Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Microsoft

+ - TomTom can license FAT without violating the GPL-> 1

Submitted by dp619
dp619 (893918) writes "Capped per-unit royalties make FAT licensing agreements permissible under the GPL, and SD Times has found that Microsoft's public license policy caps royalties at $250k. If the royalties are capped — as they seem to be — TomTom should be able to license FAT without violating the GPL. And if that is the case.... TomTom needs some serious explaining to do as to why they aren't licensing FAT. That said, Microsoft still needs to explain why it just cannot say that folks won't violate the GPL if they license FAT under its terms."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

TomTom can license FAT without violating the GPL

Comments Filter:
  • And if that is the case.... TomTom needs some serious explaining to do as to why they aren't licensing FAT.

    Um, because it's a bad patent (neither nonobvious nor tied to something physical), and is being abused to essentially implement a "compatibility tax"?

Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to work.

Working...