Package Signing Comes To Pacman and Arch Linux 103
Posted
by
timothy
from the ok-but-who-are-you-really dept.
from the ok-but-who-are-you-really dept.
fwarren writes "One of the main complaints heard around here on why some Slashdotters don't run Arch Linux is that the packages are not signed. Fear no more: Arch Linux and Pacman now allow for package signing."
Re:Now how about getting Linux users basic hygine (Score:4, Funny)
Which is surprising because SOAP is a patent free industry standard.
Re:FRIST (Score:5, Funny)
Whew.... (Score:5, Funny)
I've been using Arch for years, and the constant flow of virii and rootkits that were deluging me might finally go away!
With all the recent news of linux package repositories being the main vector of all these advanced persistent threats my CPO (Chief Pentest Officer) has been telling me about, I can now breath a sigh of relief.
Re:Arch (Score:2, Funny)
This post is unsigned and may have been forged.
I just live on the edge (Score:5, Funny)