Mandrake 8.2 Available 447
Jester998 writes "Linux Mandrake 8.2 is out! Check out the official
annoucement
or head off to your closest mirror to grab the ISO images.
The release is bound to be amazing, with the return of kernel-secure, a 65MB minimum install, hotplug device support, encrypted filesystems and more!"
Awesome! It's the RH7.2 "killer" (Score:3, Funny)
I was very impressed with the 8.2 betas... time to throw this puppy into the production environment!
Re:Awesome! It's the RH7.2 "killer" (Score:3, Insightful)
Wow! 4.2.9 is much better than the 2.4.19-pre3 I found on ftp.kernel.org.
Crippled? (Score:2)
Of course, you have to compare the stock 2.4.18 kernel with the highly tweaked 2.4.9 kernel from RH.
P.S. I don't think that the kernel is at 4.x.x yet
A portrait (Score:3, Interesting)
This chap (baby) is the new distro on the market(compared to the others anyway). He is always seen as a new lunix user hence the baby look, and the distro is regarded as one best for beginners to learn who might be migrating from windows to linux.
Re:A portrait (Score:3, Funny)
If you are serious about linux and power you use Slack.. all the other are just candy coated slackware...
BTW, I still have a CD of the first linux distro Yggdrasil... you dont hear of that one anymore..
well as my Leet rant finishes up I might as well do the same as the rest and put in a list of props and shouts
Nahhhh... that's for lamers....
I'll go back to my hole now..
Re:A portrait (Score:3, Interesting)
If you want to be leet with Mandrake, feel free...
Anyway, Slackware has lost it's leet status now that Gentoo is here. Slack coddles you too much by providing binaries...
Re:Being l33t with Mandrake (Score:2)
Isn't init in
Could be a bit hard to run mandrake's init scripts, if init is in a partition that isn't mounted until after init runs and kicks in all the rest.
Probably the same sort of conclusion could be drawn with
Re:Being l33t with Mandrake (Score:2)
not to mention that these programs also happen to be dynamically linked (in some cases) to stuff like
It's not "No, no, you don't want to do that!"; it's "Uh... you can't do that." Which is damned right.
-clee
Re:A portrait (Score:3, Interesting)
Slackware installed from floppy disks - Now THAT's a treat form masochists^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H hard core Linux users.
Re:A portrait (Score:2)
In the current state, if you keep using the GUI tools to play with your system, your system WILL break one day.
I won't say it won't break if you play with it with vi, but at least it is easier to fix, because at least you could have made a log of what you've done.
Until it is certain that the GUI config stuffies won't mess my system up no matter how I use them, I'll stick with vi.
And no, I don't want to use a bit of both. Be consistent and you'll stay away from a lot of trouble.
Not just for babies anymore (Score:2, Informative)
That's Mandrake's optimized version of Apache, in use by more than 75,000 web servers, more than Domino or Stronghold (Redhat's secure server).
So it might be the best one for beginners, but it's used on a lot of servers too.
SHhhhhh! (Score:4, Funny)
So I started downloading. @ ~350KBPS, my usual best rate... This has been slowing and I can't figure why other than..... Did that @#$%!%! post something on
Yup, story is posted.... sites are
*sigh*
b
Re:SHhhhhh! (Score:2, Informative)
Er, there goes my "great luck."
Re:SHhhhhh! (Score:2)
wait a bit before slashing it (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:wait a bit before slashing it (Score:2, Funny)
What, so you can get it first? I don't think so! Hahahaha...
I've been using the beta... (Score:5, Informative)
Mandrake is a very good distro for the beginner and advanced user alike. I have tried several and this is definitely my favorite. This install is really great and warns you if you are installing anything that is a potential security risk. If you haven't tried it, what are you waiting for?
alcatel, (Score:2)
Get it from the Mandrake Club (Score:5, Informative)
Its a fast download and there is additional software available there. i.e. commercial packages.
At $60.00 per year its a great value!
Re:Get it from the Mandrake Club (Score:2)
WRONG!! NOT TRUE, not available (Score:2)
Go ahead prove me wrong.
Ahem... I should know it. .-) (Score:3, Informative)
No, there are no ISO downloads for users (yet?), we simply don't have enough servers to survive that. MandrakeClub members can download the applications which aren't in the "downlaod edition" from MandrakeClub site, but they have to get the ISOs from the same places as everyone else.
List of mirrors (Score:5, Informative)
Czech Republic
ftp://mandrake.redbox.cz/ Mandrake/iso/ [redbox.cz]
France
ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/ linux/Mandrake/iso/ [rpmfind.net] (Lyon)
ftp://ftp.ciril.fr/pub/linux/mandrake/iso/ [ciril.fr] (Nancy)
Germany
ftp:// ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/Mandrake/iso / [fht-esslingen.de] (Esslingen)
Iceland
ftp://ftp.mbl.is/pub/mandrake/ iso/ [ftp.mbl.is] (Reykjavik)
Italy
ftp://bo.mirror. garr.it/mirrors/Mandrake/iso/ [mirror.garr.it] (Bologna)
http://bo.mirror. garr.it/mirrors/Mandrake/iso/ [mirror.garr.it] (Bologna)
Slovakia
ftp://hq. alert.sk/pub/linux/distributions/mandrake/iso/ [alert.sk]
ftp://spirit. profinet.sk/mirrors/Mandrake/iso/ [profinet.sk] (Bratislava)
Taiwan
ftp://mdk.linux.org.tw/ pub/mandrake/iso/ [linux.org.tw]
United States
ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/m andrake/Mandrake/iso/ (North Carolina)
[ibiblio.org]
ftp://ftp-linux.cc.gatech.edu/pub/linux/distributi ons/mandrake/iso/ [gatech.edu] (Georgia)
ftp://ftp.math. utah.edu/pub/linux/Mandrake/iso/ [utah.edu] (Utah)
ftp://mirror.mcs.anl. gov/pub/Mandrake/iso/ [anl.gov] (Illinois)
Re:List of mirrors (Score:5, Funny)
Re:List of mirrors (Score:2, Funny)
Mandrake Linux. Because it's got bigger tits.
You obviously missed this [tuxje.nl]
Note: this is on-topic: it says "chicks dig mandrake" sideways... you just can't get better advertising.
Re:List of mirrors (Score:2)
:) (And I'm even married - don't tell my wife about that Linux chick!)
Cheers!
2.3KB/s SLASHDOT in effect (Score:2)
Re:List of mirrors (Score:2)
No...don't download the ISO's (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:No...don't download the ISO's (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:No...don't download the ISO's (Score:2, Funny)
Re:No...don't download the ISO's (Score:2)
Why not? Subscribe to the Club, instead of buying (Score:2, Insightful)
But when you buy a box, specially in stores, there's only a small portion of your cash that goes to the developers. Manufacturing, packaging, shipping, support, distributor's and retailer's margins take the major part of the revenue.
When you subscribe to the Club, you make sure the cash will be spent directly on the Mandrake Linux open-source development, you have access to all the software, including commercial applications, and a lot of Club privileges.
Besides, the boxes won't be available until a few weeks, so join the club and you can download everything today.
Re:Why not? Subscribe to the Club, instead of buyi (Score:2)
Do both. Moving boxes adds to counts of users. Club membership supports development. Support for Mandrake is what counts. Millions support Microsoft and right now, Mandrake poses one of the few threats to the Evil Empire (TM). We need to support them or once again, we'll have no choice.
Re:No...don't download the ISO's (Score:3, Insightful)
| sed -e 's/needs/deserves/g'
Mirror of announcement (Score:5, Informative)
Mandrake Linux 8.2: Solid server, Friendly desktop.
Altadena, CA - March 18th 2002 - MandrakeSoft is proud to introduce Mandrake Linux 8.2 as the most feature-rich, multi-purpose Linux operating system ever made available to the public. This new version of our flagship product combines the power and flexibility of a full-featured Linux server with the simplicity and elegance of well designed graphical user interfaces.
Mandrake Linux 8.2 is the best "all-in-one" solution for saving time and money with personal computers: installation couldn't be easier with our world-famous graphical installer, and no post-configuration hassles means that your Mandrake system is immediately ready for work. Depending on your requirements, Mandrake 8.2 can be installed either as a full-featured & powerful Linux server, or as a highly productive personal workstation.
New server features include the ability to use an encrypted filesystem for protecting sensitive data; "kernel-secure" adds important security features to the default Linux kernel; and an "Enterprise" kernel delivers SMP (Symmetric Multi Processing) and Hi-memory support (above 1024 MB) for high-end servers. Mandrake Linux 8.2 also introduces a quick and efficient way to set up printers and scanners; a new file sharing feature for easily sharing files and directories in a networked environment; and improved "hot-plug" support that lets users install new devices quickly and painlessly without having to reboot the system. A new remote desktop utility, RFBdrake, is extremely useful for controlling machines remotely within a LAN or securely through the Internet.
New desktop features include a completely redesigned Mandrake Control Center that serves as a central location for Mandrake-specific tools and utilities, as well as many new configuration wizards. Desktop users will appreciate the task-oriented menus in GNOME and KDE which greatly simplify locating applications by categorizing them into common "tasks".
MandrakeFirstTime is an easy-to-use wizard that helps setup a desktop environment (KDE, GNOME, etc.), choose a theme and configure email settings. DrakNet, the Internet connection and network utility, efficiently helps users configure all types of network connections, from common dial-up modems to DSL and cable connections.
The reworked version of MSEC, a utility for configuring the security level of a machine (Standard, High, Highest, Paranoid) is more powerful than ever. Also included are the latest stable versions of KDE and GNOME which both offer some great new features and applications such as anti-aliased fonts and Evolution (an Outlook-like email client and personal information manager). StarOffice 6.0 is included with the ProSuite and PowerPack Editions.
"With version 8.2, Mandrake Linux proves that it is the ultimate Linux experience. This new release is the result of our four year commitment to providing the best operating system ever. Mandrake Linux has long been the preferred Linux distribution for individuals, but Mandrake 8.2 marks a new step in our penetration of the corporate environment. The features and unparalleled ease of use make 8.2 an incredibly efficient and affordable alternative to UNIX and Windows 2000" said Jacques Le Marois, CEO of MandrakeSoft.
Core System Components
* Kernel 2.4.18
* Improved Firewire support
* Support for USB2, ECC memory, i830 DRM, ATA133, Geforce3
* XFree86 4.2 provides 3D acceleration for many video cards previously only supported in 3.3.6
* Glibc 2.2.4
Software and Applications
* Apache 1.3.23
* PHP 4.1.2
* MySQL 3.23.47
* PostgreSQL 7.2
* Sendmail 8.12.1
* Postfix 20010228
* Staroffice 6.0 is the latest version of the famous Office Suite that boasts integrated creativity and productivity tools, improved interoperability with Microsoft Office files, support for XML file formats, and improved international support.
* Evolution 1.02 is a full-featured personal information manager and advanced E-mail client. Evolution provides the best features in its class.
* KDE 2.2.2 (KDE 3.0 RC2 is also provided as an alternative desktop for users who enjoy the bleeding edge) and GNOME 1.4.1 -- Enjoy the latest versions of these popular desktop environments. KDE 2.2.2 includes a new print system which has been integrated with PrinterDrake; GNOME 1.4.1 includes Evolution to closely match the features and look of MS-Outlook.
Mandrake Linux 8.2 is currently available for x86 processors, and will soon also be available for the PPC platform.
To find out more about Mandrake Linux 8.2, please visit
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/82.php3
Pre-orders are now being accepted for the Mandrake Linux 8.2 ProSuite and PowerPack Editions at
http://www.MandrakeStore.com
Or download your copy today at http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ftp.php3
Mandrake Club members are entitled to download proprietary drivers and commercial software for 8.2:
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/club/
About MandrakeSoft
MandrakeSoft provides a trusted interface between users of information technology and open source developers. The company offers its enterprise, government and educational customers a set of GNU Linux and Open-Source software and related services, and user-friendly and highly competitive information technologies. In addition, MandrakeSoft offers technologists committed to open software and courseware a trusted channel to offer their services.
The company has technologists in over 20 countries, and is traded on Paris Euronext Marché Libre (Euroclear code: 4477.PA; Reuters code: MAKE.PA) and the US OTC market (stock symbol MDKFF). "Born on the Internet" in late 1998, MandrakeSoft established headquarters in the U.S.A., Montreal, England, Germany and France. Please visit the Web site, http://www.mandrakesoft.com for more information.
Re:Mirror of announcement (Score:2)
Woo hoo!
Re:StarOffice 6.0???? (Score:3, Insightful)
Hardly (Score:3, Interesting)
And StarOffice 6.0 is about to be officially launched (this week or the next). So I think it is really SO 6.0.
Truly amazing product, truly amazing company... (Score:5, Interesting)
I have to say I'm really impressed by how MandrakeSoft, a small and rather fragile company, is keeping on going its own way. They prefer doing more efforts in building and improving a dream OS everyday, keeping the right open source software way, and they try to avoid laying offs by requesting financial contributions of its users (see the Mandrake Club announcement). I don't know what this company is going to become in the next ten years but really, Mandrake Linux and MandrakeSoft are more exciting product and company than Red Hat or SuSE!
Star Office 6.0? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Star Office 6.0? (Score:3, Informative)
So technically StarOffice 6 is not available yet.
During the Linux-World expo in NY, the people at Sun said that basically the final release was ready, but they waited until end of March or beginning of April to clean up some final issues with licensing and partners.
So expect a PR from Sun real soon.
Redhat (Score:2)
Re:Redhat (Score:2, Informative)
1st Karma Whore (Score:3, Informative)
New Features
Including what will soon be my favorites:
New installation features include the ability to download and install updates at install time
new wizard-oriented rescue mode
redesigned and polished Mandrake Control Center
DiskDrake now supports an encrypted filesystem
Improved URPMI (apt-like package manager) and Software Manager
Rfbdrake - remotely control an X session.
New minimal (65 meg) installation mode, which installs nothing but the base system
Also mentions that StarOffice 6.0 is included, although It doesn't say, I'm sure it's probably the Beta.
Worth Mentioning:
Kernal 2.4.18
Improved Firewire, USB2, ATA133
Looking Good Mandrake!
Keep up the great work!
EVERYONE!! (Score:5, Funny)
Cached articles?? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Cached articles?? (Score:5, Informative)
Now, assuming CmdrTaco and the other powers that be are not completely oblivious to what's happening here, they've seen the request. And despite a general theme of labeling all anti-micorosoft news as interesting, I assume they're somewhat open-minded as well.
So I figure they've either looked into things, or are still doing so. The problems I can see are (1) huge increase of bandwidth for slashdot itself because of the cache, (2) legal problems, and (3) technical problems with actually doing this.
Since Google is caching websites as well, I assume (2) and (3) should not be too much of a problem. Oh sure, it might take some time to really talk things through with lawyers and the like, and perhaps this is still happening, but eventually it shouldn't be a barrier. Likewise, slashdot employs some people who're tech-savvy enough that (3) shouldn't be a problem for very long as well.
Bandwidth however definitely could be a problem. I imagine caching linked to pages, even if it's only the first page directly behind the link, would increase bandwidth use by 50%-150% (remember, only 75% of al statistics are made up on the spot)
Unfortunately bandwidth costs money. So if this is not something still in development (considering how long these requests have existed, I'd say that is slightly unlikely at this point), they've looked at it, and decided that it's not worth the money.
Maybe, perhaps, they'd be willing to reconsider if the subscriptions are succesful enough, but I personally don't count on that ever happening.
The other possibility is linking to the google cache of the linked to pages directly from the article. It's extra effort that's not worth the time since there are plenty of karma whores who will do the same almost as soon as the article's up anyway.
But basically, I think there's really no use in continuing with these requests. Everything that can be said about it has been said more than once. The powers that be have undoubtedly seen it all. There's little more for us to do than wait and see, or most likely don't see.
Re:Cached articles?? (Score:2)
As it says there, the problem is a matter of courtesy to sites that generate revenue from banner ads. They say nothing about being bandwidth-limited or technically challenged.
This gets pointed out each time somebody asks about caching...surely you saw one of them?
The most innovative suggestion I've seen recently is that slashdot look for the <META> tags that
a site can use to tell google not to cache their page. Or perhaps they can invent their own META tag, although I personally think it should be opt-in, not opt-out (i.e., the default should be that slashdot will not cache; only if the slashdot meta tag is found will a cache be created).
Re:Why not make a deal with google? (Score:2)
I still don't like their packaging (Score:4, Insightful)
While I suppose that this is the "right" way to do it in one sense, it makes adding in other KDE software (whether compiling or what not) very difficult.
You've got to do some nasty configure black-magic like
Re:I still don't like their packaging (Score:2)
Re:I still don't like their packaging (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't agree with this but that's their explanation anyway.
I really wish they would drop this whole redhat compatibility thing and just follow the LSB.IMO the more distros that follow the LSB the better. It's the best way that I can see to be "compatible" with other distros.
In the beginning Mandrake was RH with bug fixes, toys and compiled specifically for i586. But it has since grown in to much more than that. Ever since 7.0 they've broken away from that whole "redhat++" thing and I think it's time for them to break this compatibility issue and start following a standards base rather than acheiving compatibility by following another non-standard distro.
It just doesn't make much sense to me especially if the idea is to make Linux more consistent which seems to be part of what Mandrake is about.
It's really quite ironic.
P.S: And you know what the worst part about it is? Mandrake still installs a
--
Garett
it's a symlink, guess its for compatiability (Score:2, Interesting)
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Mar 16 15:36 redhat-release -> mandrake-release
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Bluebird) for i586
Re:I still don't like their packaging (Score:2)
Nope;
I read that too (FHS - 3.12). So from that point of view, would not a distribution installing KDE in
Re:I still don't like their packaging (Score:2)
Uh, Mandrake defaults to KDE, so I would assume that makes KDE part of the original install.
In any case, I never liked the /opt thing. I see NO reason why it is better to slap on a new directory like that instead of just installing, say, kde2 into /usr/kde2, or kde3 into /usr/kde3, etc. Then you get the same "benefit" of /opt but without that silly extra, hanging-out-there-by-itself directory.
I have java installed in its own /usr/jre directory, and would prefer kde be in its own /usr/kde directory (instead of scattered around /usr, /usr/lib, /usr/include, etc. Just don't give me /opt.
Whoohoo! Only a few more weeks... (Score:3, Interesting)
I am very impressed with the tools that they are inlcuding in this release. The best is the ability to RIGHT-CLICK on a folder and then LEFT-CLICK on SHARE!!!
That is the greatest feature to add to Linux. The medium sized computer manufacturer that I work for is very interested in being able to use Linux in their Server products. Since most of their technical staff and clients have no interest in learning how to configure Samba, this will be a great help.
Now, all they will have to do is have me or a few of the other techs, go by the machines, or SSH into them to update them on occasion.
Mandrake is truly bringing Linux to the masses.
With this one feature, the market share and thus the potential number of commercial products for Linux can and hopefully will increase dramatically.
--
.sig seperator
--
Request for Mandrake 8.3 (Score:2, Insightful)
Yes, I know of several root/boot rescue disks,
but a disk made specifically for Mandrake might be more useful & user friendly.
Floppies are unreliable, slow, and don't hold much.
Include something like Symmantec Ghost for easy backups
Include CDRW support and USB2/firewire support for those new external burners and hard-drives.
Stupid idea? - I'd pay extra for it.
What's everybody else think?
Re:Request for Mandrake 8.3 (Score:2)
I recently had to wipe out a virus that had lodged itself in the C:\_RESTORE directory of someone's WinME install. Of course, Windows won't let you touch these "critical" files, so I booted to DOS mode... del *.*... wait 15 minutes... and it's still not getting anywhere very fast. Put coat on, tell customer I'll be back in 10 minutes.
Come back with Linux Mandrake 8.0 CD#1, insert, reboot, type 'rescue' at LILO prompt, mount
The Mandrake rescue feature is much more useful than just restoring a broken LILO or whatever. I now carry that CD around with my tech kit.
P2P ISO Distribution (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:P2P ISO Distribution (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:P2P ISO Distribution (Score:2)
Mandrake in trouble (Score:5, Insightful)
Right on Mandrake's site is what I would call a plea, and what otehrs would call begging for money.
"Mandrake Linux distribution's short-term future is in jeopardy due to a simple factor: money"
So perhaps just this once people can go out and buy some CD's to help support this company and make sure there is another release in the future.
I saw someone else say this earlier, but it got modded up to 2 as Funny... I don't know why buting the CD's to support a company in financial trouble is funny though.
Re:Mandrake in trouble (Score:2, Funny)
I never pay Micros~1 for their stuff and they're doing OK.
Join Mandrake Club instead (Score:2, Insightful)
A noble sentiment, but if you want to really help then Join the Mandrake club.
If you buy CD a lot of that money goes towards packaging distribution and marketing.
--
Guilty [microsoft.com]
Re:Join Mandrake Club instead (Score:4, Insightful)
If you buy CD a lot of that money goes towards packaging distribution and marketing.
True, but buying boxed editions has another positive effect. If lots of people buy the boxes, more stores will stock them, giving the distribution more visibility to people who have not used Linux yet, potentially getting more new users, producing more income. So there are benefits either way.
Re:Mandrake in trouble (Score:3, Interesting)
WRONG! (Score:2)
Cheap fucks like you may WISH the GPL guaranteed you a free ride, but it doesn't. They're being nice.
Re:Mandrake in trouble (Score:2)
> If I was not unemployed (get into computers, they said in the '70s. It's the wave of the future, you'll never be out of work! Yeah, right), I'd pay Mandrake for their distro.
I'm in the same boat. Although I'm using Debian at the moment, I would pay for the Mandrake club just to support as what I perceive as the other great distro. Unfortunately, as a recent MIS graduate, I can't find work and I'm about to sell my winter jacket here in Wisconsin just to afford next month's rent. I now realize the folly of my ways (hindsight is 20x20), but I remember them selling me on the idea of majoring in MIS five years ago because I would be gaurenteed to find a job and could expect to earn a lot of money. Horse pucky! I consider myself "above average" and on-par with most of the CS graduates through job experience and personal persistence and I keep getting turned down due to lack of experience. I particularly loved this quote from my alma mater's web site [uwec.edu] on why to study MIS:
> Well paid. The annual salary range for an entry-level MIS trainee with a bachelor's degree is $45,000-$52,000.
Note "entry level". I visit that page once in awhile for a good laugh. EVERYONE, even entry level, wants experience. Everyone.
It would be cool if someone would organize a class action lawsuit. Too bad I'm a lazy bitch and lack hard evidence.
Re:Mandrake in trouble (Score:2)
A lot of people don't realize that if we don't support the company's that support us we all lose in the end.
The great thing about Linux compays is that if you can't afford to contribute you are still allowed to download the distribution. This is empowering and if we can break out of the box and do what is necessary then it will be a good thing for us all.
Don't expect any high standards from this individual. Lots of people complain about Microsoft but are unwilling to support anything better.
I believe that open source company's will fail because we as a society try to apply our traditional capitalistic values on a very untraditional business model.
Also, I sensed by the original posters comment "We don't care.. "(If Mandrake goes out of business.) That he may not have a lot of compation for the needs of other people. Imagine if the world had no one who felt differently! Not a world I would like to live in.
SuSE is better (duck!) (Score:3, Interesting)
YALD (Yet Another Linux Distribution) (Score:5, Informative)
I've been a linux user since 1995, cutting my teeth on Slackware 2. Since then I have seen linux evolve, grow, change directions and broaden it's horizons.
Here's the lowdown on Mandrake: I thoroughly believe that Mandrake Linux is the single most balanced distrubution available. I have used it for enterprise-scale web servers, for applications development, and even for an experimental wireless data-retrieval system in peru (the very complete internationalization of the Mandrake distro made it the ideal candidate, as well as it's ability to scale down MUCH smaller that I could ever get a red-hat system)
It's also dandy as a day-to-day desktop workstation.
However, It has it's caveats, like any distro. It's still too large. I'd like to see what you get with a 65 meg install. If it's got internationalization and a functional x-server as well as some basic ncurses-type config tools, I may end up switching from my own LFS system (weighing in at about 90 megs right now.) Also, like redhat, the configuration tools are a little too complex. If they decide to switch to ONE config manager and ONE only, that doesen't mess with your own customizations, I'll finally start using them. As it is, I don't install any of them, and I edit all files by hand, a-la slackware. However, if you're a newbie, all the drak* tools are VERY well done and perform in a fairly straightforward manner, as long as you're not getting jiggy with the
I must admit, I have a soft spot for Debian, especially as it's going to inherit the HURD, and apt is soooo schweet, but give rpm-drak a try. I hope you won't be disappointed.
Other than that, well, I'd encourage anybody who believes in supporting an excellent distro to go out and buy a copy, or Subscribe. It's going to be worth the money.
Re:YALD (Yet Another Linux Distribution) (Score:2)
When discussing Mandrake's "small install" options, let's remember that all the binaries which ship with Mandrake (at least in the x86 version - the most popular one by far) are 586 optimized. What's the smallest hard drive you've ever seen in a Pentium?
Personally, I'm a bit surprised that they bothered. I don't the idea is to make a "Mandrake for older systems", which is the point of many small distros (such as Tiny). More likely, they're aiming for those expert users who just want the core programs and libraries, and will build their own system from there. For example, users who are setting up a minimal server with as little unnecessary code as possible lying around (in which case I would think that XFree and internationalization tools would not be included).
Re:YALD (Yet Another Linux Distribution) (Score:2)
That's what I'm gonna do.
I have a feeling I'm really going to like the minimal install option... Now it'll be very easy to do Linux From Scratch, because you won't need an existing Linux installation to do it!
Why this obsession with ISO's? (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:Why this obsession with ISO's? (Score:2)
That you know in advance that you'll always have a backup installation to fall onto, that always works, without worrying whether your network connection is down?
Re:Why this obsession with ISO's? (Score:2)
Enter Redhat world - one FLOPPY diskette (the netboot.img one) - boot it, put an IP (assuming that your network is connected through another Linux gateway), and continue to install from there while downloading what you need only - from the net..
DAMN! (Score:2)
So does it support HomePNA yet? (Score:2)
Amazing things can happen in 4 years! (Score:2, Interesting)
DON'T USE IT if you have a Promise ATA133 card (Score:2, Informative)
During testing, I discovered a bug that's related to the ATA133 patch including in Mandrake's version of the 2.4.18 kernel. If you attempt to install 8.2 with a Promise Ultra TX2 card (the ones packaged with Maxtor ATA133 drives), it will not successfully complete and will destroy your existing installation. I reported this bug on the cooker mailing list and to Mandrake's bugzilla site. It was not fixed before release. Be forewarned and wait for an updated kernel with this bug fixed. Cheers.
I'm comparing it against FreeBSD (Score:2)
Mandrake, though, had an easier install that even Forrest Gump could do.
However, a look at the
Is zlib (and others) fixed in Mdk 8.2 ? (Score:2, Interesting)
candiates hoping the zlib [cert.org], OpenSSH [openbsd.org] and other
recent security fixes would be incorporated.
I can't find mention of these updates for 8.2 on
the Mandrake announcement site, or forums.
Anyone know if zlib and the gang have been fixed?
My query about this on the Mdk forums [mandrakeforum.com] was
immediately marked as "-1: Offtopic" suggesting
to me the fixes are not there.
download edition (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:mirrors? (Score:2, Informative)
Sorry,
Derek
Re:*Mirrors*? (Score:2)
I just can't wait!
Those are my (more than) 2 cents (to help Mandrake)
Sounds like a connection error... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Sounds like a connection error... (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course, it's just as easy now that I'm running Win 2k pro, but I was mucho impressed running LM 8.1 on my PII 400/128MB PC100 RAM/16.6GB HD system, and the only reason I haven't installed it on my new box is because I knew that 8.2 was imminent and it would save me the hassle of installing 2x. My plans are to run a tri-boot Win 2k pro/XP pro/LM 8.2 on my Soyo Dragon+/Athalon 1700+/256MB DDR RAM/WD 120GB HD w/8MB cache system (only running XP because my telephone tech support job requires me to be familiar with it).
Mandrake rocks. Wish there could be some Mandrake-centric books though. (EVERYTHING is Red Hat!!!)
Chris
Re:Mandrake's PHP Hammered: Announcement Text Belo (Score:2)
Not that I can use the default one (I need LDAP built-in, which afaik the rpm doesn't have), but it would be nice for them to be running something newer, like, say Postfix 1.1 which came out in mid January. There's been a lot of refinements since then.
Re:Mandrake's PHP Hammered: Announcement Text Belo (Score:2)
There is NO Star Office 6.0 officially available - there is open office - without tons of fonts (only the free fonts), no dictionary (not the gnu old dictionary!), and tons of other stuff which is not there. So I think that they bundled a snapshot of Open Office..
Star office 6.0 WILL cost you money! How much? good question, but it won't be available freely for Linux (although you could use Open Office with the limitations I mentioned above).
FYI.
Re:Share your upgrade experiences (Score:2, Insightful)
tar czvf home.tar.gz
Don't need a GUI for something that straightforward...
I personally keep all data that I want persistant accross installs on non-root partitions:
Re:Please (Score:2)
Re:Good for newbs (Score:2)
oh no, please God no.
I hate the people who only like bands because they're underground. I was talking to a guy about the Strokes the other day and he said "yeah I saw 'em a few times and I really liked them, but then vanity fair started writing about them, so forget that."
you should like something or use something because *it works for you* not because it is "alternative" or "underground" or anything else. If windows is working for you, then don't switch to Linux because it's "cool." switch to Linux because it's a better product.
Re:Good for newbs (Score:2)
How many people would of look at Linux at all if it wasn't for the fact that it was "underground"?
Don't get me wrong I agree with you. Sadly, we're in the minority. which to these people makes us cool.
Re:intel 830M chipsets (Score:2)
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/linux/c400.html [unsw.edu.au]
Hope this helps.
-Sean
Re:There go my iso downloads (Score:2)
Re:has to be better... (Score:2, Interesting)
Linux was designed from the beginning, and still is, to be run on lousy hardware. I'm about to set up a Pentium 60MHz firewall/router/log-in-terminal, and I've seen people running that on 386's. By speaking like you, we only get bloatier, bigger and slower software, because "hey, I've got the hardware for it!" But have you ever tried running DOS with Windows 3.11 on a Athlon 1200? Blazingly fast! People knew how to work in Windows 3.11 as well, they just didn't have that kindergarden-look of WinXP. Keep the software small and fast, and the computers will run faster! Linux should run (and does) on Pentium 200s. It even runs fast, if you set it up correctly or use a small, fast distro (think Blackbox, few services - boots in 10 seconds). My favourite server distro in that matter is Trustix - small, fast and it works.
MHO, anyway..
Re:65MB Minimum? (Score:2)
Re:Motd (Score:2)
What about the stuff that you wrote? Or that stuff that you paid to be released as free software? Or how about the hours of packaging and bug testing?
Re:Motd (Score:2, Insightful)
Doesnt anyone remember their donation to debian also?