Newest Mandrake Linux Delayed 179
Jens Lönn writes: "Linux seller MandrakeSoft has had to delay shipment of its newest version of Linux because of problems in moving manufacturing to the United States. Mandrake Linux 8.1 is available as a download, but the first CDs of the product were supposed to ship by the end of September. "Getting 8.1 production up and running in North America has been a slow and expensive process," the company said in a e-mail message to those who have ordered the CD." Since Mandrake makes certains things so easy (smooth installation), I hope they soon get their newest release again on Walmart shelves across the U.S.
Slow and expensive? (Score:1)
Obviously I don't understand the problem.
Re:Slow and expensive? (Score:1)
Re:Slow and expensive? (Score:1)
that seems logical, may be mandrake should turn to those in the far east for (i)legal CD production(duplication), I know they're pretty fast
humps
Re:Slow and expensive? (Score:4, Insightful)
1) Get quotes and find the right supplier
2) Fill in the credit application form
3) Hit voicemail
4) Get the iso images burned on a CD-R and tested on a few machines to make sure the media is OK
5) Get the artwork in a format that's readable by the film-maker (sorry, gotta use QuarkXpress)
6) Get the artwork to a print bureau and check the output for any errors
7) Get the address where to send all the materials
8) Send them
9) Make sure all they received is okay
10) Hit the voice mail
11) It's weekend, so it will have to wait until monday
12) The CD plant received all the documents
13) They make the film for printing
14) They fax you a copy
15) You approve the copy and send it back
16) They call to ask it you want a white background or leave it silvery. They hit your voicemail
17) You call them back and tell them to leave it silvery
18) They start manufacturing
19) A couple of days later, your CDs are ready, they ship it to you via UPS/Fedex/Whatever
20) You receive them in your warehouse and have to ship thousands of CDs one-by-one
Re:Slow and expensive? (Score:1)
Those must have been big tarrifs!
Re:Slow and expensive? (Score:1)
Re:Slow and expensive? (Score:1)
The paperwork for employees and work permits for aliens still apply.
Re:Slow and expensive? (Score:1)
I guess assembling a few bits does count as manufacturing.
Is this related to the poor reviews (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Is this related to the poor reviews (Score:1)
Re:Is this related to the poor reviews (Score:1)
Re:Is this related to the poor reviews (Score:5, Funny)
the release of Linux Mandrake 8.1, aggressively timed to coincide with that of Microsoft's much vaunted Windows XP, marks the start of the final battle for domination of the computer industry.
The Linux operating system was born in 1991 and was created by one man, a Finnish student coincidentally named Linux Torvalds.
Previous versions of Linux have been named Red Hat, Slack Ware, Storm and Coral. In stark contrast to the mundane names such as 98, ME or NT preferred by Microsoft, the crazy names of each Linux release hint at its renegade nature.
why isn't the industry standard web browser, Internet Explorer, included with Linux? Despite the best efforts of the experts at the Internet Engineering Task Force to encourage adoption of the Internet Explorer standard, the creators of Linux seem to think that they know better.
But here's the dead giveaway:
Computer security is also an area that seems to have been overlooked by the developers of Linux. In these times when hacking and viruses are commonplace, it defies belief to learn that no anti-virus software is available for Linux. To add insult to injury, there is no Linux version of the popular ZoneAlarm firewall. By using Linux, you are issuing an open invitation to the hordes of ne'er-do-wells on the Internet.
The shortcomings of Linux are obvious. Without even installing Linux Mandrake, I have exposed several fundamental flaws.
As with most Satire, the danger lies in the unwashed masses taking it literally...
Re:Is this related to the poor reviews (Score:1)
Smooth Installation... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Smooth Installation... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Smooth Installation... (Score:3, Informative)
If you change the theme of the Installer GUI (bottom left hand corner) it does have little silver & black checkboxes. Of course, it would have been nice if they made that theme the default.
Jaysyn
Re:Smooth Installation... (Score:1)
I've been using MDK for a couple years now. I just slapped my MDK 8.1 Install CD in a box to test this. I honestly didn't know those little colored bars at the bottom DID anything...
Thanx for the tip!
Re:Smooth Installation... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Smooth Installation... (Score:2)
Maybe a delay is a good thing? (Score:3, Informative)
Seems strange to me (Score:2)
I suspect that it's just easier for Mandrakesoft to get someone else organising their North American manufacturing and distribution all at once, rather than managing the supply chain from Europe.
amazing nonetheless (Score:1, Funny)
Of course... (Score:4, Informative)
All three CDs (two install and the supplemental) including shipping for $10 US
You can only preorder it (Score:2)
You're missing the point. (Score:2, Interesting)
Cheap Bytes (bless their busy little hands) only dl's stuff and burns it, then sells it cheap. Nothing wrong with that, but Mandrake doesn't get a cut, as far as I know. The point of this story is that Mandrake, the orginisation, is having trouble making money because of shippiing problems.
I for one, happen to think it would be a real shame if they went under. Mandrake and Debian are my two favorite distros.
Re:Of course... (Score:2)
wal-mart shelves? (Score:2, Insightful)
"Who in their right mind would pay for another OS when one came with the system i bought FOR FREE?!"
It's not really a market i see happening. If you MUST have a Mandrake CD at 2am, most likely you can d/l and burn one yourself..
Re:wal-mart shelves? (Score:1)
Re:wal-mart shelves? (Score:5, Funny)
I have a friend who was employed in the "electronics" department at Wal-Fart.
While stocking shelves one day, a co-slave looked at him and said
"What the H*LL is this [the Mandrake box]."
My friend attempted to explain
"So it's like Windows. Isn't that illegal."
My friend now works at Pizza-Hut.
Re:wal-mart shelves? (Score:5, Insightful)
I highly recommend buying an off-the-shelf version and comparing it to the version you downloaded. It's rather enlightening, and it's tough to go back to the "download edition" afterward.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:1)
btw, 2 of the 4 Mandrake 8.1 offerings supply dvd's in them.
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:1)
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:2)
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:1)
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:2)
But Mandrake had intended, originally, to produce them overseas and ship them to the US.
Apparently a capacity issue at their overseas facility is what prompted them to move US production into the US, rather than wait for their overseas facility to begin turning out the CDs.
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:2)
MandrakeSoft moved North American production to the United States because tariff laws for imported products effectively increased the manufacturing cost by a factor of two or three, said Jean Mar, business operations manager.
The overseas company could probably have handled the capacity fine, but importing the CDs to america is expensive.
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:2)
Chalk another one up for regulation.
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:3, Interesting)
Back when I first got DSL and downloaded my first
Certainly we should all support our favorite distribution by purchasing a packaged product once in awhile. This isn't too hard when most are priced between $30 and $50 dollars.
However, I do not see how these companies can continue to survive much longer without venturing into different product areas as Red Hat has done. I really don't think their revenue streams can support them for much longer. Suse has had troubles recently for some of the same reasons (IMHO).
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:1)
Broadband is dead according to Cringely
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20011011
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:3, Interesting)
Contrary to some "dot-bomb" companies of recent times, it seems like the guys who make Mandrake Linux 8.1 are conservative in their approach to selling their product, and drop non-revenue-generating offerings very quickly. They started a whole portal thing for the release of 7.2, then dropped it fairly quickly since it didn't look like it would make money. As a user of Linux-Mandrake since version 5.2 (the first version), I've seen them grow the package from a small offshoot of a stock RedHat install to a robust and up-to-date distribution with an enormous developer base. Subscribe to the "cooker" mailing list for a few weeks; the volume of mail is just incredible, and package announcements come in almost daily. Yeah, the products are pushed out a little early, without incredibly robust quality assurance. I hate to say it, but the strategy worked for Microsoft, and it works for Mandrake: People (like me!)*want* the latest and greatest, and put up with problems in exchange for benefits, so put it out there early and bugfix it later. Mandrake Linux, IIRC, is not yet a publicly traded company, but it seems to me that they have their act together, and know how to market the product so they stay in the black.
On a side note: I noticed Linux-Mandrake changed the name to "Mandrake Linux" with version 8.1. I wonder if that's a step towards calling it "Mandrake GNU/Linux" with version 8.2?
Re:This bodes not well... (Score:2)
The first version... (Score:2)
http://slashdot.org/articles/980725/117228.shtml [slashdot.org]
Had to recall that, just for history
I wonder if there's more to it... (Score:2, Informative)
Devfs is causing many people no end of grief, I wonder if Mandrake is going to actually fix a few things while their "production delays" are taken care of. If they don't, I suspect 8.1 is going to be one bumpy ride for them.
Re:Do0o0o0o0o0o0oom!! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:1, Informative)
KDE 2.2.1 and mozilla 0.94 is included, which is very nice, and I can really recommend this version!
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:1)
That is nice to hear. I can't say I had as much luck with it. I couldn't determine what device was my floppy drive (it wasn't fd0, like it should be) and was unable to mount floppies. It wasn't much of a problem, because I do most of my archiving to ftp, but a pretty important flaw nonetheless. When I went to look for help in the #mandrake chat rooms all I ended up doing was answering questions on installing programs and such.
For anyone whose been using Linux for awhile, but still considers himself a newbie, I would say don't hesitate to try Slackware or Debian. The installs are not all that hard, and speaking from experience the lack of 'user friendly tools' makes a lot of things easier if you just use your head. I used Redhat, then Mandrake, then Debian, and now Slackware. I wouldn't go back to Redhat/Mandrake ever again. I know Mandrake has its niche, and I think its great what the company is doing for Linux, but if you're reading /., you should be, IMHO, be using something like Slack or Debian.
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:1)
I had the same thing -- a post on Usenet explained that 8.1 (the download version, anyway) installs a broken /etc/fstab.
On the whole, I've been impressed with Mandrake. I recently built my first x86 box (need a dual boot with Windows on this one) and took the opportunity to try out Debian and Mandrake. The Debian install was just godawful. Could I have managed it? Sure, I've been installing Linux since Red Hat 4 / MkLinux DR2. But I have things to do with my time. Mandrake did a great job with hardware detection and setup. Windows 98, on the other hand, which I've used occasionally but never installed or admined just sucked. It correctly detected far fewer devices than did Mandrake and required a reinstall when I added a modem and again when I switched monitors.
Now, if only I could get that modem to work under Mandrake...
Me too.. nasty problems (Score:2, Informative)
Something is unstable in my system and I'm not sure what it is: after a few minutes of running X the video occasionally starts to get corrupted... these things never happened to me in 8.0
I'm going to regress back to 8.0 which was quite simply: solid. I'm simply not knowledgable enough with their distro to be able to troubleshoot the problem. All I can say is that 8.0 was great.
p.s. installed 8.1 fresh from CDs (not an upgrade)... anyways.. for those interested, my system is an Athlon 850 Asus A7V and Matrox G400/SB Live/3COM3c905b/AcerCDRW
Installation CDs burned after doing MD5 checksums on ISOs, and then afterwards on RPMs on CDs.
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:2)
Hopefully 8.1 will work with my laptop.
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:1)
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:2)
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:2)
I have a Sony VAIO which I had a wide variety of problems getting any distro to install correctly on. Mandrake 8 was the first that installed where it was all useable (ie X config OK, sound working, networking working, etc). I had problems getting my wlan card to work under 8, but the installer for 8.1 detected and configured it without a hitch.
I've got 4 machines (including the laptop) running Mandrake 8.1 now. I've been running various flavors of Linux on those same 4 machines for a long time and Mandrake 8.1 is the first I ever remember that installed flawlessly on each of the machines.
As someone who's been using Linux desktops since the days of Red Hat 4, it's pretty incredible to me how far Linux on the desktop has come, especially on laptops.
Mandrake 8.1 is a pig (Score:2)
What happened to the days when you could install a perfectly functional Linux system with X, apache, perl,gcc, etc. in less than 40 MB ?
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is a pig (Score:2)
Oh, I've only been using Linux for a little more than two years, but I find it hard to believe that you could ever install all of that in 40 mb.
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is a pig (Score:1)
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:1)
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:3, Informative)
sorry, but i have to disagree -- mandrake 8.1 has TONS of problems related mainly to the new GUI wizards they included for all kinds of setups.
i'm referring here specifically to their "Internet Connection Sharing" wizard (ugh, what's with that Windows nomenclature), which is supposed to setup up proper IP forwarding and some firewalling features, but falls furstratingly flat on its face. the anti-aliased KDE is pretty and obviously they spent lots of time on fluffiness and likeability, but they need to work harder on the tools they came up with.
there's a long way to go in this respect, especially with regard to the inclusion of like fifteen different tools to do the same thing in a *standard* installation, which will surely confuse many of the newbies this product is aimed at.
on mandrakeforum.com the consensus has been that this 'final release' should've been nothing more than an 'RC', since day 2.
peace
-p
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:1)
At one point, I couldn't view my desktop, or any of the icons, in either GNOME or KDE.
Finally, I just said the hell with it and went back to 8.0. Hopefully, they will have fixed the bugs by 8.2.
Re:Mandrake 8.1 is great (Score:1)
To bad for all of you who have had problem with 8.1.
On my computer it works a lot better than 8.0, and feels like a more polished product.
Tariff (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Tariff (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Tariff (Score:1)
It's US gov't that kill the business (Score:1)
This story shows that technologically physical medium production may not need long time to setup. I believe the whole thing is slow because you have to go through all the process of registration (making sure you're not asking the factory to press pirated version of software), and the less competitive response time from factory because the market is protected by the government tariff.
How about... (Score:2, Funny)
Slashdot: So?
s/Heinz/Mandrake/
s/beans/Linux/
s/cans/CDs/
Slashdot: Quick! Hot news!
Hmm. I know how useful sed is, but I never realised it was powerful enough to turn boring tripe into news in just 3 simple commands. Maybe I should read the man more carefully.
Re:How about... (Score:1)
This is why we have niche media, okay?
- Robin
Only affects America (Score:1)
:o)
Kiwaiti
Re:Only affects America (Score:2)
Please take this opportunity... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Please take this opportunity... (Score:2, Informative)
Also, read through some of the past articles on Mandrakeforum starting with this. [mandrakeforum.com]
RedHat have the same problems (Score:4, Offtopic)
I believe RedHat have the same problems, since RedHat 7.2 has been ready (even on the mirrors) for some time now, but they will not distibute it (ie. add the everyone-read bit to the file permissions) until they have the CDs ready.
The RedHat 7.2 relase is available trough rsync ....
$ rsync -av csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu::pub/redhat/redhat/lin ux/7.2/en/iso
... done
n ux/7.2/en/iso/i386/MD5SUM .
... done
*** Welcome to the Purdue University Computer Society RSYNC Server
*** Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
http://csociety.ecn.purdue.edu/
This archive is available via FTP, HTTP, and RSYNC at:
ftp://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/
http://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/
rsync://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/
Report problems to ftp@csociety.ecn.purdue.edu
receiving file list
dr-x------ 4096 2001/10/05 01:54:02 iso
dr-x------ 4096 2001/10/04 02:01:50 iso/doc
-rw-r--r-- 50 2001/10/04 02:02:00 iso/doc/MD5SUM
-rw-r--r-- 624476160 2001/10/04 00:35:00 iso/doc/enigma-docs.iso
dr-x------ 4096 2001/10/04 02:03:42 iso/i386
-rw-r--r-- 226 2001/10/04 02:04:22 iso/i386/MD5SUM
-rw-r--r-- 680282112 2001/10/04 00:27:19 iso/i386/enigma-SRPMS-disc1.iso
-rw-r--r-- 542537728 2001/10/04 00:29:25 iso/i386/enigma-SRPMS-disc2.iso
-rw-r--r-- 677961728 2001/10/04 00:22:08 iso/i386/enigma-i386-disc1.iso
-rw-r--r-- 669429760 2001/10/04 00:24:42 iso/i386/enigma-i386-disc2.iso
wrote 94 bytes read 691 bytes 314.00 bytes/sec
total size is 3194687764 speedup is 4069665.94
$ rsync -av csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu::pub/redhat/redhat/li
*** Welcome to the Purdue University Computer Society RSYNC Server
*** Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
http://csociety.ecn.purdue.edu/
This archive is available via FTP, HTTP, and RSYNC at:
ftp://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/
http://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/
rsync://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/
Report problems to ftp@csociety.ecn.purdue.edu
receiving file list
wrote 106 bytes read 500 bytes 242.40 bytes/sec
total size is 226 speedup is 0.37
$ cat MD5SUM
efab549656a1a85ab8fa39eb873eff0e enigma-SRPMS-disc1.iso
70703897af7703b40e41777a3aa186c3 enigma-SRPMS-disc2.iso
cf7bce0c1cdbfedfae29e60aef202f6f enigma-i386-disc1.iso
fd705b3e5d0e37a828db35d21195a9f6 enigma-i386-disc2.iso
Note that the files are dated 2001/10/04
Re:Anyone mirroring these files? (Score:1)
Again? (Score:2, Funny)
Interesting Politics (Score:1)
I guess the poor ol' US software industry needs the protection of imports, even though until recently they needed special rules to import more tech workers, and the DOJ is working on breaking up MS.
Yea... I'll buy it. (Score:1)
I been using Mandrake 8.1 for the last 2 weeks and let me tell you I love it. I think Mandrakesoft out done a great job putting Mandrake 8.1 together. It is so easy to configure your network, change boot loaders, install/remove software and download updates. Everything you need all in one place! Now I been a Linux user for two years and sometimes you just want junk to work without trying to figure out every little thing. I know if anyone who want to start using Linux I would give them a copy of Mandrake hell I'm going to buy Mandrake 8.1 when it hit stores. Just to show my support and even if you don't like Mandrake Linux I think everyone need to still support there disros of choice.
This is only a minor bump in the road (Score:1)
It's great value for the money.
Don't worry. (Score:2, Interesting)
Seriously...where do these guys find time for quality testing...they seem too busy stuffing the next distro out the door.
Sheesh.
-Ben
Problems (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Problems (Score:1)
What a jackass.
Re:Problems (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm just trying to find work that matches my skills and background. It doesn't seem
like posting to the mailling list about my availability is a bad idea -- I've actually encouraged
other people in that community to use the list to help match themselves up with jobs.
It's hard out there -- the economy is not so great right now and this is greatly affecting jobs. There are a whole lot of very capable people being laid off because companies need to cut their costs.
I don't bear MandrakeSoft any ill will. Retail markets are not as strong as they were a year ago, or even a month ago. That's going to hurt everyone who gains revenue from that sector -- MandrakeSoft's doing the responsible thing by ending my salaried employment.
Anyway, I'll still be sponsored by them, though not as a fulltime employee, for a little while, as they're able. I'll be contracting with them a bit, to whatever extent they can do it.
- Jay Beale
So long Mandrake (Score:2, Insightful)
(1) Their management is obviously incompetent. This group of French business dum asses handed the most popular (at least by download stats) Linux distro over to a bunch of dot-bomb e-learning idiots here in the States. They later fired that group. Who knows how much money that cost.
(2) Mandrake has to have the worst marketing of all the Linux distros. There is a reason that no big OEMs that Mandrake seriously. This distro has attempted to sell an operating system that people will use to run their businesses while the main Mandrake marketing motif is a drunken looking goofy version of Tux. As for the Mandrake icons and graphics all I can say is it great that Gael Duval's sister has found work.
(3) The Q&A that you see from the older distros like SuSE and RedHat just isn't there. Mandrake 8.1 uses DevFS. While an admirable technical pioneering effort, you just have to look at the Mandrake mailing lists to see that DevFS isn't ready for prime time. It is pretty much a disaster as there are significant hardware configs that DevFS can't handle. Mandrake went from the distro that has the best hardware support to the distro that has the worst. And this is supposed to be a Newbie Linux? 8.1 shipped with a kernel with a VERY broken VM. I have locked up my box many times now as the kernel after taking all 256 megs of swap dies a horrible death.
Mandrake 8.1 (Score:2)
Factual or not, this is how new users see the operating system. The harassment that the author of the review received in the wake of writting it will probably drive him away from Open-Source forever and only further reinforce the stereotype of the Linux Community being elitists and jerks. Another story [adequacy.org] on that site (I can't really figure out the purpose of the site; some of the stuff is really weird) reinforces the same idea: new users like the authors of these two articles are insulted and demeaned for "factual errors" because they're... gasp... new users. The irrational desire for guruism and leetness wins out over the rational desire to encourage and help new users, and ultimately the Linux Community suffers.
Just something to think about.
I personally find Mandrake 8.1 to be a real gem (the X configuration has improved greatly, I love the changes to the package management, and I see little changes here and there that keep making me smile), but if the review reflects the experience that most new users have, maybe it'd make more sense to examine the OS experience rather than flaming the newbies.
Right and wrong. (Score:1, Redundant)
Does it really help the Open Source Community to call inexperienced users "idiots" rather than explaining to them how things work; for example, why there's no Internet Explorer for Linux? Now that most distros are shipping with either no manual (just a "quick install sheet"), a 12-page manual covering just the installation, or a 2000-page manual that'll never be opened, there's no way for new users to know these things -- they have to be told.
Do you really think most users who are frustrated by their first Linux installation experience (which is a perfectly normal situation for the new user to be in if he isn't a geek guru like us) and are told that they're "useless idiots" because of it are going to make a SECOND attempt?
I don't.
Re:Right and wrong. (Score:2, Insightful)
Documentation? (Score:1, Redundant)
It's a scary thought, but the site seems to be legit, unless you can document otherwise.
Re:Documentation? (Score:2)
So I don't know if I'd say it's satire or what the fuck it is. But it clearly at least acknowledges how ridiculous it is.
Personally... (Score:1)
I can't wait until Mandrake 8.1 hits the shelves. While I have downloaded the latest version and have the 3 CD set and have also installed it. I would like to support Mandrake Financially.
I used to be unable to afford that. With my current job, I now can afford to support Linux companies. I have been happy with Mandrake's previous releases and would like to see that OS taken more seriously in the corporate and home user markets.
One way for this to happen is to generate real sales figures that give software houses the idea that there are enough installed Linux desktops that they could make a few bucks selling their wares.
Now, many of you believe that Linux doesn't need commercial apps. While that is true, Linux needs no commercial apps. Unless, Linux-users want their OS of choice to be taken seriously. The average PC user (Home or Corporate), will only take Linux as a serious operating system if there are readily available commercial applications.
I do my best to advocate Linux to as many people as possible and that is the one wall that I regularly run into. Where are the commercial apps? Where is the software on the shelves of [Insert_software_vendor_name_here]?
If you like Linux, love Linux and use Linux. Then support Linux, by buying your distros. Not only will it be good for the state of Linux companies, it will also help raise awarness of Linux in the minds of corporate [Insert_Country_Name_Here].
--
.sig seperator
--
Re:Personally... (Score:2)
Smooth install? (Score:3, Interesting)
Maybe compared to the text install of Debian that I tried first, okay, I can accept that. I've been trying to jump the Windows bandwagon for a few weeks now on some test machines, and haven't been terribly lucky with everything going smoothly, not even with Mandrake 8.1.
For instance, if you try to set up an ethernet card using the Control Panel (or whatever it's called), you cannot set up a NIC correctly without using BOTH normal AND expert mode. Reason being, in expert mode, there's no way to set the Gateway and DNS (I think?) servers... you have to go to normal mode to do that, but only if you set up a static IP. If you set up bootp or dhcp, it won't show up those boxes. So once I set those correctly, I went through the expert install and finished off the process. This took some serious tinkering to figure out their severely broken UI, and several hours to sort out because they don't even show you what the settings are unless you get to those screens by pure luck.
If I were the typical clueless Windows user trying Linux for the first time, I'd probably have given up and installed Windows by now.
Re:Smooth install? (Score:2)
Re:Smooth install? (Score:1)
Hard to get the newest and greatest to customers (Score:3, Interesting)
I think this is quite a problem when selling Linux on CD, since i believe many folks who think about buying Linux in the store at least know the kernel version (but probably don't bother about glibc, gcc,
The folks at Mandrake know all this, their distributions contain all the most recent stuff, their development rpms (cooker) are really cutting edge, and they even offered to sell 8.1 as preview and send the actual CDs when they're out. I run Mandrake and am quite happy with it. I'll probably buy 8.1 just for the manual and being able to install it on some friends computer (and also since i think it's worth the money), since i think Mandrake is a great distribution to start with, and also a good one to stay with, especially if one likes to toy around with the newest stuff (no distro wars please).
Quoting the letter I received (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes things are f**ked here, but vs. Europe.... (Score:2)
They must be freaking morons at MandrakeSoft. Hey, I use Mandrake, but it's cheap and easy to get a run of CDs with whiz bang labelling, inserts, cases, shipping even large quantities is a breeze, and cheap to boot....
They probably just didn't plan well, or just moved here without any idea how those things run here.
And if you're worried about big brotherish laws in the US, and you're in the UK apparently - well, that makes a lot of sense.
Re:Yes things are f**ked here, but vs. Europe.... (Score:1, Interesting)
Development will eventually drift into Europe (Score:2, Insightful)
The U.S. has been and is a great place. However, the crazy legal environment and corporate republic mentality will gradually cause a migration to Europe anyway for pragmatic reasons.
In the EU there is no DMCA, no weird cryptography rules. The EU Commission, as bad as it is, even seems to be handling the Microsoft issues better.
Recruitment will happen. The benefits are much better: lower crime, health care, 5 weeks holiday, free university, pension, and in some countries, clean rivers and lakes.
Also, most European governments (at least the Northern European ones) make it really easy to start small businesses and provide tax major breaks and grants. The larger countries also get pretty good deals. However, the competition between companies in the same branch is often really cuttroat and dictated by who is childhood friends with whom.
For example, regarding privacy, I automaticaly get a written statement of who has requested my credit rating and why.
The other option is to phase in the European standard of living in the U.S. For ex, doesn't California provide free or inexpensive university to its residents?
Re:Development will eventually drift into Europe (Score:2, Funny)
Not yet, you mean... The EU is very busy to implement the EUCA, a almost exact copy of the DMCA.
But here (in europe that is) there is still time to act, so pick up a pen and write your political reprensatieve a deadtree letter!
For more info visit www.eurorights.org.
Re:Boycott the USA (Score:2)
From the Adobe copy protection debacle, it looks like you can be arrested in the US for doing something that's legal where you live, but illegal in the US... this is an interesting precedent.
I'm looking forward to the UK government arresting any US tourists that carry concealed weapons when they are at home in the US.