Shuttleworth Calls For Coordinated Release Cycles 238
voodoosws points out on Mark Shuttleworth's blog Shuttleworth's call for synchronized publication of Linux distributions, excerpting: "There's one thing that could convince me to change the date of the next Ubuntu LTS: the opportunity to collaborate with the other, large distributions on a coordinated major / minor release cycle. If two out of three of Red Hat (RHEL), Novell (SLES) and Debian are willing to agree in advance on a date to the nearest month, and thereby on a combination of kernel, compiler toolchain, GNOME/KDE, X and OpenOffice versions, and agree to a six-month and 2-3 year long term cycle, then I would happily realign Ubuntu's short and long-term cycles around that. I think the benefits of this sort of alignment to users, upstreams and the distributions themselves would be enormous. I'll write more about this idea in due course, for now let's just call it my dream of true free software syncronicity."
err Gentoo? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:One reason why Synchronicity is bad (Score:5, Funny)
You get to learn that synchronicity also means "the quality or fact of being synchronous".
Merriam-Webster: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Synchronicity [merriam-webster.com]
Bartleby: http://www.bartleby.com/61/42/S0964250.html [bartleby.com]
Re:err Gentoo? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:One reason why Synchronicity is bad (Score:3, Funny)
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/synchronicity?view=uk [askoxford.com]
Lets see (Score:1, Funny)
erm... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Good idea... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Anhy reasons not to? (Score:4, Funny)