Penguin Airlines 274
An anonymous reader writes "DesktopLinux.com interviews Chris Stevens, President of Penguin Airlines about his young venture's business model that includes using Linux in all aspects from the ground up -- from desktops to the reservations system! 'Tux' is more than just a name for this new air taxi service which brings convenient, economical, time-saving air travel via the shortest route between home and destination." They wrote an essay about their business plans, and their heavily computerized jets look nifty as well. CD:Those interested in the aviation side of things should check out James Fallows book "Free Flight" as well.
Hate to be obvious... (Score:5, Funny)
I hope they have better luck than the real birds.
Re:Hate to be obvious... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hate to be obvious... (Score:2)
So far, I've only been able to produce what golfers know as a "worm burner."
Of course, seeing the target windows across the field, I think I'm doomed for a crash anyway. I hear penguins are right up there next to humming birds and robins when it comes to large windows with blue reflections...
.
Re:Hate to be obvious... (Score:2)
Niether do flowers, yet that is what Hawaii Airlines has as a logo.
BTW, Does Linus Travolds fly for free?
Re:Hate to be obvious... (Score:2, Funny)
Yes, Bill Gates DOES fly for free.
Re:Hate to be obvious... (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
Depends on the Penguin (Score:2)
Get it out of the way (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Get it out of the way (Score:3, Funny)
The downside: Takes a team of 4 people reading faqs for 2 hours just to figure out how to get the damn landing gear to retract.
Re:Get it out of the way (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Get it out of the way (Score:2)
Re:Get it out of the way (Score:5, Funny)
Passenger: Stewaress, can I get some peanuts?
Stewardess: Get em yourself, fucking newb. Can you believe this little bitch? Thinking he has skills.
Re:Get it out of the way (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Get it out of the way (Score:3, Funny)
RTFM (Score:2)
RTFM: Read the fucking magazine!
Re:Get it out of the way (Score:2)
Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up ... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . (Score:3, Funny)
"What's the command to change this guy's reservation?"
"It's 'chgres -x -p#30240 -usrname=John Doe -t12:00 -tx13:35 -fn usa412."
"Oh... Didn't realize that command had a vowel in it."
Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . (Score:2, Funny)
I don't mean to be pedantic, but you probably ought to quote the username. The shell will think it's another arg otherwise. So you'd change his reservation like so:
Yes, I realize you were joking.
-B
Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . (Score:2)
Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . (Score:2)
Sounds like the AC touched on a sore spot there. Heh.
Re:Using Linux in all aspects from the ground up . (Score:2)
I know, I've used it. heh.
" how, exactly, does a windows user get around bsod's that (s)he doesn't like?"
Win9X (95, 98, Me...) are awful and BS all the time. Win2k almost never Bsod's. When it does, it's a driver making a bad call.
Let me put it to you this way: I've never had an overnight or over the weekend process interrupted because of Windows stability or lack of. It's been quite reliable. Lotsa places that use Win2k for LW rendering farms will tell you a similar story. That's why I find BSOD jokes about as interesting as 'Dan Quayle is stupid!' jokes.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
You see, there are all these little things called 'Apps'. People use Apps on their computer to do work. The underlying OS is of no importance as long as the apps work. Guess what? The apps I run in Windows work. I am being productive. Windows is not holding me back. Switching to Linux would be about as wise as switching to a hydrogen powered car. Sure it's more efficient, but I can't go very far with it. Until enough gas stations around the country support hydrogen cars, I'm stranded.
GNU may be superior technologically, but when it comes to applications it's basically a niche product.
Today, being a Linux Zealot gets you popularity points with the Slashdot Community, but it gets you nowhere in the 3D world unless you wanna pay upwards of $10,000. There's a reason that movie studios are switching to Linux, and TV studios are not.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Im talking about using Linux as a desktop/Workstation OS. Yeesh.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Hooray for GNU!! It can almost do what Windows is already doing today!
Why, in another year, it might even start showing signs of being user friendly!
Meanwhile, I'm cruising along quite happily.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
There's a reason that Unix has never been a popular OS for home users.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Hmm, nope. As a matter of fact, the dictionary definition of 'tool' supports my argument:
"Something regarded as necessary to the carrying out of one's occupation or profession: Words are the tools of our trade."
Everybody in my office uses Windows 'as a tool for their trade'. I especially, since I'm a 3D animator, my only realistic alternative is Macintosh. (Linux is a distant 3rd, but a drastic increase in price as it's not supported by the progs I use. Just to be clear, that's not Linux's fault.) No Windows, no trade.
The definition of 'toy', however, says this:
"An amusement; a pastime"
Most people running Linux as a desktop OS (mainly at home) are using it as a toy. They're not doing anything real interesting on it. This isn't Linux's fault, either. Big corps haven't picked up on it. They won't until it is elevated from 'geek toy' status to "actually useful to people who don't need to learn unnecessary things to make a computer work."
Call it a flame if you like, but the reason Windows works is because people don't have to run out and play with the shell all the time to do basic stuff. Linux is horribly designed for people who aren't interested in learning it. That is not a fault of the people, it's a fault in design. Linux has a lot of evolving to do for the desktop. It's great as a server, but it's horrid as a desktop OS.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Umm actually it doesn't say anything about 'needing to learn words', it just says they're the tools of the trade. Tools, by design, are easy to use. If you don't believe me, I suggest you look at the hammer (no manual required), the knife (no manual required), the wingnut (No manual required), and so on. All that comment proved was that you're hellbent on telling me that Windows is useless, even though there are entire markets making a living off it.
I doubt you know that many people then heh. Sorry bud, Windows greatly outnumbers Linux by such a large margin that I don't even need to try to argue that one. Most businesses run on Windows. Could they do better with Linux? Some could, most wouldn't. Heck, they don't even need to. Windows works just fine, particularly if you're using Windows 2000. Arguing with me doesn't change that fact. You want Linux to be more proliferated out there? Make it easier to use.
Oh, I forgot, with Linux the developers have to be interested in making mods like that. Since Linux charges no money, there's no incentive to make it anything less than masochistic to use . Heh. Brilliant.
Linux should stick to servers.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
And then, on top of that, you've limited the scope of the debate to only people you know, just because the numbers were working in my favor.
That's what "You're really reaching" means. I'm not sure how you read "You're absolutely right!" out of that. Maybe more word definition twisting there? Perhaps you'd like to change the definition of 'reaching' to mean 'right!'. Hmm yeah I can see how you could do that: "Well, if you reach something you're aiming for, that means you're getting closer and closer to your goal. Therefore, when you told me that you're really reaching, you were saying that I was about to win!"
Yeah, that'd be your style of debate. So I'll just say "I'm confident that you have reached as far as you can." That way you can misinterpret that as my concession. Heh. Funny stuff.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
I find it hard to believe that you think something needs to be badly designed in order to not be a toy.
"Stupid things stay stupid regardless how many people do them. And even fifteen years ago I knew it was a stupid argument to buy M$ "because all others buy it"
It isn't a stupid argument if your job is to support those users. It's not a stupid argument if you're writing apps for all those users. And it's not a stupid argument if you're attempting to tap that market.
Oops, more holes in your point.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
I suggest you take your own advice Mr. "Windows is a toy."
"The Unix design is clearly superior! You are either trolling or have no idea of an operating system."
The underlying systems of Unix are superior, I'm not arguing that. But it's user interface is worthless. Windows kicks Unix or Linux's butt so many times there. Unix is a screwdriver without a handle. Only a blacksmith can do anything useful with it.
I'll tell ya something, I'm not anti *Nix. I feel pretty strongly that in the next 2-3 years I will be running Linux. (if not, I'll be running MacOS on top of BSD) Linux certainly has the potential, but it is not there yet. Windows is still kicking it's butt. When Linux Zealots like you get off their asses and realize that people actually have to USE their computer instead of playing with it, they'll figure out how to make a nice OS that people can actually pick up and do something productive with. Until they do, the edge is still to Windows. Sorry, that's life.
The amusing thing there is that Linux already has all the groundwork in place to make an excellent Windows-killing interface. You guys really should be looking at OSX and taking notes.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
It's equally hilarious when people use $ instead of S when typing Microsoft, then they bring up 'borrowing of ideas' as if that really matters. Heh.
Ah this is silly. You're busy telling me Windows is 'a toy', and I'm busy with an animation project in Windows. Heh. Ah I love having a big paycheck every month.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Ah yes, the 'You must be paid by MS' argument. The only way you could sink lower is to relate MS to the Third Reich. Hahahahaa you're cracking me up! Got a friend here reading this, he's laughing at you too. Your debate style is rather comic.
And I'm happily using GNU/Linux to earn my living for more than 5 years and you tell me that it's impossible to use.
So.... you're being willfully ignorant again. Heh. "I can't argue with you so I'm going to pretend you said something else." ROFLLMABVAKWEWK
Heh. Fun stuff!
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Who am I talking to here, Ralph Wiggam?
"Me fail english? That's unpossible!"
And you're taking a poke at MY IQ? Btw, you're 'drawing a wild conclusion' about my IQ there. Heh. Too bad you made a wild assumption about why I said what I said. Oh well, the only reason I'm responding is for pure entertainment value. I gave up on you understanding anything ages ago.
Hee hee that's classic. Im gonna bookmark this one. Heh.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
No, I blamed you for what YOU do. I didn't hold a gun to your head to force you to ignore my points.
"When there were arguments in your posts I showed you that they turn against you. "
You mean like this one?
NanoGator: "Heh. So double standards are okay when they're in your favor? You can make unreasonable assumptions about what I say, but I can't do that to you?"
Ass: "Great! Double standards. You seem to get your arguments by poking into a dictionary."
Heh. Obviously you're not poking into a dictionary, that's not what 'turning your agruments against you' means.
I have a serious question: Is English your native language? Sometimes your choice of words is peculiar. You're either doing really well learning English, or you drove your teachers up the wall in high-school. I honestly can't tell heh.
Re:The difference Re:Windoze is reliable!!!! (Score:2)
Ah, so you admit you did ignore my points. Your concession is accepted.
"But maybe these words have a different meaning to you from the one they have in standard english."
I think you got that the wrong way around. You're the one who argued with a dictionary. Of course you admit to ignoring all my points, so I don't expect you have even bothered to look in the dictionary. Doesn't surprise me, though, it would have proven you are totally 100% wrong.
Not the analogy I would've used (Score:4, Funny)
So, instead of a large bird majestically soaring through the air, the chose a name of a... dumpy, flightless bird that spends most of its time in the water. Hmm...
To the non-linux savvy, the choice of imagery to represent the company is perhaps less than ideal. I mean, how's about starting with a bird that actually flies through the air?
Re:Not the analogy I would've used (Score:2, Funny)
First bird that came to my mind: Turkey Buzzard.
Re:Not the analogy I would've used (Score:2)
No, that would be Microsoft Airlines.
Sp Southwest must mean ... (Score:2)
Well, pretty lame, but what the heck, it's only karmakarmakarma.
Re:Not the analogy I would've used (Score:2)
And the rest of his time running for Vice-President alongside a dirty, occasionally-dead Communist cat.
Windows.. (Score:2, Funny)
Flying Penguins (Score:2, Funny)
So if a Pengiun Airlines jet does a fly over of a fleet of parked Penguin Airlines planes, will the planes all fall backwards in unison??
BBC link - old news [bbc.co.uk]
Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? (Score:2)
Can we run it on Macs?
Um....no. Macs are evil.
Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? (Score:2)
It's not, necessarily (yeah, I realize it was rhetorical)
What IS a good idea is that they're basing their entire system on Open Source Software. If I was setting up a new business, I would try like crazy to avoid using proprietary software for anything important unless there was really no choice.
Anyway, the applications they use (which are probably custom written anyway) are far more important than the OS. We all know that Linux is good enough to handle this stuff!
Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? (Score:2)
Re:Why is this a Good Thing (tm)? (Score:2)
Standardization (Score:2)
As a ridiculous example, a sentence is composed of words. Pick each word from the language that best characterizes the exact shade of your meaning. Each word is the best choice, but the sentence is a mess.
With a name like Penguin Airlines, there are some natural image effects with the Linux mascot. As long as it's not a horrible choice for the particular job, methinks they'll do just fine.
And why does the Linux matter?! (Score:2)
Linux is great and all, but I'd feel a little more comfortable knowing that the people behind the scenes are experts in something else, like, I don't know . . . FUCKING AIRPLANES?!
We will all be forgiving . . . (Score:2)
. . . and understand that you meant to say "flying airplanes."
-r
Re:And why does the Linux matter?! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:And why does the Linux matter?! (Score:2)
Re:And why does the Linux matter?! (Score:2)
Linux is great and all, but I'd feel a little more comfortable knowing that the people behind the scenes are experts in something else, like, I don't know . . . FUCKING AIRPLANES?!
Mod parent up. Didn't we already learn our lesson when the
Great name for an Airline (Score:2)
Which is all the flying penguins do...
Unbelieveable (Score:2)
Because 5 posts into this story, their box is slashdotted.
Slashdotted (Score:5, Funny)
Too bad they didn't use Linux... oh, wait...
OS Airlines? (Score:5, Funny)
Linux Airline
Disgruntled employees of all the other OS airlines decide to start their own airline. They build the planes, ticket counters, and pave the runways themselves. They charge a small fee to cover the cost of printing the ticket, but you can also download and print the ticket yourself. When you board the plane, you are given a seat, four bolts, a wrench and a copy of the seat-HOWTO.html. Once settled, the fully adjustable seat is very comfortable, the plane leaves and arrives on time without a single problem, the in-flight meal is wonderful. You try to tell customers of the other airlines about the great trip, but all they can say is, "You had to do what with the seat?"
Taken from this page [ox.ac.uk]
Soko
Eclipse hasn't flown yet... (Score:2)
sPh
Re:Eclipse hasn't flown yet... (Score:2)
Building small turbines at a reasonable price (i.e. cheaper than big turbines) is very difficult. It defeated the auto industry, for example, which is why turbine car prototypes worked fine but never made it to production.
Dr. Sam Williams [williams-int.com] designed many of the really small turbines that worked, including the back-pack turbine manlifter of the 1950s, and the powerplant for U.S. cruise missiles. His company ships some jet-trainer sized engines,. but the little model for general aviation is still a prototype.
It's striking how few people can design certain difficult mechanical devices. All the mechanical teletypes that worked well came from one guy, Ed Klienschmidt, who did half a century of teletype machines for his own company and Teletype Corp. Many others had tried, all the way back to Edison, but Klienschmidt's mechanisms were rock-solid reliable. Typesetting machines changed very little from Merganthaler's original Linotype until the end of the hot-metal era. Again, this was an incredibly complex but very reliable machine, far better than its competitors.
The obligatory jokes ... (Score:2, Funny)
"The inflight movie is Revolution OS
"If you bother the stewardess again, I'm going to have to mark you a Troll and have you sedated, sir."
"Our complementary meal service will be brought to your seat by a Mindstorms robot our pilot just built. Cool, huh?"
and of course:
"Penguin Airlines: If You Don't Like How We Operate, Fork Off!"
what a bunch of morons you all are (Score:3)
What they're selling is freedom, and it's freedom at a reasonable price. I'm definitely going to check these guys out next time I fly. Yeah, I won't be flying to Texas any time too soon, but still, I'll encourage them to expand as rapidly as they can.
Not only that, but they're flying from small town to small town. So intead of having to go to an "airport", you can go to your town's airport, e.g. Potsdam's. This jet can land, pick you up, and take off again in less than ten minutes. And that airport is only ten minutes from my house.
-russ
Re:what a bunch of morons you all are (Score:2)
The "shortest possible route" thing is what I'm interested in. Unfortunately, they're in Texas, an area not known for supporting new ways of thinking.
Google cache for those too lazy to find it ... (Score:2, Informative)
Oops.... (Score:3, Funny)
I will start a company called Penguin Moon Trips (Score:2)
Seriously, come on!?!? It might be news if their business ever gets really started and if using Linux really provides them with some other competitive edge than the one - marketing edge - which was already used.
Doh.... (Score:2)
Good timing... (Score:2)
Seriously though, I wish them intelligence. I'd wish them luck, but intelligence seems to be so much more scarce.
Odd Schedule (Score:3, Funny)
Airline Security Standards? (Score:2)
Re:Airline Security Standards? (Score:2)
They went on to explain that, because all flights would be "charter" and to/from small airports, they would be exempt from the new security checks. And unlike airliners, there were over 5000 airports in the US where they could land.
The estimated cost of a flight was somewhat more than the price of a first-class airline ticket. But for that price, you could take up to six people.
They were predicting lots of business as the airlines came under the control of the new security procedures.
Occasional followup reports have said that these predictions are slowly coming true.
Cab Service (Score:2)
Re:Cab Service (Score:2)
Quote from their jet brochure (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Quote from their jet brochure (Score:2)
It's just unnecessary fluff -- they should just say aluminum and assume people will figure out that it's aircraft aluminum. Otherwise, it's like the Marines saying "we're using military-grade kevlar in our bulletproof vests." Duh.
When a laptop manufacturer says it's using aircraft aluminum, or when a bicycle tire manufacturer says it's using military-grade kevlar, or when Jack-in-the-Box says it's using military-grade titanium 99-cent buttons on its cash registers, then it's a bit more appropriate.
Maybe, who knows. (Score:2)
Re:Maybe, who knows. (Score:2)
Dude, flannels, mooseskin hats, and Kraft Dinner in an igloo will *never* go out of style, Eh.
A paranoiac writes: Finally!! (Score:2, Funny)
An airline where I don't have to wear my tinfoil hat!
Do you people have ANY IDEA of the shit I've had to put up with gettin that thing onboard normal airlines?
Ali [the dark side]
This is perfect (Score:2, Interesting)
Flight problem (Score:4, Funny)
Next time I'll take Blue Skies of D (BSOD) Airways, a subsidiary of MS. (They wouldn't tell me what the 'D' stood for.)
Choice of software packages (Score:2)
Yes, both have made progress, but it's STILL a bit much to say that you're basing an entire airline's support on those projects. I loved the line about 'phpgroupware is rumored to potentially support VoIP in the future'. Great reason to use things now - something in the future *might* support something that other packages already *do* support today.
My company supports PHP wholeheartedly - phphelpdesk.com and PHP training courses are two services we offer. But trying to run a whole airline (even if it's small) off postnuke and phpgroupware - they're going to spend quite a lot on inhouse staff writing custom modules. They *might* be better off financially using *some* third party stuff.
The focus here is as much on open source stuff as Linux (phpgroupware could be run on Windows, for example) so instead of 'right tool for the job' you've got 'open source at any cost', which is, imo, just as bad as 'closed source at any cost'.
Big Mistake (Score:5, Funny)
You guys are missing the point (Score:5, Informative)
What these guys are proposing is using the Eclipse 500 [eclipseaviation.com] to fly people all over the place. It's a six-seat airplane, 355 knot cruise (ca 410 mph), and according to the specs page, it has an accelerate-stop takeoff distance of 2,595 feet. This means it can accelerate to just under the speed it needs to fly on one engine, lose an engine, and still stop safely without running off the end of the runway. This will increase the number of airports Penguin can fly to versus, say, Northwest Airlines, by at least a factor of five. Most municipal airports have at least a 3,000 foot runway. Now, their page is slashdotted, so I'm not sure exactly how they'll handle this, but theoretically that means they could fly me (on a typical trip) from Springfield, MO [sgf-branson-airport.com] to New Richmond, WI [nrairport.com] in a total time of about two hours, including drive time to and from the airport. Currently, it takes about six hours, including nintey minutes for checkin/security and an excursus through St. Louis, Memphis, or (heaven forbid) O'Hare, and then an hour driving from the Minneapolis airport to New Richmond. It's about twelve hours to drive, so it's almost not even worth it to fly, but with these guys, it would be so much nicer. This has the potential to be a serious boon for travellers. Depending on how they do this, it could eliminate hubs, and eliminate having to fly into one of the larger airports, followed by up to three hours of driving.
The Eclipse isn't yet certified, but it looks like it has a really good chance. These guys have been working on it for a while, and they seem to know what they're doing. They're using the Williams EJ22 engine [eclipseaviation.com], which is similar to their FJ44 engine that has been very successful on the Cessna CitationJet [cessna.com] series. What really amazes me, though, is the price of these things. They're only asking about $850,000, which is barely enough to buy a twin-engine pison (instead of jet) Beech Baron [raytheonaircraft.com] these days.
All of which is to say, I'm really, really excited to hear about these guys, and I hope their business does well. I'll be flying them as soon as I can. They've got cool technology all the way around, and it has the potential to make life much better.
Re:You guys are missing the point (Score:3, Funny)
I must say, seeing the words "groundbreaking" and "airline" together in the same sentence mad me a tad nervous.
Re:You guys are missing the point (Score:2)
I love the thought myself, but right now my "jet" is a "Compair 7" with a turbo-prop. I can carry 6 people at 250mph at a cost of about 100 grand after 2 years of building hehe.
AeroComp itself is working on a Jet as well. http://www.aerocompinc.com/airplanes/CA-Jet/
The experimental restrictions prohibit commercial use of such aircraft, but atleast it will help accelerate development/r&d of such aircraft to ultimately lower the TCO of Certified jets.
essay mirror (Score:2)
http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT80154847
But are the flights free as in freedom and beer? (Score:2)
If the answer to these questions is a Yes, then I can believe "Tux' is more than just a name for this new air taxi service which brings convenient, economical, time-saving air travel via the shortest route between home and destination.".
Formal dress required? (Score:2)
Re:sounds like a joke to me! (Score:5, Funny)
I wouldn't go that far, but you would need to know Bernoulli's Law to board the plane.
Re:This is a joke right? (Score:3, Interesting)
So - operations and service are where airlines distinguish themselves, and make their money. Some years ago (when they were actually turning a profit) I was at a presentation concerning United Airlines' IS Dept. They had 40 guys with PhD's in Operations Research alone working on their scheduling and fare algorithms.
So, the efficiency of services and how they are presented to the customer can indeed make the difference.
Whether or not this is legit is another question!
sPh
Re:fly for free? (Score:2)
If you market to hackers, that is probably what will end up happening. Very few will end up buying real tickets. The rest will have have "magic coupons" that cannot be traced to any revunue.
Re:Jets for nerds... (Score:2)
Can you buy tickets with Karma?
Are trolls kept off, or have to sit in back?
Re:Jets for nerds... (Score:2)
Just don't make me sit next to Goatse.
Re:Welcome aboard! (Score:2)
"Where do you want to go today?" is Microsoft's.
Re:Windows shapes (Score:2)
Actually, all of the windows will be arranged in the shape of an X. Because technically it's the "X Window System".
(I slay me.)
TheNewWazoo