Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Submission + - Jury in Apple v. Samsung case likely to be confused (

puddingebola writes: "Jurors in the Apple v. Samsung case will receive a 100 page "instructions to the jury" document tomorrow. They will also receive a multi-page form with numerous questions to come to a verdict. From the article: "The document, which both sides have yet to agree on, is still in its draft stage. In Samsung's case, it's 33 questions long, and stretched across 17 pages. For Apple, it's 23 questions spread over nine pages."

Perhaps this is standard in patent trials? Perhaps road sobriety tests will soon include hopping on one foot while juggling?"

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Jury in Apple v. Samsung case likely to be confused

Comments Filter:

FORTRAN is not a flower but a weed -- it is hardy, occasionally blooms, and grows in every computer. -- A.J. Perlis