Ubuntu 10.04 Alpha 2 vs. Early Fedora 13 Benchmarks 157
Given that early benchmarks of the Lucid Lynx were less than encouraging, Phoronix decided to take the latest alpha out for a spin and has set it side-by-side with an early look at Fedora 13. "Overall, there are both positive and negative performance changes for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Alpha 2 in relation to Ubuntu 9.10. Most of the negative regressions are attributed to the EXT4 file-system losing some of its performance charm. With using a pre-alpha snapshot of Fedora 13 and the benchmark results just being provided for reference purposes, we will hold off on looking into greater detail at this next Red Hat Linux update until it matures."
Re:What is the status on Ubuntu reducing features? (Score:5, Funny)
Shut up! It is a known fact that pulse audio sucks for EVERYONE.
Re:what is the state of ext4? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Trolls are fun (Score:1, Funny)
Does it provide a configurable "vibration mode"?
Come again? (Score:5, Funny)
What the hell is a bad performance improvement?
Re:rubbish (Score:3, Funny)
unless of course it is a windows alpha or beta, then it is blazing fast and feature rich. Sigh....
Re:linux is for cock smoking queers. (Score:5, Funny)
Yes, the inductors and transformers for Macs are hand-rolled on the thighs of virgins.
Re:What is the status on Ubuntu reducing features? (Score:4, Funny)
Shut up! It is a known fact that pulse audio sucks for EVERYONE.
Speak up, we Ubuntu users can't hear a word you're saying !
Re:I LIKE the toboggan ride (Score:4, Funny)
Shut up! Don't you know Ubuntu is the ONLY linux distribution that does not require to write kernel modules in assembly by yourself ?
I'm glad they finally switched to assembly, I've misplaced my paper card puncher and I've been afraid to reboot ever since !