Hardy Heron Alpha 4 Released 272
LarryBoy writes "Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy Heron) alpha 4 was released Friday and Ars Technica has a look at what's new in the latest builds of Hardy Heron. 'Although many of the significant architectural features like PulseAudio and GIO are still in transitional stages and aren't fully functional yet, Ubuntu 8.04 alpha 4 is still very impressive. I'm a big fan of D-Bus and I'm very pleased to see it being adopted throughout the entire desktop stack in core components.'"
PulseAudio works nicely in Fedora 8 (Score:3, Informative)
Re:ndiswrapper (Score:5, Informative)
nautilus is undergoing big changes (Score:4, Informative)
Snipped from the release notes:
Nautilus can behave erratically, especially in trash operations. Refrain from operating on valuable files with this version. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185756 [launchpad.net]
Someone tell me please... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:PulseAudio works nicely in Fedora 8 (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Getting tired of Ubuntu (Score:3, Informative)
I understand why that would frustrate you. My experiences were mixed - it's as stable as always on my desktop with Compiz disabled, but crashes about once a week with Compiz enabled. I enable it anyway - there's just something about people's reaction the first time I close a window and it burns up that makes me more tolerant. :-)
On the other hand, 7.10 is the first version that worked perfectly on my laptop with no tweaking (unless you count clicking on the network control and selecting my local network from the drop-down list). It was literally easier than setting up my daughter's new Vista-based laptop - and Vista was pre-installed. Go figure.
Re:Yet to be impressed (Score:4, Informative)
I click on a PDF link in Epiphany and it downloads the PDF and opens it in Evince (or whatever is registered as the primary PDF handler). If the website annoyingly opens a new window to show the PDF in (as if you have the plugin installed), Epy even helpfully closes the empty window for you.
This works for all registered content types, not just PDFs. If on some occasions it does not work, it is because the server is misconfigured and is sending the wrong MIME content type.
Re:ndiswrapper (Score:3, Informative)
Re:ndiswrapper (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Maybe they'll fix the broken releases? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:PulseAudio works nicely in Fedora 8 (Score:5, Informative)
More to the point, though Launchpad isn't yet open source, Canonical have made a commitment to open sourcing it. The reasons for it not being done yet are well documented - Shuttleworth himself explained things at length in a blog post some time back. They've already open sourced Storm.
So Launchpad isn't open source, but using that to level an accusation of Ubuntu being closed source is a fairly radical interpretation of the facts.
Re:I'm waiting for the next one... (Score:3, Informative)
(The idea of stepping through the alphabet seems to have started with Edgy, which followed Dapper. Previously it was random: Warty, Hoary, Breezy, Dapper
Re:ndiswrapper (Score:5, Informative)
To add my experiences with Ubuntu (and being more specific) I had troubles with Ubuntu 6.06 on my T42 ThinkPad trying to use wireless security, although connectivity and WEP worked straight off. Later, Ubuntu 7.10 had a greatly improved NetworkManager. It's everything thing I need. My hat's off to those guys. Even VPN works beautifully through the same interface.
I do hope an open source 11n driver comes out soon. It's really up to which chip vendor wants write one, and it was in this area that I had hopes for the Dell/Ubuntu laptops. If they want to ship 11n, then they'll push someone to support it. You see, your characterization was mistaken. You said:
HP, and Microsoft, fixed the issue with the Broadcom wireless driver
No they didn't. Broadcom fixed it. HP forced them too, and Microsoft did nothing. That's the way it's going to be. Once HP and Dell care, Linux support will be there before the product is shipped.
Re:Anyone try the latest totem? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:PulseAudio works nicely in Fedora 8 (Score:5, Informative)
How did this get moderated insightful?
Re:Queued file operations -- finally?! (Score:3, Informative)
- which volumes are mounted under which mount points (quite easy, but then calculate that for all files transferred, not just root of each transfer)
- which volumes are really LVM2 logical volumes, and how those are mapped to volume groups and then physical volumes (LVM is default in Fedora and maybe also Ubuntu, I always install it explicitly)
- is RAID in use, at level of software RAID (Linux only), fake RAID (hardware assist + Linux) or hardware RAID, and if so are you using RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, etc, and which blocks might be on which disks given different RAID striping models and which disks are in which group. (And once we get ZFS-FUSE to be stable, that has its own version of RAID...)
- is this disk actually mapped at block level onto a network block device (e.g. iSCSI, ATA over Ethernet, etc - or even ElasticDrive which is really an Amazon S3 based storage service)
Given LVM and RAID in particular, I can't see how any GUI tool can figure this out easily - it would really need to poke the kernel to get some hints if you want to do this, or perhaps hint to the kernel 'these 5 operations are a group, please schedule them sequentially if that will improve performance' - still very complex however you do it.
One interesting feature here, to set priorities for I/O between processes although not threads, is 'ionice' - it's available in Ubuntu from repositories and let's you set the priority for I/O of a process - great for disk-bound transfers, e.g. set your K3B disk burning to high priority, or backup process to low. Useful blog posting at http://friedcpu.wordpress.com/2007/07/17/why-arent-you-using-ionice-yet/ [wordpress.com]
Incidentally Vista added I/O priority to Windows, but XP doesn't have it, which is why I need to suspend some processes altogether when they are churning the disk on my Windows laptop.
I would like to see the various GUI system monitor tools make it easy to see how much I/O is going on, like Windows' Process Explorer (from the great Sysinternals team, far better than Task Manager) and to view and change the I/O priority interactively.
Having said all that - I think Nautilus is going to include a Pause transfer feature in next iteration, so you could simply use that to stop something that may be slowing things down.
Re:ndiswrapper (Score:4, Informative)
My wife couldn't be happier.
And you can rest your mind, PCLinuxOS 2007 doesn't put all users into root. If something requires administrative privileges, it will ask for the root password, which is where I come in, if it happens to my wife.
Anyway, in terms of ease-of-use, PCLOS is still much ahead of Ubuntu. I wouldn't run PCLOS on a server, but on desktop and mobile systems, it's top notch.
Re:PulseAudio works nicely in Fedora 8 (Score:2, Informative)
Canonical is still a small company, and so we certainly do a lot more integration at Ubuntu than we do from-scratch software development; however, anyone who equates integration work with parasitism has clearly never done any of it themselves. An obsession with creating things on one's own is a rather curious one in the free software community. Most of the work put in by Canonical-employed Ubuntu developers is on improving existing software.
Anyhow, some things just off the top of my head that (variously) Canonical, Ubuntu developers on contract to Canonical, and community Ubuntu developers have been entirely or largely responsible for:
This is probably biased to things I've been near, and I'm certainly not going to try to enumerate everything as I'd like to do something else with my week, so I've certainly left out a number of interesting projects. Company-wide, our staff are in the Maintainer or Uploaders fields of nearly 5% of the source packages in the Debian archive, which is not too shabby for a small company, and in many cases they do work on those packages on work time. Aside from that, if you want to know what Ubuntu developers do all day, you could always do some genuine research and look through the mail archives of the various *-changes lists!
I don't think the milestone release announcement (which, BTW, was sent to the developer announcement list and was not a "press release") particularly misrepresents anything as being Ubuntu's work when it isn't; right up at the top it talks about "the absolute latest and greatest software the Open Source Community has to offer". Bearing in mind that the intended audience for milestone releases is developers and enthusiastic testers, I don't think this is particularly unreasonable - the people preparing these notes are more interested in describing major things that need to be tested than anything else. However, anyone who feels they are short of acknowledgements should feel entirely free to add them, as the release notes are in wiki-mode while they're being prepared.