On one hand, I think Stallman cannot lead effectively under these conditions, and given the long history of accusations.
Only because people like you keep spouting this crap. The 'has become a distraction' argument has become nothing more than bland cover for cowards who won't stand up to cancel culture but also don't agree.
"Cancelers" need to be called out for the shit-stains they actually are. Cowards are who they are, personal I just make note of them for future awareness that they can't be depended on.
Only because people like you keep spouting this crap.
It's actually because people keep making claims of harassment against him, but way to marginalize them.
The 'has become a distraction' argument has become nothing more than bland cover for cowards who won't stand up to cancel culture but also don't agree.
I don't stand up to cancel culture because I am not opposed to cancel culture. Conservacucks have no right to stand up to cancel culture because they invented cancel culture. I am not a coward, and I do agree. Lots of things should be cancelled.
"Cancelers" need to be called out for the shit-stains they actually are.
Conservatives cancelled alcohol and drugs. They tried to cancel heavy metal and dungeons and dragons. They cancelled thousands of black people with nooses. Now they
I agree, some cancel culture is in order. People like yourself for instance...;)
Seriously, no, no and a thousand times no! You do not get to talk about marginalizing accusations. Because accusations without a proper hearing before a judge are and will forever remain just some people throwing niceties at someone else they don't like.
Given how much it is en vogue to accuse anyone whose name is known to more than five people of misconduct, an accusation is worth NOTHING!
I see in another comment you describe yourself as a high functioning aspergers. I think you are slightly less high functioning than you imagine.
The bit you're missing here is that someone can act very unpleasantly, and make people not want to have anything to do with them, but for their behaviour to not be criminal offence.
Stallman has repeatedly done stuff that makes people not want to have anything to do with him. He's been told specific parts of his behaviour are unpleasant. He, like you, thinks that if
At some point the people running a project need to decide who they want to include and who they want to exclude.
They did. After his resignation, they apparently realized that allowing him to go was a mistake. So now he's back. They have decided.
This has really annoyed the woke progressives, because it calls into question their ability to infiltrate and dominate organizations through sheer intimidation. I hope and trust that the FSF will stay true to this decision, and keep Stallman despite external pressure.
Organizations like OSI that have condemned his return? I do believe we have found a way to identify which organizations have already been infiltrated.
I'm so torn (Score:5, Interesting)
On one hand, I think Stallman cannot lead effectively under these conditions, and given the long history of accusations.
On the other hand, Debian governance gave us systemd.
On the gripping hand, if the OSI says they won't work with the FSF while Stallman is around, that's a huge bonus. Fuck those fraudulent fucks.
Re: (Score:0, Flamebait)
On one hand, I think Stallman cannot lead effectively under these conditions, and given the long history of accusations.
Only because people like you keep spouting this crap. The 'has become a distraction' argument has become nothing more than bland cover for cowards who won't stand up to cancel culture but also don't agree.
"Cancelers" need to be called out for the shit-stains they actually are. Cowards are who they are, personal I just make note of them for future awareness that they can't be depended on.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Only because people like you keep spouting this crap.
It's actually because people keep making claims of harassment against him, but way to marginalize them.
The 'has become a distraction' argument has become nothing more than bland cover for cowards who won't stand up to cancel culture but also don't agree.
I don't stand up to cancel culture because I am not opposed to cancel culture. Conservacucks have no right to stand up to cancel culture because they invented cancel culture. I am not a coward, and I do agree. Lots of things should be cancelled.
"Cancelers" need to be called out for the shit-stains they actually are.
Conservatives cancelled alcohol and drugs. They tried to cancel heavy metal and dungeons and dragons. They cancelled thousands of black people with nooses. Now they
Re: (Score:4, Insightful)
I agree, some cancel culture is in order. People like yourself for instance... ;)
Seriously, no, no and a thousand times no! You do not get to talk about marginalizing accusations. Because accusations without a proper hearing before a judge are and will forever remain just some people throwing niceties at someone else they don't like.
Given how much it is en vogue to accuse anyone whose name is known to more than five people of misconduct, an accusation is worth NOTHING!
Obviously it must be investigated prope
Re: (Score:5, Insightful)
I see in another comment you describe yourself as a high functioning aspergers. I think you are slightly less high functioning than you imagine.
The bit you're missing here is that someone can act very unpleasantly, and make people not want to have anything to do with them, but for their behaviour to not be criminal offence.
Stallman has repeatedly done stuff that makes people not want to have anything to do with him. He's been told specific parts of his behaviour are unpleasant. He, like you, thinks that if
Re:I'm so torn (Score:5, Insightful)
At some point the people running a project need to decide who they want to include and who they want to exclude.
They did. After his resignation, they apparently realized that allowing him to go was a mistake. So now he's back. They have decided.
This has really annoyed the woke progressives, because it calls into question their ability to infiltrate and dominate organizations through sheer intimidation. I hope and trust that the FSF will stay true to this decision, and keep Stallman despite external pressure.
Organizations like OSI that have condemned his return? I do believe we have found a way to identify which organizations have already been infiltrated.