Linux Wireless Driver Violates BSD License? 355
bsdphx writes "After years of encouragement from the OpenBSD community for others to use Reyk Floeter's free Atheros wireless driver, it seems that the Linux world is finally listening. Unfortunately, they seem to think that they can strip the BSD license right out of it."
Re:No, it doesn't. (Score:1, Interesting)
Strange (Score:3, Interesting)
- * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
- * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
* Copyright (c) 2006-2007 Nick Kossifidis
Personally I would have left in some detail to show that the code was initially issued under the BSD, I would find that meets with my own moral requirements, I would also include a link to the place the BSD code originated, but there is no requirement to do so. That is the difference between the BSD and the GPL, Previously this code could have been closed (and If BSD versions were lost then it would remain closed) under the GPL it now cannot be closed.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think I read the diff correctly.
Re:Strange (Score:3, Interesting)
- * GNU General Public License ("GPL") version 2 as published by the Free
- * Software Foundation.
Mod parent up! (Score:4, Interesting)
The move is clearly against the BSD license. (Also, combining GPLv2ed code and BSDed code is subtly against the GPL, as the requirement to reproduce the license - as shown and violated here - is an extra requirement compared to the GPL, violating the "no additional restrictions" clause of the GPL.)
Eivind.
OpenBSD Wireless (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:No... It's about something a little different.. (Score:4, Interesting)
The submitter wrote some of the driver, but there are a few other names in the Copyright list. There is no information in the article indicating their (dis)approval.
Re:Hmmmm (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:No, it doesn't. (Score:2, Interesting)
I prefer fries, but if someone asks me to pass the menu, I shouldn't cross out mashed potatoes before doing so.
I wouldn't even go that far (Score:4, Interesting)
BSD uses economics to protect freedom. GPL tries to use the force of law.
Generally I prefer the BSD approach but tend to feel safer with the GPL
Re:No... It's about something a little different.. (Score:4, Interesting)