Mandrakesoft Acquires Conectiva 229
rednaxel writes "This morning, both companies issued press releases about the merge. French Mandrakesoft is acquiring all shares of brazilian Conectiva for a total amount of 1.79 million EUR (2.3 million USD) in stock." CNet has coverage of the merger as well. From the article: "This won't elevate us to the status of Red Hat or Novell/SuSE yet, of course, but this is a significant growth for us..."
How? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:How? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How? (Score:4, Insightful)
They sell their product. For between $30 and $150 per box. And people like me buy it, so they make money.
It might sound odd to buy something that you can download without charge (or buy CDs for $6), but really that's just a convenient aspect of the distribution mechanism. If I lose my boxed copy of Mandrake, I can make a copy, download, or buy a cheap copy. (Compare that to other operating-systems, where if you so much as change a hard-drive, you have to beg for permission to continue using the OS)
It might still seem odd to pay when you can freeload, but my opinion of that is that I'm paying for the future availability of Mandrake. (just like I pay for wikipedia even though it's free) -- we're buying the ability for anyone in the world to use the best OS without charge. And that's quite different to paying for just a license.
Re:How? (Score:5, Informative)
The real question in this case is why is Mandrakesoft's stock worth enough for Conectiva investors to consider this to be a worthwhile deal (as opposed to grabbing on to a sinking ship). I haven't looked at the business side of either company, so I can't comment there.
Re:How? (Score:2, Interesting)
Anyone knows how much (if anything) of Mandrake stocks are held by ABN ?
Looks like (from the numbers) Mandrake is getting only the remaing stocks still help incompany by the original founders of Conectiva.
Unless there is some big involvment of ABN on Mandrake, I find this all very strange.
Re:How? (Score:3, Informative)
Yet your analogy with stock splits is erroneous. In a stock split, nothing really happens. Each old share becomes 2 or 10 new shares. It's just a story of splitting the cake in more pieces, but everybody still has the same proportion of the cake. An investor that used to own 1% of the stock will own twice (or ten times) more shares but still own 1% because the total number of out
Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company (Score:2)
I wanted to look up their stock stats but yahoo finance doesn't have them. Anyone know how many outstanding shares Mandrake has?
Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company (Score:2)
Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company (Score:4, Interesting)
Profitability is not measured in absolute numbers. (Score:2)
A company investing 1000000 and arning 900000 is crap (putting all this out of any context).
Another one investing 10000 and making 20000 is much more profitable.
Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company (Score:2)
Well that means that profit is about 27% of gross revenues. That doesn't seem too shabby.
Oh!, Oh, I see. You weren't talking about profitability. You were talking about quantity. Not quite the same thing, ducks.
Re:How? (Score:2, Interesting)
As far as I know, their main sources of revenue are from consulting, corporate support, some value added like packages of various proprietary closed-source software to their OS, and through their club membership program. I understa
Re:How? (Score:2)
Actualy what MandrakeSoft did was asking for bankrupcy protection, which is different to bankrupcy. With this protection, MandrakeSoft was able to straight up its financial situation, went back to normal and now is profitable again.
Peace!
Re:How? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How? (Score:2)
Exactly. For those of you who are visually-oriented, A graph [yahoo.com]
I think Mandrakesoft knows it's core customers and treats them right. Connectiva could probably have found another bigger fish to latch onto, but probably not one so much inline with the core value of their customer base also.
More Visible (Score:2)
Re:How? (Score:3, Interesting)
How do they have the money to do this? Werent they almost bankrupt about a year ago?
First, their financial situation was never as bad as it sounded. They had no money and couldn't fulfil debt obligations because a previous board of directors had moved them into to many business areas that were too far removed from their core business model (which has always been selling support and services to corporations).
Once they axed the former board, ceased unprofitable ventures, and got back to their core pro
Re:How? (Score:5, Interesting)
Facts, please.
Mandrake club is currently less than or equal to 28% of their revenue, not the 80% you claim. From their latest quarterly summary [mandrakesoft.com]:
Product sales amounted to 51% of revenues, enterprise services 21% and online sales and services 28%.
So you're dead wrong about where their money comes from.
Also, your numbers are slightly off. According to that same report, Mandrake is worth about 40 million euros (market value); that's about 50 million USD. Sure, they're not the size of RedHat but that's one of the reasons I like them.
I don't know where you got the loss figure from but I bought the stock at 2.1 euros. On 4 August 2004, it was 2.39 Euros. It is now 7.60 Euros. Unless Canadian math is different than American math, that's a 317% growth in the period from August 2004 to February 2005. Overall, that's a growh of about 361%. That's not a bad return over the 2.5 years that I've owned the stock
Representing your opinion and numbers you pull out of your ass as fact is embarassing when people call you on it, eh? ;-)
And oh, by the way, I happen to like M. LeMarois. He's always been cordial and straightforward in my dealings with him and he seems to have a good idea of where the company should be headed. That, of course, is just my opinion.
Re:How? (Score:2)
Re:How? (Score:2)
It is the US Dollar which is very low compared to Euro. It is not the Euro being very highly priced everywhere else.
Peace!
Re:Mandrake support level? (Score:2)
wtf... Nothing special, just a machine I am logged into right now.
# uname -m -r -s -p
Linux 2.4.27 i686 unknown
# uptime
4:25pm up 104 days, 16:25, 7 users, load average: 0.15, 0.44, 0.72
Re:Mandrake support level? (Score:2)
Pray tell, how do I do that?
New Name (Score:3, Funny)
Re:New Name (Score:2, Funny)
Re:New Name (Score:2)
What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:5, Informative)
Well Connectiva were one of the first distributions to embrace apt-rpm (they may even have done a lot of the development work, I can't recall) and provide some of the major development impetus behind Synpatic [nongnu.org] which is far and away the best GUI package manager around. As far as I am concerned what Mandrake could gain from Connectiva is a move to apt-rpm and Synaptic. I know URPMI has a lot of fans but I think apt and Aynaptic may be the way to go for pakcage management. It helps standardise things as well - all the Debian based distros use apt, and several use Synaptic by default as well, and despite yum being the default apt-rpm and Synaptic is very popular on Fedora, and even SuSE (instead of YaST).
At the very least I hope Connectiva stays with apt-rpm and Synaptic. I would hate to see them shift to URPMI at this stage.
Jedidiah.
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:5, Interesting)
Conectiva Linux will not exactly shift to urpmi, but instead it will be merged into Mandrake Linux.
And remember guys, we're called Conectiva, with a single "n".
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:5, Insightful)
As far as I am concerned what Mandrake could gain from Connectiva is a move to apt-rpm and Synaptic.
huh? Mandrake can move to apt-rpm and Synaptic any time they want. They don't have to merge with Conectiva to do that! It's Free Software after all.
The merger has got little to do with software and technical features, and everything to do with getting entry to South American markets.
Besides, both are heading towards the SMART package manager.
--
Simon
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
That is why urpm/apt/smart are needed.
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Brazil is a big country. With a lot of resources. Often people in the northern hemisphere forget that that that there is another half of a world. Could they become the Linux of South America?
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2, Informative)
Yes, the name of the country is in native language, but the brother one of the first Presidents slaughtered all of our Indians - Uruguay and Costa Rica are about the only American countries without natives.
Back on topic, I'd say that buying Conectiva is a smart move, because Linux capitalizes on the anti-American (and anti-Microsoft) feeling that the current left wing presidents share, so it wouldn't be st
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
The Brazilians are rabid about free (libré) software and they have a growing economy. Check out Lessig's blog about his trip there.
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Point taken, but you're on an English board.
I hadn't realized it was borrowed from Spanish; I assumed it was Latin, but it looks like that's 'liber'. I invite the classics majors to jump in now and provide all the rele
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Native spanish speaker(Mexican).
Gracias.
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
You start from a false assumption: that portuguese can be viewed and analysed by changes "from" castillian (AKA "spanish"). Portuguese, or Galaico-portuguese, was the literary and cultural language in the Iberian peninsula even before Castille started to gain political influence amonsts the other Iberian "nations" that nowadays constitu
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
My grandfather was a native Dutch speaker, and in talks with native Belgians and Germans, the impression I get is that Dutch and German
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:5, Informative)
Marcelo Tosatti has been maintaining the 2.4 kernels you've been running for a long time. He's a Brazilian working for Conectiva.
You on the other hand are an asshole.
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:4, Informative)
Actually, he left Conectiva a long time ago
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:3, Insightful)
Marcelo works in Brasil. Hit.
Marcelo doesn't work for Conectiva anymore. Miss.
garcia is an asshole. Hit.
That's enough "informative" for me.
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:3, Insightful)
Marcelo works for Cyclades @ Brazil.
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:2, Funny)
And they moderate it "informative" and "insightful". Go mods!
No mucho? (Score:2)
First thing I see is market. Think South America is interested in cheap software? I'd guess they are.
Exposure, due to the connection, and perhaps a stronger documentation/application translator force. Mandrake (eventually) saves the Connectiva platform with a buyout (or maybe it just doesn't die), offering Mandrake as
Re:No mucho? (Score:4, Informative)
First, the majority of Conectiva users speak portugues, not spanish. I would guess at least 70% of the user base is in Brazil.
Second, Conectiva has been profitable for some time now, so this won't be exactly saving the Conectiva platform, as if it were dying.
Conectiva has some big corporate customers, including several banks. One of them is even using Conectiva Linux on their ATM machine. So I really don't understand why you wrote "customers" (using quotation marks).
Also, it is Conectiva, with just 1 N. Not Connectiva.
About what I think, is that people should do their homework before posting. Then again, this IS slashdot.
Thank you. (Score:2)
My bad. Myself, and others I'm sure, appreciate your reply. Thank you for clearing me up and not letting my uninformed dialog go read by others unchecked.
I've heard nothing but good things about the distribution.
Do you think the purchase is healthy for Connectiva and/or Mandrake?
Re:Thank you. (Score:2, Interesting)
For Conectiva, I'm afraid to guess.
Conectiva turned into a profitable company mostly by firing employees and closing offices. That is what you get wh
Re:Thank you. (Score:2, Interesting)
Are their the shares still held by the original founders, or are they the shares that ABN-Amro Bank held ?
If their are the shares held by the original founders, one has to guess how many shares of Mandrake are held by ABN, and if this is some kind of twisted move from ABN to get a hold of Mandrake too.
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? (Score:3, Insightful)
Uh oh... (Score:2, Funny)
I think I just felt my knee jerk a little bit...
*Runs for the hills*
Been with Mandrake for years (Score:5, Interesting)
Being a Mandrake user for several years, I am happy to see that they overcame their financial difficulties and are in a position to expand.
Apart from the botched 9.2 upgrade debacle, they have a distro that I can use for a Linux home network [baheyeldin.com] without spending too much time on it. I have four machines running Linux at home, and don't want to spend a lot of time on each configuring it.
They are also familiar and friendly enough for my kids to use it as their only desktop. They get to play their MP3, use FireFox or Konqueror, use Open Office for homework, ...etc.
Moreover, it is also perfectly good as a server for LAMP, Samba, ...etc.
Go Mandrake!
Re:Been with Mandrake for years (Score:2)
If you were an investor, your opinion would be different. They bought free code. Brilliant.
Re:Been with Mandrake for years (Score:2)
I am not an investor, just a happy user.
Regarding "they bought free code", I think it is not what this is about. My guess would be that they bought a brand, marketshare, geographical penetration, and minshare.
Re:Been with Mandrake for years (Score:2)
Mandrake made a good power move into the South American Linux market with the market leader, dipshit.
Sofware is about services. (Score:2)
Re:Been with Mandrake for years (Score:2)
"Ethics" means, essentially, "value system" or "code of conduct." We all have them - the question is whether your ethics are in line with someone else's ethics. What is wrong with a company making something proprietary if that allows them succeed, reward the people who put up money to form the company, pay the people who work for the company, and (most importantly) take care of a need that paying
Re:Been with Mandrake for years (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm from Quebec and my primary language is French. I do not use Mandrake Linux but I feel their implication in the Linux movement improved my own experience. Vive Mandr
Re:Been with Mandrake for years (Score:2)
The *real* question is... (Score:2)
Kicking MS out of the 5th largest country? (Score:5, Funny)
Heart attack averted (Score:2, Funny)
Quality of Mandrake Nowadays (Score:3, Informative)
I guess a distro is only as good as the hard disk it sits on, and I discovered it was on a DeskStar . . . when it died. I put an install of Mandrake 10 on drive it was RMA'd and returned. This didn't seem to be a very mature OS. I couldn't choose what to install, and later found out it didn't include gcc. I installed that only to find it couldn't successfully compile anything! I've since switched to SuSE at home bceause that's what we use at work. While that had its own problems, most of it would have to be blamed on my home CD-burner dying (bad luck lately).
I hear there's a community edition ISO along with something else. Whatever I got might have been the junkier of the two. Either way, it left a very sour impression. I'm surprised they're still conducting business, but the best of luck to them.
Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays (Score:2)
Just out of curiosity, could you name a few of the major ones? (I've been running Linux, mostly mdk, since '99, but my involvement in the nuts and bolts of my distro has been rather on-and-off).
Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays (Score:2)
Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays (Score:2)
Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays (Score:2)
Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays (Score:2)
The only version of Mandrake that doesn't include compilers is the Discovery Edition, which is not avialable for download. But, even on Discovery, you can use online urpmi repositories to install any software you like.
Since this seems to be your main argument, the rest of your post is really invalid.
Please try a bit better with your next troll.
Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays (Score:2)
Nice merge ... (Score:4, Interesting)
My note on Mandrake Usability.. it 'just works' (Score:3, Interesting)
Debian; I never managed to get the ATI drivers to play nice with my card (and this wasn't for lack of trying)
Fedora didn't want to give me sound, nor did it give my laptop power-savings.
Suse I never tried, and compiling/Gentoo is out of the question.
That's true, but (Score:2)
Re:From the press release: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:From the press release: (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm biased because Mandrake really got me into the linux field and away from Micro$oft products. And linux has made computing fun to me again, which has not been the case for some years now.
I say, if they are trying to make things a little more uniform with these sorts of mergers(software, releases, security) then yay for them. Let's see how it turns out.
Re:From the press release: (Score:2)
From that, one can imagine they will start merging their linux distributions almost imediately.
Re:From the press release: (Score:2, Interesting)
Actually, after this merger, only Red Hat of all the big distro's is still on it's own.
I wonder how long that'll last. Then again, who's left to buy them?
Re:From the press release: (Score:2)
among other things, they don't think anyone would actually use "IBM's Linux" because of image issues. They want to make money from support anyways, it works well to be distro-neutral.
Re:From the press release: (Score:2)
It tells people you're not American. With the current situation in the US with regards to IP legislation, that's worth a bundle.
Re:Yet? (Score:2)
Re:Yet? (Score:2)
Oh, wait, forgot where I was for a second.
Re:Yet? (Score:2)
I think hating or loving companies who are out to make money no matter what they have to do is just foolish.
Re:Yet? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Yet? (Score:5, Insightful)
Such a move is often good for consumers, too. Imagine what would happen if all of the cell phone companies were small, local businesses. Not only would your service be crappy, but support and prices would probably suck too. By combining into a few major players, you get national service, a sturdy support system, and longevity - they're less likely to fold and leave you hanging.
You don't get to be the richest man in the world by letting your competition win.
Growth Paths (Score:2)
Its also in vogue these days..
Re:Yet? (Score:2)
Re:Novell/SuSE (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:What are you talking about ? (Score:2, Informative)
"All software that comes on every distro is free"
Thats a large idiot speaking. If you ever want to legitimize the business you have to follow certain business level practices to be successful. While open sourcing is good, ultimately in the end, someone has to pay out the cash to support it. Why is RedHat