Another Win For Linux At The Cash Register 149
Matt Lupfer writes, "According to CNET, MaxSpeed, a
California-based networked cash register manufacturer used at places such as Little Caesars,
Goodyear Tire, CVS Drugstores and Harley-Davidson, will begin moving
its product line to Linux-based systems. [MaxSpeed CEO Wie Ching] says, 'Linux is
the wave of the future. And you can't beat the price.'"
Re:Bigger appliations? (Score:1)
Well, gee, I know facts are inappropriate here... (Score:1)
But the US postal service is one of the best in the world, and also among the cheapest. Should I say "least awful" instead of "best"? Maybe so, but if you stop and think (fate forfend!
Let's not even get started on the people there and their violent and emotionally unstable tendencies
Okay, maybe your whole post was intended as a joke
Next week on Slashdot: NAMBLA to switch their databases over to MySQL on Linux!
I submitted that story and it was "declined". Bastards.
Linux in cash registers will change everything!! (Score:1)
Register lady: Hello, Mr. Malda! Your usual copy of 'Barely Legal', is it?
Starts scanning
Computer screen: Illegal Operation. Application obliterated.
Register lady: What the fuck? Hold on a second, sir.
She reboots
Register lady: Now lemme try again.
Scan's CmdrTaco's favorite mag again
Computer screen: Total charge: 38c
Rob Malda: Wait a second! Your computer is in error! I demand to pay more!
Register lady: Hold on a second, sir...
etc.
Obviously, if they were using Linux, none of these problems would occur. CmdrTaco would be back at home, enjoying the "articles" he enjoys "reading".
LINUX MEANS REVOLUTION!
IT WILL CHANGE EVERTYHING!
Imagine how many customers they could handle (Score:1)
With a Beowulf cluster of cash registers!
bad idea (Score:1)
You and virtually everyone else who reads Slashdot (Score:1)
Re:Would you trust your money to Linux? (Score:1)
--
Re:Anyone been to Wawa lately? (Score:1)
--
CVS (Score:1)
FUD (Score:1)
Linux's popularity right now doesn't make it suddenly dumb for people to use it.
Oh, and I have to laugh at the vague questioning of linux's security. This is a discussion of CASH REGISTERS, after all. Not even a credit card terminal. Cash registers aren't on the internet, aren't running bind/ftp/http/nsf/smb/whatever, and therefore aren't a "security" worry.
Re:Would you trust your money to Linux? (Score:1)
Not sure I'd be bragging about that... (Score:1)
The U.S. Postal Service? C'mon, couldn't you have gone and picked an organization held in higher regard than the USPS? Like, say, oh I dunno, ValuJet, CyberPromotions, or maybe Juggs Magazine? :)
When's the last time you've heard anyone exalting the USPS for great and efficient service? Never, you say? There's a reason for that: It sucks! (Hmmm, could Linux be the reason? ;) )
Let's not even get started on the people there and their violent and emotionally unstable tendencies, so much so that the term "He's gone postal" is well entrenched in the national lexicon. Who knows, maybe they went to Linux after ESR gave one of his raving gun nut speeches -- "You too can stock your underground bunker to the teeth with guns with all the money you'll save on the price of the OS!" Aha!
Next week on Slashdot: NAMBLA to switch their databases over to MySQL on Linux!
Ahhh, the possibilities abound... :)
Cheers,
ZicoKnows@hotmail.com
Re:Bigger appliations? (Score:1)
No, not xterms, but those otherwise dumb terminals that have just enough smarts to do a network boot and run an X server. Been around for years.
Re:Who cares? (Score:1)
Sounds like a benefit to me.
And as someone else pointed out, it encourages hardware manufacturers to make sure Linux drivers are available.
Right thing, wrong reasons? (Score:1)
I mean I'd hate to see them set everything up and then have an enterprising Linux (cr|h)acker come and point out their mistakes.
What kind of some will they be singing then?
Re:Who cares? (Score:1)
COMPUSA uses Java (Score:1)
Re:At least no blue screens o' death (Score:1)
but the back-office some unix, i know because i once saw one reboot after a backup.
if i remenber it said, something like, reading
/lib
/usr
etc...
nmarshall
#include "standard_disclaimer.h"
R.U. SIRIUS: THE ONLY POSSIBLE RESPONSE
Re:Bigger appliations? (Score:1)
Re:Bigger appliations? (Score:1)
Note that the "GUI" in this case was "DEC Windows" which is simply X11 running over DECNET.
Re:It will allow two users one linux machine? (Score:1)
Probably something like www.sharedware.com, but finally realised that this is a lot easier with an X server than Windows.
What about Open Source software for POS??? (Score:1)
I know I need the hardware (barcode scanner, printer(s), Cash drawer, etc), but I would like a program that could handle all this kinds of hardware, and of course the software part...
Now, is there any such program for Linux??? Where?
Seeya!
Re:Who cares? (Score:1)
This move simply increases the legitimacy of Linux for use in such devices, it's only recently started being about the money. Now when Fred Foobar wants his boss to use Linux for cash registers, there's just one more example he can point to.
Think of it as a few hundred more free advertisements for Linux.
Having it run on cash registers will at first at least get cash register software ported
In short, it certainly doesn't hurt "the cause".
Another retail chain is going to use Linux... (Score:1)
Oh well.
It will allow two users one linux machine? (Score:1)
re: sunrays (Score:1)
One or two people with bad code/programs can make everything slow down a bit...
That, and sometimes the damn things don't log out correctly.
it is a nice idea, though...
"wave of the future" (Score:1)
Re:Bigger appliations? (Score:1)
You don't hook up fifty keyboards, monitors, and mice directly to one central linux box- that would be unscalable.
You get fifty inexpensive display controllers, and connect them to a network with one or more large servers doing the actual heavy labor.
Check out Sun's solution- The 'Sun Ray' at $499.
Linux solely because it is a hot buzzword. (Score:1)
I just turned down a 6-figure job offer from a local company, after I found out that they are converting all of their (perfectly good as they stand) web servers from Solaris on UltraSparc to 'Beowulf Clusters' of (cheap) Intel PC's running 'Linux'.
They aren't doing this for performance, they aren't doing this to save money, they aren't doing this to make administration of the servers (which would be my job) easier...
They are doing this because the company is planning for an IPO, and certain key words give the market a stiffy.
Re:You and virtually everyone else who reads Slash (Score:1)
Anyway, I'll check it out. I've got clients begging for an affordable non-ms solution
Re:Bigger appliations? (Score:1)
They were called Vax mainframes.
several hundred users could use the system at once, and although the VMS system was command line driven, the terminals did support graphics, so you could display graphs, pictures, etc... VMS is a very powerfull and full-featured operating system, which resulted in some of the same "too hard to use" complaints you hear about Linux.
Vaxes were also commonly clustered, and from a user point of view would share load. There was no crashing (ok, maybe once a year, or when the operator tried to crash the system on purpose (ps- Dec fired his ass)), no rebooting, and the system was up and on 24/7.
If you demand a more gui environment, you could cluster vaxstations (small workstations) together with a mainframe over the network- the mainframe stored all user info/files, with the vaxstation providing processing power.
Security was reasonably well implemented, with users being protected from each other, as well as the system being protected from the users!
(un)fortunately, vax hardware was built to withstand the rigors of rocket launch. This turned out to be stupid for several reasons-
Most users did not launch their vaxes and so percieved no benefit from the over-design
Hardware was absurdly expensive to build.
Hardware was absurdly expensive to design and to test (get thru the DEC standard 102 tests)
In addition, VMS licensing fees were high, and DEC seemed to discourage 3ed party apps.
Everyone prefered cheap, cheap, cheap, and so the PC, with MS on it, crept from the primeval ooze to the position it occupies today.
Re:Cash (Score:1)
Does this mean you can play DVDs on cash registers now?
[/Obligitory DeCSS Comment]
----
Don't underestimate the power of peanut brittle
Re:Would you trust your money to Linux? (Score:1)
I know this wasn't meant seriously (at least I hope not!), but I don't want people walking away thinking this. I know some people do. And someone actually modded this up as "interesting" (where clearly "funny" if anything is most appropriate).
Re:Right thing, wrong reasons? (Score:1)
Re:But will CVS (Score:1)
Re:Bigger appliations? (Score:1)
would it be feasble to have hardware to allow 50 keyboards, mice, monitors to be hooked into a Linux server, and have each one be running separately? So there could be 50 users with 50 different displays doing their office or school work.
If you're talking text (good enough for Emacs), simply attach a whole bunch of cheap DOS PCs and monitors to a multiport serial card on the server and use them as dumb terminals.
On the other hand, if you're talking about X [x.org], that's a completely different story. Each X display pretty much needs its own computer (however, there can be multiple monitors in one display). Otherwise, how are 50 PCI cards supposed to fit into one box? And think about the CPU power it would need, not to mention heat.
But a whole bunch of cheap X boxes (not the Microsoft X-Box console; I also object to "Mac OS X") just might work.
The only reason I use Windoze is because they pay me.Re: Would You Trust Linux with Your Money? (Score:1)
Re:Who Fscking Cares? (Score:1)
linuxone?? (Score:1)
Re:Linux solely because it is a hot buzzword. (Score:1)
Well, would you mind tossing over the information on the company here so I can start making 6 figures? My current status of "Beer Man" at a minor leauge ball park isn't cutting it anymore...
Anyways, Linux is 'the cool thing' to do at the moment, but it is really helping it improve and grow up. I'd rather Linux be the 'cool thing' then have an unstable desktop/server like NT running most of the places I partake in business with. It scares me seeing car dealerships using Windows NT to protect their payrools and normal accounts. I was tempted to break into the system and change my bill from $4000 for the transmission to a nice $0. They hired me to resetup their network from the clueless idiots that set it up and now they have a nice secure Linux based server firewalling their internet access... Oh welps, opinions are great. :-)
Oh dear god. (Score:1)
Should say: "the fact that they are using isn't really that interesting". I should really lay off the crackpipe....
Amber Yuan 2k A.D
Who said anything about NT? (Score:1)
I've personaly seen cashregisters running java. There's more to the world then NT/Linux
Amber Yuan 2k A.D
Re:momentum / critical mass ... (Score:1)
Basically, what I'm trying to say is that 'world domination' for Linux, since it?s a free OS, Is depended only on market share. Using Linux on these machines doesn?t really gain very much Mind share for the community. Aside from press about it, there is hardly any gain. Compare this with something like the quake3 release for Linux, this pushed Linux into the limelight in the eyes of gamers. While the number of people who switched over to Linux because of Quake is going to be far less then the number of Cash registers running Linux, the Quake port gave Linux a lot more mind share.
At this point, what we really need to know is what is the goal of the Linux community I mean, is it to get more apps ported, and running, on Linux? Is it to crush Microsoft? Well, this does neither. No one is going to port their app to Linux just because a bunch of cash registers run it. And, this doesn?t hurt Microsoft in the least. Just SCO. So, what, exactly does Linux stand to gain because of this?
Some mindshare is valuable, some is simply not.
Amber Yuan 2k A.D
Re:Cash (Score:1)
Re:Who Fscking Cares? (Score:1)
Oh well... really a non-story.
Re:goat (Score:1)
And though I go back from time to time and check, I have learned whilst at my place of employment to check the actual URL for every link to make sure I don't display www.goatse.cx on my screen while, for example, my boss is standing behind me. I can only imagine how many of its hits come from clueless visitors to slashdot.
Radio Shack (Score:1)
One word... (Score:1)
I don't see how allowing Linux access the antiquated POS (piece of SH*T) POS (Point of Sale) terminals are going to better the Linux movement as a whole. Software to run the POSPOS's will be written yes, so? Will it be open-sourced? Will it be secure? Will cashiers still hit CTRL-ALT-DELETE when there's a line up of 8 people waiting?
Re:Who cares? (Score:2)
Re:Anyone been to Wawa lately? (Score:2)
Crowbarring all the custom needs of a POS system into a POS (different acronym) operating system is not my idea of fun. I feel sorry for those SASI people. A friend of mine worked there very briefly and he said that it was no picnic there...
Anyone been to Wawa lately? (Score:2)
Their previous system seemed to be pretty good. It had barcode scanning, and all the other stuff. I see nothing useful in the new system that the old one didn't provide. However, the new system uses a touchscreen for input, and provides feedback with the standard Windows sounds (ding.wav, etc.)
The touchscreen is extremely inconvenient for input, as I was told by a girl who works there. And the sounds... well, I'm sure that you can imagine how it feels to hear that "ding" sound a few thousand times every day.
Anyone know what's going on?
--
Re:Not sure I'd be bragging about that... (Score:2)
Why is it that so many trolls are on the Hemos is a child molester trip.
Most of the good troll opportunities went out the window after Sengan left. Give it some time, I'm sure things will diversify naturally. :)
Cheers,
ZicoKnows@hotmail.com
At least no blue screens o' death (Score:2)
The real coup is if some Linux providers work on some sort of embedded Linux. The efforts made to port Linux to micro-systems like PalmOS should help in this arena. But the idea would be if we could flash Linux entirely to ROM. This would take some market share away from folks like OS9 (not MacOS9!), QNX, etc.
Re:momentum / critical mass ... (Score:2)
The way I see it, Linux is an operating system with a cool development system
I don't believe that there is a single overriding "goal" that everyone who uses Linux (or even a clear majority) can be said to share. Instead, there are lots of smaller groups within the circle of those who use Linux, who may have some of the goals you mention.
And as for mindshare
You're right, the guy behind the counter probably doesn't care what OS runs his register, but then again, he probably appreciates a system that doesn't crash much.
Re:It will allow two users one linux machine? (Score:2)
Just a guess really
Bigger appliations? (Score:2)
I've never seen this on a large scale, but would it be feasble to have hardware to allow 50 keyboards, mice, monitors to be hooked into a Linux server, and have each one be running separately? So there could be 50 users with 50 different displays doing their office or school work.
Obviously, the server would have to be completely massive, which some kind of super video card system (128MBx2 SLI rig?). But it would still be less expensive than buying 50 whole computers, and it would be a ton easier to make upgrades to.
Has anyone done something similar?
Re:Beowolf Cluster (Score:2)
RE: Would You Trust Linux with Your Money? (Score:2)
PointOfSale also going that way (Score:2)
You missunderstand me. (Score:2)
I have no objection to them using it, In fact I said in my inital post that It was great for them. But it really isn't that the fact that they were wasn't really that interesting.
Amber Yuan 2k A.D
Who cares? (Score:2)
If Microsoft or sun got this deal, it would be great for them, it would mean tons of money in licenses. But for us, its nothing.
I think threes a bit more to world domination then simply the raw number of CPUs running Linux. Is having it run on millions of Cash registers going to help get software ported?
Amber Yuan 2k A.D
Re:At least no blue screens o' death (Score:2)
You know what... you're RIGHT!   When I bought my notebook last year at RS, one of the clerks was there putzing around with the box attached to the register.   I looked around to see what he was doing and was shocked to see what looked like maybe win98 running...   And then when it crapped out on him again, he booted it and it started running scandisk... scary huh?   My US$1600+ transaction depending on the results of scandisk.   Gosh... and I forgot about the whole thing since all I cared about was getting my notebook home so I could install SuSE on it...  
Re:Would you like to have a profit - SPAM (Score:2)
Moderators - please moderate the parent down as spam.   It's bad enough getting to
Thank you.
Maxspeed and Linux (Score:2)
cash registers are just kiosks with a drawer (Score:3)
I'd love to use Linux for cash registers, because I'd like to have a point-of-sale system that was cheap...
This all ties back to the I-Opener [slashdot.org] discussion: why aren't there any super-cheap Linux-based kiosk systems available? Surely there's a market for these!
Like cash registers, ATMs are also just kiosks with a slot. You can just go out and buy an ATM, you know: you're responsible for filling it with money, and it runs software that knows how to authenticate itself to the banks. There's no reason this couldn't be a Linux system too, instead of being overpriced specialized hardware.
momentum / critical mass ... (Score:3)
You still hear lots of "industry analysts" (mind my scare quotes; I know a lot of them are fine, smart people, but it's the bad apples that stand out) that say Linux "isn't ready for the enterprise" or repeat silly FUD about the dangers of fragmentation. (I'm not saying that danger doesn't exist -- only that even legitimate complaints are often applied out of context.)
And it's not just the number of CPUs running it, it's a) public acceptance, or at least that subset of the public which forms opinions about purchasing computers and b) jobs. If there are thoursands of companies using free / Free software to build their apps and run them on, it means a different type of job market than one in which open-source stuff is viewed as a novelty.
And, my favorite is that the more OSes are experimented with, the more incentive people will have to create documents / data sets that aren't tied to only one platform, which should make it easier for programmers to experiment with The Best Way to do things in pragmatic and not only experimental contexts.
Just thoughts,
timothy
Going overboard for a cash register? (Score:3)
I couldn't find the specs for their cash registers, but I wouldn't want an LCD screen (It'd get oil, flour, or just cracked by a customer) or a computer that required a fan. The (non-computer) fans always had grease in them, clogged them up good.
Even though it was a crappy system, people still had trouble with it (I was always ask to change the printer ribbon).
Maybe they're making it a different design than I'm assuming. Of course, having a Perl script to generate reports on various sales (you have to make reports on how much you sold per hour on average for the last four weeks, and how many of a certain item, such as medium pops, you sold each day). Disclaimer: I worked at an LC inside a K-mart, so the independent LC's may have different tills.
Also, my store couldn't get the damn Icee machine working on a consistent basis (it had a power switch, two defrost knobs (one for each side), and two dispenser levers), do you think they could get a Linux box to work all the time?
Cash (Score:3)
---------------------
Do not provoke me to violence for you could no more evade my wrath than you could your own shadow.
Re:Not sure I'd be bragging about that... (Score:3)
Wow.   The Zico!   As much as I've seen your many posts, I finally get to respond to you...
Okay... how about Accuweather [accuweather.com] and Linux (from some article I saw that I'm surprised didn't get posted on
Okay, here's one - Burlington Coat Factory [coat.com].   This example relates directly to the article as this company uses Linux for their POS boxes.
'Nuff said.  
Cheers,
ZicoKnows@hotmail.com
Cheers to you too... heh heh.
Re:Would you trust your money to Linux? (Score:3)
Hmmm... I don't know if I've been sucked in by a troll or perhaps you should be modded up to Funny or whatever... maybe so.   But this is just an fyi anyway to those not knowing or if you are truly sincere:   Did you know that every fscking piece of snail mail that those in the US of A send through the U.S. Postal Service is sorted using a Linux box?
Just responding to your issues with security and not meant to be a flame...