A complete cop-out over systemd, we're hurting from the bugs and the architecture, not the change of itself. Unfortunate, I'd hoped for more than a standard systemd marketing blurb cut and paste.
He answered the question. Just because you don't agree with him doesn't make his answer a "cop out". What were you expecting? Red Hat created Systemd. It is their baby. They are not going to abandon it. If it is so important to you, then install Slackware, and you will not only be able to tweak your init system, but you can tweak anything else you want, and experience pure raw Linux.
It's a cop out because it's lies and misdirection. "The problems an init system needs to solve today are different from the ones that traditional init systems were solving in the 70's, 80's and even the 90's." No, it's doing the same goddamned job. "This also makes it easy to use cgroups to configure SLAs for CPU, memory, etc." No, since redhat used boilerplate for all initscripts, it would have been easy to insert the simple shell commands to create cgroups and put daemons into them into every initscript.
You have a reading comprehension problem combined with literally zero knowledge of systemd. I have investigated it thoroughly as well as put in the relatively minimal effort to understand and leverage it. Everything he said was spot on.
Your comment would carry more weight if you weren't a well known Lennart fanboi who in previous discussions on systemd showed a distinct lack of understanding and then started cheering yourself on using an AC sock puppet once the jig was up.
Since those things aren't true, you would think my comment would carry more weight, yet it carries the exact same weight. It seems we have found incontrovertible evidence that you have no idea how comments work. Off you go now little troll...
I don't see how your comment has more weight - to me it evidently has less weight due to it not containing anything relevant to what the poster you replied to wrote.
The fact that you need to call someone else a "troll" shows that you are still at kindergarten level.
Please try to leave the kindergarten and man up.
The clothes have no emperor.
-- C.A.R. Hoare, commenting on ADA.
Complete cop-out (Score:2)
A complete cop-out over systemd, we're hurting from the bugs and the architecture, not the change of itself. Unfortunate, I'd hoped for more than a standard systemd marketing blurb cut and paste.
Re: (Score:5, Insightful)
A complete cop-out over systemd
He answered the question. Just because you don't agree with him doesn't make his answer a "cop out". What were you expecting? Red Hat created Systemd. It is their baby. They are not going to abandon it. If it is so important to you, then install Slackware, and you will not only be able to tweak your init system, but you can tweak anything else you want, and experience pure raw Linux.
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
It's a cop out because it's lies and misdirection. "The problems an init system needs to solve today are different from the ones that traditional init systems were solving in the 70's, 80's and even the 90's." No, it's doing the same goddamned job. "This also makes it easy to use cgroups to configure SLAs for CPU, memory, etc." No, since redhat used boilerplate for all initscripts, it would have been easy to insert the simple shell commands to create cgroups and put daemons into them into every initscript.
Re: Complete cop-out (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:0)
Your comment would carry more weight if you weren't a well known Lennart fanboi who in previous discussions on systemd showed a distinct lack of understanding and then started cheering yourself on using an AC sock puppet once the jig was up.
Re: Complete cop-out (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)