Microsoft Claims Patent On Elements of Embedded Linux? 191
Preedit writes "An InformationWeek story points out a recent deal between Microsoft and Japanese printer maker Kyocera Mita. Under the agreement, Kyocera obtained from Microsoft a license to patents used in 'certain Linux-based embedded technologies.' The question the author asks is why Kyocera needs a patent license from Microsoft to develop its embedded Linux products."
Japanese culture? (Score:4, Informative)
He thinks that it goes against the Japanese culture to use a technology without paying for it, that it shows disrespect to not pay for software licenses. He is not even allowed to consider using Linux or any other OSS for that matter.
Re:Maybe were reading this deal the wrong way.... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:It's a trap! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Japanese culture? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Maybe were reading this deal the wrong way.... (Score:3, Informative)
Like MS or not Samba is used in order to inter-operate with Windows and MS might actually have some legitimate claims.
I've heard the Samba IP argument before. It doesn't hold water (IANAL). Windows/DOS networking (Netbios/SMB) was born out of a joint IBM/3Com/Microsoft venture back in the 80s. Microsoft owns about as much IP in Samba as 3Com and IBM do. Microsofts enhancements (bastardization ?) of kerberos authentication entitles them to no additional IP or innovation points.
My 2-bits.
Enjoy,
Probably XPS (Score:4, Informative)
The spec is freely available, but the introductory paragraphs in the spec suggest that implementing it without licenses is not permitted.
Nothing new... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:A few questions for Kyocera (Score:3, Informative)
That's called a back-door monopoly... and it hurts us, the marketplace, and the implementation of the benefits of technology we should all enjoy.
There are three distinct and unrelated aspects to the story.
1) Microsoft and Kyocera signed a cross licence agreement.
Common business practice. Nothing suspicious. The only relevant bit.
2) Kyocera uses Linux in some of it's products.
Again nothing unusual, and nothing suspicious. Mostly irrelevant, although there is the possibility that Microsoft patented functions might run with but not be part of the Linux functionality.
3) Microsoft claim to have patents relevant to Linux.
Nothing new, nothing proven. Most likely FUD. Not relevant in this story. Patents are a very dangerous weapon for all concerned. The owner of the patent is in just as much danger as the target company. Which is why businesses usually cross license instead of going to court. Especially if they are big companies like Microsoft and Kyocera.
Because 1 and 2 are true, doesn't automatically make 3 part of the deal. Much as I would love to be critical of Microsoft. HTey haven't done anything unusual or immoral. They have just made a common business deal. End of story.
A chair flies across a room. (Score:2, Informative)
Hmmm... A story involving Microsoft. To this, I must add the obligatory "flying chair" comment:
Google is a better company than Microsoft.
This story also mentions Linux. Did I mention that the better company uses Linux extensively? Hmmm... maybe that has something to do with Google being better.
Re:Useless Article... (Score:4, Informative)
And there probably never will be. If you've ever contacted MS IP Licensing you know that you can't even discuss licensing their technologies until after you're under NDA.
Re:Useless Article... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Useless Article... (Score:2, Informative)
From the article:
Note the phrasing carefully - it specifically does not say that embedded Linux uses patented Microsoft technology, rather that Kyocera may use the technology in some of its applications of embedded Linux.
Of course, Microsoft try to spin it the other way, but it's pure FUD. No more, no less.