Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Linux Business Novell SuSE The Almighty Buck Linux

Novell Reportedly Taking Bids From Up To 20 Companies 124

Degrees writes "Although Novell rejected the bid from Elliott Associates earlier this year, reports now indicate Novell has decided to embrace the inevitable. According to the Wall Street Journal (sub. required): 'As many as 20 companies have expressed interest in Novell, according to people familiar with the matter. Most, if not all, of the companies expected to lodge serious bids are private equity firms. ... Novell has four separate businesses, each of which could be attractive to a rival technology company. However, it's unlikely that a tech company would bid for all of Novell, these people said. Private equity firms, however, could break up Novell and either sell off the pieces or run them as standalone businesses.' Are there any companies that don't have an enterprise grade Linux distribution, and ought to? Ditto workstation management, directory services, legacy email, and virtualization suite?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Novell Reportedly Taking Bids From Up To 20 Companies

Comments Filter:
  • Microsoft (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 23, 2010 @10:20AM (#32313948)

    Microsoft Linux, here we come!

  • Obviously a sale of Novell doesn't necessarily imply any change for their Linux business

    Actually, I expect one of their main partners to strongly encourage a litigious patent troll to buy them.

    They would be in a very strong position to torpedo Linux adoption for years, if not decades.

  • Re:Karma (Score:2, Insightful)

    by CosaNostra Pizza Inc ( 1299163 ) on Sunday May 23, 2010 @10:27AM (#32313990)
    same here. I actually switched from Suse to Ubuntu before Novelle made the "Microsoft" move.
  • by boorack ( 1345877 ) on Sunday May 23, 2010 @10:31AM (#32314022)
    Then i WOULD be nervous. If Novell accepts bid from private equity firm, then we can say goodbye to them. Typical scenario in company takeover by private equity firms is extracting whatever capital company has by any means. In such scenario you can safely assume that Novell will be stripped out of things having some value (that can be easily sold), saddled with huge debt and private equity fund will extract all this capital via some form of (huge) dividend. Remaining carcass is typically sold to some fool investor who then sees it bankrupting. While I don't like Novell too much (after that Microsoft debacle), I'm also worried. I suppose that some of their patents will be sold to whoever offers better price. If it will be some patent troll , then we may see problems ahead. Private equity fund (a.k.a financial vulture) managers won't give a crap about it.
  • Re:Karma (Score:2, Insightful)

    by maxume ( 22995 ) on Sunday May 23, 2010 @10:33AM (#32314042)

    If you are using a Linux system, you are probably touching them with your kernel.

  • Re:Microsoft (Score:4, Insightful)

    by fustakrakich ( 1673220 ) on Sunday May 23, 2010 @10:37AM (#32314072) Journal

    nteresting idea, but I'm not seeing a business argument for it.

    Patents! Patents! Patents!

  • IBM (Score:5, Insightful)

    by John Hasler ( 414242 ) on Sunday May 23, 2010 @10:51AM (#32314138) Homepage

    > Are there any companies that don't have an enterprise grade Linux
    > distribution, and ought to?

    IBM, not that I know of any evidence that they are interested.

  • by demachina ( 71715 ) on Sunday May 23, 2010 @11:06AM (#32314226)

    What it actually means depends on whether they are bought by an ethical private equity firm or the other kind. If its the other kind they will use Novell as a vehicle to borrow a couple billion dollars which they will use to create an instant and imaginary profit for themselves, then they will cut and run leaving Novell saddled with a crushing debt burden which will result in layoffs and eventual collapse.

    Sad to say that is frequently how the magnates of our financial system work now. They aren't out to build successful companies that make things, employ people, and make money the old fashioned way, they are out to make the quickest buck they can with no regard for the wreckage they leave in the wake.

  • by dpolak ( 711584 ) on Sunday May 23, 2010 @11:33AM (#32314398) Journal
    I wish S.u.S.E. could go back to the way they were before Novell did the damage they did. I dealt with them when they were independent and they were fantastic. Maybe if I put on the ruby slippers and click the heels three times.....
  • Re:Market (Score:4, Insightful)

    by nurb432 ( 527695 ) on Sunday May 23, 2010 @11:52AM (#32314540) Homepage Journal

    Considering most people are a Microsoft centric shop out in the 'real world', this political issue is a non issue. Sure, *I* prefer open solutions, but large corporations at a management level really don't care.

    Smaller shops, perhaps it might make a difference, if they understand it.

  • Re:Microsoft (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ducomputergeek ( 595742 ) on Sunday May 23, 2010 @02:03PM (#32315568)

    Clearly owning the Unix copyrights has to be worth something.

  • Re:Karma (Score:5, Insightful)

    by TheRaven64 ( 641858 ) on Sunday May 23, 2010 @02:44PM (#32315864) Journal
    If you're not using a Linux system, but are reading Slashdot, you've probably used OpenOffice.org. Most of the work on making it less slow was done by Novell. Last time I checked, 80% of OO.o contributions came from Sun, 15% from Novell, and 5% from everyone else combined.

"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android

Working...