Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Back for a limited time - Get 15% off sitewide on Slashdot Deals with coupon code "BLACKFRIDAY" (some exclusions apply)". ×

Submission + - Is being in the same BitTorrent "swarm" equal to "interacting"? ( 1

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes: "In the new wave of bittorrent downloading cases, the plaintiffs' lawyers like to lump a number of "John Does" together in the same case in order to avoid filing fees ($350 a pop). Their excuse for 'joinder' is the allegation that the defendants 'interacted' with each other by reason of the fact that their torrents may have eminated from the same "swarm". In Malibu Media v. Does 1-5, when John Doe #4 indicated his intention to move for severance, the Court asked the lawyers to address the "swarm" issue in their papers. So when John Doe #4 filed his or her motion to quash, sever, and dismiss, he filed a detailed memorandum of law (PDF) analyzing the "swarm" theory in detail. What do you think?"
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Is being in the same BitTorrent "swarm" equal to "interacting"?

Comments Filter:
  • by nurb432 (527695)

    Id say they interacted, semi-anonymously since you didn't identify the before hand, but still there was intentional interaction.

At the source of every error which is blamed on the computer you will find at least two human errors, including the error of blaming it on the computer.