Canonical Designer Demos Ubuntu Context-Aware UI 237
Blacklaw writes "Canonical's Christian Giordano has posted details of what he believes could be the future of user interface design in Ubuntu — a system that detects physical context. Designed to be paired with a webcam or other sensor system, the concept is that the computer is able to detect where a user is in proximity to the display along with an idea of roughly what he or she might be doing. Using this information, the operating system — in this case, Ubuntu Linux — can automatically make changes to the screen layout. For example, when the system detects that the user has leaned back in his or her chair, the system automatically makes the currently playing video full-screen. Lean forward again, and the video returns to its previous windowed mode."
Why not link the source? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why does the summary not link the actual blog post at canonical.com [canonical.com] instead of some ad-encumbered summary?
Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
So now the computer starts looking at me? (Score:4, Insightful)
So now the computer starts looking at me, instead of just me looking at the computer?
Interesting. But sounds a bit scary too.
Consitancy (Score:4, Insightful)
And no, I don't want a video to full screen when I lean back or audio to mute when I switch app or whatever they think of next.
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Exactly what I was thinking. This seems like it would be just as bad as clippy. Computers aren't good at just "figuring out what you meant". That's why language syntax has always been so strict. They're good at doing EXACTLY what you say when you're specific and say it right. If I want my video full screen I'll Alt+Enter before I lean back in the chair . . .
Re:Consitancy (Score:4, Insightful)
Yeah, I can see it now. My eyes require larger print, pictures, etc. on the display I have. I can't quite make something out and lean forward: it gets smaller. To get it bigger I must lean back. And so on and so on. I think the Greeks had a story about something like this.
Re:So now the computer starts looking at me? (Score:5, Insightful)
As long as the options aren't hidden in obscure menus, or disabled because the users are considered idiots, then I think I like it.
In short: I like it if I can tweak it (and if I can disable it if necessary).
-- The options menu of my webcam extends to my drawer where I keep my duct tape to block the lens. Be warned, evil empire, I am armed with duct tape!
Re:what happens... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Hmm (Score:2, Insightful)
And based on Ubuntu's history of poor packaging when you try to remove this it will most likely try to claim that you need to remove your entire DE as well.
Re:Hmm (Score:4, Insightful)
Rule no. 1 of UI design: When in doubt make the interface stupid but predictable. Smart systems that guess wrong even 2% of the time are just frustrations.
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
I wanted something like this for quite a while, except my primary use cases are for preventing inactivity-related actions: 1) don't lock the screen if I'm still at the computer, regardless of the inactivity timeout; and 2) don't dim the screen if I'm looking at it. I'm probably reading and I like the brightness level just the way it is.
Re:Hmm (Score:3, Insightful)
The way we do things has evolved to a stable point. At this point I want improvements to that, not a new method entirely.
No doubt you've seen this in many-a-Slashdot signature, but it must be said again... “If I’d asked my customers what they wanted, they’d have said a faster horse” -Henry Ford
The problem isn't that innovation is bad, but rather that innovation is becoming a buzzword. That's not to say that current ideas can't be improved on and/or succeeded, but it does show that not every "innovation" is better.