Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Software Linux

The Real Reason For Microsoft's TomTom Lawsuit 408

Glyn Moody writes "We now know that Microsoft's lawsuit isn't just against TomTom, but against Linux too: but what exactly is Microsoft hoping to achieve? Samba's Jeremy Allison has a fascinating theory: 'What people are missing about this is the either/or choice that Microsoft is giving Tom Tom. It isn't a case of cross-license and everything is ok. If Tom Tom or any other company cross licenses patents then by section 7 of GPLv2 (for the Linux kernel) they lose the rights to redistribute the kernel *at all*. Make no mistake, this is intended to force Tom Tom to violate the GPL, or change to Microsoft embedded software.' Maybe embedded Linux is starting to get too popular."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Real Reason For Microsoft's TomTom Lawsuit

Comments Filter:
  • by thermian ( 1267986 ) on Thursday March 05, 2009 @02:31PM (#27080297)

    And yet we wonder why Kdawson hasn't been reprimanded.

    He was reprimanded most severely. That is I mean I think he was. Actually I heard they denied him cake once. Well, someone I know said they read it.

    I think.....

  • by Hognoxious ( 631665 ) on Thursday March 05, 2009 @02:49PM (#27080545) Homepage Journal
    GP is the guy who invented the registry, you insensitive clod!
  • by FictionPimp ( 712802 ) on Thursday March 05, 2009 @03:11PM (#27080899) Homepage

    Just get me release quality AD support via 2003 server and we will call it even.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 05, 2009 @03:54PM (#27081489)

    You assume that you have the right to data created by apps you were using,
    by pretending/believing/maintaining it is YOUR data,
    when in fact it is the data of the proprietary apps.

    From the legal perspective, you're making a long shot gamble, not an assertion of fact.

    The data *before you put it into the app* was your data.

    The data *the app created* belongs to the owner of the app.

    Claiming e.g. YOU own the images in your camera's raw format is false: you don't.

    You legally have copyright on the *visual pattern* of their display, not on the data in the file.

    Poor you.

    The OWNERS have rights, and individuals don't own the patent-world: corporates do.

    hahahahaha.

  • by Dogtanian ( 588974 ) on Thursday March 05, 2009 @06:34PM (#27083835) Homepage

    Ironically, this article is about an 'Open' software license from a movement that is all about 'Freedom', and how TomTom doesn't have the right to exercise that 'Freedom'.

    You know... I do believe that you must be the *very first person* to have realised that the GPL's perpetuation of certain freedoms is done by curtailing certain others at source, and to have contrasted this with BSD's approach.

    Let's use this [encycloped...matica.com] as the start of an original and stimulating discussion on the subject. Or then again, heed the words of an exceptionally wise man and let's not [slashdot.org].

    Also, an interesting thought that just occurred to me is that GPL has its own RIAA/MPAA/MediaSentry thing going, of course the EFF and FSF have not been evil, yet ...

    Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  • by MichaelSmith ( 789609 ) on Friday March 06, 2009 @01:58AM (#27087879) Homepage Journal
    I bought a book on configuring sendmail. It did a pretty good job of selling me on qmail.

Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!

Working...