Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Ask Slashdot: Should there be a National Tax to Subsidize Scientific Research? 3

Submitted by
Josh-Levin
Josh-Levin writes "Scientific research in the US is hurting. Now there is talk of shutting the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven. I know that the Federal Government is short of money, but cutting back on scientific research is eating our seed corn.

Since basic research has been fundamental to all those hi-tech device we all enjoy, I think there should be a fixed Federal excise tax on hi-tech devices, the proceeds to go to scientific research. There shall be safeguards to prevent this tax money from being used for anything but scientific research.

I hope that Slashdot members who respond to this posting will flesh out this idea. How much money is needed, and how big is the hi-tech market? What should the tax rate be? (If it were 10%, it could be termed a "Techo-Tithe".) Who should be exempt? Should it be used only for terrestrial research, or should it include the space program? For products that are partially hi-tech, such as automobiles, should there be a reduced rate based on the hi-tech content of the product?

Ideally, the tax would be paid by the consumer, so that it is visible. Every time you by a computer, a smart phone, or a digital camera, you will know that your tax will subsidize the research behind the next generation of devices, which may be spintronic or optical rather than electronic.

I hope that this discussion will result in a "We the People" petition to the White House (see https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/how-why/introduction) to ask that such a tax be implemented. We need 150 signatures to make such a petition visible, and 100,000 signatures to make sure the President sees it. Please, readers, do not initiate such a petition on your own, until the Slashdot discussion has reached some sort of consensus. We will want to do it right the first time."
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ask Slashdot: Should there be a National Tax to Subsidize Scientific Research?

Comments Filter:
  • ok i'll bite... no governments ALWAYS fuck things up... both taxes and government funded r&d are bad

    federal government is for national defense (as in just america, not the whole world) and a small handful of other limited functions, and THAT'S ALL

    anything more and you're inviting corruption

  • See subject.
  • Every time you by a computer, a smart phone, or a digital camera, you will know that your tax will subsidize the research behind the next generation of devices, which may be spintronic or optical rather than electronic

    when you buy an electronic device (or just about anything) you are supporting the company that made it in their efforts to make the next big thing. companies already use money that consumers pay them to do r&d, and they do it much more efficiently than government could ever hope to accomplish. that's why real capitalism is so great.

    governments are inefficient because they are spending someone else's money. there is no risk if they fuck it up. there are no competitors to take the lead for making a poor i

Little known fact about Middle Earth: The Hobbits had a very sophisticated computer network! It was a Tolkien Ring...

Working...