Japan To Do Payroll On Linux 343
strannik writes "Yahoo/Reuters is reporting that the The Japanese Government will use Linux for it's payroll system. Fujitsu LTD, IBM Japan LTD and OKI Electronic Industry Co. will develop the system by March of 2004. The new system is expected to halve operating costs (to about 350 Billion Yen a year)."
Upstart? (Score:4, Informative)
Dictionary.com:
ntr.v. upstarted, upstarting, upstarts (p-stärt)
To spring or start up suddenly.
The banner-ad on the right side of my screen reading that article was the Oracle/Unbreakable Penguin ad. Granted Linux has been gaining ground quickly as-of-late, but it's not exactly been an upstart.
Re:they're saving 350 billion yen... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:they're saving 350 billion yen... (Score:5, Informative)
Excahnge rate/Weak Yen (Score:4, Informative)
Re:$300mil/yr? (Score:4, Informative)
Secondly I work for a department that supports a payroll system for about 10k Employees and I'd guess that for Developers alone we shell out about $250k a year to support the system. And this isn't even a home-rolled system, we're talking maintenance of a system that we pay for. With all liscenses included and hardware costs, I'm sure we're well over $500,000 a year.
Thats for 10k Employees, how many employees does the Japanese Govt. have?
Re:It's about time (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Operating Costs != Cost of Ownership? (Score:5, Informative)
Not any more! Search google for 'cluster knoppix'. Or go here [bofh.be]
It's this simple: boot a server with the
It's a facinating this to turn a Windows network into a temporary Mosix cluster in under an hour. Pull the CD's out and reboot, and your back to Windows. (Or other OS)
Re:Java? (Score:5, Informative)
You've said it! You have to port C code!! Java is cross-platform by design, not portable.
On the other hand, porting C code is just a matter of making sure the library you use on OS A is also ported on OS B. For example porting an X app on windows is not possible (well, you can rewrite your GUI layer, but I don't call that a "portable" app).
With Java, the standard libraries are way more usefull than the common set of C libraries... (especially if you take the common set between *nix and windows
For the PHP/Python/Java/$LANGUAGE I don't really care. But please don't tell me C is portable. Hello world compile on any language. As soon as you start fancy stuff, you're bounded by the library you're using.
On Line bill paying (Score:4, Informative)
Need to pay your electric bill? Pay it at the bank
Need to pay the phone bill? Pay it at the bank
Most companies in the U.S. are just starting to implement this or worst they are starting to charge for it.
Re:Operating Costs != Cost of Ownership? (Score:1, Informative)
Oh, and remember when Bob Young said that he *only* uses Linux? It sure looked like he was using the windows 2000 computer (kept around for programs that Linux doesn't have [dreamweaver]) and Internet Explorer to check out his stock.
Borrowing more from comments on slashdot.jp ... (Score:5, Informative)
"Of course, Fujistu almost certainly offered Solaris first. However the great and the good in the government said 'Yes, well and good but the OS with the most popular appeal is Linux.' So they went for Linux. When offered by three companies, Linux is also easier to swallow."
See the Japanese are not the only ones who can play copycat!
Re:Use Linux for a payroll system? (Score:4, Informative)
Of course it matters: why would you want to develop and run your application framework on an OS that costs you licensing fees, requires proprietary hardware, has a security track record that resembles swiss cheese, has frequent downtime or requires constant babysitting?
The OS does matter.
Re:Truly a blow to Microsoft and a great Linux cou (Score:3, Informative)
For years Microsoft's server growth has, in large part, come from UNIX to Windows migrations. Microsoft used the high price/performance ratio from x86 chips to steal marketshare from UNIX. The fact that Linux is starting to capture these sales is a big deal for the folks at Microsoft. Microsoft currently has a price/earnings ratio of 30. That means that if they want to keep their stock price up where it currently is that they have to show a significant amount of revenue growth. Even if Linux doesn't cut into Windows' server marketshare it is still robbing Microsoft of growth potential.
As for the desktop, Microsoft already has nearly 100% of that market. Part of the reason that Microsoft changed their licensing scheme is that raising prices was the only way to get any growth out of the desktop market. Microsoft doesn't have anywhere to go on the desktop but down.