Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Mandriva Businesses

Mandrake 9.2b1 Released, 2.6 Test Kernel in Cooker 219

DCowern writes "Mandrake today announced 9.2 beta 1 of their distribution. More interestingly, Mandrake has included a test version of kernel 2.6 in cooker (their development version). It's dated 27 July so it should be on all the cooker mirrors in the RPM2 directory by now. If you can't find it on your favorite mirror, it's definitely on ftp.sunet.se." Better yet, Bruha points to BitTorrent files for the 1st 2nd, and 3rd ISOs, and a link to the Mandrake 9.2 wiki, writing "Note that the beta1 installation uses the same kernel as 9.1 did, so if you had problems installing 9.1, you may want to wait for beta2 (which will use an updated kernel)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mandrake 9.2b1 Released, 2.6 Test Kernel in Cooker

Comments Filter:
  • Sweet... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by GameGod0 ( 680382 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @09:27AM (#6595264)
    Will this be the first major distro running the 2.6 kernel?
    • Re:Sweet... (Score:5, Informative)

      by MuParadigm ( 687680 ) <jgabriel66@yahoo.com> on Saturday August 02, 2003 @09:36AM (#6595299) Homepage Journal

      I think so.

      Word on various boards seems to be that the 2.6 kernel is much faster than 2.4.x. People are claiming improvements of up to 50% in some operations.

      Of course, these are early adopters, most of them with single cpu machines. I haven't heard of anyone testing it for robustness or stability in a high-end environment yet.

      Anyone else got word on it's performance or bugs?

      • Re:Sweet... (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Bryce ( 1842 ) *
        OSDL has been doing heavy duty testing of the kernel 2.4, 2.5, and 2.6 on 1, 2, 4, and 8
        processor systems, for the past 2 years. See
        its Kernel [osdl.org]
        Testing website and tools. The particular tool
        that does this is the Scalable Test Platform.

        Bryce
    • Re:Sweet... (Score:5, Informative)

      by MuParadigm ( 687680 ) <jgabriel66@yahoo.com> on Saturday August 02, 2003 @09:43AM (#6595322) Homepage Journal
      Sorry to post to myself, but I was wrong about Mamdrake being the first major distro to supply the 2.6 kernel. Red Hat has had an RPM for a few weeks.
      • Re:Sweet... (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Slime-dogg ( 120473 )

        Gentoo's had the source available in portage since test 1 was released. It works too.

        The only problem is that you need to use the open nvidia drivers, since the old drivers are not compatible. Who knows when Nvidia will release a version for this kernel. :sigh:

    • Re:Sweet... (Score:5, Informative)

      by Tirel ( 692085 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @09:44AM (#6595325)
      Well, not really, gentoo has had the option since 2.6.0-test1 came out. The portage tree is wonderfully updates within a few hours with the main branch and others (mm, aa, ac, ck, ...), so the only thing you need to do is check out /usr/portage/sys-kernel and decice which one you want to have at install time (or later, if you're upgrading like me)
      • Re:Sweet... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by mickwd ( 196449 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @11:36AM (#6595715)
        "Well, not really, gentoo has had the option since 2.6.0-test1 came out."

        Yes, but all Gentoo does with a kernel is download the source and install it into /usr/src/linux, leaving you to configure it, build it and install it.

        Anyone who can download a file and use 'tar' can do the same thing, quite easily.

        And when you install a new kernel, Portage doesn't even tell you which ebuilds need to be re-installed (nvidia-kernel, i2c, lm-sensors, etc).

        Not knocking Gentoo (I run Gentoo and Mandrake), but the binary distributions do more of the hard work for you. To some people that is their strength, to others it is their weakness.
        • Given your arguments, I find it difficult to believe you actually use Gentoo regularly. (I know this post is incredibly late...). Gentoo now has a genkernel script which can build a .config, kernel image and initrd all automagically. And also, revdep-update.sh (a new Portage addon) allows reverse dependencies of libraries and other packages (also including kernels) to be calculated and reinstalled if needed. Yes, it does still make you configure grub/lilo...
    • Not to put too fine a point on it, but 2.6 isn't out yet and is extremely unlikely to be for several months possibly even six months from now. The 2.6 test and prerelease stages are only starting and is likely to go through a significant number of iterations before being called 2.6.0. Therefore, unless Mandrake intend to release what is essentially a alpha state kernel with broken drivers and the ensuing carnage when it trashes or doesn't work in various machines, it would seem highly unlikely to me.

      Of co

      • Re:Sweet... (Score:2, Insightful)

        by jonadab ( 583620 )
        > Of course they could always include it as a 'try this if you dare'
        > advanced feature

        That's what Mandrake Cooker is all about. The regular Mandrake
        distro is somewhat less bleeding-edge (though more cutting-edge
        than some other distros), but Cooker is for testing alpha stuff.
  • by peek-n-squeeze ( 592633 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @09:28AM (#6595267)
    Beta 1 was put onto the mirrors on 22nd July. So by the time you read this, it'll be at beta2
  • by warmcat ( 3545 ) * on Saturday August 02, 2003 @09:35AM (#6595295)
    ... note that this guy at redhat [redhat.com] is tracking the test releases with redhat-installable RPMs, over RH9.

    If you try it, note that you must upgrade modutils and some other packages given in the link. Many modules have changed names, like usb-ohci.o -> ohci-hcd.ko so you will need to do some screwing around. I have been running test1 then test2 for a couple of weeks from the link on top of Redhat 9 and it has been working very nicely.
  • by groove10 ( 266295 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @09:37AM (#6595305) Homepage
    I know a lot of people use Mandrake (myself included), but really is it necessary to annouce the beta version of a point release? C'mon... Not that many people are interested in burning the ISOs for a b1. When the point release comes out of beta, then maybe it deserves a front page article, but this is just wasted space on /.s front page.
    • by Futurepower(R) ( 558542 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @09:54AM (#6595356) Homepage
      Please don't post to stories that you don't think are interesting. If you do, you will just post uninteresting comments. A new release of a beta of linux version is very important. That's how the news reaches those who would beta test. I'm very interested in knowing what to expect, even if I don't test the beta.
      • Hear, hear! I don't even know what to say about people who don't want to read about something, but still post comments about it!

        This is Slashdot. The editors will post whatever they feel like. You can even filter it out if you want to. There is no reason to whine about stories like this.

        And a new release of Mandrake will indeed be interesting to a lot of people. It shows that troubled Mandrake is still up and running, working on future versions of their distribution.

        Spam apologists and story whiners a

      • I think his objection is that it was posted to the Front Page of slashdot. It should have been posted to something like Developers, as it's really not big enough news for a front page story IMO.
    • Maybe because it's kernal 2.6 usage instead of YAPR (yet another point release)

      Maybe that's why redhat just went from 8 to 9 , they want to be on the front page of Slashdot!
    • More than a "Mandrake has updated" or "Look at this new point release" this is a "the 2.6 kernel is finally out and being used by AverageUser!" story.

      That being said, if we have another dozen stories where every other distro releases a 2.6 kernel standard then I might go postal... but not yet :)
      • "the 2.6 kernel is finally out and being used by AverageUser!" story.
        Hardly... this is only the second test version of 2.6 that started in July. The 2.4 release had 12 test versions that stretched from May to December. This is simply an optional kernel included with Mandrake. Linus himself has previously asked that distributors include a test 2.6 kernel option to encourage more testing.
    • by antiMStroll ( 664213 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @01:40PM (#6596104)
      What part of 'News for Nerds' do you find confusing?
  • ftp.sunet.se _is_ my favorite mirror.

    Oh, never mind.

  • test kernels (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Tirel ( 692085 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @09:40AM (#6595312)
    Don't be fooled by labels such as "beta" and "test", I've been running 2.6.0-test1-mm2 on a server for about a week now and it's extremely stable. If you need any of the features that the 2.6 branch introduces or if you just want to try it out, mandrake is the way to go.

    OTOH, the only thing I dislike about mandrake is that they force KDE down your throat like it's the next best thing after bread and butter, I really wish they would include mode optinons at install like wm2, ion, openbox, icewm, but also install the qt and gtk libs in the background so you could run gnome/kde applications. That way more people would find out about the alternatives to KDE (it's too distracting and relativealy slow for my tastes.)
    • Since I'm too lazy to go look at the changelog, could you tell me what's changed with the 2.6 kernel? I'm no kernel hacker, so put it in basic sysadmin terms if ya don't mind. Thanks.
    • by buchanmilne ( 258619 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @10:11AM (#6595398) Homepage
      OTOH, the only thing I dislike about mandrake is that they force KDE down your throat like it's the next best thing after bread and butter, I really wish they would include mode optinons at install like wm2, ion, openbox, icewm, but also install the qt and gtk libs in the background so you could run gnome/kde applications.

      $ cat /etc/mandrake-release
      Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586
      $ urpmq --sources enlightenment windowmaker blackbox xfce olvwm waimea AfterStep amiwm evilwm fluxbox fvwm fvwm2 ion ion-metadome pwm ratpoison rox-session swm
      ftp://ftp.cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/ Mandr ake/RPMS/enlightenment-0.16.5-13mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp: //ftp.cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS/WindowMaker-0.80.2-4mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://f tp.cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS/blackbox-0.65.0-1mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp. cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS/xfce-3.8.18-1mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp.cae. co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/swm-1.2.5-3mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp.cae.c o.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/fvwm2-2.4.16-2mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp.ca e.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/amiwm-0.20.48-6mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp.c ae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/waimea-0.4.0-3mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp.ca e.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/olvwm-4.4-14mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp.cae. co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/AfterStep-1.8.11-3mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ft p.cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/ratpoison-1.2.2-2mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp .cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/fluxbox-0.9.4-2mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp.c ae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/pwm-1.0-11mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp.cae.co .za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/ion-metadome-20020605-3mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp ://ftp.cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/evilwm-0.99.14-1mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp. cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/fvwm-1.24r-23mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp.cae .co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/ion-20030627-3mdk.i586.rpm
      ftp://ftp.ca e.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/rox-session-0.1.20-1mdk.i586.rpm

      (this is our internal mirror, find your own)

      Is that enough? (oh, there's still qvwm in PLF, since it looks too similar to some other desktop we know).

      Mandrake has never forced a desktop on anyone, and all you need to enjoy the Mandrake configuration tools is gtk+2 and perl.

      Sure, not all the window managers are in the main distro, but without contrib, you're missing half of the distro anyway!
      • Yes, but does fvwm actually work?

        Under MDK 9.0, at least, there were serious focus problems that kept you from being able to use it ;-(

    • Though Buchan has beat me to it, if you don't want KDE or GNOME, do a minimal install with urpmi, and then you can get most of the wm's you've listed from Mandrake contribs with urpmi.

    • Re:test kernels (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Azureflare ( 645778 )
      Most Newbs who will be using that package selection during the install (i.e. not selecting individual packages) aren't going to want to muck around with the more complicated interfaces (Hey, I think it's complicated, and I'm a newb...kde and gnome are reassuring, because they are more like windows than the others. I like the speed of icewm, but config of toolbar/menu is a pain, and KDE is just so much easier.)

      I think KDE is a good newbie GUI, and it's pretty effective for the average user. If you include

    • Mandrake started life as an offshoot of RH that included kde. It should be no surprise that kde is the default. There are also a whole pile of alternative window managers with it. Just install the one you want.....
  • Huh? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ErikZ ( 55491 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @10:22AM (#6595425)
    I thought Mandrake needed millions of dollars in donations or it was going out of business? What happened?
    • Re:Huh? (Score:4, Informative)

      by t482 ( 193197 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @10:40AM (#6595501) Homepage
      There distribution was alway profitable. It was there other business which pushed them into the equivalent of chapter 11.
    • I thought Mandrake needed millions of dollars in donations or it was going out of business? What happened?
      No, you misunderstood. What they said was that if they did not get another million, that God would recall them. Apparently it worked. Just like it does here in America.
  • by Idou ( 572394 ) * on Saturday August 02, 2003 @10:38AM (#6595494) Journal
    I downloaded those bitorrent iso's last week, way before they could get slash . . . wait . . . bitorrent . . .

    I CAN'T WIN!

  • by t482 ( 193197 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @10:43AM (#6595518) Homepage
    I have been using OO 1.1 now for 6 months or so. Its beta - but it is very stable. Some of the features (print to pdf) make it worth including it in the distro now.

    Also does anyone know if they have included the Ximain OO hacks for OO?
  • Torrents (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Bruha ( 412869 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @11:06AM (#6595622) Homepage Journal
    Those torrents I pointed out are from mandrake themselves.. They're running the tracker appareently.. I have not looked but I bet BT is installed in 9.2b.

    Now I'm curious what bandwidth savings Mandrakesoft made with using Bt to distribute the files!
    • Those torrents I pointed out are from mandrake themselves..

      I was quite impressed to see that. I hope that the Mandrake guys save lots of money on the bandwidth they save there. I seeded the files for about a day.

      One thing, though -- I wasn't able to find the link to the torrents from their official website. Oh well; I guess BT is at that stage where it's provided but not actively advertised as the primary download method :)
      • Actually the torrents were on the announcements page.. The portion of the story I posted was a exact copy of that announcement.

  • ...So it will be stable and clean when *I* will migrate to 2.6 :-)
  • by Mipsalawishus ( 674206 ) on Saturday August 02, 2003 @11:49AM (#6595754)
    The last Mandrake release ran a 2.4.21 prerelease kernel. I personally never had any stability problems with it. I also understand that Mandrake tends to gravitate toward the bleeding edge of the packages they include in their releases, but the kernel is one place I think shouldn't be included in this manner. I think Mandrake is a wonderful company who makes an awesome distribution. I even have a customer's server running Mandrake 9.0 for 7 months and they haven't had a single problem with it (they use it for Samba and DHCP primarily). I suppose if one is looking for the latest and greatest, look toward Mandrake. Otherwise stick to Slackware or Debian for more matured packages in a distribution release.
    • I also understand that Mandrake tends to gravitate toward the bleeding edge of the packages they include in their releases, but the kernel is one place I think shouldn't be included in this manner.

      Ummm, you did notice that the 2.6 kernel we're talking about is in contrib? Most newbies won't even be able to find it! 9.2 Will most certainly default to a 2.4.22 kernel (since we are rapidly approaching version freeze time), but there are already a few alternative kernels in contrib, and this will be just anot
    • I've had one bad experience with Mandrake using the pre-release kernel for 9.1, I wasn't able to run GDB (it kept saying it could not set a breakpoint) until the latest kernel update (I think about a week ago). Since GDB is critical to development, I'd think they would have ironed out that problem a little earlier. Aside from that I've had no problems at all, it's been great.
  • Python 2.3. I was very surprised to not see python 2.3, even in mandrake cooker. Given the increased stability and speed I would have thought they'd have rushed to update to it when 2.3 was released. Worse for me, I'm unfamilier enough with rpm building to take the risk of trying to update python myself.
  • Will this new version of Mandrake actually boot from the CDROM ISO (like redhat or slackware)? I've had trouble with the last two versions simply giving me an error that it cannot read from the device during installation. This was tested on 3 different computer systems and none of them could even get to the installation screen.

"The great question... which I have not been able to answer... is, `What does woman want?'" -- Sigmund Freud

Working...