Casio Paying Microsoft To Use Linux 262
theodp writes "Will Tux be a rainmaker for Microsoft? GeekWire reports that Microsoft has struck a deal with Casio to provide Casio's customers with coverage for their use of Linux in Casio devices. The agreement, which calls for Microsoft to receive payments of an undisclosed amount, is an implicit acknowledgment of Microsoft's longstanding claims that Linux violates its patents, an assertion that members of the open-source community have long disputed."
A good sign (Score:5, Insightful)
i translates to:
we dont use linux because its free of cost but because we believe it does a better job in the areas not protected by microsoft patents than microsoft os and believe a little overpaying in these areas is good for our customers.
Re:A good sign (Score:4, Insightful)
Ha ha, good point.
Does not change the fact that Microsoft is running an arguably illegal protection racket.
Now that SCO's gone (Score:5, Insightful)
I see that Microsoft has stepped up and started doing their own Linux license shakedown.
I see a strong uptick in "$699 Linux License" trollage on this forum, except with "Microsoft" instead of "SCO" in the text.
Re:Jumping to conclusions (Score:5, Insightful)
Sounds exactly like extortion to me.
Among other things (Score:5, Insightful)
The article starts:
Microsoft Corp. and Casio Computer Co. Ltd. have entered into a broad, multiyear patent cross-licensing agreement that, among other things, will provide Casio’s customers with patent coverage for their use of Linux in certain Casio devices.
(emphasis mine). I would not mind betting the "other things" are actually the ones that were worth paying for, and that Microsoft slipped the "Linux patents" into the mix because Casio is using Linux. It costs Microsoft nothing but they get "precedent" with which to argue they hold valid patents affecting Linux.
Re:Shameful and anti-competitive (Score:3, Insightful)
In terms of technology companies, Microsoft have been pure evil since the 80's. Apple have been wanna-be evil (ie evil at heart but not big enough to flaunt it) since the 90's. Now that they have reached mega-corp status they have indeed revealed themselves to be every bit as evil as Microsoft.
Boycott them both.
Re:A good sign (Score:5, Insightful)
Because MS refuses to name any patent that is violated, but will only mumble that there are (may be) a few. They then demand money to make sure nothing bad (like attack of the lawyers) happens to you.
Unlike legitimate insurance, if anything were to "happen", it would be deliberate on MSs part.
How is it NOT like a protection racket?
Re:A good sign (Score:3, Insightful)
Notice how MS won't say exactly which patents, or what violations without an NDA? They tried the same stunt on Barnes & Noble re: their Nook e-book reader. Barnes & Noble told them to fsck off. Which they did, eventually. After all, if MS was so sure about their case, they would have no problem proclaiming everything right out in the open. By not allowing any possible recourse, they are limiting the possible damages they could collect (in the US at least) by the principle of estoppel.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)