There's the rub isn't it. CentOS was the cheap alternative to RHEL, and RHEL was basically the "Enterprise" GNU/Linux you could sell to your boss as a well supported operating system. But neither are actually that good. They have poorer hardware support than Ubuntu, limited repositories even with EPEL, and aren't updated very often. They use standards that only RedHat has shown any interest in, and quite honestly even the latest CentOS has a "feel" like you're using something from ten years ago - only syst
Would upvote this 100x if I could. Not that Ubuntu/Debian isn't used in enterprises but acting as if RHEL/CentOS aren't supported is foolish as can be.
"People who liked CentOS" (Score:3)
There's the rub isn't it. CentOS was the cheap alternative to RHEL, and RHEL was basically the "Enterprise" GNU/Linux you could sell to your boss as a well supported operating system. But neither are actually that good. They have poorer hardware support than Ubuntu, limited repositories even with EPEL, and aren't updated very often. They use standards that only RedHat has shown any interest in, and quite honestly even the latest CentOS has a "feel" like you're using something from ten years ago - only syst
Re: (Score:2)
Re:"People who liked CentOS" (Score:2)