Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Linux Business

+ - ParanoidLinux: Will it protect the truly paranoid?->

Submitted by ruphus13
ruphus13 (890164) writes "There are still places on the world where having anonymity might mean the difference between life and death. In other walks, covering ones tracks is considered to be of such paramount importance, that we are now witnessing the rise of a Linux distro catered to just those folk. The alpha version of ParanoidLinux is now out. But is this the best way to protect oneself? Couldn't that be easily circumvented? The article states, "Why is it necessary to put the applications and services designed to protect anonymity, to encrypt files, to make the user nameless and faceless, all together, in one distribution? Let's think in a truly paranoid manner. Wouldn't it be far easier for a nefarious government organization to target that distribution's repositories, mirror that singular distribution's disk images with files of its own design, and leave every last one of that distribution's users in the great wide open?" What should the truly paranoid user do?"
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

ParanoidLinux: Will it protect the truly paranoid?

Comments Filter:

The moon is a planet just like the Earth, only it is even deader.