Ask Slashdot: Why Not Linux For Security? 627
Posted
by
timothy
from the you-just-haven't-earned-it-yet-baby dept.
from the you-just-haven't-earned-it-yet-baby dept.
An anonymous reader writes "In Friday's story about IBM's ban on Cloud storage there was much agreement, such as: 'My company deals with financial services. We are not allowed to access Dropbox either.' So why isn't Linux the first choice for all financial services? I don't know any lawyers, financial advisers, banks, etc., that don't use Windows. I switched to Linux in 2005 — I'm well aware that it's not perfect. But the compromises have been so trivial compared to the complete relief from dealing with Windows security failings. Even if we set aside responsibility and liability, business already do spend a lot of money and time on trying to secure Windows, and cleaning up after it. Linux/Unix should already be a first choice for the business world, yet it's barely even known of. It doesn't make sense. Please discuss; this could use some real insight. And let's at least try to make the flames +5 funny."
upper management (Score:4, Funny)
Simple, because upper management always wants more windows.
Re:security is a system, not in a product (Score:5, Funny)
2001 called, they want their "get the facts" back....
Re:Windows = Easy + User Friendly (Score:4, Funny)
... but it really isn't! If you can manage to find someone with zero experience, Windows does not magically make sense to them.
We seem to have no problem finding an endless supply of Windows "admins" with zero experience. I don't know why you think that's such a big deal.
Re:Fine, I'll bite (Score:5, Funny)
"A system error has occurred."
"The service terminated unexpectedly."
"Please contact your network administrator."
Linux failures leave me checking log and config files.
Windows failures leave me tearing my hair and screaming "I *am* the administrator! Tell me what the bloody problem is!!!!!" at the screen.