The Linux Desktop and ISVs/OEMs 195
olau writes "Michael Meeks, who's worked on GNOME and LibreOffice integration for many years, now for SuSE, has some really interesting thoughts on the recent Linux desktop debate and suggestions for possible strategies. He points out that regarding independent software vendors (ISVs), the real issue isn't actually the quality of the tools but the size and attractiveness of the market, and perhaps that a solution could be lower barriers for paying or donating. Regarding OEMs selling hardware with software preinstalled, he points out that while a free OS + software sounds good for consumers, it's actually a problem for OEMs on razor-thin margins, since they lose the cut they get from the preinstallations. A possible countermove could be nailing robustness and hardware diagnostics for good, lowering OEM support costs."
Fall in line (Score:5, Insightful)
No matter how much I like my Linux Desktop, I don't want to be responsible for bringing non-tech-savvy people along. The rest of the family is fully capable of troubleshooting basic windows problems, more or less.
Re:Fall in line (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Lately Windows problems seem to be getting a lot worse and a lot faster. I've had several friends have severe problems suddenly within re
Re: (Score:2)
I supposedly am educated in the ways of computers: I have a degree in the field, I work in the field, I have computers.
Bought a Win7 PC for home use - it has baffled me repeatedly, being the most *explicative* piece of *explicative* I have ever had the misfortune to use*. If anyone asks me for help with their Win7 system, I'll simply have to tell them to buy a mac.
*: basically, nothing works, and it is impossible to fix.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
When I ask them if their TV is slower, they look at me if _I_ am stoopid.
Because they know a TV is a dumb appliance that just sits there without getting software installed on a regular basis, so your analogy is stupid. Give them a little credit. Operating systems with all the assorted application software are complex, and any number of things can go wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Operating systems with all the assorted application software are complex, and any number of things can go wrong.
Only if your OS is poorly designed and written. The problem with Windows slowing down is its registry, which grows over time and consumes more and more memory. Other OSes don't have that problem. Since moving to Linux, I've never had a machine slow down with time, whereas XP and 98 needed reinstalls every year or so. W7 is an improvement, I've had my notebook for a year and it's only slowing sligh
Re:Fall in line (Score:5, Insightful)
On the other hand...
My mother has a Linux netbook. Other than getting her email set up with Thunderbird when she got it (she couldn't do that herself in Outlook Express either,) I haven't ever touched the thing. It's just never had an issue.
Her Windows desktop, on the other hand, seems to need some kind of repair every time I visit.....
Re:Fall in line (Score:5, Interesting)
Her Windows desktop, on the other hand, seems to need some kind of repair every time I visit.....
Amen to that, brother. I use to have to book special trips to fix my mothers Windows systems, printers not working, email broke, browser won't work on web site, system real slow, weird crashes, viruses like you wouldn't beleive, and on and on... Finally her laptop broke and she took it Geek Squad (mind you against my repeated admonitions not to). They charged her $70 to tell her their Windows diagnostic CD wouldn't even start and she had serious hardware problems and it would cost at LEAST $200 more just to diagnose the problems. I told her to send it to me. I installed Ubuntu. Went up there and showed her where the menus were, how to find all the nice free software for doing whatever she needed to do and set up her email in Thunderbird. Haven't had to touch it since and that was more than 3 years ago. Mind you she is about as computer illiterate as they come. I could tell several more stories of conversion. Linux is better on the desktop than Windows for everyone, not just "computer geeks". The ONLY reason it's not more wide spread is it doesn't come pre-installed. Mind you it's a lot easier to install than Windows also.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Disagree. Linux works great for those who are computer illiterate, at least as long as you don't tell them it's Linux until they are already using it (otherwise they'll probably balk at it being too hard to use before even turning the system on). And it works great for those of us who know our way around a computer.
But in between, you have the hardcore Windows geeks. The ones who know exactly which malware removal tool that
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The ONLY reason it's not more wide spread is it doesn't come pre-installed. Mind you it's a lot easier to install than Windows also.
Well, that's a big reason but hardly the only reason. Other reasons are that nobody but us nerds have even heard about it, let alone have any clue how many features Windows lacks, how it's more tolerant of hardware faults, how it doesn't have a growing registry to slow it down, how it doesn't need AV, etc. If they have herd of it, they've heard the FUD, like you have to use the
Re: (Score:2)
My mother has a Linux netbook. Other than getting her email set up with Thunderbird when she got it (she couldn't do that herself in Outlook Express either,) I haven't ever touched the thing. It's just never had an issue.
So I take it then that she never updates or installs software? That's where all the trouble starts. I wonder what version of Thunderbird she's running and how many security bugs it has.
Re: (Score:2)
What? I run a full system update on a monthly basis (I run Arch), and have been for years, and have NEVER had an update break anything. Let me guess -- your experience is with Ubuntu? Don't blame Linux; blame the crap distro.
Of course, I can't count the number of times I've had crap break because of Windows updates. Remember XP SP2?
As for whether or not her system is actually updating -- well, I hope so, there _is_ an automatic updater on the it, but having never had to touch the thing I can't say for certa
Re: (Score:2)
What? I run a full system update on a monthly basis (I run Arch), and have been for years, and have NEVER had an update break anything. Let me guess -- your experience is with Ubuntu? Don't blame Linux; blame the crap distro.
I run Debian, which Ubuntu is based on. I wouldn't call it a "crap" distro, and I wonder how Arch can prevent things from breaking given all the 3rd party software that tends to break from time to time. Maybe you've just had good luck, a selective memory, or somehow Arch is amazingly good at preventing the occasional breaks.
Of course, I can't count the number of times I've had crap break because of Windows updates. Remember XP SP2?
I've had very good results with updating XP, so no, I don't share your experience.
I _can_ tell you that her previous XP desktop never got a single update in its life -- she doesn't know how to do it, and I had to turn them off after they kept breaking shit.
Better to put up with things breaking than leaving XP unsecured.
And I'd trust an unpatched old Linux system over an unpatched Windows XP ANY day...
I'd agree with this, but only because Li
Re: (Score:2)
Don't be a troll.
Don't be the typical Internet jackass that throws around the word troll.
Dist-upgrades I have had problems with in the past, not unrepairable ones. Package updates on an LTS, never.
I'm glad to hear it. Note, though, that nobody in this thread has specifically mentioned Ubuntu or what version.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Or, you could not be passive-aggressive and decline politely.
The LyX the document processor (Score:2)
Self-publishing with LYX [aanet.com.au]
Getting me started.... (Score:2)
If only _someone_ would make a non-retarded LaTeX to HTML converter.
Even better, if someone else would make things like LyX really work with alternate document type macros, particularly SFFMS (which I used to write my novel because it will actually produce printed paper drafts in the absurd formats publishers want like double-underline for italics).
Currently I use Kile on KDE for editing my latex documents.
---
But _really_ *where* is the word processor that just saves its text in reasonable HTML. You know wh
Re:Fall in line (Score:5, Insightful)
I view that the other way round - One way or another I will be tech support for my mother. It would be easier for me, as someone that doesn't use windows any more, to support her using linux.
But frankly at this point I don't want the hassle of moving her from one OS that she knows how to use badly to another she doesn't know at all.
Re:Fall in line (Score:4, Informative)
Run windows in a vm on her machine, automate snapshots and that way you can roll it back for her.
Old folks don't play video games or need tons of storage.
Re: (Score:2)
Make sure they understand that the data they store in the VM is not permanent, and they need to keep backups of everything as often as possible. You dont want them to lose their holiday picture, right?
Re: (Score:2)
No, you keep the backups. You run another VM that they do not have access to, that you write these backups too. Better yet copy them back your home, but the option I propose works too.
Anyone were you would be doing this too is not going to be able to/want to run backups.
Re: (Score:3)
How do you get her to use the VM rather than the host OS?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Gentoo. Deban. Any Linux distro really. (Score:2)
Give yourself a remote account. Give grandma her own account that can only write in her own directory. Do remote maintenance at will. Back up her shit to something at your house because grandma is gonna break or lose that shit to her own activities someday. Do stealth maintenance.
In short, nuke that family shit from FOSS Orbit _before_ it can fester.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I agree. That is a tough nut to crack, lowering support costs for the *average* consumer. The best case scenario I can imagine (and I admit I'm not trying to imagine too hard) is being able to remote in to the system and fix the box remotely. I can't imagine how many support calls are generated because the user installed software that is imcompatible with the latest kernel update.
+1 funny (Score:2, Funny)
"family is fully capable of troubleshooting basic windows problems"
tee hee
Re: (Score:2)
The rest of the family is fully capable of troubleshooting basic windows problems, more or less.
you mean restart?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Fall in line (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, is it hate because people disagree with you or is it hate because you're wrong and being deliberately inflammatory?
Lucky you! I've seen one or more driver packs and updates in sequence for Windows XP cause it to be left in a shitty state that works (maybe) but is broken in some manner.
Really? How so? Oh wait, you won't give an example. Just a "Linux leaves systems fucked after updates! Linux sucks!" and we're supposed to believe you blindly. Got it.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Putting together a PC - or even a laptop - where all the chipsets and everything are known to work w/ Linux by itself is not a big deal. With some verification of the AVL, one can put that together, and it should work fine, which is what he seems to be describing.
But as humanrev mentioned, w/ Linux, it's either an all-or-nothing - it either works beautifully, or it simply doesn't work @ all. The worst problem in the past has been NIC and Wi-Fi, and if that doesn't work, one can't even go on forum hunts.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I need a new system. My 5 year old Dell (preloaded with Ubuntu 7.04, now upgraded to Ubuntu 12.04) is starting to really show its age. I am posting this from it with my original wireless card. While all of my favorite Windows games (RCT2, Battle Zone, Fallout, Death Rally) work perfecty under WINE and the rest, (ROTT, DOOMxxx, Cold War, DEFCON 1) have been natively ported to Linux, I can't run the lastest games like "Amnesia: The Dark Descent" with the best performance. It is playable but slow.
I got tire
Re:Fall in line (Score:4)
Now compare to Linux: I can take any distro that was released the same quarter as Vista, which is supposed to be the shittiest MSFT OS since WinME which I agree with, place it and Vista RTM side by side, patch them both to current...what do I get? All the hardware on the Vista machine still works, the hardware on the Linux box is fucked.
This is just plain a blatant lie. In the past 10 years I've installed OSes on at least 40 systems ranging from old clunky desktop hardware to netbooks. With Linux I've almost never had problems other than wireless and even that hasn't usually been an issue for years. Every time I've installed Windows it's been a battle with drivers. With XP you couldn't even install to SATA drives until Service Pack 2 years after SATA came out. Then you had to load network drivers to a CD just to get them to the system so you could even get the rest of the drivers. Then you have to figure out what video and sound drivers you needed while operating at 640×480. Now Windows 7 is greatly improved in this respect. At least the basics like networking seem to work so you can just pull video drivers from the web (mind you still, running at 640x480).
Re: (Score:3)
Big fucking deal. At least with Windows you know you'll HAVE drivers that work to support 100% of the functionality of whatever hardware you connect to your computer. Might need some searching, but they'll be out there. If I was only running Linux I'd be concerned about buying any new printer, scanner, webcam, specialized peripheral or whatever, because I know from experience that even after research is performed on the hardware's Linux compa
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Fall in line (Score:4, Informative)
The 100% bullshit really just shows a lack of experience in your pet subject. With closed drivers you have to hope that they people producing them give a shit or otherwise you run the risk of having to get new hardware when the software is upgraded. That's not a big deal for one person, but when there are large collections of hardware or niches where you depend on one bit of odd gear to do a task you end up with the legacy gear in the corner for a specific task and far more machines than you have users.
I got my mom to use linux, and she's a Grandma. (Score:3, Interesting)
I got my mom to use linux, and she's a Grandma. I got sick of having to re-install windows so I left for linux*, then told her that I wasn't really doing windows anymore because I no longer learned anything when i fixed problems on it. So she switched, loves it, when it has issues...at least I learn something.
*not having internet explorer is a feature!
Re: (Score:2)
Same here. And that was ten years ago, because I was tired of dealing with IE exploding, Outlook mail viruses, on and on. She can log on, run Firefox to get to Google, run Thunderbird for email, print, play the various free games (mostly the card games), and shut down. I also showed her how to run the regular Ubuntu LTS updates. My service and support calls (for the computer at least) dropped over 90%. I know a couple of her elderly friends who have given up on computers in the interim because they 'caught'
Yup, got that T-shirt. (Score:2)
Exactly why Granddad is on linux! But it never actually breaks, so that's a bonus too.
Grandma wants nothing to do with computers, she says she's gotten along just fine without them for nearly a hundred years and sees no need for them in her life.
Re: (Score:2)
No matter how much I like my Linux Desktop, I don't want to be responsible for bringing non-tech-savvy people along. The rest of the family is fully capable of troubleshooting basic windows problems, more or less.
But after the machine is set up, what problems are going to crop up in Linux? Most Windows problems I fix for friends involve nothing more than uninstalling crap like toolbars and removing one of two or more AV programs that are fighting amongst themselves, and flaky hardware (Windows is NOT forgiv
Re:Fall in line (Score:5, Interesting)
Oh, and she lives several hours away. So I set up a way I can SSH in through the firewall on non standard port, and then VNC. I've only had to do that about three or four times over the years, and mostly only in the early days. Things like accidentially pressing F11 to maximize Firefox -- OMG what happened! Etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Same issue (Score:2)
Ubuntu was the perfect tool for some friends who just use their PC to browse and chat online. It worked perfectly. The fucking Ubuntu went to Unity and fucked it all up. I have raged as a nerd often enough about the Gnome 3 and Unity shit but it was with the geek installs for people who just needed a PC to launch a browser that it has the biggest effect. Just installed XP back from the rescue partition and told them that IT hates them and doesn't want them to use a computer.
OSX and Windows 8 are just as bad
Re: (Score:2)
Why? Gnome 3 and Unity aren't the only DE's available, even for Unity. Just find one that looks and works the way your friends are expecting and switch them to it. I don't know about you, but one of my big selling point for Linux is the variety and your ability to customize more than just your wallpaper and icon locations.
Re: (Score:2)
" I don't know how Unity will go over"
PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD THAT YOU DON'T NEED TO RUN UNITY:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/03/gnome-classic-in-ubuntu-12-04-its-like-nothing-ever-changed [omgubuntu.co.uk]
Re: (Score:2)
You sell for the market. (Score:3)
You have a sales team, you are trying to sell your product. That is hard enough. Now you need to push Linux too on their existing Windows infrastructure too...
Companies like consistency. Linux is a perfectly good OS. However we are a windows shop here, and don't want to support two platforms.
Companies will pay more money to keep a consistent environment. Those Linux servers will need to cost $500 less then their windows counterparts. You need to be less then the OS cost and less then the Its different cost, then you will need to deal with people who will just get the lesser cost system and put their own OS on it (legal/illegal/let the courts decide if they find out)
Re:You sell for the market. (Score:4, Informative)
Linux SERVERS already manage to hit the "cost $500 less" metric. That's not the topic of discussion here. This was an article about DESKTOP Linux.
Servers are an entirely different kettle of fish and an area where Microsoft isn't nearly as dominant.
Re: (Score:2)
You run Windows? On servers?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:You sell for the market. (Score:5, Insightful)
It is 2012 everyone is using some kind of virtualization. Linux servers are as such free. They are just another vm your fire up, and the biggest savings are not having to hassle with licensing.
Re: (Score:2)
Many reasons?
Meaning you can't name any?
Ease of management is often worth any overhead incurred.
Re: (Score:2)
Vmware/Xen/KVM run great for lots of people. Datacenters all over the world.
Security is a consideration and works. Performance these days is not about CPU but IO and ram.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
But why write applications for desktop Linux ... (Score:4, Insightful)
... when you have children to feed and a mortgage to pay ... ... and the users expect all their software to be free?
Better off spending one's time addressing a market where people expect to have to pay for stuff, no?
Re:But why write applications for desktop Linux .. (Score:4, Insightful)
What linux users expect all software to be free?
I guess I did not pay for all these steam games.
Where did you get that idea?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't TurboTax all on the website now?
I know I paid to use it last year.
More software a linux user paid for!!! SHOCKING NEWS!!!
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't TurboTax all on the website now?
I know I paid to use it last year.
More software a linux user paid for!!! SHOCKING NEWS!!!
I'm a die-hard Linuxer and I also pay to use TurboTax online. I doubt if I'd buy the Windoze edition to run at home but running in my browser is just fine and there is the presumed added advantage that the on-line edition is up to date.
The quoted poster's implication is correct. Linuxers don't want everything for free; I pay for lots of value-added services, such as the aforementioned TurboTax, membership on a chess site, etc. I'm even going to BUY--- that's right, I said BUY--- the Linux edition of Scriv
Re:But why write applications for desktop Linux .. (Score:5, Insightful)
Ah, Slashdot. You've entered a new age when anti-FOSS/anti-Linux trolling is marked as "Insightful."
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, we really need a new old slashdot.
Oh well, all good things ....
Re: (Score:2)
Thought this one was worth a try :-)
I do sometimes get things right.
Re: (Score:3)
I can think of 5 reason why (in no particular order):
1) Your company pays you to write software for linux
2) You have fun writing application for linux and do it part time (everyone needs a hobby, right?)
3) The software is good enough, that people donate money to help you work full time on it.
4) You sell support (or special edition cds or whatever) for your software, but your software is free.
5) You sell a commercial version of your software, that has additional components that are not included in your free
Re: (Score:2)
(1) Well, people have certainly paid me to write software that runs on Linux, but it's always been proprietary stuff that runs on servers in turnkey systems and suchlike (in fact I'm doing one such project right now), never shrink-wrap desktop stuff for sale to end users.
(2) Erm ... I'm afraid that my hobby is flying little aeroplanes ... and my other hobby, being an elected politician, is even more expensive.
(3) Don't have sufficient marketing skills and expertise, in that I can make more money by writing
Re: (Score:2)
1) It depends on the company. Many companies understand the open source community and do fund stuff that help them market some of their other products.
2) After the initial ground work by one developer (or a small set of developers), the hobby developers can and do make an impact. By hobby I mean something like one hour a month, by hundreds (in some projects thousands) of developers (some of them would have worked on similar problems before and are really experts in them). You can contribute if you want to t
Re: (Score:2)
I forgot to add, the 3rd option, donations, is becoming more and more popular with kickstarter (remember how dispora got $200,000). If you have an real idea that people would find useful. Linux, free-as-in-beer, and donation depend is not a bad model at all. You can find a number of such tools getting funded on kickstarter.
Re: (Score:2)
1) Your company pays you to write software for linux
Yeah, but will the company want to pay him to write the same thing once and port it to different revisions of Linux, or different combinations of Linux/X/glibc/Qt/GTK+? Most ISVs would want to write a software version once that would run on Linux version n, n++ and so on. Subsequent versions of the software would be enhanced features, not merely more ports
2) You have fun writing application for linux and do it part time (everyone needs a hobby, right?)
Yeah, but how much fun is it writing the same application once, and struggling to port it to a myriad #platforms and software combinations?
3) The software is good enough, that people donate money to help you work full time on it.
Why not just
Re: (Score:2)
1) Your company pays you to write software for linux
Yeah, but will the company want to pay him to write the same thing once and port it to different revisions of Linux, or different combinations of Linux/X/glibc/Qt/GTK+? Most ISVs would want to write a software version once that would run on Linux version n, n++ and so on. Subsequent versions of the software would be enhanced features, not merely more ports
Er, why would you want to port a Qt application to GTK+, when it will run just fine? But I understand you point, companies do not pay for porting to varying platforms, but this is where the community (of hobby devs) usually takes over.
2) You have fun writing application for linux and do it part time (everyone needs a hobby, right?)
Yeah, but how much fun is it writing the same application once, and struggling to port it to a myriad #platforms and software combinations?
Not fun, but you always find volunteers doing this on many many open source projects.
3) The software is good enough, that people donate money to help you work full time on it.
Why not just straight-forward sell it for a reasonable price, say $20-50?
Why not just straight-forward accept donations and then build your project (aka kickstarter)
4) You sell support (or special edition cds or whatever) for your software, but your software is free.
I agree w/ the GP's response on this one
I have responded to GP.
5) You sell a commercial version of your software, that has additional components that are not included in your free version.
I am surprised you been on slashdot for so long, and still did not understand this.
Again, like he said, it's hard to draw a balance b/w making it so good that add-ons won't be needed, vs making it so bad that the user won't want to trust him w/ his money.
Again responded to GP, but many projects have successfully used it. I guess
Re: (Score:2)
1) Your company pays you to write software for linux
Yeah, but will the company want to pay him to write the same thing once and port it to different revisions of Linux, or different combinations of Linux/X/glibc/Qt/GTK+? Most ISVs would want to write a software version once that would run on Linux version n, n++ and so on. Subsequent versions of the software would be enhanced features, not merely more ports
Er, why would you want to port a Qt application to GTK+, when it will run just fine? But I understand you point, companies do not pay for porting to varying platforms, but this is where the community (of hobby devs) usually takes over.
Problem is that once a company has ported an app to, lets say, Mint 12, it would expect it to work seamlessly in Mint 13, 14, and so on. Let's say it makes something called Acmeworks 1.0, which was developed on/for Mint 12. Now, later, it might choose to develop Acmeworks 2.0 and make Mint 15 its target platform - that is standard practice.
However, if the company has ported Acmeworks 1.0 to Mint 12, and finds that 1.0 doesn't work on Mint 13, that's a major bummer. B'cos it would like to leverage its
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
and the users expect all their software to be free?
Interesting contradictory fact. [humblebundle.com] Scroll down and look at the payment statistics. Linux users evidently pay about twice as much as Windows users when given the choice. I have bought two bundles before, and both times the pattern was the same as with the latest bundle.
Re: (Score:2)
... when you have children to feed and a mortgage to pay ... ... and the users expect all their software to be free?
Better off spending one's time addressing a market where people expect to have to pay for stuff, no?
I bought the Linux Edition of Corel WordPerfect 8 a while back. No, I don't expect everything to be free. But companies also have to make the effort to support Linux. Soon it will be required if they want to keep certain market segments as Microsoft is destroying itself.
Which planet again? (Score:4, Insightful)
I get paid major bank to work on software for Linux. That some of it goes out to be free is no skin off my teeth.
See free software isn't "I'm gonna write some POS and hope someone buys it" development model. Those days are dead mostly anyway. Its "Some guy wants these features put on that 'free' bit because he actually has a use case, and he's gonna pay me to meet his needs then give it away so neither of us get stuck paying upkeep and he can have me do something newer and better".
Who want's to spend 40 years doing maintenance on a some accounting or word processing software anyway. There are people who are writing better gear because they need to process words and account for money. And since they really make their money counting money and processing words, giving the bycatch code out as the "whole cost" of getting the whole pre-mod app is a huge win.
It just won't lead to "another microsoft"
That closed source model was a fluke anyway, the preceding 40 years were open source. The next twenty five or so was a grand experiment that largely failed except for a few really unexpected cutthroat operators, and now its back to the more natural state of only paying for what you need.
In a current version of word I don't use 90% of it, and I'm a technical writer and novelist, but I paid for it all back when I was that foolish. Same can be said for any person or company that has ever bought that slag. So now there is this free stuff that was made by someone who actually needed it, so it's not so much slag, and given away to others who _might_ need it, and then gotten back greatly improved by the supporters and the adders on.
That's lots of money feeding lots of people, and nobody is wasting their time or money playing the "trade secret" and "big P.R." games.
What's not to love?
The Future: Pay a premium for free software (Score:4, Insightful)
I just figured I would share the future in advance with everyone so that the reality would set in sooner: Start supporting vendors which sell pre-built computers that aren't locked down as well as standardized DIY hardware. Also, start supporting home fabrication projects which will soon be able to create primitive computers, because ultimately unregulated capitalism will always find some way to fuck you otherwise. DIY hardware is already horribly unstandardized and consumer-raping. If you live in a country which is regulated so you feel you don't have to worry - just wait, you will. There is meaning behind the saying with the roots and the evil. No, not the recipe for making evil root beer.
That is a aftershot of the freakish, dying, temp.. (Score:2)
...orary software-for-money model.
See, thing is. Software was originally written by people who had to actually do things other than write software. It was all open soruce anyway. Not just Unix whith its original sharing stuff, but all the software that came before. In the seventies when IBM delivered you a copy of DOS and TSO and CICS for your big-iron mainframe it came on two sets of tapes. One was the ready to run binaries, and the other was the "you bet your ass you are going to find something you are go
I'm surprised no one is mentioning Chrome OS (Score:5, Insightful)
Linux desktop, with browser, backed by web applications.
Five OEM systems and counting.
Can we have desktop Linux with crapware? (Score:2)
Srsly. That would invalidate the cost/margin argument.
If you don't want crapware, download an ISO and reinstall, just like you can with Win7.
"ABI" (Score:2)
ABI
Another Microsoft marketing guy.
Michael Meeks (michael.meeks@novell.com)
Figures...
Ubuntu v. openSUSE .. (Score:2)
Suggestion for Michael Meeks (Score:2)
Suggestion for Michael Meeks: work more on LibreOffice and less on Gnome.
Re: (Score:3)
The internet before those hordes was the internet without wikipedia.
There are immense benefits to growing your community.
Re: (Score:2)
I agree with that. But the linux community has grown considerably (the computer market has grown, and the proportion of linux users has grown slightly). This has brought benefits in the form of more focus on usability and esthetics.
I mean, I like the command line, but there is something to be said about a good file manager with does previews. I think that the evolutions in desktop linux we are seeing are a consequence of the growth in the community. Some of which is not so good (I'm looking at you, GNOME an
Re: (Score:3)
Unlike Windows, when I install a fresh copy of Linux on my laptop, all the hardware works out of the box. Shit, I can't even get internet out of the box on Windows without using an OEM-supplied disk that already has drivers pre-loaded...
Windows isn't more usable than Linux -- OEMs MAKE Windows more usable than Linux. Would you expect Windows to be easy if you bought a computer from Apple and a regular Windows install disk from, say, Amazon.com? And even with these massive advantages, I've still always found
Re: (Score:2)
"Would you expect Windows to be easy if you bought a computer from Apple and a regular Windows install disk from, say, Amazon.com? "
Actually, I just did that. I got a regular old copy of Window 7, put it in the drive of my old 2006 1.66Ghz core Duo Mac Mini and it installed without a problem. It recognized the Wifi, Intel graphics, bluetooth, Firewire, Gigabit ethernet and kne it was a MacMini1.2 manufactured by Apple. No drivers were necessary.
Re: (Score:2)
OK, well good for you I guess if you find it works...my experience has been the exact opposite.
Windows updates have a history of breaking things. This may be a bit out of date -- I haven't used Windows much since XP -- but remember XP SP2? I can't count the number of systems I had to reverse that update on after it broken damn near everything. I recall at least one or two needing a full system reinstall. I know systems that are still running XP SP1 because of how much of a disaster that was. As for drivers
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
%s/[sS][^ ]*[uU][^ ]*[sS][^ ]*[eE]/SUSE/g
It actually turns "superuser" into "SUSEr". I am thrilled!
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Face it, if you don't run windows, you'll never, never, never ever have 100% office compatibility. Never. .
If you run Microsoft Office you've never had 100% Office compatibility. Open a docx document with Office 2003. You can look at it ( with a helper program), but you can't edit it unless you save it as a .doc document.
Re: (Score:2)
This is correct. Windows has gotten to the point of diminishing returns, and Windows 7 is a good target for someone like, say ReactOS, to attain. Similarly, if someone makes a suite compatible w/ and does everything that Office 2003 does, he's good. Calligra could use some catching up on PowerPoint and Kexi, but yeah, it too can get there.
There won't be any reason for any OS or app to be compatible w/ Windows 8 any more than anybody had any reason to be compatible w/ Itanic.
Re: (Score:2)
First off, Windows and Apple ecosystems are quite similar. The main exceptions are that 1) OS X has significant chunks that are FOSS, 2) OS X has to run on Apple hardware as opposed to the effort that Microsoft and OEMs make to ensure they are compatible/well integrated, and 3) Windows is encrusted with money-making schemes (even ISPs and breakfast cereals are in on it) whereas Apple shuns the crapware ecosystem entirely.
Other than that, both commercial platforms try to provide a familiar (feature-stable),
Re: (Score:3)
The biggest problem w/ Linux is that requirement of CLI knowledge. The only ones who have managed to completely eliminate that requirement has been Apple. NEXT had proven in the 90s that it could be done, and Apple continued the trend. Forget about the XNU kernel for a bit (Apple could have used FBSD completely had they so wanted), but Apple putting Quartz on top of FBSD userland demonstrates that it can be done.
So, given that KDE has tools by which one could alter system configurations and do just abo
Re: (Score:2)
Linux is like water. Water is free and abundant, but the only way a business is going to make money off water is
a. take the good stuff (mt spring for example) for yourself and sell it (e.g. Evian)
b. give "free" water such a bad rap that yours is better (e.g. pollute the crap out of free water). But then sell basic tap water with good marketing (e.g. Dansi, Dannon, Arrowhead, etc...)
Odd, I thought companies making things like boats, fishing rods, lures, bate, sails, paint, etc,etc were all making money off Water.