Wal-Mart's $200 Linux PC Sells Out 619
hankmt writes "About a week ago Wal-Mart began selling a $200 Linux machine running on a 1.5 ghz VIA C7 processor and 512 MB of RAM. While the specs are useless for Vista, it works blazingly fast on Ubuntu with the Enlightenment Window Manager. The machine is now officially sold out of their online warehouses (it may still be available in some stores). And the product sales page at wal-mart.com is full of glowing reviews from new and old Linux users alike."
What's that in bogomips (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What's that in bogomips (Score:5, Funny)
Oh, I guess someone did.
Re:What's that in bogomips (Score:4, Funny)
Re:What's that in bogomips (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:What's that in bogomips (Score:5, Informative)
No, that's the index. But thinks for the link.
Looks like it would be about 3,000 bogomips. Not cutting edge, but not too shabby either.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
He's on first.
It's been like this (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:It's been like this (Score:4, Informative)
Aargh! (Score:5, Interesting)
I had it in my cart this morning. Didn't close the deal. Maybe I can catch the next round. I also would like to know how many they sold and how fast. If any come available open box maybe I can get one of those.
I have the 1.3GHz via, and I like it. With Vista any kind of video is a slide show, even with the XP drivers loaded. Runs XP decently well with 1GB of memory. With Ubuntu it's just a regular PC. Power efficient, there are kits to scale it down for your car. It's not a toy -- you can do real stuff with it.
If anybody bought one of these and aren't happy with its linuxy wierdness, try selling it on ebay. I think you'll do better than taking it back to the store. :-)
I'm not buying the $299 one with Vista and twice the RAM. They can keep that. You can get a 2GB stick of DDR2-800 at newegg for $50 so if they wanted $250 for the box with 2GB in it I could go there.
WalMart does not like to run out of stuff. I wonder if they'll take this as a sign that Everex isn't ready to be a WalMart supplier, or as a sign that we're all ready for the smokin cheap environmentally friendly linux pc. Can Via even make the motherboards to meet the demand? I hear their output is rather limited.
Re:Aargh! (Score:5, Interesting)
You put me straight into geezer mode with that statement - This blows my mind. The IBM XP is a quarter of a century old, had a 5mhz clock speed (this box has a 1300mhz clock speed), had 64K of memory and a ten mb hard drive, and guess what? you could still do real work on it! Spreadsheets, word processors, statistics, databases; I used these things at work in 1987 (we also had a couple of 286s and the blindingly fast 386 at the time).
I bought one used, the one I bought for my home had a Hercules card so was capable of graphics. I bought some extra memory and a joystick port, installed them, and had a gaming machine.
Real work? Pshaw, when the 486 (capable of internet A/V, could sample and play CD quality WAV files) came out a computer like the Wal Mart Ubantu box was a supercomputer.
-mcgrew [kuro5hin.org]
Re:Aargh! (Score:4, Insightful)
But I'm confused. (Score:4, Funny)
Just wondering...
Re:But I'm confused. (Score:5, Insightful)
I never disliked Walmart. Although I am aware of the reasons many people do not like Walmart. (No, I don't need them reiterated here, thank you.)
One thing I've suspected for awhile, is that the "Linux Revolution" (Linux taking off as a desktop alternative) would NOT happen at businesses or with high-end users. It will happen much like the "Windows Revolution" happened back in the 90's. It will start with the "Walmart buyer". Ordinary people making ordinary FINANCIAL decisions to buy a cheap PC.
This is the regular, ordinary, joe-sixpack, "what's a right-click?" kind of person. The kind of people scorned by many of the elitists in the OS and PC fields. The people looked down upon by many many many here at Slashdot as backward, ignorant rubes living in "flyover country". The kind of people that voted for GW Bush, that fly American flags from their porches, that have communities with 4th of July parties that everyone in town attends. Small-town middle American traditional people.
THEY are the ones that will start the Linux revolution. Not because they "did the research" or "grok FOSS" or any of that elitist crap. But because it makes financial sense to buy a $200 US PC that can do everything they need it to do. They will get introduced to Linux for the first time, perhaps as their first PC EVER, and will love it. They will stick with this machine for at least 5 years, as it will be able to handle all the basic tasks they need it for, and when it dies or they need another, they will look for another LINUX PC to replace it with.
The Linux revolution begins... In Iowa, at Walmart.
Re:But I'm confused. (Score:5, Funny)
Then, for the next shipment, you cut down on setup costs and provide the machine with Gentoo minimal CD bundled.
?
Profit!
Not to troll, but what do they expect for returns? (Score:3, Interesting)
Based upon the comments there ... none. (Score:5, Interesting)
And for home users it's all about knowing someone who can fix it when it breaks. With Windows there's usually some neighbor's kid who "knows computers".
So don't expect too many returns on this.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The same kid may also know a certain alphanumeric string that can fix the Linux trouble.
Re:Based upon the comments there ... none. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Based upon the comments there ... none. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur (Score:5, Funny)
They know exactly what an OS is, it's the blue window that tells them they've got mail, duh..
I don't expect many returns. (Score:4, Insightful)
Remember, these are typical Walmart customers here.
That is important, they are not like Slasdot readers. Unlike business users or college students, M$ has done no favors for these people and they have zero loyalty.
How many of them are going to return these things when that AOL CD they have doesn't work automagically?
I don't know. The EEE has an AOL button, no CD is required. I know it's hard to believe but AOL would be happy to spam users of other OS.
How many of these people are expected to have DSL or Cable instead of dial-up?
None. Why should they?
How many are going to be returned because they don't have MS Office pre-installed on them?
None. Open Office is more than enough for the average school paper. Very few people actually NEED M$ Office for work and even they hate it. The rest of the world considers M$'s ever changing, secret file formats an expensive ass pain. They are right.
Anyone who actually needs M$ Office will have their boss pay for it or pirate the junk. If M$ makes the second option impossible, the first option will have to happen or the boss will learn to use free software. M$ is not going to be able to get everyone to pony up $400 every couple of years for a text editor and that's where they system breaks down. Sooner or later, all of those smart business users and college graduates will figure out that they don't need M$ either.
Re:I don't expect many returns. (Score:4, Interesting)
Wikipedia page [wikipedia.org] is sparse at the moment. On the Graphics side, the Via Arena site I just saw:
Via chipsets (Score:3, Informative)
As to Warcraft III, I couldn't comment. Back
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I replaced mine and it worked for awhile, but then died again (not sure why). You can give it a shot, since caps are cheap. Basically you need to find caps with the same rating, clip the existing ones so there's some stalk above the board, and then solder a new cap onto the remnants of the old stalk.
Sadly, it seems that VIA uses (or at least used to use, not sure about current) inferior caps, as I had an M10000 and an M10000-2 (or whatever the one with the PCMCIA slot is) fry ov
Re:lol dollars (Score:5, Insightful)
Agreed. "Hate" might be too strong a word.
However, tell a small business client that they've got to buy a separate license for EACH station for MS-Office. While you might not get "hate", you're sure not going to get any "sweet sweet lovin' ", either. Typically, they next ask for workarounds to install one copy on multiple machines.
Personally, that's my big gripe with Office and Vista. MS marketing aside, I can't see the value in paying $400 for a software package that does what its parent company wants. Heck, I have installed an OS that didn't cost a dime and uses an office suite of the same cost... and it does what *I* want.
....and I donate to support those. THAT is value.
Re:lol dollars (Score:5, Interesting)
Microsoft Office has an interface designed in Hell by idiots. I hate it. HATE IT.
You can't do anything that isn't programmed in. My boss, who is a Microsoft fan, fumbles around in its interface, I've watched him. The emperor is wearing no clothes.
You just think it's OK because you don't know anything better.
Yeah, I know I"ll be modded down for this. Whatever. Star Office sucks, but so does Microsoft Office.
I was impressed by what is now known as Microsoft Word before it was bought out by Microsoft, but that was a couple decades ago. What is also impressive is that I see the same kind of fumbling around in a twisty maze of GUI menus all alike that I saw when someone was once trying to impress me with Microsoft Windows for Workgroups. Not more than a couple of years previous, I had people screaming at me at my workplace to not require any of that in the UI guidelines I was writing for that section of the company.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, I am an Emacs user. And you know what, I used it for 3 years before touching its configuration file. Also, my current config file is 5 lines long for using a GUI and 1 line for using a CLI, and 2 more for an obscure programming language I've tried once, totaling 8 lines. I can copy that same file on every machine I touch and have (cumulatively) spent less than half working day configuring it.
Emacs comes with sensible defauts, you just need to configure obscure functions. Word is a hell to use withou
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The Star's software was written in Mesa rather than Smalltalk, and it didn't originally ship with Smalltalk (or any other programming language for that matter). Smalltalk was added later as an option, but then so were several other languages, including Lisp.
"Too complex and bug-ridden compared to simpler things like functional programming"
Smalltalk
Re:lol dollars (Score:5, Insightful)
Then perhaps you'd like to address the issues he raises instead.
I've listed them below for your convenience.
Re:Modems vs broadband (Score:4, Insightful)
But anyway, I think this is a moot point; most people who bought the machines probably knew exactly what they were buying. It'll only be when the enthusiast market gets saturated that you're going to see these machines trickling down to the "retractable cupholder" crowd.
Re:Modems vs broadband (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur (Score:5, Insightful)
I think a load of these were bought by linux fans wanting to support linux on a retail box. for a low price.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I resent that incredibly racist and elitist statement. I may not be the "typical" WalMart customer, but I do shop there. I would be a fool to spend fifty dollars for a pair of jeans elsewhere when I can get a pair of Wranglers at Wal Mart for $12. I would be a fool to pay $8 for a big bottle of Listerine at Osco's ehen I can get the same bottle for half the price at Wal Mart.
Is Wal Mart evil? Sure they are. ALL big corporations are evil. I'd rather spend te
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I do refuse to use the self-checkout in th egrocery store. Not like it's going to do any good, I used to refuse to use self-service at the gas station untill there was no such thing as full service.
If there was an alternative I'd u
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If people were lining up for this, they knew what it was. They read about it ahead of time. They didn't just line up for the fu...n of it.
Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur (Score:4, Funny)
There, fixed that for you.
Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur (Score:5, Insightful)
Assuming that at least some of those sales of this box was to Joe Average, this can be a boon or bust moment all dependant on the support they get from WalMart. If WalMart washes their hands after sale (i.e. "All sales are final. Take it up with the manufacturer or Ubuntu") then this could be doomed after all the geeks have gotten theirs.
Personally, I wish WalMart success on this venture. There is nothing more healthy to a monopoly than competition.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Your figures are greatly exaggerated. Even in rip off britan XP home/vista home basic (which are the editions are a cheap shit box would come with) whitebox OEM are arround £50 ($100) including VAT (our equivilent of sales tax), it is widely believed that the big brand OEMs pay even less.
The problem is that the same ti
Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur (Score:5, Funny)
Thank you, thank you - I'm here every night. Be sure to tip your cocktail waitress.
Useful user reviews - oh wait (Score:5, Informative)
By NWAshopper, AR Read all reviews by this reviewer
Value for price paid: 1 out of 5
Meets Expectations: 1 out of 5
Buyers beware! Don't let the low cost of this computer sway your credit card. This computer doesn't have the power to run Windows XP!!! This is a decent buy for the tech smart who are looking for ITX Hardware on the cheap. DO NOT BUY. You will be very dissapointed!
Overall Rating: 4 out of 5
Great Value for Money, 11/06/2007
By CompuShopr Read all reviews by this reviewer
Value for price paid: 5 out of 5
Meets Expectations: 5 out of 5
This is a Linux machine that's capable of XP or Vista. It runs quick, and upgrades easily. Major con is no monitor. Tried XP and Vista and it runs like a champ. Definitely recommend this product.
Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait (Score:5, Interesting)
Walmart + Linux = ... (Score:5, Funny)
Also available from a small retailer... (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.zareason.com/shop/product.php?productid=16160&cat=0&page=1 [zareason.com]
So you can buy it there with a clean conscience. heh.
BTW, I have no business relation with the family that runs Zareason, but I did buy about $8,400.00 worth of products from them, and Zareason did a fine job of shipping the products to the public middle school that I ordered on behalf of. More details on that purchase here:
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/11/1446254 [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
More /. Cognitive Dissonance (Score:5, Funny)
Linux = Good
*whimper*
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Seriously, though, you don't have to buy a sub-$200 PC from Wal-Mart if you don't want to.
At Pricewatch, there's quite a few bring-your-own-OS deals, including Core 2 Duo or athlon 64 x2 systems for ~$200 including shipping.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Do they sell em with monitors? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I ordered one. (Score:2)
I ordered one online for my kid. It's supposed to arrive at the local walmart by about Nov. 26. My wife was convinced my brain had been taken over by aliens, since I normally don't like walmart. I was like, "Honey, this is Linux! It's not evil, it's good!"
Walmart has had other linux PCs for sale online. What was supposed to be different about this one was that it was supposed to be on the shelves in the stores. AFAICT that never actually happened. The local walmart was one of the ones on the list that was
Re: (Score:2)
That's probably because they weren't making any money on them, as I imagine Wal-Mart isn't making on these $200 Linux things.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Retail component prices:
That makes a total component retail cost of $182.97 if you built one yourself. I'd estimate then that Walmart would get them wholesale for about $160, which would
Cheap/Slow PCs are more than capable (Score:5, Insightful)
I hope these machines are good. I used to buy the $200 Fry's Great Quality machines, but Fry's is no longer selling those
Me too. Well the architecture is pretty similar (cyrix CPU) but it looks like the software is a factor better, many of those GQ machines didn't have adequate drivers to support the on-board video so you were stuck at 640x480 or whatever. Though installing Mandrake (back then) usually took care of that.
The thing that really burns me is all the "Good for Light Word Processing"crap these power-system zealots keep spewing - and I ma not discriminating here, all of the platforms, Windows, Mac and Linux are full of em. I can tell you that machine (512MB RAM/80GB HDD) is probably capable of some great DTP (Scribus) could be great for illustration (Inkscape) and really serious office work (OOo). It may not be fast at doing such things, but we should never say it is not capable.
As a Classic computerist I know of authors who write books and other published works still on Commodore 64s, (heck some have never left their typewriter behind). To them they get familiar with something and stick to it they don't upgrade because they are to busy being productive with what they have (the hard part is finding replacement parts for their daisy wheel printers). Same reason why the XO will be a hit with kids, they will not see those laptops as underpowered or slow, but the draw is they have access and the speed isn't really a factor when you are starting out (as they get better and outgrow it, then that's another matter; it took me years to outgrow the VIC-20).
Desktop Linux growth in 2007 (Score:5, Insightful)
I think the Walmart results might be indicative of a growing trend where people are just about ready to make the leap themselves... particularly when it comes preinstalled like it does here. Another step in the right direction.
What I'd love to see, though, is how much previous computer experience all of those Walmart reviewers had -- for some, it seems like quite a bit.
--
Electronics kits for the digital generation. [nerdkits.com]
But, (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle America (Score:4, Interesting)
That a Linux machine is sold out at Walmart suggests that plain folks -- not like you and me -- know and respect Linux. The lesson is that there is a ready market, in middle America, for Linux-based applications. Will software developers heed this lesson?
For most people, the monster computer (with globs of memory and a gazillion hertz of processor speed) running Windows XP is already more machine than most Americans need. Now, Microsoft will kill off Windows XP in order to sell Vista to us. We will need a super-monster computer to run Vista. This whole process of bloated operating systems (OSes) driving purchases of even more excessive amounts of hardware is a damned waste of money.
The simple machine that runs Linux is good enough for most people. The number one application in America, after all, is e-mail.
Software developers should tune into middle America and sell Linux-based applications so that we can put an end to this never-ending cycle of bigger, badder OS needing bigger, badder computer.
Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course with this being Wal-Mart, the more likely scenario is Joe Sixpack reads "Ayy Beth-Ann-Bobbi-Jo-Ruthie-May! They got dem compyooturz at thu walmart for $200!"
With the absence of "them thar geek peopullz" that talk about "virusin' and spahhhwurin' the box", they can pick one up on their
Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Dare I say it.. or will it jinx it? (Score:5, Interesting)
But that's okay. Linux -- and other Free OSes -- don't need a "year." They're gaining traction, slowly, and will continue to do so. The migration away from vendor lock-in on the part of the general public isn't something that's going to happen in a single year. It's going to happen over the course of decades.
The writing is mostly on the wall: the price of hardware has dropped and will continue to fall, and that makes it a lot harder to justify big bucks for an OS, while at the same time more people are satisfied with their current machines and don't want to upgrade, meaning you can't lower your price and make it up in volume. Less revenue means less to spend on top talent, and that means a crappier product. The public may be slow, but eventually it catches on when you try to push too many lemons. (And once it does, it can be brutal and unforgiving; just ask the big U.S. automakers.)
Microsoft will do what it can to wring the last drops out of the Windows/Office monopoly, but they're busy diversifying as quickly as they can out into other areas. They're too big to just keel over and die overnight, but they'll probably have to pull an IBM: preserve their brand and reinvent themselves as a different company.
I'm optimistic that when the history of the late 20th and early 21st century is written, it will be remembered as a sort of digital Wild West, a lawless time, when proprietary non-standards roamed and fortunes could be made and lost overnight. But that's all going to come to an end, and when it does, the advantages of open standards -- and, to a slightly lesser extent, open source and Free software -- will be pretty clear. The forces driving that transition, however, are slow and grinding. They're not the sort of thing that lend themselves to a "year of," except arbitrarily and in retrospect.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
In addition to that members of my family have bought a variety of consumer electronics which have turned out to run on Linux ( FSG, Tom-Tom and some sort of cable box thing ). I'd say Linux has a
Must resist.... (Score:5, Funny)
We are not clones of our average here. (Score:4, Funny)
The readership of Slashdot varies drastically. Attempts to use social pressure to homogenize it have failed, with great hilarity.
Apparently you did not get the memo. B-)
Please do not expect all of us to march in step.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. It's called "lying", and it's a popular pastime in the marketing world.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I don't trust the reviews (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I don't trust the reviews (Score:4, Informative)
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=599025 [ubuntuforums.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Dubious (Score:2, Insightful)
Cool, but how many did the really sell? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Cool, but how many did the really sell? (Score:5, Informative)
look out! (Score:2, Funny)
They forgot an important disclaimer! (Score:2, Funny)
blazingly fast ... Enlightenment WM (Score:5, Funny)
Wal-Mart is really trying to make Linux sell (Score:5, Informative)
2002 Walmart sells Lindows PCs:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/general-10/wal-mart-ships-linux-pcs-23619/ [linuxquestions.org]
2003 Microtel computers with SUSE Linux:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,111557-page,1/article.html [pcworld.com]
2004 Linspire computers on sale at Wal-Mart for $498.00
http://www.news.com/Wal-Mart-debuts-498-Linux-laptop/2100-1044_3-5498006.html [news.com]
May of 2007, Dell computers on sale at Wal-Mart:
http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/15701 [networkworld.com]
Wal-Mart is not stupid. They know that as the price of PCs falls, their sales volume rises. They have a vested interested in commoditizing PCs. With Microsoft, Wal-Mart gets a limited mark-up. With Linux PCs made by small vendors, Wal-Mart gets to call the shots. Wal-Mart has dollars signs in their eyes, and those dollars signs are dancing with Tux.
Ha! (Score:5, Funny)
*RTFA*
Oh. Good job, carry on.
Hah! I can image the tech support calls now (Score:5, Funny)
Walmart - "What operating system do you have installed"
Customer - "Windows Vista"
Walmart - "I'm sorry, that PC shipped with Linux. You'll have to reinstall that before we can help you!".
Next thing you know, they'll blame faulty hinges on Windows!
Re:Support??? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Support??? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
You'd think Aldi would be doing Ubuntu PC's already
Re:Australia sucks (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Most people I know use their PC for web browsing and word processing; this system would be plenty good enough for that, so long as they had a monitor to go with it.
Heck, if I can install more hard disks in there I'm tempted to buy one myself and stick it in the basement to replace my desktop system as our file-server... it's got to burn less power than a 3GHz Pentium.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
France Invented the Personal Computer (Score:3, Interesting)
A French company invented, marketed, and sold the first personal computer, the Micral, in 1973 [computerhistory.org].
Via is from Taiwan moron...Taiwan isnt commie (Score:3, Informative)
GDP per capita of $29,600. The only people who claim Taiwan is part of PRC is the PRC
and people who dont know geography
They do have factories in China just like every american manufacturer but the
corporation and the chips are from Taiwan.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
One of the biggest complaints about Vista I see is that machines that run XP fine are dog slow with Vista.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes. [thinkgos.com]