Adobe To Port AIR To Linux 218
unityofsaints writes "Up until now, Adobe hasn't done much in terms of porting its applications to Linux, as its only product to have recieved any kind of Linux implementation is Flash. This may be about to change because the company has announced a Linux port of AIR, its web application development software. No definite release date is mentioned in the interview with Adobe CTO Kevin Lynch, just a vague 'later this year.'"
Bzzt (Score:5, Informative)
Not quite (Score:5, Informative)
Adobe FrameMaker has run on more than 10 Unixes over the years, including Linux. Consider this nit picked!
Re:PDF? (Score:5, Informative)
Flash for i386 Linux (Score:1, Informative)
Going out on a limb... (Score:2, Informative)
No thanks. (Score:4, Informative)
I've not given Adobe a single dime in a decade*. First it was their overpricing themselves out of all but the students-and-pirates market. Then it was about using their corporate power to influence our government against the valid rights of individuals [freesklyarov.org] who were speaking out about data security and the freedom to read.
I'm sure some cash went from Canon or Apple to these jackasses, when I bought hardware that bundled their teaser products (which I don't use). I regret even that level of support for Adobe.
This is not surprisng... (Score:2, Informative)
I think the REAL interesting part, though, is how AIR relates to an earlier statement made by Adobe's CEO. He mentioned that in the future, all Adobe apps would be on the web. I think that statement was a bit misleading, either through a mis-understanding or mis-interpretation. I think that Adobe is banking the future on AIR as the runtime for all of it's applications (Photoshop, Illustrator, etc.) This gives them the design capabilities of Flash and web graphics, and a common runtime on which to deploy them. Then, platform independence becomes a reality, as whatever platform has AIR, can run Adobe applications.
Re:No such thing as a closed source port to open O (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, the vendor will probably only pre-compile binaries for the most popular architectures (32-bit x86 being the main one), and only for the most popular packaging formats (deb and rpm). But really that covers the vast majority of Linux users anyway.
Yes, it's a pain for the vendor to compile/package 2-8 versions instead of just one, but it's hardly the insurmountable obstacle you make it out to be.
Re:People use Photoshop to Dev the Web too Adobe! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:If you want to give file system accesss to Air. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:PDF? (Score:2, Informative)
-Ellie
Re:I think we deserve an answer (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Going out on a limb... (Score:3, Informative)
Bad information (Score:5, Informative)
Wow
1) Flex Builder [adobe.com] has had a public alpha for Linux for some time now.
2) There's Adobe Acrobat for Linux/Solaris/Unix [adobe.com]
3) Most of the servers Adobe offers, like ColdFusion [adobe.com] and Flash Media Streaming [adobe.com] servers are available for Linux/Unix.
4) Adobe AIR isn't a web application development environment of any sort... that's completley messed up. It's the runtime component of a connected desktop app platform that supports HTML/CSS/JS/PDF/Flash content.
5) Macromedia (now part of Adobe) has made attempts to commercialize Dreamweaver/Flash/Freehand on Linux before utilizing Wine-compatible releases, but there was no enough demand to pay the bills, so the project was canned. I have the feeling they'll be trying this with selected Adobe CS applications again within 24 months, but it'll be expensive, so the market should show enough demand, and put their money where their mouth is, this time.
Re:No such thing as a closed source port to open O (Score:4, Informative)
Re:People use Photoshop to Dev the Web too Adobe! (Score:4, Informative)
(This layer is likely to be rather complex -- witness how long it took them to bring Photoshop to MacIntel)
Re:Bzzt (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Not quite (Score:5, Informative)
Actually Frame Technology Corp. wrote Framemaker and ported it to many Linux/UNIX based OS's, Windows, and Mac OS. Once Adobe acquired Frame Technology Corp. they slowly dropped all the other versions until 2004 when they finally dropped Mac OS (who at the time comprised about half of their user base), making this product a Windows only. They basically put the whole program in the deep freeze with minimal updates to keep things working and no new features while they tried to migrate users to their home grown InDesign which was written originally for making magazines and was very unsuited to technical books (which was Framemaker's main target). In fact, they only recently started up development again (outsourced to India) when MadCap Software announced a new program called Blaze, which was billed as having every feature of Framemaker, but implemented from scratch with many new features and an order of magnitude better performance. As of 2007, they claimed to have no plans to support anything but Windows going forward.
Re:People use Photoshop to Dev the Web too Adobe! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:People use Photoshop to Dev the Web too Adobe! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:People use Photoshop to Dev the Web too Adobe! (Score:2, Informative)
In case you're wondering why they took this direction, Adobe has a fairly strong research group called "STLabs"; if you can find their online presence, check out Alexander Stepanov (inventor of the STL to boot!), Mat Marcus, and Sean Parent (Sean is an important driver for all of this).
Get the AIR on Linux Beta (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2008/02/20/adobe-air-on-linux-pre-beta-testers-needed/ [jamesward.org]
-James
Re:People use Photoshop to Dev the Web too Adobe! (Score:3, Informative)
Right about now it'd cost much more than it'd be worth in new sales. However, the market is getting increasingly OS agnostic, and it's not in Adobe's interest long term to stay tied to any OS. The more cross-platform they get, the more versatile they will be to OS changes.
Just look at Silverlight - it's directly targeted at Flash, and the only reason it'd succeed is because
Now that Microsoft is targeting a big Adobe product, Adobe needs to take steps to revoke their support of Microsoft's big cash cows (Windows and Office).
Since Office is being challenged by web apps and Open Office, Adobe would be wise to help weaken reliance on Windows, and that means showing the world that they can get what they want on whatever OS they choose. Linux is a good next step.