Retailer Refuses Hardware Repair Due To Linux 1018
Tikka writes "Today I visited PC World (London, UK) because my 5-month-old laptop has developed a manufacturing fault: the hinge to the display has started to crack the plastic casing. Anyone in the know will know that this is due to the joint inside, and it means that in time the screen will separate from the keyboard. Repair was refused, because I have Gentoo Linux on my laptop, replacing the Windows Vista that was pre-installed. PC World said that installing Linux had voided my warranty and there is nothing they will do for me. I spoke to a manager, who said that he has been told to refuse any repairs if the operating system has been changed. I feel this has really gone against my statutory rights and I will do everything I can to fight it. I will review comments for your advice."
UK consumer protection laws (Score:3, Interesting)
For those of us on the new side of the pond, it will be interesting to see how UK consumer protection laws compare with US consumer protection laws (such as they are). In the US, the consumer would have several options, including consulting the Better Business Bureau and also with the various state Attorneys General offices. Good luck!
Rights in England? (Score:1, Interesting)
Talk to a solicitor/barrister/whatever-you-people-call-it.
The operating system does not matter (Score:5, Interesting)
Embarrass them into compliance (Score:0, Interesting)
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:5, Interesting)
Possible scenario: the sleep function didn't work under Linux, so he just left the lid closed with the laptop running. The excess heat, over the course of many (5) months, weakened the plastic case, causing it to crack. So actually, Linux is to blame.
I am completely serious. This is totally plausible.
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:UK consumer protection laws (Score:3, Interesting)
Also the Federal Trade Commission.
The company's refusal to fix a mechanical flaw totally unrelated to the software violates the "implied warranty of serviceability and fitness". That's a BIG no-no.
Lunix machine failure (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:install windows (Score:3, Interesting)
What for? Back up your data (4 GB usbsticks are about $60 right now if you watch the sales), do a OEM fresh install, bring it in to whatever idiotshop there is locally and tell them that a fresh install of windows from the OEM disks didn't fix the cracks in the casing. *sarcastic grin*
If that fails, beat them over the head with it. Or just plain don't worry about it. (I have two laptops, both with various physical defects that don't detract from the usability. One of them is held together by Black Gorilla Duct Tape (800lb). It's probably sturdier than the other one, which doesn't have the duct tape. I use it to administer the headless cli ubuntu server VM from my main machine; it's perfect in the role, and I didn't have to throw away that 'old' pcmcia 802.b card.
What, are they supposed to retain their resale value, or something? Oh come on...
SB
Repair the Laptop (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:It's happened to me before... (Score:3, Interesting)
You could also accomplish all sorts of other mischief with the interrupt switch, but on very early Macs, even if you didn't know anything to type in the prompt, you could sometimes generate some amazing results by simply typing lots and lots of gibberish. I've seen the displays start flickering in weird ways and had static coming out of the speakers on a couple occasions.
Ahh, Good times.
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:1, Interesting)
The computer sales reps tried to explain it away, saying it's x86 compatible and everything, lol.
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:5, Interesting)
So I can only assume you are being completely serious in ignorance.
Being in the UK there is bound to be a consumer affairs department to which the complaint can be forwarded, for remedial action, I know of the ones for South Australia and for Australia. These government departments are very useful as they will handle any prosecution, so not only will your laptop likely be repaired, but other people in similar situation could also get legal rectification and very likely the retailer could get stuck with penalties well in excess of the cost of repairs.
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:4, Interesting)
Personally I see this as a purely hardware issue. I'm still trying to work out exactly why the laptop was turned on in the first place or how they even found out Gentoo had gotten on there.
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:2, Interesting)
I've done this twice with SWMBOs little Sony TR2 laptop on which you can't remove the harddrive without voiding the warranty, it's usually dual boot Debian XP, both times it's come back with various updates installed, which I just over write with my old install.
The whole principal aspect of it never occurred to me before, but I absolutely see your point and in future will return all my broken PCs with fresh linux installs on them, irrespective of what they usually run, out of shear bloody mindedness.
Hard Drive Substitute (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:3, Interesting)
Similar story (Score:2, Interesting)
Still waiting (one week and running)...
It would be better for them to directly use robots : this wouldn't change anything for consumers, and would be better for their bottom line.
Re:Setting aside the humor, do they have a point? (Score:2, Interesting)
As opposed to someone who overclocks their hardware in Windows? I fail to see the relevance in this case. Plenty of people running Gentoo just fine without tweaking anything on the hardware side.
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:5, Interesting)
Their carbon fiber reinforced plastic cases are tough as hell, active protection system and motherboard roll cage seems to keep them ticking long after most cheep plastic machines kicking arround today would be in peices imo
This lenovo blog article should interest you ThinkPads are Ruggedized Machines [lenovoblogs.com] :o)
Re:Setting aside the humor, do they have a point? (Score:2, Interesting)
Now listen, you should really post the Clear BRAND, MODEL and possibly a link to a page describing the defective notebook, i suggest epinions.com or something close to it. This could make really a difference. When you do be careful to be objective and not to let you go into hate speech. Then point the attenction of some PCWorld's upper managment there and you'we got excuses and the new laptop (And I think you deserve both).
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:3, Interesting)
Same for NC6000 and most other 2001-2006 business notebooks. Every single P4 or PentiumM based one I have tested during that period failed thermally under Linux if you ran it on ACPI alone.
As thermal tolerances differ from model to model your mileage may vary. In your case you ended up on the better side. This is rare.
Re:Setting aside the humor, do they have a point? (Score:3, Interesting)
Obviously, in some situations, they have every right to argue that they won't fix your problem if you've changed operating systems. But in this country, businesses are encouraged to push such limitations as far as they can because if they are proven wrong, there are very few negative consequences.
If YOU hire a lawyer, and YOU take them to court, and YOU take dozens of hours of your own time to sue them in small claims court, you will probably win. BUT, their lawyers will make it very hard because they know that, even though they have a poor case, they will get paid, even if they lose. Whereas your lawyer has to worry that he won't make a dime if you lose (either you hired one of those lawyers who advertise that "we don't get paid, unless you get paid," or they are worried that you just won't pay them, and you don't have enough money to be worth suing.
If you do win, the defendant will have to do the repair they should have done, and they will PROBABLY have to pay your legal fees, but good luck getting money for all of your wasted time (or for that matter, as a reward for the monetary risk you took in order to sue them).
They are hoping that you would rather take the hit for a few hundred dollars, than deal with all that shit.
Now look at it from their point of view. There is no precedent that they have to conform to, so they can argue ignorance (in reference to the aforementioned car analogy, I'm sure that the whole after market car stereo thing has been used as an excuse to not repair things unrelated, but someone eventually beat them in court, setting a precedent, so they don't use that argument anymore). They know that most of their customers don't have the resources to fight them. They know that if they they lose in court, they will basically just be forced to do what they should have done in the first place.
It's like walking into a store knowing that if you steal something, you probably won't be caught, but if you are, the worst the cops will do is make you pay for the merchandise you took.
Rubbish (Score:3, Interesting)
Don't put up with it. They sold you a product, it's failed. Get them to replace/repair and KNOW YOUR RIGHTS.
Re:Setting aside the humor, do they have a point? (Score:3, Interesting)
Where would it stop with a PC? What if I put in a bigger hard drive, or more ram, or a new drive or card? Should the OS be considered a user serviceable part?
Depending how shady you're feeling you could probably pop out the factory hard drive and plug in a clean one to install Linux, then when if you start having problems swap the drives back to get the repairs done.
Re:ahem.... are you sure? (Score:3, Interesting)
Opening the software is a reasonable use of said software - in fact you can't tell if it works or not without opening the box! You have a legal right to use something before rejecting it as faulty/not as described.
Avoiding the issue entirely... (Score:1, Interesting)
Or install a bios password. They won't get past the bios password screen (they wouldn't clear it without permission and wouldn't need to to fix a hinge) and wouldn't see that the PC had linux.
On the other hand, I'd rather you kicked'm in the arse and had them change their FUD policy.
Linux hardware repair refused (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Setting aside the humor, do they have a point? (Score:2, Interesting)
In the US, the responsibility falls onto the manufacturer to prove that the non-stock modification caused the failure before denying warranty work. For example, if you buy a motorcycle and make exhaust system modifications and the transmission fails, the manufacturer would have to prove that the exhaust modification caused the transmission failure in order to deny warranty service.
Seems to me, the same would apply here
Re:Setting aside the humor, do they have a point? (Score:2, Interesting)