Open Source Cities Followup — Munich Yea, Vienna Nay 162
We're catching up on two stories of municipal engagement with open source software: Munich (which decided to go OS in 2003) and Vienna (2005). E5Rebel brings us news that Munich has stayed the course. But bkingaut informs that Vienna has decided to migrate back to Windows (Google translation) — to Vista no less. The migration of 720 computers used in kindergartens will cost the city about €8M. The given reason for all this is a language test application for the kids that only works with MS IE and won't be made compatible (by the producer) with Firefox until 2009.
Stupid developers (Score:4, Insightful)
Why not switch test software? (Score:5, Insightful)
OR even better, they could write some and help other schools going open source.
Re:Stupid developers (Score:5, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why not switch test software? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Why not switch test software? (Score:4, Insightful)
The questions are usually copyrighted so you need someone to write a new set of questions, get them certified by the education department, get the app written, the app certified by the education department and so on. All this is subject to junkets, sometimes money changing hands, lobbying and so on.
Educational and testing software is an area which is nearly impossible for a newcomer to break in. Competition is virtually inexistent, quality is crap and there is bugger all that can be done about it.
Re:Stupid developers (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Compatability? (Score:3, Insightful)
If I was that government I would have paid some High School students to write a website for a passing grade in one of their classes.
Re:Stupid developers (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Stupid developers (Score:4, Insightful)
IE has a market share of over 50%.
If you develop for the web you MUST develop for IE. It doesn't matter that Firefox is easier to develop for because it is still extra work.
If you are going sell anything that works on a web browser IE support is mandatory.
I along with a lot of other people feel that Firefox is also mandatory for anything you put on the Internet. If you are building a site you don't want lock out big percentage of potental users. I do tend to write for Firefox and then port to IE but IE support is without a doubt mandatory.
Microsoft has it right. Developers, Developers, Developers! People don't use an OS they use applications. I love Linux but I have to keep a Windows for work and for FSX.
If the programs you use don't run on an OS that OS is useless to you.
Re:so... (Score:3, Insightful)
Price that out vs. converting all 720 physical computers to nonfree software from the OS up, and that for one app that will be compatible in a year.
Re:The COMPLETE migration will cost about 8M euros (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Stupid developers (Score:5, Insightful)
Abso-fricken-lutely (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Stupid developers (Score:4, Insightful)
You are correct that IE 5,6, and 7 are different but that doesn't matter.
If it works in IE 5 it will probably work in IE 6. IE 7 was a little harder to deal with which is why a lot of companies held off on IE 7. But NONE of that matters. You must support the terrible mess that is IE. There really isn't a choice for most web developers. Heck I wish that we could all just stick with W3C code but that isn't an option in this world.
Firefox's market share is around 30% in Europe. But here is the key question. What market share does windows have? How many Firefox users also have IE so they can use it when they have no other choice?
I love Firefox. It is a better browser than IE. It is easier to code for than IE.
BUT the sad truth is that just doesn't matter.
Re:In my experience (Score:3, Insightful)
Going that way, it takes about a day to get things working right in IE once things are working. Going the other way you could easily drop a week, bouncing back and forth between the two browsers.
Re:Compatability? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:so... (Score:3, Insightful)
"General. The OS Components are provided to you by Microsoft to update, supplement, or replace existing functionality of the applicable OS Product."
I doubt installing it on Linux is allowed, since it's pretty clear that it's licensed to you for use with the "applicable OS product" = Windows.
Re:Abso-fricken-lutely (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Stupid developers (Score:2, Insightful)