EXT4, Btrfs, NILFS2 Performance Compared

Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

EXT4, Btrfs, NILFS2 Performance Compared 102

Posted by timothy on Tuesday June 30, 2009 @12:07PM from the where-will-you-put-your-bits-next-year? dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Phoronix has published Linux filesystem benchmarks comparing XFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems. This is the first time that the new EXT4 and Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems have been directly compared when it comes to their disk performance though the results may surprise. For the most part, EXT4 came out on top."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

EXT4, Btrfs, NILFS2 Performance Compared

Search 102 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

What, no ReiserFS? (Score:5, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Tuesday June 30, 2009 @12:10PM (#28529729)

you folks are killing me

Share
twitter facebook
Who's stripping? (Score:3, Funny)

by clarkn0va ( 807617 ) writes: <<apt.get> <at> <gmail.com>> on Tuesday June 30, 2009 @12:41PM (#28530379) Homepage

Yeah, I know I'm behind the times, but when did striping become stripping?

Share
twitter facebook

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

EXT4, Btrfs, NILFS2 Performance Compared 102

EXT4, Btrfs, NILFS2 Performance Compared More Login

EXT4, Btrfs, NILFS2 Performance Compared

What, no ReiserFS? (Score:5, Funny)

Who's stripping? (Score:3, Funny)

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

Slashdot Top Deals

Slashdot