French Parliament To Go Open Source 231
dhoyte writes, "Newsfactor.com reports that next June the French parliament will be switching from Microsoft to open source products such as Linux for desktops and servers and OpenOffice for day-to-day documents. They see it as a cost-cutting measure." The French have not settled on a Linux distribution yet. The article quotes an analyst voicing a note of caution: "'The evidence on the cost savings attributable to a switch to Linux has been mixed,' according to Chris Swenson, director of software industry analysis at research group NPD. 'There has been some evidence that companies have to spend a good deal on training and support after you deploy...'"
Re:mandriva (Score:5, Insightful)
Spend money on education not 1's and 0's. (Score:5, Insightful)
My experience though is that if the tasks you need to do can be done using opensource you will save quite a bit of money. If there are rough spots you need fixed you can spend a little bit of money to hire, or sponsor, an existing developer of that project to make things work the way you need. For what you could spend to buy a few licenses of your average commercial app you could have the opensource equivilant customized to your needs. That is power over your own fate. How much is that worth over years or decades?
Liberté would be a stronger ground to stand o (Score:5, Insightful)
As Stallman explained at WSIS [fsfe.org], if we argue based on cost, they can offer that too, but if we argue based on freedom, they're not even in the running.
translation (Score:4, Insightful)
The French have not settled on a Linux distribution yet.
Translation: We want to see what Microsoft's counteroffer will be; if it's too low, we'll state we're picking Ubuntu, and if Microsoft still hasn't given a huge keep-me deal, we'll say we probably want Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Re:Hope it goes through (Score:3, Insightful)
Being less dependent while saving costs can only be a good thing. Let's hope that they prove it's possible so others will make the step as well.
Re:Retraining. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Retraining-Relearing how to breath. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Hope it goes through (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Retraining-Relearing how to breath. (Score:4, Insightful)
you have to remember that its the French Parliement. Parliement, not any kind of technical branch of the government. The people affected by this move will only surf the web, write reports and emails.
I dont think that a massive training will be needed to switch from IE to Firefox, etc. Nor will it be from scratch. From a strictly user view, for the computer illiterate, the only changes they will notice will be maybe fonts, or colors.
Re:Site contains Micr$oft ads (Score:2, Insightful)
People in glass houses (Score:3, Insightful)
It's just for getting cheap windows (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:long term savings! (Score:1, Insightful)
You do realise they ARE talking about the long term. licensing costs are such a tiny fraction of the cost of any IT department that they have almost no effect over the overall TCO. It all comes down to administration, deployment, maintenance and monitoring costs. linux is not a deploy and forget solution, those costs like an MS environment are very real and VERY expensive. Why do linux zealots always think it is so clear cut to saving money when it is far from it. linux saves them a couple of percent in licensing, but those savings can easily be lost in managing the environment.
Obvious tactic to save money... (Score:1, Insightful)
No one ever really switches. Microsoft gives them tons of free software everytime. French Parliament doesn't want to pay the money to upgrade everyone to Vista, so instead they are playing a tactical rouillette game, in which they will win because regardless of who it is and how weak they are, Microsoft doesn't want a single hi-profile entity to actually switch to Linux and will willingly 'give' them the free software, not that it actually costs Microsoft anything, but they can then write it off as well as a charitable donation... blah blah blah.
Cluebat time (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh hell yes it does, especially in an organization. If all of an organization's data is in Office format that organization will probably stay on Windows. Crossover Office ain't going to cut it (Office license + CX Office license and forget getting a sweet deal on the Office licensing) and neither will OO.o's import filters. First time a document doesn't work 100% in the initial testing a MS fanboy (MCSE type afraid of learning) will raise holy hell.
Get everyone off of Office and IE first and swapping out the underlying OS is a lot easier. Remember, people don't run an OS they run applications.
Re:RE-training? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:mandriva (Score:1, Insightful)
(Yes, I know it's not on the same par, but still.)
What's the good word? TO HELL WITH GEORGIA!
Re:Retraining-Relearing how to breath. (Score:3, Insightful)
For 98% of people, 98% of their skills. As 98% of office workers just click to open a document, type, and click on a button to format, click on a button to print or email. The support techs are the ones who will have to actually learn anything new; and as they're already using Linux servers, that won't be a stretch for them.
The 2% who have VBA mactros and such will need more hand-holding. But it's certain that an upgrade to Vista would cause a lot of grief for them too.
Yes, I made up the figures. But it's based on my personal observation of what real people in offices do all day.
Re:Liberté would be a stronger ground to stan (Score:3, Insightful)
Or they're the kind of people used to looking at the bigger picture and beyond the next quarterly results, such as, say, governments?
Re:translation (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What is this training people speak of? (Score:2, Insightful)
Another problem that could arise is if the XServer crashes and the user, who maybe hasn't used DOS in 10+ years, is suddenly met with this command prompt and a lot of text about XFontErrors and core dumps. Their first thought probably won't be, "Woops, I guess I'd better restart the XServer and e-mail this core dump and a list of things I was doing at the time to the appropriate people. How mildly inconvenient," but rather, "Oh, shit, oh shit oh shit, I just destroyed the computer. I'm going to be fired!" and that's when, thinking back to their days in Windows when they needed to fix a crashed program, hit the power button to reboot the computer...without unmounting any of the filesystems or properly shutting down.
I'm too young to have read tech magazines in the late 80s/early 90s (other than those often funny often unfunny Fifth Wave strips in the Xxxx for Dummies books). Was there all this bullshit back then too about how people shouldn't switch from MS-DOS/Mac/etc. to Windows for Workgroups because of the "high cost of training people?"
Re:Bullshit (Score:3, Insightful)
The nearest thing there is to a standard for the hardware is at the signalling level - it's generally all still RS-232, or if it's USB, it's USB set up as an RS-232 USB device (or if you're unlucky, USB set up as a HID generating keyboard input). The protocols used by the hardware are pretty simple though - for example, most barcode scanners just spit out the data in ASCII and that's that. Cash drawers are often not directly connected to the computer, but connected to the receipt printer - and you tell the printer to pop the draw open.
Re:mandriva (Score:2, Insightful)
Seriously - is anyone else bored of these "OMFG, Government X is switching to Linux!!!1!!one!" stories, inevitably followed by "Government X backs down and licenses Windows/Office" headlines a month later?
To Whom It May Concern: Either announce a switch to Linux, go through with it and provide a flagship test-case for Linux in government, or STFU and stop wasting our time with vacuous attempts to scare better licensing terms out of Microsoft. It's getting boring.
Re:Retraining. (Score:1, Insightful)
However, using styles, writing equations, table of contents, section breaks etc, tend to complicate the migration process. Furthermore, back when I was using OOo 2.0, it still had issues with the equation editor not rendering properly half the time. And I tried using 1.x (don't remember the exact one) at work to edit a spreadsheet, and it kept corrupting the spreadsheet until I finally had to redo it from scratch.
Don't get me wrong. I'm glad that OOo is trying to compete with Office. However, Office is really the flagship MS product in terms of quality, stability, and usability and OOo right now doesn't come close.
BTW, if a company is going to switch to Linux, I'd recommend WINE so as to be able to retain Office.