Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Ubuntu Linux News Your Rights Online

Canonical Begins Tracking Ubuntu Installations 548

suraj.sun passes along this excerpt from Phoronix: "Just uploaded to the Ubuntu Lucid repository for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (and we imagine it will appear shortly in Maverick too for Ubuntu 10.10) is a new package called canonical-census, which marks its initial release. Curious about what this package provides, we did some digging and found it's for tracking Ubuntu installations by sending an 'I am alive' ping to Canonical on a daily basis. When the canonical-census package is installed, the program is to be added to the daily Cron jobs to be executed so that each day it will report to Canonical over HTTP the number of times this system previously sent to Canonical (this counter is stored locally and with it running on a daily basis it's thereby indicating how many days the Ubuntu installation has been active), the Ubuntu distributor channel, the product name as acquired by the system's DMI information, and which Ubuntu release is being used. That's all that canonical-census does, at least for now. Previously there haven't been such Ubuntu tracking measures attempted by Canonical."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Canonical Begins Tracking Ubuntu Installations

Comments Filter:
  • Phone home? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Zumbs ( 1241138 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @06:07AM (#33201652) Homepage
    While I fully understand that Canonical would like some reliable statistical information on users, I seriously hope that it will be easy to see what information is sent and opt out ... or even better ... opt in (ie. default is off).
  • FUD? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @06:22AM (#33201736)
    You missed the most important information... probably because mentioning it wouldn't make the story as interesting as it sounds. Is it installed by default? Is there a notice? Is there a toggle button to install it during installation?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @06:22AM (#33201738)

    Could lead to useful statistics. Dunno why this is being made into such a big deal. Even though it sounds very much like MS Windows phoning home, both have two different objectives. Nothing to see here. Move on.

  • by FuckingNickName ( 1362625 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @06:40AM (#33201846) Journal

    ...thus giving a convenient database of computer availability and movement.

    The good news for those concerned about privacy is that it appears for now Canonical is just interested in tracking the users of OEM installations -- those PCs that ship with Ubuntu by default such as from ZaReason, System76, and Dell.

    I'm sorry, what? Why is this good news? This sentence makes as much sense as, "The good news for those interested in peaceful action is that the sniper is only interested in targetting the Dutch."

    For those not wanting to participate in this anonymous data gathering process, they could always sudo apt-get remove canonical-census.

    Yeah, you can always opt-out of spam too.

  • by Toreo asesino ( 951231 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @06:56AM (#33201972) Journal

    ...I wonder what the reaction would be on this site?

  • NTP (Score:3, Insightful)

    by MichaelSmith ( 789609 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @06:59AM (#33201994) Homepage Journal

    I thought that was the reason for the NTP server.

  • by TaoPhoenix ( 980487 ) <TaoPhoenix@yahoo.com> on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @07:42AM (#33202398) Journal

    I know!
    Through a security flaw, MS discovers the Canonical DB, thus earning a unit count of "enemies"!

    The entire point of Linux is the philosophy. There's other choices for the "Just-Works" proprietary synergies.

    Is Canonical getting to that "power corrupts" stage?

  • by Richard_at_work ( 517087 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @07:46AM (#33202412)
    Why should the details of the article negate the fact that this is a privacy issue, and there should be an outcry about it? Does the fact that its only happening against a subset of installs matter? Not really. Does the fact that there is an *opt-out* option? Again, not really, as its tracking usage - this should be opt-in for definite.
  • Re:Phone home? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by RabbitWho ( 1805112 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @07:47AM (#33202414) Homepage Journal
    They're giving me a free OS. This is the least I can do for them.
  • Re:Phone home? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by JustOK ( 667959 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @07:49AM (#33202428) Journal

    no, you could do less.

  • Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by zippthorne ( 748122 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @07:50AM (#33202432) Journal

    Yeah. It probably is something they can bargain with. Namely, it can be used to counter the claim that the people buying the machines are just wiping them to put pirated windows on.

  • Re:Phone home? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Zumbs ( 1241138 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @07:54AM (#33202460) Homepage
    As such, I don't mind either. I would probably let the feature stay enabled. But I do want easy access (no code digging) to see what information is being collected, who gets access to it and an easy way of turning the feature off. And I would consider it a courtesy if Canonical actually asked me.
  • Re:It's about time (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Missing.Matter ( 1845576 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @08:08AM (#33202572)

    They should send the usage statistics to the mailing addresses of all the big name game developers so we can finally get rid of Windows.

    They'll look at the numbers and think "hm, just as low as I thought" and then continue to develop exclusively for windows.

  • by tepples ( 727027 ) <tepples.gmail@com> on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @08:17AM (#33202654) Homepage Journal
    My reaction to your postulated microsoft-census: "Doesn't Automatic Updates already do this?"
  • Re:It's about time (Score:5, Insightful)

    by John Hasler ( 414242 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @08:23AM (#33202680) Homepage

    > They'll look at the numbers and think "hm, just as low as I thought"...

    Regardless of what the numbers actually are.

  • WINE compatibility (Score:4, Insightful)

    by voss ( 52565 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @08:31AM (#33202764)

    While Linux native code would be nice, just getting popular games working properly
    in WINE on linux would be a great start. If you knew say you could add
    2 to 3 million potential customers with compatiblity code tweaks...that would be worth it to
    many companies.

    World of Warcraft and EVE online are two games that have great WINE compatiblity,
    and there are sufficient linux users for both that they have their own forums
    on the gamemakers sites.

  • Re:Test Your Bias! (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Walter White ( 1573805 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @08:42AM (#33202860)

    What does Windows Genuine Advantage do in this regard? Doesn't it periodically contact Microsoft?

    And AFAIK you are not able to opt out. If you do not comply, it is my understanding that your computer will cease to operate.

  • Re:Phone home? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by MMC Monster ( 602931 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @09:20AM (#33203242)

    Your definition of easy differs from my mom's. ;-)

  • Re:Phone home? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by InsertWittyNameHere ( 1438813 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @09:48AM (#33203588)
    I'm also ok with it. As long as they don't give it a deceptive name like "Ubuntu Genuine Advantage"
  • Re:Phone home? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by PRMan ( 959735 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @11:18AM (#33204610)
    Wouldn't it be easier to remove the canonical-census package?
  • Re:Phone home? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by natehoy ( 1608657 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @11:37AM (#33204858) Journal

    Canonical could have done a better disclosure job.

    It hasn't happened yet, so it's tough to assess whether they "could have done" a better disclosure job until, you know, there is a need for disclosure.

    They've put a package in the repos that you have to go out and install (if it's even on all the mirrors yet). If you go and install it yourself, then obviously it's been disclosed to you, and you want to stand up and be counted. If you don't want to be counted (or you are unaware that the package exists), you won't be installing it and you don't need to be informed of anything.

    Once they start putting this on OEM installs, or in the default distro, then we can talk about how much disclosure was done, and whether they "should have done" more.

    We aren't there yet. I don't know what Canonical intends for a communication before, or even if, they ever decide to make this a default install. Maybe it'll be an option on the installer or a first-run question on OEM installs. Maybe it'll be disabled by default and they'll mention it on the distro home page and ask you to enable it. Or maybe they'll sneak it in and turn it on and they'll then be subject to a valid and reasonable accusation of insufficient disclosure.

    But that's all stuff that hasn't happened yet. Let's wait until it does, and keep an eye on Canonical and this package, so we're ready for our nerdragegasm when one is appropriate.

  • Re:Phone home? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by gorzek ( 647352 ) <gorzek@gmaiMENCKENl.com minus author> on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @11:51AM (#33205042) Homepage Journal

    Mod parent up!

    I can't believe how many people are already jumping to conclusions and deciding that Canonical is as evil as Microsoft. Come on, people!

    When it comes with the default installation and is enabled automatically without any input from the user, then it would be fair to trash Canonical for invading the privacy of its users. For now, they haven't actually done anything, and frankly I get tired of the reactionary nonsense hurled by Linux users on stories like these.

    I find it very difficult to get worked up about a counter that pings a remote server once a day just to count up how many active installations there are and how long they've been running. Some "privacy invasion." As long as Canonical is up front about what the package does and they do not enable it without your permission I don't see a problem here.

  • by John Hasler ( 414242 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @12:10PM (#33205292) Homepage

    > Just saying before the shit hits the fan.

    Too late for that. It's always too late for that on Slashdot. There are monkeys here who crap in their hands and throw it at the fan.

  • That applies in everything. Looking at CrossOver [codeweavers.com] money is being made now with Linux and OSX. If CodeWeavers can make money with CrossOver then software vendors should be able to make money creating cross platform software too.

    On the other hand, game developers would have a semi-solid set of numbers to go by, so they can assess the size of their potential market. As it is, there really aren't good numbers on Linux adoption

    Even with this there still will not be good numbers. First, Canonical is only including the tracking software on OEM installations but I bet most installations are done by users or local gurus. It is not mandatory either. Then there are other Linux distros.

    Falcon

Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.

Working...