What 2008 May Hold In Store for FOSS 266
eldavojohn writes to mention that LinuxPlanet has a brief discussion on what 2008 may hold for FOSS. The list includes thoughts on KDE 4, OOXML, DRM, and 3-D desktops. What boons for FOSS are you looking forward to in 2008?
Had to be said (Score:5, Insightful)
Correction... (Score:4, Insightful)
More Linux games! :( (Score:3, Insightful)
Why do they keep selling themselves to DirectX instead of OpenGL? GRRRR!
What boons for FOSS are you looking forward to...? (Score:5, Insightful)
Hopefully a linux driver for my wifi card (Score:2, Insightful)
Yes sir. I really can't ask for more than that can I?.. The old BCM94318 w/out any damned NDIS wrapper.
Yep. It sure would take a warm and good soul to release one of those.
Re:I KNOW I KNOW! (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not trying to say we should necessarily support a company that has a lot of bad practices, but they create a huge market for us to make money. When they release a new OS, they beef up the minimum requirements for it and in turn brings prices of last gen products down in price for us to use.
Re:3d desktops? (Score:4, Insightful)
I think the idea was offload the desktop onto the GPU (who wouldn't be doing anything anyways until a game is loaded), which in theory would free up more CPU cycles for the regular old processor.
Secondly, you can supposedly get better vector graphics and quicker response with a 3d engine for a desktop. The best example of this is of course not Linux for the Nintendo DS. Most 2d looking games for it are actually using a 3d engine because its easier to code for and less intensive on the CPU.
That and it looks just as good at any resolution and screen DPI. It wasn't as big of an issue, but if you have a 30" monitor with an unreasonably high resolution and try to increase the size of your icons on a 2d desktop that doesn't use vectoring... You will notice how pixelated everything looks.
Re:What boons for FOSS are you looking forward to. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I KNOW I KNOW! (Score:5, Insightful)
Joe User gets a lot of email. He tends to be organized, so he likes to sort his mail into different folders. He could use procmail or his client's filtering capabilities, but why should he have to? OSS has good solutions to the text classifying problem [sourceforge.net]
If only the email client (or imap server) paid attention, he's already supplying all the input necessary for a text classifier to sort all his mail for him without any additional action on his part.
When Joe (manually) moves an email from his inbox to a new folder, this is a training event.
If Joe notices that an email is in an incorrect folder and moves it (manually) to the right one, this is a retraining event.
This concept could be expanded to other applications: how about a window manager that remembers where you tend to arrange your applications and starts putting them in the right place to begin with? The ability do manually set placement rules like with KDE doesn't count. That's just a workaround for not using the information the user is already providing.
Re:How about fixing what we have now? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What boons for FOSS are you looking forward to. (Score:5, Insightful)
Same with the novel (or insert song, program, etc in here). You might have (and without copyright likely would have) been paid to write the story in the first place. Once you've been paid to write, you write the novel. Now, you can choose to only give it (or you could technically sell it) to the people who already gave you money, but the bottom line is you will have already been paid to write it. Once it's done your part is done and if people want to make copies of it to sell, or to give away, that's their own concern. If you want to keep raking in cash you better have written a story good enough that people are willing to pay you to write another one. And you better be willing to write a number of "sample" stories to begin with if you want anybody to start reading your stuff.
With music, it's even easier. You could in the same way be paid to write the songs, or more likely you would be paid for live performances (ie, you are actually gonna have to get out there and do work again).
With software, GPL isn't needed because if you release a closed source version of my code I'm just gonna decompile it, reimplement the changes in a high level language, and rerelease it again. If you want to be paid for software, someone will end up hiring you to do a custom program for them (ie, you must work, not live off imagined entitlement), or you can write free stuff and charge to support it (again, working).
You also have to understand that not EVERYTHING will/would be feasible with copyright gone. It's a shift of society, but for the better. I'm sure if we reinstituted slavery we could achieve some absolutely marvelous feats in construction and such, but that doesn't mean it's something that a fair society should support. I seriously doubt large scale motion pictures as they currently stand would still be realistically profitable (though live theater certainly might return to a much more profitable status). That's not something we can't live without though, and it's certainly not worth instituting insanely oppressive laws over.Copyright instills a limited supply (and source) onto something that by nature is unlimited (and not really even tangible). It's one of the most perverted corruption of economics ever seen.
Re:OLPC vs clothes (Score:3, Insightful)
It makes me wonder if Bob Geldof has done the world more harm than good.
Re:More Linux games! :( (Score:4, Insightful)
Those two can most certainly be compared.
Re:Nothing nothing and nothing (Score:2, Insightful)
if i see someone using something that can be replaced fine with FLOSS software, i will do it.
the more people use FLOSS software, more easilly will new open projects show up, and existent ones get better and better.
i dump and fight against many close source programs because they refuse to work with others programs and use open standards.
if they would use open standards, worked with other programs, i would be completely neutral to then and could even use several of then (and i use several like this).
As far i i can do, i refuse to use close apps that can be replaced and those that cant, i try to find a balance.
so yes, i'm zealot to want FLOSS to get better, not only because it helps others, but even more because it helps me and the programs that i use to get better.
No one uses a OS or apps that dont work, we use FLOSS software because it works good enough for our needs and each year that "good enough" overlaps more and more closed apps until it can replace everything that anyone wants.