hw manufacturers for the most part.
It's not like he's constantly flying off the handle as claimed.. It happens occasionally, and for good reason. Broken code from senior people and/or closed drivers make a ton of extra work for the rest of them, so he's justified. Look at what happened to android. If he yields to political correctness, he then has to clean up the mess left behind by people who need a grilling they now won't receive. Choosing between not hurting feelings and/or keeping these people away, and getting the job done right isn't hard.
Re: (Score:1)
"Damn the P.C.. Four Tweets ahead! Let the Fecal Matter hit the Rotary Impeller and where's my Clue Gun?"
Re: (Score:2)
Choosing between not hurting feelings and/or keeping these people away, and getting the job done right isn't hard.
False dichotomy. You can get you point across without hurling chairs. It's called not being an asshole.
Re: (Score:2)
That's a good point.. If the PC crowd thinks their processes would yield better software, they should fork and create a development effort around their principles.. Lets see who does a better job in the long run.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't recommend you to work in Finland... :)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I have thicker skin that most people. You can say anything to me no matter how dirty or derogative.
Right. Which, no doubt, is why you're posting anonymously.
Re:Whoah whoah (Score:5, Informative)
would you prefer to be ignored, with all your work and the patchs never getting merged and you didn't even knew why?
That is the "correct and polite" way... but totally useless.
And no, being polite and slowly trying to explain the errors will not work, too much people around, any manager will get tired of repeating the same thing over and over, and so getting more rude as time goes by.
Please note that Linus is usually not rude for newbies, only for people that are around for sometime, specially for maintainers. Those should already know what is allowed or what is not and if maintainers, Linus already have some trust on then... if they fail that trust, Linus will be very direct.
If you work with other top kernel developers (check the *BSD) you will see the same problem, with ones being more rude than others (ie: Theo de Raadt)
If you are comparing with enterprise development, think again. Those can also be rude... but even if they are not, they are probably playing the ignore card, the faking/lying card or simple the "i can get you fired" card. And don't forget the "i'm the boss" card, where you don't even try to be a smartass and always do what you are being told.
Finally, even if that attitude might scare some developers, at least have manage to keep the linux development together, there is no forks, so it isn't that much a problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Nothing wrong with direct, blunt communication..
Fuck you.
Re: (Score:2)
Yup! Exactly!
Re:Whoah whoah (Score:5, Interesting)
I hate to counter a possible AC troll, but Linus has always followed the "do one thing and do it well" mantra. In a sense, we are likely better off that he didn't "look at the big picture" and lose focus on the core.
I believe the issue the AC brings up lies more with Linux desktop environments, rather than with Linus himself. If Linux had more or less standardized on a single desktop* for corporate use, we would likely see more Linux on the desktop today. But it didn't and the rest is history.
* I am not trying to imply there should be one and only one desktop for Linux. I am simply saying that to address the corporate desktop market, a standardized desktop** is more or less essential. Of course there are also special needs outside the corporate desktop, and this is where different desktop environments can exist and fill a particular niche.
** Win8 is a good example where MS changed the standard desktop environment and is being shunned by the corporate crowd as a result. It's just too different from what had become the "standard" since Win95.
Re: Whoah whoah (Score:2)
Desktop standardization has nothing to do with it, the problem was, and continues to be:
Application availability.
Application toolkit interoperability.
Inconsistent management of applications.
The purpose of a kernel is to manage the operating system, and the purpose of a operating system is to run applications. After 22 years they still don't get this, users don't fucking care about some abstract kernel!
It's just like a car... few people actually care about the engine, they just put gas in the fucker and expe
Meanwhile (Score:1, Offtopic)
Meanwhile Windows has gone from Windows 3.11 to 95, 98, __, 2K, XP, 2K3, _______, Windows 7 and finally Windows 8 and each and every time made huge progress!
Linux? Same old login prompt!
JK. At least my comment is better than the two first ones.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you pretending Android phones, Chromebooks, Tivo, Tom Tom and Kindle don't run Linux?
Re:Meanwhile (Score:4, Insightful)
99% of the people using those products would never care if you changed them from Linux to something else.
Provided all software is working and GUI remains the same? They would not care if you change NT kernel on their Windows desktops to this mystical 'something else', then. Majority of people using any product do not think much about kernel, and rightly so.
Re: (Score:2)
Not caring doesn't invalidate my statement.
Re: (Score:2)
Having been an actual ME user back in the day, I have to say it would have been an interesting choice between using
a) ME, which I knew how to use but could be depended on to crash all over the place, or
b) Linux, which I didn't know how to use at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Meanwhile Windows has gone from Windows 3.11 to 95, 98, __, 2K, XP, 2K3, _______, Windows 7 and finally Windows 8 and each and every time made huge progress!
Linux? Same old login prompt!
JK. At least my comment is better than the two first ones.
I think the picture will be slightly different if you only look at the NT kernel.
Comparing kernels with kernels and so on.
Re: (Score:2)
NT was a different OS that ran parallel to WFW3.11, 95, 98 and ME. It was only at XP that it merged w/ the rest of the OS.
Also, a lot of distros bypass the login prompt and go straight to the working DE.
Re: (Score:3)
Apple Macs was 32 bit since the start in 1984. The Motorola 68000 only used 24 bits for addressing though.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple had 32-bit computing. The issue was that all OSs up to System 9 did not support preemptive multitasking. That's what Copland was supposed to address, but never materialized. Ultimately, Apple had to throw in the towel on that one and acquire NEXT.
Looking back at it, since they were moving to a new OS, they could have also adapted SPARC and/or PA-RISC as platforms on which to support it. NEXTSTEP already existed on those 2 CPUs, so had Apple made Macs out of either of those 2, OS-X would have be
Re: (Score:2)
Linux? Same old login prompt!
Actually Unix from 1980 just called and would like it's FUD back.
Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DID IT IN SIX !! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Buy better hardware...
That doesn't always work. If you buy a better sound card, you will get worse linux drivers, as ALSA devs are busy supporting Intel HDA and Realtek ALC instead.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Concurred : I spent the last seven years on Debian, all upgrades went without a hitch, all my software needs being covered many times over.
Also, I have been working full time for over 3 years with an eee pc, which is close to unusable under Windows, and quite pleasant with linux.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
One example : user installs Debian, can't see the wifi networks. What did he do wrong?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Windows user can fix it himself by double-clicking a setup.exe stored on a CD-ROM or USB stick, provided by Broadcom or TP-Link or D-Link etc. ; the Debian user needs sysadmin skills , wired connection to the internet and knowledge about what a "firmware blob image" is.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:22 YEARS TO 3.11 !! WINDOWS DIDhtt IT IN SIX !! (Score:3)
Hey, at least they're making progress. 13 years ago Windows was up to 2000, now they've gone all the way down to 8. That's 1992 versions! At this rate they'll hit zero in just 19 days.
I'm a believer. (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Did you come to this conclusion before or after you saw her face?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Indeed, ovh.com has statistics on the systems installed on its dedicated servers :
Windows =~ 5 000
Linux =~ 60 000
Re: (Score:1)
So, pick up the ball and maintain it yourself. Or, help improve other video editors out there. Or maybe you aren't ready for the Linux desktop?
Re: (Score:2)
LOL, yeah, that is why Linux doesn't' exist on the desktop. I use it all the time at work for projects but it stopped being a personal desktop for me roughly 6-7 years ago... maybe longer, can't remember anymore. I stuck with OS/2 until 96-97 too so it isn't like I don't give alternatives a chance past their obvious primes. My first Linux installation was Slackware 2.4 and the last one I personally used was Ubuntu X.X. Luckily Apple took FreeBSD and made it very usable and so I have a MBP now. I have a
Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? (Score:4, Insightful)
And how much software for other os is there that is no longer maintained?
At least with the sourcecode you have the option of maintaining it yourself... If you choose not to take advantage of that option, then you are never any worse off than the alternative.
Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? (Score:4, Informative)
Anyway, these days we use Kdenlive for video editing.
Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? (Score:5, Informative)
You are sorely lacking in the history department of Linux Video Editors.
Kino was originally developed with only DV editing in mind. It grew to be pretty usefull, but around the mid 00's, the main developers (Charles Yates and Dan Dennedy) realised that the basic foundation of Kino would never accomodate anything besides a clip-oriented DV editor. They therefore wrote the MLT framework (http://www.mltframework.org/) that is a powerfull (open source) multimedia framework, which is used in TV productions, and is the basis of several open source video editors, most notable Kdenlive and OpenShot. (See list here: http://www.mltframework.org/bin/view/MLT/Projects).
Dan Dennedy decided to keep Kino "alive" as it is usefull to some people, but not do any further development on it.
Dan Dennedy still maintains MLT and have contributed to several of the MLT related projects. Kdenlive is a powerfull NLE video editor that can do most of, if not all, that the very expensive tools for other platforms do. In some cases way more. (And, yes, it runs under Gnome or other desktops, you just need the KDE libs)
It is unfortunate that people keep referencing Kino. No new development have been made on it for literally years, and e.g. Kdenlive are much, much more powerfull.
(On a side note, it is also unfortunate that so few people know of the massive amount of work that Dan Dennedy has invested in to Video editing on Linux. Besides Kino and MLT, he has been heavily involved in the Firewire/dv1394 drivers of the Linux kernels, and it is amazing how much he has contributed).
If you want to see Kdenlive related videos, search for kdenlive on youtube. Tons of people have made videos with Kdenlive.
Disclaimer: I have contributed code and translations to both Kino and Kdenlive. I belive I may even be listed as one of the authors of Kino (or at least was at some point).
Re:Is it ready for the desktop ? (Score:4, Insightful)
A lot of the times no longer maintained could stand for 'Project is stable enough'
Re: (Score:3)
Strongly disagree. Maintenance isn't just about fixing bugs - it's also about making sure the damn thing keeps running after the environment changes. Newer toolkits, libraries, heck various distro changes can result in an unmaintained project not even compiling anymore without changes, which may or may not be trivial. Maintenance ensures said project can survive while everything changes.
In Windows, maintenance isn't so importa
Where is the Workgroups support (Score:4, Funny)
I think its about time that Linux was adapted for Workgroups. How anyone could justify releasing version 3.11 without them this late in the game is something I just cannot fathom.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
long done deal. just set "workgroup = workgroup" in your smb.conf and restart samba
Re: (Score:3)
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/13/07/15/1530233/linux-311-officially-named-linux-for-workgroups
See with your own eyes:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Makefile
Humility (Score:5, Funny)
It was 22 years ago today that Linus Torvalds last humbly announced anything.
Linus doesn't humbly announce anything (Score:1)
Nor does he do anything else humbly. He's too busy trying to be the biggest asshole he can be to do anything humbly.
Re: (Score:2)
people who accomplish great things don't have to be humble.
you're just jealous, you can't start nor manage such a hugely successful project for decades
I guess the Linux team isn't superstitious. (Score:2)
Sometimes a version number is a version number and not an association of a long defunct product.
I'm confused (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
instead of going 3.09, 3.10, 3.11, the Linus chose to go 3.9, 3.10, 3.11
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your link to a pedantic article on "how to ask a question" was not help. At best, it was an immature attempt at condescension. You are angry. Someone needs to give you a hug.
Regardless, I did discover the source of the confusion. Not being a programmer I didn't realize that the decimal simply separated major and minor versions. Like all normal human beings would, I assumed it had some sort of correlation to fractions of real n
Re: (Score:2)
Linux will never reach year of the desktop! (Score:3)
Linux will never reach year of the desktop even with this kernel release coming up. In a lot of ways Linux right now in various distro's such as Ubuntu and variants like it kind of remind me of the Windows 3.x and 95 days. You might have decent driver support for most hardware but come time to upgrading the kernel more often then not you break the official closed source nvidia drivers along with your nice GUI boot screen that usually hides all the normal boot messages from the kernel as it's loaded up until you see your fancy login screen. Same goes with the god awful support of AMD video support in Linux both with official and open source drivers and more often then not your network and ow wi-fi settings might be hosed or you may not even have the WI-FI driver needed and then it's a mad dash off to the official Ubuntu forums for help.
And applications need to be improved too in some area's. There's really only one half assed decent CD/DVD/BR burning program and thats K3B that actually won't produce messed up unreadable discs. Wheras in Windows you have the excellent free CDBurnerXP or if you like bloatware "one does it all" package the commercial Nero Burning rom. Video players in Linux suck too when you don't have much choice been mplayer and it's front ends and VLC. Gnome Mplayer as a front-end example can't even jump to a specific point in hours, minutes, or seconds in a video if you want and won't allow you to save bookmarks.
VLC on the other hand DOES allow you to jump to a specific time, but it sure as hell can't save bookmarks at any point in a video until you use a workaround of saving a bookmark into a playlist file, and not too mention that when playing audio files VLC will absolutely ignore embedded artwork in say Ogg Vorbis and FLAC files and by default will try and download cover art that's garbage in quality or completly wrong.
When in comparison to windows xp/7/8 you have K-lite media codec pack and the great Media Player Classic HC (MPC-HC) that not only has more modern video renderers such as Haala and MadVR but can also use newer LAV audio/video decoders for much better picture and sound quality compared to VLC, and if you don't want to use LAV decoders you can use ffmpeg included with k-lite instead and STILL get better picture quality. Oh and also no problems playing DVD's either when even with restricted-extra's packages in Ubuntu and variants and some other stuff installed to play dvd's you still find the occasional DVD that will not play because of it's copy protection garbage.
Image viewers and editors aren't much better. Irfanview and Xnview are great to use but all you have with Ubuntu is the newer XnviewMP (Multi-Platform) which is really the only decent image viewer on Linux these day's that isn't retarded. For editors sure you have GIMP on Windows, Linux ETC but Adobe Photoshop still has a fair amount of features that GIMP doesn't have. Audio players in Ubuntu suffer too when the only decent audio player is Audacious but in comparison to Foobar2000 on windows which does so much freaking more it's like night and day.
Overall in a lot of ways windows has better apps in some areas or has more development in some area's towards audio and video quality in playback. It's just that for the most part a lot of people are dumbasses and don't take precautions of running ONLY Firefox as a browser with Adblock Plus, Noscript, Cookie Controller, Ghostery (or DoNotTrackMe if you prefer) and Socialfixer (to fix whats annoying as hell on facebook) and don't actually read each popup from an installer asking if you'd like to install "X toolbar" or "X program" and automatically default to YES until you click no or refuse to avoid getting malware and viruses and browser hijackers simply because people are too stupid to read and in a hurry to always click through every screen. That and people who still to this day launch attachments from emails.
Linux is no better either these days with some newer malware packages showing up and with all those so called wonderful Linux help