Correct. Because Linux is not used to do any of the important work, only as server or routing functions. All important applications and data and the mission-critical information resides on Windows machines.
Correct. Because Linux is not used to do any of the important work, only as server or routing functions. All important applications and data and the mission-critical information resides on Windows machines.
This is purely Linux's fault. Linux still refuses to add support to run the Excel macros which are responsible for processing almost all of today's enterprise data.
The problem with Linux is that anybody with money can easily infiltrate the developer network and there isn't enough money in open source to actually audit massive amounts of code enough, which was kind of part of the promise of it's benefit.
SURE, the code is there to look at, but as your develop an OS that's millions of lines of code interacting with each other the ONLY way to keep it secure is to constantly audit the code and there isn't even enough money in the private sector to get that done.
We've s
Interesting point. How do you know countries or criminal organizations haven't bribed or blackmailed developers who work for proprietary companies? If they have lots of money, they can pay for people wherever they want. So your argument is kind of moot.
He comes the Wolf! - cried the boy (Score:4, Insightful)
So... resuming: the supposed danger does basically nothing in Linux and the REAL issue is that they use it to attack Windows and iOS attached to it...
WOW!
Re: (Score:-1)
Re: (Score:5, Funny)
Correct. Because Linux is not used to do any of the important work, only as server or routing functions. All important applications and data and the mission-critical information resides on Windows machines.
This is purely Linux's fault. Linux still refuses to add support to run the Excel macros which are responsible for processing almost all of today's enterprise data.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:He comes the Wolf! - cried the boy (Score:3)