Debian On the Openmoko Neo FreeRunner Phone 167
BrianWCarver writes "It was inevitable. One can now run the entire Debian distribution (ARM port) on the Openmoko Neo Freerunner. We previously discussed the July 4th launch of this GNU/Linux-based smartphone, which is open down to its core, with the company providing CAD files and schematics for the phone. Openmoko released an update to their software stack earlier this month, called Om2008.8, which is still a work in progress. But now one can use these instructions on the Debian wiki to open up the possibility of using apt-get to access Debian's more than 20,000 applications on your phone, which, due to integration with freesmartphone.org efforts, can also actually be used as a phone. There were previous efforts to run Debian on the predecessor product to the Neo FreeRunner, the Neo 1973, but with the wider adoption of the Neo FreeRunner and the hard work of many Debian developers at the ongoing DebConf 8, carrying Debian in your pocket has just gotten a lot easier."
Re:Neo 1973? (Score:4, Informative)
(I think you're being funny here, but for the record) 1973 was the year of the first call on a mobile phone.
Re:Great learning tool. But what else? (Score:5, Informative)
The answer is that OpenMoko predates all those things.
Re:Neo 1973? (Score:4, Informative)
No it wasn't... the first (cellular) call of a mobile phone would have been somewhere in the mid-60's...
The first "mobile" phone call, was probably in the early 1900's, using radio, however it was limited to a few channels, but could be linked into an actual phone network, albeit cumbersome and annoying, with middle-men.
Re:Great learning tool. But what else? (Score:5, Informative)
Devices that run Android don't even exist yet. How can you possibly claim it will be usable out of the box?
Re:Right, but...? (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.joachim-breitner.de/blog/archives/297-guid.html [joachim-breitner.de]
The hardware
It was smaller than I thought, and is quite light. My girlfriend says it's ugly, but I'm fine with the look of it. Besides being a GSM-phone, it comes with some nice gimmics: GPS, accelerometer, WLAN. The touchscreen works fine, although I don't have anything to compare it with.
The software
The system it comes with, even after upgrading, is still very rough. It mostly works for doing phone calls and SMSs, but there are a number of unsolved quirks that prevent me from using the Freerunner as my sole phone for now. The suspend mode is left too often, resulting in a battery life of about eight hours, and there are issues with the audio for the conversation partners, who will hear static and echoes. But, as this is free software, there is hope that this will be fixed eventually
It's ok if you bring a Lauterbach and a laptop with you when you carry it. And TALK LOUDLY to make sure people can here you over the static and echoes. Echoes. echoes. ec...
Re:Right, but...? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Can it reliably make phone calls yet? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Great learning tool. But what else? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Great learning tool. But what else? (Score:5, Informative)
I have high hopes for OpenMoko - if they can release a HSPDA phone in a year or two with a bigger screen then I'll definitely buy one.
Re:20,000 applications my ass (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Can you still buy it direct? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Open down to its core?? (Score:3, Informative)
If you used individual transistors, you'd barely be able to fit a single ALU in the space occupied by the entire case of a modern mini-tower PC. Your "computer" would fill up a large room, consume megawatts of electricity, cost millions of dollars, have a clock frequency measured in the tens or hundreds of hertz, and have the same capabilities as that same four-function calculator that I mentioned before.
On the contrary, that's not hypocritical at all. The difference is that it is possible to make Free software equally functional as proprietary stuff, while it is not possible to make even slightly comparable hardware without spending millions of dollars.
In other words, they advocate "dog-fooding" somewhat less capable Free software because they're working to improve it. For hardware, that would be entirely futile.