9 Features We May See In Ubuntu 11.10 281
splitenz writes "Canonical's Ubuntu 11.04 'Natty Narwhal' may still be occupying much of the Linux world's attention, but at last week's Ubuntu Developer Summit in Budapest, the next version of the free and open source Linux distribution began to take form. A number of decisions were reportedly made about Ubuntu 11.10, or 'Oneiric Ocelot,' at the conference, while numerous other questions are still being debated. ... Here's a roundup of what's been reported so far."
Re:When is... (Score:4, Informative)
Unity passed my parents' test... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Unity passed my parents' test... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Killer App? (Score:5, Informative)
The release version is frozen in time, essentially. The only thing that a named release will get is security and some other important updates. As for stable, testing, and sid:
stable always points to the current named release (today squeeze, later something else). When the new release is released, if you are running stable, an apt-get dist-upgrade will pull down the new release.
New package versions are pushed into sid. Sid can be frustrating because you might update to a package with broken dependancies or other issues that will not install. Give it a few days and it'll probably be fixed.
After some period of time in Sid, those packages move to testing. Testing is where I run, as it is continually updated and I have not observed many instances of breakage. When its time for a release, testing goes through a freeze and then becomes stable. Or something like that.
If you want stability, run stable.
If you want cutting edge, run sid.
If you want a reasonable mix of both, run testing.
Re:Killer App? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Killer App? (Score:5, Informative)
From personal experience, for a normal user I would recommend Sid too, because you get the latest software, and breakages happen very rarely.