10-Year Anniversary of Open Source 161
Bruce Perens writes "Saturday is the 10-Year Anniversary of Open Source, the initiative to promote Free Software to business. Obviously, it's been incredibly successful. I've submitted a State of Open Source message discussing the anniversary of Open Source, its successes, and the challenges it will face in the upcoming decade."
I think you mean "Open Source" (Score:3, Informative)
10 years - not hardly (Score:2, Informative)
Try to get over yourselves people.
Correction: free software is the success (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Surprised by Wealth! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Not 10 years: thank ESR for the lies (Score:5, Informative)
Of course, the words "Open Source" could have been used that way before then, but we can't find any record. Since Open Source Definition only got done (as the Debian Free Software Guidelines) in July 1997, whatever was referred to before then wasn't quite what we know as Open Source today.
Thanks
Bruce
Re:10 years - not hardly (Score:4, Informative)
Thanks
Bruce
Re:Surprised by Wealth! (Score:5, Informative)
Technocrat.net has been back for a while. If you did know that and don't like its current editorial content, I could really use some better article submissions. I've got to take most anything people submit right now because it's slim pickings. But not over here at Slashdot, darn it.
New projects in the wings: a start-up company called Kiloboot. Product not announced yet. An American version of FFII.
Thanks
Bruce
Re:Misleading use of capital letters (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'm so sick of "Open Source" it's bogus! (Score:5, Informative)
Now, obviously, I think that Open Source evangelists like me have a role in talking with business people that Richard can't fill. His brain wiring isn't built for it. The a priori arguments he makes are not the way to start selling these concepts to business people, but hopefully they will eventually come to appreciate Richard's arguments after they enter through Open Source. Obviously, I don't want to erode the goals of the Free Software campaign at all. I'm out to help people understand Free Software with a gentle introduction. I tried to make that clear in the article.
Thanks
Bruce
Re:Not 10 years: thank ESR for the lies (Score:5, Informative)
The references you point out refer to the presence of source code, not the presence of licensing that assures the right to redistribute, modify, and use. BSD did provide that sort of licensing, but it was just called BSD licensing. The only campaign for developers to provide those things at the time was called Free Software.
Actually, there was a regular use of the term open source at that time, to refer to a form of military intelligence.
But I really did invent the term "nojomofo" Bwahh haha ha! :-)
Re:Surprised by Wealth! (Score:3, Informative)
Bruce
Re:I'm so sick of "Open Source" it's bogus! (Score:3, Informative)
It's obsolete. ESR wrote it before IBM stepped into the picture, etc. I invite you to read The Emerging Economic Paradigm of Open Source [perens.com]. At least one now-professional has based his thesis on this paper.
I think the major difference in objectives between Open Source and Free Software evangelists is that the Free Software folks say that proprietary software does not have a right to exist. Unfortunately, I can't say that and win the argument where it's important to win. You have to sound fair to everybody to win with politicians, if you ask to disenfranchise someone else you generally won't get very far.
Sorry if you don't buy that, and we'll have to agree to disagree.
Thanks
Bruce
Celebrate them all (Score:2, Informative)
Silver Jubilee!
Who's going to write the press releases?
Re:Celebrate them all (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I think you mean "Open Source" (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Correction: free software is the success (Score:3, Informative)