Richard Stallman Speaks About UEFI 549
An anonymous reader writes "Despite weaknesses in the Linux-hostile 'secure boot' mechanism, both Fedora and Ubuntu decided to facilitate it, by essentially adopting two different approaches. Richard Stallman has finally spoken out on this subject. He notes that 'if the user doesn't control the keys, then it's a kind of shackle, and that would be true no matter what system it is.' He says, 'Microsoft demands that ARM computers sold for Windows 8 be set up so that the user cannot change the keys; in other words, turn it into restricted boot.' Stallman adds that 'this is not a security feature. This is abuse of the users. I think it ought to be illegal.'"
I would have had first post! (Score:5, Funny)
But I couldn't boot into my OS.
Re:The Right To Read (Score:5, Funny)
That's only because the bad guys look at what he fears for some good ideas.
Now if only RMS had've patented his ideas :)
Re:What instead of the boiling frog? (Score:2, Funny)
It is a fallacy. [wikipedia.org] Too bad if you don't like it.
Re:What instead of the boiling frog? (Score:5, Funny)
all the way to the death camps
You know, using a slippery slope argument is a shockingly bad way to convince someone that a slippery slope isn't a logical fallacy. Just saying.
Re:Shackles (Score:5, Funny)
FTFY. The root key wants to be found.
Re:Shackles (Score:4, Funny)
Re:What instead of the boiling frog? (Score:4, Funny)