Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Software Linux

A Linux Kernel More Stable Than -stable 142

Posted by Unknown Lamer
from the linux-gets-a-day-job dept.
jfruhlinger writes '-stable' is the term for the current Linux release most suitable for general use; but as Linux moves into more and more niches, there's a need for a kernel more stable than -stable, which is updated fairly regularly. Both enterprise and embedded systems in particular need a longer horizon of kernel stability, which prompted Greg Kroah-Hartman, then at SuSE, to establish a -longterm kernel, which will remain stable for up to two years. Now there are moves to get this schedule formalized — moves that are a good sign of Linux's long-term health."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A Linux Kernel More Stable Than -stable

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Good (Score:5, Insightful)

    by icebike (68054) on Tuesday August 16, 2011 @07:37PM (#37113578)

    Yay, done with maintenance for a while.

    This isn't about your server or your workstation.

    Its about your wifi routers ADSL modems, cable modems, and electric toasters , and everything else that has linux embedded these days, many millions of which are attached directly to the net, serving as your first line of defense.

    Not one in a hundred wifi routers get updated over their life span.

    I have servers running ancient linux. (Embarrassed to say just HOW old). They do specific tasks and have no user accounts, and they reside on the Local net, but still any disgruntled employee could own them if they tried. There is no patch source for these old installations, and trying to back port security patches is simply a non-starter.

    Two years is not enough. 5 years is marginal. Even then, I want nothing but security patches. If I need the next version of something I'll upgrade, but for embedded devices or single purpose servers, all I need is security fixes.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 16, 2011 @07:46PM (#37113690)

    1) insert Windows install disk
    2) c: format
    3) run win7.exe
    4) PROFIT!!!!

  • by renzhi (2216300) on Tuesday August 16, 2011 @09:05PM (#37114272)

    Linux could have dominated, if there was some sort of stable API for third-party developers. Developing for the Linux platform quickly becomes an experience of insanity, when you start doing compatibility test, and the test matrix just explodes.

    I'd say, if it was too hard to keep API stable across all versions of Linux, maybe we should at least have API stable for all minor versions, say, 2.6.x?

    I know all the arguments for moving faster, for keeping a cleaner code base, etc. But hell, what good is a shiny kernel if the apps can't keep up with?

    Just venting, from my experiences working with kernel module.

"Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberrys!" -- Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Working...