Linux.org Quietly Comes Back To Life 52
jfruh writes "The venerable Linux.org site quietly relaunched some weeks ago, offering much of the original useful content on Linux as well as some new articles. The site is still associated with Michael McLagen, a somewhat controversial figure due to the fights around the Linux Standards Association back in the late '90s. McLagen has not responded to requests for comments on the relaunched site."
Re:A long history of attracting nutballs (Score:5, Funny)
Unlike rational and reasonable people like Steve Ballmer or Steven Jobs?
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe its just the computer field in general. Have you ever seen as much angst as when Microsoft or Canonical changes some small widget in their GUI?
Re: (Score:1)
Steve: DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS /CHAIR
Steve: GET OUTTA HERE
Steve: GOBBLE GOBBLE GOBBLE
Steve: I WILL SPEND EVERY DOLLAR THAT APPLE HAS TO BANKRUPT AND DESTROY GOOGLE. THEY ARE THIEVES!!!
Do I need to continue?
Rational Enough? (Score:3)
Yes, please do. Those are not very good examples, they're stories that prove that people act irrational at times. I'm not sure that qualifies as "irrational" in general. Look at their work instead of tabloid headlines.
After all, did Steve continue to throw chairs at work? Did they launch Microsoft Chairs XP? I suppose he has a temper, but how did that affect his business decisions? It does not seem to have been very detrimental? Microsoft is still pretty solid.
Steve Jobs' desire to bankrupt and destroy Goog
Re: (Score:3)
Emotional Business (Score:2)
I don't take that kind of talk at its face value. On the other hand it was deeply personal for Jobs, what he really meant and felt is not for us to speculate about. If Jobs truly had put Apple on the line [to destroy Google], that would change things. He didn't.
Re: (Score:1)
Parent AC probably thinks Patton was irrational because he slapped a deserter and threatened to shoot him.
Re: (Score:1)
Steve: DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS Steve: GET OUTTA HERE /CHAIR
Steve: GOBBLE GOBBLE GOBBLE Steve: I WILL SPEND EVERY DOLLAR THAT APPLE HAS TO BANKRUPT AND DESTROY GOOGLE. THEY ARE THIEVES!!!
Do I need to continue?
"I WILL SPEND EVERY DOLLAR THAT MICROSOFT HAS TO BANKRUPT APPLE" er., wasn't that the latest headline? Like peas in a pod, brother...
Re: (Score:3)
There's a lot more controversy around either Bill Gates (super villain or super philanthropist) or Steve Jobs (hippest person who ever lived, or megalomanical asshole) than anyone I can think of in the Linux community.
Quietly coming back to life.. (Score:2)
Until we /.'d it..
Re: (Score:2)
Until we /.'d it..
Do sites still get /.ed? I haven't seen it happen in a long time. I remember people used to post comments with links to mirrors so people could still see the story when the main site was down. I haven't seen that in a while either.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Quietly coming back to life.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Quietly coming back to life.. (Score:5, Funny)
In case the site is down, here's a mirror http://www.invitinghome.com/Mirrors/img/mirror-1534.jpg [invitinghome.com]
Your mirror doesn't seem to work. Either that, or I've become a vampire without realizing it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Here's some more penguin news with a bit of history...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18370797 [bbc.co.uk]
Interview (Score:2)
McLagen has not responded to requests for comments on the relaunched site.
Now that would be an epic /. interview article. Unless one of the ground rules was "the first rule about fight club is we don't talk about standard linux, err fight club"
Re:Targeted Design (Score:5, Funny)
Why would this be useful for Linux users? They're all using Lynx, as Linux is a command-line-only OS.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Fuck you, asshole. I use telnet.
Re:Targeted Design (Score:5, Funny)
Dude - seriously, "whoosh!"
Besides, I use fread() straight off the network card to get all my website content. Doesn't everybody?
Re:Targeted Design (Score:5, Funny)
Dude - seriously, "whoosh!"
Besides, I use fread() straight off the network card to get all my website content. Doesn't everybody?
I hook a flashlight to the fiber link and click it on and off really fast. Network cards are for amateurs.
Re:Targeted Design (Score:4, Funny)
I hook a flashlight to the fiber link and click it on and off really fast. Network cards are for amateurs
Fiber? Luxury! I pick up the telephone, dial a modem, and start making bonging noises, followed by hissing... and then a comment appears on Slashdot
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Targeted Design (Score:4, Funny)
Only in promiscuous mode, cause I'm a whore. ;)
Re: (Score:2)
So you don't run a javascript blocker, and this is the worst thing you've run across?
You must not frequent the kinds of sites I do....
Re: (Score:1)
gui-ifying man will ruin its utility (make it slow, crappy, can't use from a text terminal, can't pipe its output to other commands... really, WTF?!)
The voice of ignorance speaks.
Re: (Score:2)
Uh... (Score:1)
Controversial? (Score:4, Interesting)
Good lord.. since when... oh the 90s.... which were.... over a decade ago.
Follow the bouncing ball: (Score:4, Funny)
"Welcome to CodeIgniter! The page you are looking at is being generated dynamically by CodeIgniter. If you would like to edit this page you'll find it located at: application/views/welcome_message.php"
Maybe his first article should be about setting up a site with CodeIgniter...or not!
Nostalgic impulse (Score:2)
Requires Facebook to login? (Score:2)
It does say that it's an "alpha release", so perhaps we'll see local accounts or OpenID login in the future. Requiring a Facebook account to login to linux.org seems like it might alienate a number of people.
Open source can't be hacked (Score:4, Insightful)
I love the "testimonial" in the Latest News box from Pivatejetscharter.com that sounds like it was written by a Linux marketing specialist:
http://www.linux.org/article/view/privatejetscharter-net-why-we-love-linux [linux.org]
Open Source software gave us an extra level of security and speed that just wasn’t available through proprietary software. Our website has unique demands and we designed customized security for it that we are constantly changing and updating. Unlike static proprietary software that can be studied and then hacked in mass, attacking unique open source sites just isn’t profitable and it is much more difficult.
Proprietary software is static and easily studied and hacked. Open source sites are unique and can't be hacked in mass.
Re: (Score:2)