Mandrake Appealing to Community, Again 687
An anonymous reader writes "It seems that MandrakeSoft's short-term financial problem is worse than was thought. A new page on the Mandrake web site says: 'Everyone who is concerned with the company's future is encouraged to read and distribute the following message. In order to reach the next release, MandrakeSoft currently needs to raise cash, and quickly complete the Increase of Capital.' Darn, and I thought they were almost over this hump. Looks like a good time to help recruit Mandrake supporters for the Club."
well... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:well... (Score:3, Insightful)
Who knows, Mandrake-the-distribution may live after MandrakeSoft dies. If it's that good of a distro (I wouldn't know, never tried) volunteers will keep it going.
Subscribing to the club is like subscribing to aol (Score:2)
Or RedHat, Mandrake provides a service. This is their business.
Re:well... (Score:5, Insightful)
If you like Mandrake and believe in Linux then the only way to show it is by actually supporting the products to believe are valuable. Free software, unless you mean free-beer, doesn't alleviate the producers of a product or service from the realities of economics. If you do not believe Mandrake is viable, despite liking their products, then don't purchase a MandrakeClub membership or box. If you do believe in the products, then support them.
I've got a shiny new Mandrake 9 PowerPack, and I'm happy with it. I've replaced MS Office with StarOffice. Those who value the products should do the same, and those who don't value the products should not. I think Mandrake has a chance to get back into the black, and I've voted with my $.
Re:well... (Score:3, Interesting)
But, I still have some concerns. Is it a good thing to help a company recover from management mistakes? Of course, this is not Enron, and they got snookered by a fast-talking group of used-car salesmen, but what's to prevent it from happening again? I am not trying to undermine Mandrake, I use it. I'd like to see some policy statements.
Pardon? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Pardon? (Score:5, Funny)
"Please help these needy software developers. Your donation can get a Linux developer a brand new system, a 100 gig SCSI drive, or maybe a clean t-shirt. For the cost of a Mountain Dew you can give a developer some Mountain Dew to develop trivial new Linux applications you might not ever use or understand. Is that too much to ask for a command-line driven utility?"
For each Linux developer you sponsor, you will recieve a 45K JPEG portrait, and a monthly email detailing his progress."
Re:Pardon? (Score:2)
And.Monitor.
Mod parent underrated!!
Re:Pardon? (Score:2)
Re:Pardon? (Score:2, Interesting)
Clearly you don't meet this criteria, so don't worry about it.
Personally, I think its unfortunate most people don't see it this way - its the reason great companies with great products get gobbled / trampled by the Wal-Marts, Microsofts, and Sony's of the world. Economic darwinism (the idea that if a company fails, they must've had an inferior product) is a complete crock of shit, and leads giant uncontrollable monsters like the RIAA et al.
Scott
Re:Pardon? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Pardon? (Score:4, Insightful)
And if you think the reason Microsoft dominates the desktop is marketing, you need to slow down and take an honest look at the situation. Marketing never hurts, but having an OS that can be run (and maintained) by a slobbering idiot doesn't hurt either. See also: Apple.
Re:Pardon? (Score:2)
Re:Pardon? (Score:5, Informative)
Are you trying to be a troll? If this is a serious question, go look at fsf.org . It should suffice to say that there would probably be no Mandrake distribution without their work.
Bruce
Re:This means redhat would be the only Linux Deskt (Score:4, Interesting)
Knowing how dedicated Debianites are, I'm sure this will get modded to troll immediately, but...
I'm not a newbie. I was taking classes in assembler back in the early 80's. I've been working with computers since the late 70's, in high school, and I've had a computer on my desk ever since the Apple
I had to set up a new system last week. I spent 2 days trying to get Debian to install. If it asked for Disk 1 and I mistakenly put in Disk 2, and hit return, then put in the correct disk at the error message, it wouldn't even acknowledge the correct disk. I checked all my CDs to make sure they were readable in the drive I was using, but not once, in 2 days of trying to install Debian did I have a successful install. Every single time, whether I installed from the network, or from a CD, it kept telling me it couldn't get all the packages (and this was a basic install with the basic X-Windows and KDE, not something with a lot of extra programs). I tried the floppy install, following directions, and it still asked for the CDs (not when it was asking for debs sources -- at the beginning). If it installed, X wouldn't run. It did not talk well with my ATI Radeon A-I-W. And forget it even realizing I had a firewire card! I had really wanted to set up a video system under Linux and all my Debian loving friends have been swearing on how good Debian is.
2 days and not once did I get a working install that could recognize my hardware and give me X w/ KDE. So after all that, I decided to try Mandrake 9.0. It worked perfectly the first time. I went to the Penguin Liberation front and got the commands to add RPM sources and all the extra programs I needed (like Cinelerra) installed perfectly. My firewire card worked and for the first time I could capture video in Linux, as well as getting MPlayer to play DVDs.
Mandrake got skunked by venture capitalists who "knew better." Right now I'm still in the startup stage of a business. Money's coming in, but it's paying off startup costs. Mandrake has won my loyalty and I can tell you that within the next month I'll be buying the most complete version of Mandrake 9.0 and will continue to do so with each upgrade they offer. Why? Because it just works! I use the computer as a tool to do work, not as a tool to create tools to make more programs to do more techie stuff with Linux. I use it as a tool, and Mandrake works as a tool. Plain and simple.
Newbie or not, Mandrake is a solid distro and a great tool if you want to actually use your computer to get work done. Such a company deserves our support if we ever want to see Linux prosper on the desktop.
Debian sure isn't anywhere close to the "just install it and it works" stage yet.
You people are incredible (Score:5, Interesting)
I swear . . . you people amaze me. You cry a river over Palladium and litter these message boards with cheers when some country decides to go Linux. You hate Microsoft - yet - when the most user friendly desktop distro is in financial trouble - you scorn them. I mean - wtf? If you believe in the cause and a major leader is having problems - you help them out. You help them out not because you want something in return, you help them out to keep the movement alive. And don't give me this market philosphy bullshit either. If you really believe that shit, stick with MS.
I swear you people are incredible. You cry so much about the DRM thing yet you make it invetiable by turning your back on Mandrake. You're just proving to everybody (including the RIAA, MPAA) that you just want a free lunch. Nothing else. Nothing more.
Go ahead - flame me to death and knock me down to the -1 country. I don't give a shit.
Re:You people are incredible (Score:5, Insightful)
No, its a company that has a crappy business plan and is not making any money. A company asking for cash donations so it can survive a little longer is one of the dummest things I have ever heard. Maybe they should rethink their business plan instead(what a strange idea- a business that actually makes money without donations?). You are not helping out the "movement" at all- Linux does not rely on Mandrake for survival. If you want to donate your money, that is fine, but you should realize that by donating you are just throwing your cash down the toilet to enable a crappy business to survive another week.
And you should leave Microsoft, DRM, and all of the other
Its not charity to subscribe to the club (Score:5, Interesting)
If you want Mandrake 10 you'll subscribe to the club, and if you dont want it, you wont subscribe,the code costs money to produce.
Re:Pardon? (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm reminded of the number of products I've really enjoyed over the years, and can't get anymore because no-one even cared to write in, or buy the products. Worse, that which replaces it on the shelf, is often not as good or worse. I've had to settle for "other", over the years, more than I care to list.
Sorry I don't, yet, have an informed opinion on Mandrake 9.0, as it just arrived in the mail a couple days ago (yeah, I did buy it because I do believe in supporting Linux distros with more than just words) and I'll be installing it during the next few days.
I've had RedHat and wasn't overwhelmed with their product, it's ok, but I'd like to try another and picked Mandrake based upon positive user reviews.
It was shipped late and I just got a very nice letter from Mandrake appologizing for the delay (which was actually only about 3 business days to process, not a big deal.)
It's not charity. (Score:3, Insightful)
If you haven't used Mandrake, or you've bought products from them in the past, then I don't think their request for support is directed at you.
Re:Pardon? (Score:2, Insightful)
Very different than a non-profit.
Re:Pardon? (Score:5, Insightful)
1. Donated heaps of cash to KDE developers to encourage development and keep people fed.
2. Open sourced all their software they've created in-house in order to benefit the community.
3. Provided free downloads of their distro from day one.
I'm sure there are dozens more, but first and foremost, they work for the community.
Let them go (Score:2, Insightful)
And frankly, after having bought a copy of Mandrake Linux, and being very unsatisfied with the support, I don't really think they should survive.
My appeal (Score:5, Funny)
I am a 31 year old male virgin and I really, really need to lose my virginity this year. At this point I don't care if you're a guy or the world's skankiest geekette. If you are willing to finally make me a man, please reply to this post with your address. I'll fly over next week.
Re:My appeal (Score:3, Funny)
Alan M Ralsky
6747 Minnow Pond Dr
West Bloowfield Township, MI 48322-2663
hey (Score:5, Informative)
San Antonio, TX 78213
rawr!
Re:hey (Score:5, Funny)
Re:hey (Score:5, Funny)
what are you doing? (Score:3, Funny)
San Antonio, TX 78213
John Romero's address?
What [penny-arcade.com] kind [penny-arcade.com] of [penny-arcade.com] woman [penny-arcade.com] are [penny-arcade.com] you? [penny-arcade.com]
Mandrake: Embarrassment (Score:3, Insightful)
Mandrake should either go non-profit so they can beg for money without being an embarrassment, or shut the doors.
Re:Mandrake: Embarrassment (Score:2)
While they beg for money, I cannot influence how they do their business. For example why did they spend so much in something that turned out to be totally bad? I am in specific referencing their experiment in the education market.
So while I do not find their appeal for money bad, it is how they spend it that I find bad.
Re:Mandrake: Embarrassment (Score:4, Insightful)
I have downloaded and used isos for:
Mandrake 8.0
Mandrake Single Network Firewall
Mandrake 8.1
Mandrake Corporate Server
Mandrake 9.0
At work everytime I have a server problem there is usually an easy Mandrake solution.
At home I have used the most recent version of Mandrake for the last 3 or 4 releases. Yet to date I have not paid a dime.
Well today is the day I will pony up and stop being a complete leach. Sadly I can't afford much 'cause this is an expensive time of year.
Thinning the herd (Score:5, Redundant)
IMO, Mandrake is about to get thinned from the herd. And it'll be too bad, since they've provided a lot of leadership in terms of desktop Linux, but I think we're all a lot more realistic about business realities than we were a few years ago.
Re:Thinning the herd (Score:2, Interesting)
Don't give in to the prisoner's dillema. Always do the right thing, and others will follow.
Re:Thinning the herd (Score:5, Insightful)
You've failed to make the argument about why saving Mandrake is "the right thing".
Not everything is worth saving, and particularly not everything with good intentions. Why does Mandrake offer that is so great that it's worth dumping $4M into? And note that that $4M is not going into new development -- it's to resolve outstanding debts from all the wasted money of the past.
Why Mandrake is worth saving. (Score:4, Insightful)
Numerous polls show that Mandrake is the favorite desktop distribution by a wide margin, so there are clearly a lot of people who use Mandrake and like it, and if Mandrake goes out of business, they're all going to be moving to SuSE or Red Hat. Clearly, there are reasons that so many people opted to use Mandrake in the first place, so SuSE and Red Hat are going to be a step down for many.
I am a standard member of the club, and I purchased the DVD set of Mandrake 9.0, because it was worth paying for.
Re:Why Mandrake is worth saving. (Score:3)
Good for you.
But you ought to be able to see the writing on the wall. Mandrake's business model is failing. You just can't justify the amount they spend on development and packaging costs with the amount they make selling Open Source software. And if you support them now, you better expect to dole out even MORE cash in another 6 months, more after that....
Heck, RedHat is having a hard time, too, but they are at least treading water. In another five years the only full distro will be Debian, which is actually strengthening over time, as opposed to the weakening coming from Mandrake and the others. The reason is that you cannot make enough money selling Open Source software to support a company based on packaging. However, the collective community can do it quite well - thus Debian and its volunteers survive.
It remains to be seen if companies like RedHat will be able to morph themselves into support companies based on Debian packaging (a HUGE win financially for RedHat - lose the devel and packaging costs, zero in on the cash flow).
Note: I could care less how much you like Mandrake. Lots of quality products fail financially, and that is not a judgment on their quality, but on their market value. And, pretty soon, that market value will be less than zero.
Re:Thinning the herd (Score:4, Insightful)
In the interests of promoting diversity in Linux choices, I can see giving a few dollars to help an otherwise viable company get over a particular rough patch.
But this doesn't seem to be the case here -- rather, it's beginning to look more and more like Mandrake will never turn a profit. This brings up the spectre of the community supporting a supposedly for-profit company via donations, which just isn't realistic. So it's not a question of the "right thing", but one of eceonomic reality.
This is *not* the Prisoner's Dilemma... (Score:2, Insightful)
What this all boils down to is you have to decide how many chances you feel Mandrake should get. How many times will you give money to an entity that, although they make a nice product, seems incapable of balancing gains and expenditures. This is merely a business decision, one which occurs daily. The strong survive, the weak die out.
Re:Thinning the herd (Score:3, Insightful)
Damn straight. They follow too closely in the shadow of RedHat and have no way to break even, much less dream of a profit. So appeal to the community, again, and again. It annoys me that to download Mandrake they try to force you to join Club Mandrake.
If I want to join a club, it isn't going to be Mandrake. I use Mandrake, and I actually like it quite a bit. If I were to pay for anything it'd be RedHat though. A company that can at least give me a return on what I pay for. Someone else pointed out that they should go NPO or close the doors, and they were right. I'll donate to an NPO, I buy things from a company. What do I stand to gain from Mandrake by buying? Nothing. I can just as easily use Red Hat, Debian, Slackware, or even *BSD. I'm pretty sure a lot of the target market feels the same as me.
Re:Thinning the herd (Score:2)
You answered your own question earlier in your comment:
"I use Mandrake, and I actually like it quite a bit."
It sounds to me like you gained without buying. How about supporting the company that made that gain possible? What more to you gain from RedHat?
Re:Thinning the herd (Score:4, Insightful)
The real difference here is that RedHat isn't counting on sales of CDs or, worse, the altruism of the community to make money.
Instead, they have displayed good business sense and are creating sell-able services surrounding Linux, such as training and subscriptions to time-saving services (using up2date anytime is worth $60 a server, IMO). This is working out really well for them -- they're suddenly in the black.
If Mandrake can't do the same, well, that's life. They need to either develop a viable for-profit business plan (if they want to remain a for-profit business) or work out another way to survive (go non-profit or get aquired).
That's just reality.
Re:Thinning the herd (Score:2)
I agree to support Mandrake Linux, please send me to the Mandrake Linux Users Club Registration page now.
I'm already a member of the Club or plan on registering soon, please send me to the download page now.
Pretty Tacky if you ask me...
Re:Thinning the herd (Score:2)
tell me you' re a troll, please. Please, don't let me know that people like you actually exists.
Re:What do you buy from Redhat? (Score:3)
Ah, but you contradict yourself. You say "pay for a redhat subscription" then say it's a donation? That is wrong, what I would be buying from redhat is a subscription. In no way is it a donation, because I am getting an actual service from them.
And no, I don't work for Red Hat. I find it funny that if you say you would pay for a commercial Linux distro that is making money, you are accused of either being a troll or working for red hat.
Re:Thinning the herd (Score:3, Interesting)
These days though, most goals can be accomplished with software that's stabilized and has been regression tested for a few months, thus making many other distributions preferable to mandrake.
It's sad to see them go out of business, but that doesn't mean that they shouldn't go bankrupt.
Red Hat turning profit on ~100 Mega$/year revenue (Score:2)
Boxed Sets (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Boxed Sets (Score:2, Insightful)
Why aren't they making money?
People like me who download it for free and install it on the half-dozen machines within their reach are a loss of market share, but there are millions of new PCs sold each year. You would think a small company could make a few bucks on a tiny part of that market.
I have an idea (Score:3, Insightful)
Its not the responsibility of the consumer to buy their products and then donate money. Either a) raise the price of distro box or b) increase sales of the box by making it more appealing (subscription to slashdot(hah), intro to linux book, good manual, cd full of games, etc).
Re:I have an idea (Score:2)
Here's a hint if you ever run your own business... generally the way to riches is to CUT prices, not raise them. :)
The quickest way to bankruptcy when your business is hurting is to raise your prices.
you got it wrong! (Score:4, Funny)
What if your loaded but stupid? I would have thought dumb rich people would be the way forward...
Enough is enough... (Score:5, Interesting)
Why don't they focus more on people who AREN'T already customers? do what real companies do--SELL SHIT! Yeah, yeah, i know they sell free software. so does redhat, they do alright. lindows seems to be making out alright, and i don't think they're as good a desktop as mandrake is. start holding the distribution ransom--don't release a major upgrade until you're operating in the black or something. but i swear to god if you don't quit whining and begging for money i'm switching back to windows! (ok, maybe not that far, but i'm definitely sticking with gentoo from now on.)
Re:Are you French? (Score:3, Insightful)
It's too bad... (Score:5, Insightful)
The third one tends to work the best. The problem is, I think, that many of the target consumers of this software don't feel like paying for it. The third one avoids this problem by requiring that you pay for it, or that you spend more time than anyone would reasonably spend trying to make your own version.
In the future, all open source projects may be forced to move to the third model. Not that this is such a bad thing, considering the only people who won't be able to get it are the people who caused the change in business model to occur in the first place.
Just my thoughts.
Re:It's too bad... (Score:2)
AFAIK, the "don't make the binaries available for free" only applies to Red Hat Advanced Server.
Re:It's too bad... (Score:3, Insightful)
Wrong. Most custom software is created to solve a problem. For it to help your competitor they would have to have the same problem. So you have to ask yourself -- what is the bigger competitive advantage? Solving your problem with the chance that it may help your competitor if they ever have the same problem, or continuing on with the problem, in hopes that your competitor has the same problem eventually?
One Born Every Minute... (Score:2)
Mandrake is playing the so-called "Linux community" like it was one giant sucker.
what a gift... (Score:2)
Kind of reminds me of the Friends episode where Chandler donates money to the New York Ballet in honor of co-workers for a Christmas gift.
I doubt they'll make much off of this...
Personally, I've tried mandrake, and thought that their control center was very touchy. It always seemed to lock up on me on the computers I've tried. I made the switch to redhat when mandrake released 8.1 and I tried that. That release made my server die, ended up having to reinstall from scratch.
The economics of the distro market (Score:4, Interesting)
In any case, I don't see any viable market model for Mandrake. Even if someone were to pursue the Red-Hat aftermarket, its probably something best left to volunteers. The real competition here is in diversity - I am much more interested in (for example) Gentoo vs. Red Hat then Mandrake vs Red Hat.
What value does Mandrake add? (Score:3, Interesting)
With Redhat I can see they contribute to developing software that hits the community. I use redhat so I know that much, but could someone elinghten me on the value added by Mandrake?
You gotta provide a distinct service if you want to stay alive. I dont even pay redhat but I am considering joining the premium download club as one of my charitable efforts.
Yes their for profit, but their is nothign wrong with donating to a for-profit if their heart is right.
***Besides, if you never donate to _anything_, you can never withdraw your donation support in protest of bad decisions.***
Re:What value does Mandrake add? (Score:2, Informative)
I use it all the time and it is the best that I have found. It includes statefull firewalling VPN caching server (SQUID) Intrusion ditection (prelude) and they are all setup through their slick web interface. This product alone justifies their existence in my opinion. That however is not to say that I agree with the way that they are raising money if they want money why not release some stock as I for one would buy it.
Me too (Score:5, Funny)
So, if you want to donate to my company, leave your email, phone number and the amount you would like to donate in a reply here. We will be contacting you soon (probably next year, Holidays being what they are). We will also send you a nice stuff T-shirt for you donnation.
slashdot...the insensitive clod.. (Score:2)
True Free Software business model (Score:2)
Yeah its sad and all.. (Score:5, Interesting)
A second point to be made in this is Mandrake is a company. When they start begging for money like this to save the company, I want to see a plan. I want to know how my money is going to help. What they have is way to vague.
Our current cash needs are approximately 4ME ($4M USD). This level of cash infusion would resolve outstanding debts, cover the expenses needed to become profitable, plus secure an extra amount to satisfy the needs of future growth.
What kind of outstanding debt? Is my money going to pay for those 1,500 dollar Aeron chairs the executes who are already being paid 6 digit salary are sitting in? Is it to cover "corporate meetings" held at the Sheraton or some other overly expensive restraunt? Those are the things that bother me the most. I'd be more than glad to help a company that is going under due to the pressure of the market, but I want to know why they got to where they are now. Is it because of a sincere inability to raise profit and lower required expenses? Or is it because the executives demanded fresh squeezed juices while they sit back in an Aeron chair.
I'm not saying Mandrake is like that, but I know plenty of companies that are to be overly cautious about investing any money into a company about to go bankrupt.
Re:Yeah its sad and all.. (Score:4, Informative)
From what the pictures showed they looked like a small outfit with nothing really fancy -- it looked like an older office, the chairs looked comfy but reasonable and the computers also looked average.
It would be a big shame to loose Mandrake. They have several developers that work full-time on open source projects and nothing else -- in other words they contribute solely to the projects and nothing value-added for Mandrake.
For instance, looking through the kernel ChangeLogs Mandrake recently added a lot to the network drivers' mii interfaces so that mii-tool would work properly with more network cards. Little things like this make a big difference but no one ever notices. .
Letter to Mandrake Users (Score:2, Interesting)
Flash: MandrakeSoft's Future
Many of you have followed the evolution of MandrakeSoft throughout the past few years. Everyone who is concerned with the company's future is encouraged to read and distribute the following message.
Despite the many financial challenges of maintaining a fully open source business model, MandrakeSoft has always followed the Free Software approach, but in this normally joyful holiday season we are experiencing a serious short-term cash crisis.
In order to reach the next release, MandrakeSoft currently needs to raise cash and quickly complete an Increase of Capital. Please take a moment to read this important message at the Mandrake Linux website: http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/future.php3
We know you may have read our previous appeals, but if you are truly concerned about MandrakeSoft's future, now is the time to mobilize and help spread the word.
With the holidays upon us, a great way to spread some "Linux cheer" is by offering the gift of a MandrakeClub membership. The Club is a great way to support MandrakeSoft, and to help others too.
Sincerely,
The MandrakeSoft team.
Sigh. (Score:5, Insightful)
By my watch, with the amount of money that Mandrake has already spent, they should have the absolute best commercial distribution of Linux available. There should be no question as to the performance of Mandrake compared to any other commercial version. They should be kicking ass and taking names. Unfortunately, the only ass they're kicking is the collective behind of the Linux community, and the only names they're taking are followed by credit card numbers.
Meanwhile, we're a non-profit company that produces the absolute best-of-class general-purpose audio compression codec in the world, proprietary or otherwise. We've been through recessions and poor economic times before; Hopefully we'll live through this one, too. Everybody and their brother has a Linux distribution; Why don't you support the smaller projects that actually make a difference?
Emmett Plant [mailto]
CEO, Xiph.org Foundation [xiph.org]
I couldn't agree more (Score:5, Insightful)
So people, if you are feeling the urge to donate to free software, give it to the Xiph guys. No matter what OS you use, OGG is available to you, and it's GOOD at what it does. If Mandrake dies, well, then they die and we are limited to only the other million and a half Linux distros. If Xiph dies, we don't get updates to Vorbis, and none of the rest of their projects come to be.
right fucking on (Score:3, Interesting)
Meanwhile, projects that actually contribute something unique to the community, as opposed to Yet Another Goddamn Shoddy Distribution, languish. I've donated [xiph.org] to the Ogg project; have you?
Emmett, any timeframe on getting vorbis support into the iPod?
Sigh. Another bitter programer (Score:3)
I find that Mandrake is a step ahead of the other distrobutions in general polish and usability. They are also closer to the ideals of the Free Software Foundation than any other distrobution.
Mandrake has made a difference for me. I probably would just be using windows at this point if it hadn't been for Mandrake. This was back with version 7.0 that was just a RH clone, but with better hardware support. I have purchased just about every release since then. And I consider them to be a good investment.
The Linux world will be a poorer place without Mandrake. This call for help was directed at the existing community of Mandrake users. If you do not want to support Mandrake, then don't. But don't use your position to degrade them and discourage others from supporting them. That makes you a very ugly person in my eyes.
I have also supported other small and medium projects. With that attitude, I am not inclined to support Xiph though.
Re:Sigh. Another bitter programer (Score:3, Insightful)
What situation? The situation that a company that has bled millions of dollars is once again asking for more cash from their captive audience? You're right, I am powerless to bail out MandrakeSoft. As far as 'following a similar route,' I doubt it. We never had millions to burn in the first place, and it's never been our goal to start a company and turn a massive profit.
I cannot and will not feel sorry for any company that burns through insane amounts of money like MandrakeSoft has. Just because they sell Linux services does not mean they get special dispensation; When they opted to jump into the corporate fray, all bets were off. You compete, or you die. It is often vicious. It is often difficult. It is often unfair. But that's the game.
The Linux world will be a poorer place without Mandrake. This call for help was directed at the existing community of Mandrake users. If you do not want to support Mandrake, then don't. But don't use your position to degrade them and discourage others from supporting them. That makes you a very ugly person in my eyes.
Call me crazy, but this isn't the first time that MandrakeSoft has done this. I think it's irresponsible. Where are they spending this money? How are they going through this much cash, this quickly?
While you may be a huge fan of the Mandrake distribution, please understand that while they're a for-profit corporation, they're playing the for-profit game. When my phone bill comes, I don't ask my friends and family to help me pay it, just because I am a brilliant conversationalist. I have my own debts, I take on my own responsibilities. MandrakeSoft is acting like a college kid, calling home for pizza money.
Imagine if all companies did this. Wouldn't you find it extremely offensive if McDonald's employees came up to you during your meal, asking you to help them out with some of their expenses?
"Hi, how are you? I hope you're enjoying that Big Mac. You know, we work really hard on the Big Mac, and we'd like to continue making Big Macs for the next few years. Unfortunately, the current economy hasn't been too kind to us, and we're feeling a little less like Ronald, and more like Grimace."
You would find it irritating. You would find it annoying. You might not ever go back there again, and you'd tell your friends about it. I'm just asking you to consider the nice little diner down the street when you're tired of being shaken down by the clown.
Emmett Plant [mailto]
CEO, Xiph.org Foundation [xiph.org]
Mandrake is great. (Score:2, Informative)
The setup we are currently using is Mandrake Linux 9.0 running MySQL 3.23.52, Apache 1.3.26, and PHP 4.2.3. Along with the we are running Postfix and the IMAP server for our internal E-mail.
We originally started with Mandrake Linux 8.0, but tried several competing solutions including FreeBSD 4.7, RedHat 7.2, RedHat 8.0, and Windows XP Professional. For our needs, we finally decided to return to Mandrake Linux as the best of choice. With this, we gave Mandrake Linux 9.0 a try and haven't looked back since. Our main reasons were that Mandrake Linux was the fastest, most stable option for us as our Hardware is slightly aged. We see minimal slow-downs even with steady work loads. This is especially noticeable when comparing Mandrake Linux to the Windows XP server we tested. The Windows XP server couldn't handle more than a few simultaneous connections before seriously beginning to slow down the entire network.
We will continue to use Mandrake Linux 9.0. At least until the next Mandrake release.
Donate to a project with a solid product instead.. (Score:2)
Mandrake Club (Score:2)
If anyone that is a member of this "club" is reading, can you explain to those of us who aren't what is good (and bad?) about this club?
Thanks!
Maybe they would have more $ if (Score:2)
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
http://www.mandra
http://www.mandrakeclub.com/
http:/
http://www.mandrakebizca
http://www.mandrakeforum.com/
http://ww
http://www.mandrakesecure.net
http://www.mandrakeonline.net/
Well, come on.... (Score:2)
If Mandrake wants people to like and buy their distribution, they shouldn't actually go through the effort of wiping their old distributions out of existence. I though some of the ideas were pretty neat, but won't buy a distro that not only completely drops support for older systems, but makes sure you can never get the old distro again.
Anyone want a mandrake486 cd? I'll burn you a CD free and send it for price of Priority Mail postage ($3.20). I'll only send out ten total, just want to make sure other people have it, so it won't completely vanish.
This the business model of the 2ks? (Score:2)
Oh no, Playstation 2 is behind schedule cuz it costs too much, donte money now!
this is a bit on the weird side folks. maybe it's the codeine i've been taking for my surgery but this just don't work for me.
Amazon doesnt give you free products (Score:3, Insightful)
Mandrakesoft gives you free access to download software, they freely allow a programmer to work on KDE and the Linux Kernel, they freely give you a website, Mandrake Expert, Mandrake Forum etc,
You cant donate some money to keep these free services? I guess you dont really want them.
If PS2 were giving out free games why not donate $60 once in a great while?
It's sad, but... (Score:2)
If you have some money that you want to donate to a good cause, pick one where it will do some good. I don't care whether it's the Salvation Army or the EFF, but be effective with your donations. Let the market take care of the less effective corporations--that's what it does.
Data. (Score:2)
Let me spell it out for you guys: show us graphs. Show us numbers. Let's see your exact plan for ending your reliance on our philanthropy. I wanna know what your assumptions are.
The only data points I have right now are:
- You sell something that you also give away for free, with little obvious value-add in the for-sale version
- Your business model, despite mumblings otherwise, has relied in the past on the goodwill of the community
- The goodwill of the community is running out
"hump"? (Score:2)
Who are we trying to kid? Slippery slope. There are too many commercial linux distro, with not enough to distinguish them and just not enough market to sustain all those jobs. You know it, I know it, we all know it, we just delude ourselves otherwise.
Some commercial linux distros are going under, and Mandrake is showing all the signs that it's going to be one of them. Ask yourself this; if you bail out Mandrake (again), do you acccept that means that someone else will go under instead?
You've got to be kidding me.... (Score:2, Insightful)
By March 2001, the results of this strategy showed a marked decrease in income, while expenses increased by 400%. At its worst point, MandrakeSoft's "burn rate" was approximately 1.5 ME/month ($1.5M/month). As a result, it was soon decided to remove this experienced management team and to refocus the company's activities strictly toward Linux.
So, because they've made poor business decisions in the past (to include hiring bad management and throwing away money) we're supposed to support them? Give me a break! Sheez, by this logic, someone should just pay off my credit cards and give me a house (any takers?).
Feel free to mark me as troll.
What about.... (Score:2)
Mandrake has (in my opinion at least) always been more comfortable in the home / desktop environment (sorry, but I dont believe in using X windows, and graphical tools to admin a Linux server) - perhaps Sony and Matsushita could look at some kind of buy out for Mandrake, and put their expertise to work for them instead?
Pop culture *always* has the answer (Score:3, Funny)
Why should someone donate $50 or whatever to Mandrake and see the same benefit as the guy who donated nothing?
Now all they need is Stanley Spidowski's Word Processing program pre-installed as well as Conan the Librarian's File-Sharing client.
In other news... (Score:2)
I am going to give them money (Score:2)
How I help Mandrake (Score:5, Insightful)
If only... (Score:2)
I haven't so far, but I will since I use Mandrake on a few machines. The price is a hell of a lot better than the price of WinXP, and they don't try to force any registration or similar thing on You.
A feature that I really like about Mandrake is the "urpmi". I don't need to register anywhere, just point out where the upgrades live (on some ftp mirror) and have a "urpmi.update -a ; urpmi --auto-select --auto" in my crontab, and my system will be up to date and I don't even have to care.
I even upgraded my 9.0 system to a 9.1 (the devel-version) this way. All I had to do was to point the urpmi to the devel-version and it took care of everything.
I really hope they make it.
Want to be a stable node [sourceforge.net]?
Not responsive to business community (Score:2)
RedHat specifically is branching out into training and vertical markets ('advanced server', 'rh database', etc). I don't see Mandrake really trying to address any specific need beyond not pissing off the general linux community. That's just not enough to make a profitable business, imo.
If anyone from Mandrake actually reads this message, please email me at michael@tapinternet.com. Thanks.
Classic example. (Score:3, Insightful)
Linux PBS (Score:3, Interesting)
What's all this then? (Score:3, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
MandrakeClub is not a charity (Score:5, Informative)
I am in charge of MandrakeClub, and i have worked very hard for last 12 months to build that place into something really special.It isn't finished yet, but it is indeed on a good way to become by far the best "service" for private users and small companies.
I wan't bother you with the details (as if someone would care to read anyway), but there is a whole bunch of people there who are really happy to be Club members today, so I must have done something right after all.
I know that everyone on Slashdot is telling you that Club is no-good, but maybe you should just go there once, and try to build your own meaning.
OK, it wan't be a very excitiong trip (site is not made for anonymous users, and it is in fact even quite unfriendly towards them), but maybe you could still get a feeling that it isn't "just charity" by browsing trough FAQs, and looking at the discussion in the "future" forum on MandrakeClub.
Well yes, actually (Score:2)
Mandrake has tradtionally tailored its distro to the desktop/home user/newbie crowd. They've done a reasonably good job of it too ( with some caveats beyond the scope of this particular post). Mandrake actually installs faster and easier on every system I've tried it on than Windows 98. Just pop the CD in the "cup holder" and click on "Yeah, Whatever" a couple of times and you're done.
Red Hat focuses on the business market. Even their desktops assume some sort of corporate enviroment, and the entire distro reeks of being tailored to the back room.
On the whole this makes Red Hat and Mandrake entirely *compatible* distros, since one is based on the other, but they go after different sides of the "user coin."
Jack Sprat could eat no fat, his wife could eat no lean.
And in practice it actually seems to work this way. Between the two of them they have far more than the Lion's share of the commercial market. Of course Red Hat is clearly the King of the Pride.
I don't think this is the reason for Mandrake's problems right now though. Mandrake has made some critically bad managment decisions over the past couple of years. They appear to still be making them. At the very least the *public* view of the company's internals still seems very disturbed, with a new managment team ( this is what, the second within the last year?) and CEO who publicly state they "like the oportunity to learn about Open Source."
Mandrake makes a decent distro. They make a distro friendly to a market that everyone else pretty much ignores. They can't run a multinational business for shit.
It seems a shame but they just might deserve to die.
And please note that because of the GPL the company dying doesn't necessarily mean the *product* dies.
KFG
Re:And this is why "free" is "stupid." (Score:2)
This has been my random message of the day (tm)
Re:OK, I Installed Mandrake (Score:2)
Re:OK, I Installed Mandrake (Score:3, Insightful)
To answer the question: nedit and xemacs are two pretty decent GUI text editors that run on Linux. nedit is probably easier to learn if you're coming from the Windows world, but if I were you I'd put the time into learning xemacs, since it's descended from emacs, which is one of the standard text editors in the Unix world.
Also do at least learn a little bit about vi (type "man vi" at any Terminal prompt) since it's a) very simple for quick, in-place editing, and b) on just about every distro of every type of Unix machine.